Multivariate MR biomarkers better predict cognitive dysfunction in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease

To understand multifactorial conditions such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) we need brain signatures that predict the impact of multiple pathologies and their interactions. To help uncover the relationships between pathology affected brain circuits and cognitive markers we have used mouse models t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Magnetic resonance imaging 2019-07, Vol.60, p.52-67
Hauptverfasser: Badea, Alexandra, Delpratt, Natalie A., Anderson, R.J., Dibb, Russell, Qi, Yi, Wei, Hongjiang, Liu, Chunlei, Wetsel, William C., Avants, Brian B., Colton, Carol
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 67
container_issue
container_start_page 52
container_title Magnetic resonance imaging
container_volume 60
creator Badea, Alexandra
Delpratt, Natalie A.
Anderson, R.J.
Dibb, Russell
Qi, Yi
Wei, Hongjiang
Liu, Chunlei
Wetsel, William C.
Avants, Brian B.
Colton, Carol
description To understand multifactorial conditions such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) we need brain signatures that predict the impact of multiple pathologies and their interactions. To help uncover the relationships between pathology affected brain circuits and cognitive markers we have used mouse models that represent, at least in part, the complex interactions altered in AD, while being raised in uniform environments and with known genotype alterations. In particular, we aimed to understand the relationship between vulnerable brain circuits and memory deficits measured in the Morris water maze, and we tested several predictive modeling approaches. We used in vivo manganese enhanced MRI traditional voxel based analyses to reveal regional differences in volume (morphometry), signal intensity (activity), and magnetic susceptibility (iron deposition, demyelination). These regions included hippocampus, olfactory areas, entorhinal cortex and cerebellum, as well as the frontal association area. The properties of these regions, extracted from each of the imaging markers, were used to predict spatial memory. We next used eigenanatomy, which reduces dimensionality to produce sets of regions that explain the variance in the data. For each imaging marker, eigenanatomy revealed networks underpinning a range of cognitive functions including memory, motor function, and associative learning, allowing the detection of associations between context, location, and responses. Finally, the integration of multivariate markers in a supervised sparse canonical correlation approach outperformed single predictor models and had significant correlates to spatial memory. Among a priori selected regions, expected to play a role in memory dysfunction, the fornix also provided good predictors, raising the possibility of investigating how disease propagation within brain networks leads to cognitive deterioration. Our cross-sectional results support that modeling approaches integrating multivariate imaging markers provide sensitive predictors of AD-like behaviors. Such strategies for mapping brain circuits responsible for behaviors may help in the future predict disease progression, or response to interventions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.mri.2019.03.022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6859063</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0730725X18306805</els_id><sourcerecordid>2202670599</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-db4f3f99769d5eac696d31ad9c3adf3d3788bb1b1290fcfb1ddd3f8bcf220f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rFTEUhoMo9lr9AW4kO93MeJLMVxCEUvwotBRKF-5CJjlpc52ZXJPMhfbXm3Jr0Y2bZJHnvOecPIS8ZVAzYN3HbT1HX3NgsgZRA-fPyIYNvajaQTbPyQZ6AVXP2x9H5FVKWwBouWhfkiMBsoFGNhviLtYp-72OXmekF1d09GHW8SfGREfMGSPdRbTeZGrCzeILi9TeJbcuJvuwUL_QOawJy2lxSjQ4ejLd36KfMb5P1PqEOuFr8sLpKeGbx_uYXH_9cn36vTq__HZ2enJemaZlubJj44STsu-kbVGbTnZWMG2lEdo6YUU_DOPIRsYlOONGZq0VbhiN4xxcI47J50Psbh1ntAaXHPWkdtGXne5U0F79-7L4W3UT9qobWgmdKAEfHgNi-LViymr2yeA06QXLlqq04V0PrZQFZQfUxJBSRPfUhoF60KO2quhRD3oUCFX0lJp3f8_3VPHHRwE-HYDylbj3GFUyHhdTDEQ0Wdng_xP_G0n4pOY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2202670599</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multivariate MR biomarkers better predict cognitive dysfunction in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Badea, Alexandra ; Delpratt, Natalie A. ; Anderson, R.J. ; Dibb, Russell ; Qi, Yi ; Wei, Hongjiang ; Liu, Chunlei ; Wetsel, William C. ; Avants, Brian B. ; Colton, Carol</creator><creatorcontrib>Badea, Alexandra ; Delpratt, Natalie A. ; Anderson, R.J. ; Dibb, Russell ; Qi, Yi ; Wei, Hongjiang ; Liu, Chunlei ; Wetsel, William C. ; Avants, Brian B. ; Colton, Carol</creatorcontrib><description>To understand multifactorial conditions such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) we need brain signatures that predict the impact of multiple pathologies and their interactions. To help uncover the relationships between pathology affected brain circuits and cognitive markers we have used mouse models that represent, at least in part, the complex interactions altered in AD, while being