Multivariate MR biomarkers better predict cognitive dysfunction in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease
To understand multifactorial conditions such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) we need brain signatures that predict the impact of multiple pathologies and their interactions. To help uncover the relationships between pathology affected brain circuits and cognitive markers we have used mouse models t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Magnetic resonance imaging 2019-07, Vol.60, p.52-67 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 67 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 52 |
container_title | Magnetic resonance imaging |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Badea, Alexandra Delpratt, Natalie A. Anderson, R.J. Dibb, Russell Qi, Yi Wei, Hongjiang Liu, Chunlei Wetsel, William C. Avants, Brian B. Colton, Carol |
description | To understand multifactorial conditions such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) we need brain signatures that predict the impact of multiple pathologies and their interactions. To help uncover the relationships between pathology affected brain circuits and cognitive markers we have used mouse models that represent, at least in part, the complex interactions altered in AD, while being raised in uniform environments and with known genotype alterations. In particular, we aimed to understand the relationship between vulnerable brain circuits and memory deficits measured in the Morris water maze, and we tested several predictive modeling approaches. We used in vivo manganese enhanced MRI traditional voxel based analyses to reveal regional differences in volume (morphometry), signal intensity (activity), and magnetic susceptibility (iron deposition, demyelination). These regions included hippocampus, olfactory areas, entorhinal cortex and cerebellum, as well as the frontal association area. The properties of these regions, extracted from each of the imaging markers, were used to predict spatial memory. We next used eigenanatomy, which reduces dimensionality to produce sets of regions that explain the variance in the data. For each imaging marker, eigenanatomy revealed networks underpinning a range of cognitive functions including memory, motor function, and associative learning, allowing the detection of associations between context, location, and responses. Finally, the integration of multivariate markers in a supervised sparse canonical correlation approach outperformed single predictor models and had significant correlates to spatial memory. Among a priori selected regions, expected to play a role in memory dysfunction, the fornix also provided good predictors, raising the possibility of investigating how disease propagation within brain networks leads to cognitive deterioration. Our cross-sectional results support that modeling approaches integrating multivariate imaging markers provide sensitive predictors of AD-like behaviors. Such strategies for mapping brain circuits responsible for behaviors may help in the future predict disease progression, or response to interventions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.mri.2019.03.022 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6859063</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0730725X18306805</els_id><sourcerecordid>2202670599</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-db4f3f99769d5eac696d31ad9c3adf3d3788bb1b1290fcfb1ddd3f8bcf220f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rFTEUhoMo9lr9AW4kO93MeJLMVxCEUvwotBRKF-5CJjlpc52ZXJPMhfbXm3Jr0Y2bZJHnvOecPIS8ZVAzYN3HbT1HX3NgsgZRA-fPyIYNvajaQTbPyQZ6AVXP2x9H5FVKWwBouWhfkiMBsoFGNhviLtYp-72OXmekF1d09GHW8SfGREfMGSPdRbTeZGrCzeILi9TeJbcuJvuwUL_QOawJy2lxSjQ4ejLd36KfMb5P1PqEOuFr8sLpKeGbx_uYXH_9cn36vTq__HZ2enJemaZlubJj44STsu-kbVGbTnZWMG2lEdo6YUU_DOPIRsYlOONGZq0VbhiN4xxcI47J50Psbh1ntAaXHPWkdtGXne5U0F79-7L4W3UT9qobWgmdKAEfHgNi-LViymr2yeA06QXLlqq04V0PrZQFZQfUxJBSRPfUhoF60KO2quhRD3oUCFX0lJp3f8_3VPHHRwE-HYDylbj3GFUyHhdTDEQ0Wdng_xP_G0n4pOY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2202670599</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multivariate MR biomarkers better predict cognitive dysfunction in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Badea, Alexandra ; Delpratt, Natalie A. ; Anderson, R.J. ; Dibb, Russell ; Qi, Yi ; Wei, Hongjiang ; Liu, Chunlei ; Wetsel, William C. ; Avants, Brian B. ; Colton, Carol</creator><creatorcontrib>Badea, Alexandra ; Delpratt, Natalie A. ; Anderson, R.J. ; Dibb, Russell ; Qi, Yi ; Wei, Hongjiang ; Liu, Chunlei ; Wetsel, William C. ; Avants, Brian B. ; Colton, Carol</creatorcontrib><description>To understand multifactorial conditions such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) we need brain signatures that predict the impact of multiple pathologies and their interactions. To help uncover the relationships between pathology affected brain circuits and cognitive markers we have used mouse models that represent, at least in part, the complex interactions altered in AD, while being raised in uniform environments and with known genotype alterations. In particular, we aimed to understand the relationship between vulnerable brain circuits and memory deficits measured in the Morris water maze, and we tested several predictive modeling approaches. We used in vivo manganese enhanced MRI traditional voxel based analyses to reveal regional differences in volume (morphometry), signal intensity (activity), and magnetic susceptibility (iron deposition, demyelination). These regions included hippocampus, olfactory areas, entorhinal cortex and cerebellum, as well as the frontal association area. The properties of these regions, extracted from each of the imaging markers, were used to predict spatial memory. We next used eigenanatomy, which reduces dimensionality to produce sets of regions that explain the variance in the data. For each imaging marker, eigenanatomy revealed networks underpinning a range of cognitive functions including memory, motor function, and associative learning, allowing the detection of associations between context, location, and responses. Finally, the integration of multivariate markers in a supervised sparse canonical correlation approach outperformed single predictor models and had significant correlates to spatial memory. Among a priori selected regions, expected to play a role in memory dysfunction, the fornix also provided good predictors, raising the possibility of investigating how disease propagation within brain networks leads to cognitive deterioration. Our cross-sectional results support that modeling approaches integrating multivariate imaging markers provide sensitive predictors of AD-like behaviors. Such strategies for mapping brain circuits responsible for behaviors may help in the future predict disease progression, or response to interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-725X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5894</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.03.