A Novel Preference Elicitation Technique Based on a Graph Model and Its Application to a Brownfield Redevelopment Conflict in China
Disputes are very common and pervasive in brownfield redevelopment projects, in which multiple stakeholders or decision-makers (DMs) strategically interact with each other with a conflict of interest. The preference information of DMs involved plays a vital role in identifying possible outcomes or r...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of environmental research and public health 2019-10, Vol.16 (21), p.4088 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 21 |
| container_start_page | 4088 |
| container_title | International journal of environmental research and public health |
| container_volume | 16 |
| creator | Zhao, Shinan Xu, Haiyan |
| description | Disputes are very common and pervasive in brownfield redevelopment projects, in which multiple stakeholders or decision-makers (DMs) strategically interact with each other with a conflict of interest. The preference information of DMs involved plays a vital role in identifying possible outcomes or resolutions for resolving a tough brownfield conflict. In this research, a novel preference ranking technique is purposefully proposed within the graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR) paradigm to effectively and accurately garner DMs' actual preferences, in which states are ranked according to their similarities and closeness to the most and least preferred states instead of subjective option statements or weights in traditional preference ranking methods. Finally, a real-world brownfield conflict which occurred in China is utilized to show how the proposed preference ranking method can be applied for conveniently obtaining the true preference information of DMs and strategically determining the equilibria of a given dispute. The case study indicates that the novel preference elicitation approach is more objective and reasonable than the traditional option prioritization method. Moreover, there exists an equilibrium which can provide strategic advice and meaningful insights for addressing the brownfield conflict. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ijerph16214088 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6862116</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2329652890</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-1d0498a8d60e1e72dc472c6323c64f4da6d6a619fc8365cf24bd344346063bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1vGyEQxVHUKB9urj1WSL3k4hQWzLKXSo6VL8lJqsh3RGC2i7WGLaxT9dx_vBM5jZKeGMHvDTPvEfKJszMhGvY1rCEPHVcVl0zrPXLElWJTqRj_8KY-JMelrBkTWqrmgBwKrmZVw-oj8mdO79IT9PR7hhYyRAf0og8ujHYMKdIVuC6Gn1ug57aAp3hl6VW2Q0dvk0edjZ7ejIXOhwFlO9GYEDrP6VdsA_SePoAH_CMNG4gjXaTYIjrSEOmiC9F-JPut7QucvJwTsrq8WC2up8v7q5vFfDl1kutxyj2TjbbaKwYc6so7WVdOiUo4JVvprfLKKt60Tgs1c20lH72QUqABSmA5Id92bYft4wa8w1my7c2Qw8bm3ybZYN6_xNCZH-nJKI32coUNTl8a5ISOlNFsQnHQ9zZC2hZTCdbMWM1ZjeiX_9B12uaI2yFVNei-bhhSZzvK5VQKBvA6DGfmOV7zPl4UfH67wiv-L0_xFy0uonw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2329652890</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Novel Preference Elicitation Technique Based on a Graph Model and Its Application to a Brownfield Redevelopment Conflict in China</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Zhao, Shinan ; Xu, Haiyan</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Shinan ; Xu, Haiyan</creatorcontrib><description>Disputes are very common and pervasive in brownfield redevelopment projects, in which multiple stakeholders or decision-makers (DMs) strategically interact with each other with a conflict of interest. The preference information of DMs involved plays a vital role in identifying possible outcomes or resolutions for resolving a tough brownfield conflict. In this research, a novel preference ranking technique is purposefully proposed within the graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR) paradigm to effectively and accurately garner DMs' actual preferences, in which states are ranked according to their similarities and closeness to the most and least preferred states instead of subjective option statements or weights in traditional preference ranking methods. Finally, a real-world brownfield conflict which occurred in China is utilized to show how the proposed preference ranking method can be applied for conveniently obtaining the true preference information of DMs and strategically determining the equilibria of a given dispute. The case study indicates that the novel preference elicitation approach is more objective and reasonable than the traditional option prioritization method. Moreover, there exists an equilibrium which can provide strategic advice and meaningful insights for addressing the brownfield conflict.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16214088</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31652907</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Brownfields ; China ; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods ; Contaminants ; Decision Making ; Delay ; Environmental Restoration and Remediation ; Humans ; Land pollution ; Literature reviews ; Local government ; Methods ; Negotiating - methods ; Preferences ; Ranking ; Redevelopment ; Sustainable development ; Taxation ; Urban planning ; Urban Renewal ; Urban sprawl ; Urbanization</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019-10, Vol.16 (21), p.4088</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 by the authors. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-1d0498a8d60e1e72dc472c6323c64f4da6d6a619fc8365cf24bd344346063bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-1d0498a8d60e1e72dc472c6323c64f4da6d6a619fc8365cf24bd344346063bd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1982-9324</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6862116/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6862116/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31652907$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Shinan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Haiyan</creatorcontrib><title>A Novel Preference Elicitation Technique Based on a Graph Model and Its Application to a Brownfield Redevelopment Conflict in China</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>Disputes are very common and pervasive in brownfield redevelopment projects, in which multiple stakeholders or decision-makers (DMs) strategically interact with each other with a conflict of interest. The preference information of DMs involved plays a vital role in identifying possible outcomes or resolutions for resolving a tough brownfield conflict. In this research, a novel preference ranking technique is purposefully proposed within the graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR) paradigm to effectively and accurately garner DMs' actual preferences, in which states are ranked according to their similarities and closeness to the most and least preferred states instead of subjective option statements or weights in traditional preference ranking methods. Finally, a real-world brownfield conflict which occurred in China is utilized to show how the proposed preference ranking method can be applied for conveniently obtaining the true preference information of DMs and strategically determining the equilibria of a given dispute. The case study indicates that the novel preference elicitation approach is more objective and reasonable than the traditional option prioritization method. Moreover, there exists an equilibrium which can provide strategic advice and meaningful insights for addressing the brownfield conflict.