raised in uniform environments and with known genotype alterations. In particular, we aimed to understand the relationship between vulnerable brain circuits and memory deficits measured in the Morris water maze, and we tested several predictive modeling approaches. We used in vivo manganese enhanced MRI traditional voxel based analyses to reveal regional differences in volume (morphometry), signal intensity (activity), and magnetic susceptibility (iron deposition, demyelination). These regions included hippocampus, olfactory areas, entorhinal cortex and cerebellum, as well as the frontal association area. The properties of these regions, extracted from each of the imaging markers, were used to predict spatial memory. We next used eigenanatomy, which reduces dimensionality to produce sets of regions that explain the variance in the data. For each imaging marker, eigenanatomy revealed networks underpinning a range of cognitive functions including memory, motor function, and associative learning, allowing the detection of associations between context, location, and responses. Finally, the integration of multivariate markers in a supervised sparse canonical correlation approach outperformed single predictor models and had significant correlates to spatial memory. Among a priori selected regions, expected to play a role in memory dysfunction, the fornix also provided good predictors, raising the possibility of investigating how disease propagation within brain networks leads to cognitive deterioration. Our cross-sectional results support that modeling approaches integrating multivariate imaging markers provide sensitive predictors of AD-like behaviors. Such strategies for mapping brain circuits responsible for behaviors may help in the future predict disease progression, or response to interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-725X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5894</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.03.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30940494</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Alzheimer Disease - diagnostic imaging ; Alzheimer Disease - pathology ; Alzheimer's disease ; Animals ; Behavior ; Behavior, Animal ; Biomarkers ; Brain - pathology ; Brain Mapping - methods ; Cognition ; Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnostic imaging ; Cognitive Dysfunction - pathology ; Contrast Media ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Disease Models, Animal ; Disease Progression ; Fornix, Brain - pathology ; Genotype ; Hippocampus - pathology ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Magnetics ; Maze Learning ; Memory ; Memory Disorders - pathology ; Mice ; Mice, Knockout ; Mouse models ; Multivariate analysis ; Neurodegenerative Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Neurodegenerative Diseases - genetics ; Neuroimaging ; Predictive modeling ; Spatial Memory</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance imaging, 2019-07, Vol.60, p.52-67</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-db4f3f99769d5eac696d31ad9c3adf3d3788bb1b1290fcfb1ddd3f8bcf220f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-db4f3f99769d5eac696d31ad9c3adf3d3788bb1b1290fcfb1ddd3f8bcf220f43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6621-4560 ; 0000-0001-8816-4832</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X18306805$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30940494$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Badea, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delpratt, Natalie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, R.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dibb, Russell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Hongjiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chunlei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wetsel, William C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avants, Brian B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colton, Carol</creatorcontrib><title>Multivariate MR biomarkers better predict cognitive dysfunction in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease</title><title>Magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><description>To understand multifactorial conditions such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) we need brain signatures that predict the impact of multiple pathologies and their interactions. To help uncover the relationships between pathology affected brain circuits and cognitive markers we have used mouse models that represent, at least in part, the complex interactions altered in AD, while being raised in uniform environments and with known genotype alterations. In particular, we aimed to understand the relationship between vulnerable brain circuits and memory deficits measured in the Morris water maze, and we tested several predictive modeling approaches. We used in vivo manganese enhanced MRI traditional voxel based analyses to reveal regional differences in volume (morphometry), signal intensity (activity), and magnetic susceptibility (iron deposition, demyelination). These regions included hippocampus, olfactory areas, entorhinal cortex and cerebellum, as well as the frontal association area. The properties of these regions, extracted from each of the imaging markers, were used to predict spatial memory. We next used eigenanatomy, which reduces dimensionality to produce sets of regions that explain the variance in the data. For each imaging marker, eigenanatomy revealed networks underpinning a range of cognitive functions including memory, motor function, and associative learning, allowing the detection of associations between context, location, and responses. Finally, the integration of multivariate markers in a supervised sparse canonical correlation approach outperformed single predictor models and had significant correlates to spatial memory. Among a priori selected regions, expected to play a role in memory dysfunction, the fornix also provided good predictors, raising the possibility of investigating how disease propagation within brain networks leads to cognitive deterioration. Our cross-sectional results support that modeling approaches integrating multivariate imaging markers provide sensitive predictors of AD-like behaviors. Such strategies for mapping brain circuits responsible for behaviors may help in the future predict disease progression, or response to interventions.</description><subject>Alzheimer Disease - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Alzheimer Disease - pathology</subject><subject>Alzheimer's disease</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Brain - pathology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping - methods</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - pathology</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Fornix, Brain - pathology</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Hippocampus - pathology</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Magnetics</subject><subject>Maze Learning</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory Disorders - pathology</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Knockout</subject><subject>Mouse models</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Neurodegenerative Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neurodegenerative Diseases - genetics</subject><subject>Neuroimaging</subject><subject>Predictive modeling</subject><subject>Spatial Memory</subject><issn>0730-725X</issn><issn>1873-5894</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1rFTEUhoMo9lr9AW4kO93MeJLMVxCEUvwotBRKF-5CJjlpc52ZXJPMhfbXm3Jr0Y2bZJHnvOecPIS8ZVAzYN3HbT1HX3NgsgZRA-fPyIYNvajaQTbPyQZ6AVXP2x9H5FVKWwBouWhfkiMBsoFGNhviLtYp-72OXmekF1d09GHW8SfGREfMGSPdRbTeZGrCzeILi9TeJbcuJvuwUL_QOawJy2lxSjQ4ejLd36KfMb5P1PqEOuFr8sLpKeGbx_uYXH_9cn36vTq__HZ2enJemaZlubJj44STsu-kbVGbTnZWMG2lEdo6YUU_DOPIRsYlOONGZq0VbhiN4xxcI47J50Psbh1ntAaXHPWkdtGXne5U0F79-7L4W3UT9qobWgmdKAEfHgNi-LViymr2yeA06QXLlqq04V0PrZQFZQfUxJBSRPfUhoF60KO2quhRD3oUCFX0lJp3f8_3VPHHRwE-HYDylbj3GFUyHhdTDEQ0Wdng_xP_G0n4pOY</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Badea, Alexandra</creator><creator>Delpratt, Natalie A.</creator><creator>Anderson, R.J.</creator><creator>Dibb, Russell</creator><creator>Qi, Yi</creator><creator>Wei, Hongjiang</creator><creator>Liu, Chunlei</creator><creator>Wetsel, William C.</creator><creator>Avants, Brian B.</creator><creator>Colton, Carol</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6621-4560</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8816-4832</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Multivariate MR biomarkers better predict cognitive dysfunction in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease</title><author>Badea, Alexandra ; Delpratt, Natalie A. ; Anderson, R.J. ; Dibb, Russell ; Qi, Yi ; Wei, Hongjiang ; Liu, Chunlei ; Wetsel, William C. ; Avants, Brian B. ; Colton, Carol</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-db4f3f99769d5eac696d31ad9c3adf3d3788bb1b1290fcfb1ddd3f8bcf220f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Alzheimer Disease - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Alzheimer Disease - pathology</topic><topic>Alzheimer's disease</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Brain - pathology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping - methods</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - pathology</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Fornix, Brain - pathology</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Hippocampus - pathology</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Magnetics</topic><topic>Maze Learning</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory Disorders - pathology</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Knockout</topic><topic>Mouse models</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Neurodegenerative Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neurodegenerative Diseases - genetics</topic><topic>Neuroimaging</topic><topic>Predictive modeling</topic><topic>Spatial Memory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Badea, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delpratt, Natalie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, R.