</description><subject>Brownfields</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Delay</subject><subject>Environmental Restoration and Remediation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Land pollution</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Negotiating - methods</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Ranking</subject><subject>Redevelopment</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><subject>Urban Renewal</subject><subject>Urban sprawl</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1vGyEQxVHUKB9urj1WSL3k4hQWzLKXSo6VL8lJqsh3RGC2i7WGLaxT9dx_vBM5jZKeGMHvDTPvEfKJszMhGvY1rCEPHVcVl0zrPXLElWJTqRj_8KY-JMelrBkTWqrmgBwKrmZVw-oj8mdO79IT9PR7hhYyRAf0og8ujHYMKdIVuC6Gn1ug57aAp3hl6VW2Q0dvk0edjZ7ejIXOhwFlO9GYEDrP6VdsA_SePoAH_CMNG4gjXaTYIjrSEOmiC9F-JPut7QucvJwTsrq8WC2up8v7q5vFfDl1kutxyj2TjbbaKwYc6so7WVdOiUo4JVvprfLKKt60Tgs1c20lH72QUqABSmA5Id92bYft4wa8w1my7c2Qw8bm3ybZYN6_xNCZH-nJKI32coUNTl8a5ISOlNFsQnHQ9zZC2hZTCdbMWM1ZjeiX_9B12uaI2yFVNei-bhhSZzvK5VQKBvA6DGfmOV7zPl4UfH67wiv-L0_xFy0uonw</recordid><startdate>20191024</startdate><enddate>20191024</enddate><creator>Zhao, Shinan</creator><creator>Xu, Haiyan</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1982-9324</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191024</creationdate><title>A Novel Preference Elicitation Technique Based on a Graph Model and Its Application to a Brownfield Redevelopment Conflict in China</title><author>Zhao, Shinan ; Xu, Haiyan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-1d0498a8d60e1e72dc472c6323c64f4da6d6a619fc8365cf24bd344346063bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Brownfields</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Delay</topic><topic>Environmental Restoration and Remediation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Land pollution</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Negotiating - methods</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Ranking</topic><topic>Redevelopment</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><topic>Urban Renewal</topic><topic>Urban sprawl</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Shinan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Haiyan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Shinan</au><au>Xu, Haiyan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Novel Preference Elicitation Technique Based on a Graph Model and Its Application to a Brownfield Redevelopment Conflict in China</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2019-10-24</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>4088</spage><pages>4088-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>Disputes are very common and pervasive in brownfield redevelopment projects, in which multiple stakeholders or decision-makers (DMs) strategically interact with each other with a conflict of interest. The preference information of DMs involved plays a vital role in identifying possible outcomes or resolutions for resolving a tough brownfield conflict. In this research, a novel preference ranking technique is purposefully proposed within the graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR) paradigm to effectively and accurately garner DMs' actual preferences, in which states are ranked according to their similarities and closeness to the most and least preferred states instead of subjective option statements or weights in traditional preference ranking methods. Finally, a real-world brownfield conflict which occurred in China is utilized to show how the proposed preference ranking method can be applied for conveniently obtaining the true preference information of DMs and strategically determining the equilibria of a given dispute. The case study indicates that the novel preference elicitation approach is more objective and reasonable than the traditional option prioritization method. Moreover, there exists an equilibrium which can provide strategic advice and meaningful insights for addressing the brownfield conflict.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>31652907</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph16214088</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1982-9324</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| ispartof | International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019-10, Vol.16 (21), p.4088 |
| issn | 1660-4601 1661-7827 1660-4601 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6862116 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Brownfields China Conservation of Natural Resources - methods Contaminants Decision Making Delay Environmental Restoration and Remediation Humans Land pollution Literature reviews Local government Methods Negotiating - methods Preferences Ranking Redevelopment Sustainable development Taxation Urban planning Urban Renewal Urban sprawl Urbanization |
| title | A Novel Preference Elicitation Technique Based on a Graph Model and Its Application to a Brownfield Redevelopment Conflict in China |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T11%3A21%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Novel%20Preference%20Elicitation%20Technique%20Based%20on%20a%20Graph%20Model%20and%20Its%20Application%20to%20a%20Brownfield%20Redevelopment%20Conflict%20in%20China&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Zhao,%20Shinan&rft.date=2019-10-24&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=4088&rft.pages=4088-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph16214088&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2329652890%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2329652890&rft_id=info:pmid/31652907&rfr_iscdi=true |