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dibb, Russell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Hongjiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chunlei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wetsel, William C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avants, Brian B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colton, Carol</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Badea, Alexandra</au><au>Delpratt, Natalie A.</au><au>Anderson, R.J.</au><au>Dibb, Russell</au><au>Qi, Yi</au><au>Wei, Hongjiang</au><au>Liu, Chunlei</au><au>Wetsel, William C.</au><au>Avants, Brian B.</au><au>Colton, Carol</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multivariate MR biomarkers better predict cognitive dysfunction in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>60</volume><spage>52</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>52-67</pages><issn>0730-725X</issn><eissn>1873-5894</eissn><abstract>To understand multifactorial conditions such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) we need brain signatures that predict the impact of multiple pathologies and their interactions. To help uncover the relationships between pathology affected brain circuits and cognitive markers we have used mouse models that represent, at least in part, the complex interactions altered in AD, while being raised in uniform environments and with known genotype alterations. In particular, we aimed to understand the relationship between vulnerable brain circuits and memory deficits measured in the Morris water maze, and we tested several predictive modeling approaches. We used in vivo manganese enhanced MRI traditional voxel based analyses to reveal regional differences in volume (morphometry), signal intensity (activity), and magnetic susceptibility (iron deposition, demyelination). These regions included hippocampus, olfactory areas, entorhinal cortex and cerebellum, as well as the frontal association area. The properties of these regions, extracted from each of the imaging markers, were used to predict spatial memory. We next used eigenanatomy, which reduces dimensionality to produce sets of regions that explain the variance in the data. For each imaging marker, eigenanatomy revealed networks underpinning a range of cognitive functions including memory, motor function, and associative learning, allowing the detection of associations between context, location, and responses. Finally, the integration of multivariate markers in a supervised sparse canonical correlation approach outperformed single predictor models and had significant correlates to spatial memory. Among a priori selected regions, expected to play a role in memory dysfunction, the fornix also provided good predictors, raising the possibility of investigating how disease propagation within brain networks leads to cognitive deterioration. Our cross-sectional results support that modeling approaches integrating multivariate imaging markers provide sensitive predictors of AD-like behaviors. Such strategies for mapping brain circuits responsible for behaviors may help in the future predict disease progression, or response to interventions.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30940494</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.mri.2019.03.022</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6621-4560</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8816-4832</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0730-725X
ispartof Magnetic resonance imaging, 2019-07, Vol.60, p.52-67
issn 0730-725X
1873-5894
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6859063
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Alzheimer Disease - diagnostic imaging
Alzheimer Disease - pathology
Alzheimer's disease
Animals
Behavior
Behavior, Animal
Biomarkers
Brain - pathology
Brain Mapping - methods
Cognition
Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnostic imaging
Cognitive Dysfunction - pathology
Contrast Media
Cross-Sectional Studies
Disease Models, Animal
Disease Progression
Fornix, Brain - pathology
Genotype
Hippocampus - pathology
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetics
Maze Learning
Memory
Memory Disorders - pathology
Mice
Mice, Knockout
Mouse models
Multivariate analysis
Neurodegenerative Diseases - diagnostic imaging
Neurodegenerative Diseases - genetics
Neuroimaging
Predictive modeling
Spatial Memory
title Multivariate MR biomarkers better predict cognitive dysfunction in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T08%3A38%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multivariate%20MR%20biomarkers%20better%20predict%20cognitive%20dysfunction%20in%20mouse%20models%20of%20Alzheimer's%20disease&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Badea,%20Alexandra&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=60&rft.spage=52&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=52-67&rft.issn=0730-725X&rft.eissn=1873-5894&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.mri.2019.03.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2202670599%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2202670599&rft_id=info:pmid/30940494&rft_els_id=S0730725X18306805&rfr_iscdi=true