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30940494</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Alzheimer Disease - diagnostic imaging ; Alzheimer Disease - pathology ; Alzheimer's disease ; Animals ; Behavior ; Behavior, Animal ; Biomarkers ; Brain - pathology ; Brain Mapping - methods ; Cognition ; Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnostic imaging ; Cognitive Dysfunction - pathology ; Contrast Media ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Disease Models, Animal ; Disease Progression ; Fornix, Brain - pathology ; Genotype ; Hippocampus - pathology ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Magnetics ; Maze Learning ; Memory ; Memory Disorders - pathology ; Mice ; Mice, Knockout ; Mouse models ; Multivariate analysis ; Neurodegenerative Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Neurodegenerative Diseases - genetics ; Neuroimaging ; Predictive modeling ; Spatial Memory</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance imaging, 2019-07, Vol.60, p.52-67</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-db4f3f99769d5eac696d31ad9c3adf3d3788bb1b1290fcfb1ddd3f8bcf220f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-db4f3f99769d5eac696d31ad9c3adf3d3788bb1b1290fcfb1ddd3f8bcf220f43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6621-4560 ; 0000-0001-8816-4832</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X18306805$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30940494$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Badea, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delpratt, Natalie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, R.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dibb, Russell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Hongjiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chunlei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wetsel, William C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avants, Brian B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colton, Carol</creatorcontrib><title>Multivariate MR biomarkers better predict cognitive dysfunction in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease</title><title>Magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><description>To understand multifactorial conditions such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) we need brain signatures that predict the impact of multiple pathologies and their interactions. To help uncover the relationships between pathology affected brain circuits and cognitive markers we have used mouse models that represent, at least in part, the complex interactions altered in AD, while being raised in uniform environments and with known genotype alterations. In particular, we aimed to understand the relationship between vulnerable brain circuits and memory deficits measured in the Morris water maze, and we tested several predictive modeling approaches. We used in vivo manganese enhanced MRI traditional voxel based analyses to reveal regional differences in volume (morphometry), signal intensity (activity), and magnetic susceptibility (iron deposition, demyelination). These regions included hippocampus, olfactory areas, entorhinal cortex and cerebellum, as well as the frontal association area. The properties of these regions, extracted from each of the imaging markers, were used to predict spatial memory. We next used eigenanatomy, which reduces dimensionality to produce sets of regions that explain the variance in the data. For each imaging marker, eigenanatomy revealed networks underpinning a range of cognitive functions including memory, motor function, and associative learning, allowing the detection of associations between context, location, and responses. Finally, the integration of multivariate markers in a supervised sparse canonical correlation approach outperformed single predictor models and had significant correlates to spatial memory. Among a priori selected regions, expected to play a role in memory dysfunction, the fornix also provided good predictors, raising the possibility of investigating how disease propagation within brain networks leads to cognitive deterioration. Our cross-sectional results support that modeling approaches integrating multivariate imaging markers provide sensitive predictors of AD-like behaviors. Such strategies for mapping brain circuits responsible for behaviors may help in the future predict disease progression, or response to interventions.</description><subject>Alzheimer Disease - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Alzheimer Disease - pathology</subject><subject>Alzheimer's disease</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Brain - pathology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping - methods</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - pathology</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Fornix, Brain - pathology</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Hippocampus - pathology</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Magnetics</subject><subject>Maze Learning</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory Disorders - pathology</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Knockout</subject><subject>Mouse models</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Neurodegenerative Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neurodegenerative Diseases - genetics</subject><subject>Neuroimaging</subject><subject>Predictive modeling</subject><subject>Spatial Memory</subject><issn>0730-725X</issn><issn>1873-5894</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1rFTEUhoMo9lr9AW4kO93MeJLMVxCEUvwotBRKF-5CJjlpc52ZXJPMhfbXm3Jr0Y2bZJHnvOecPIS8ZVAzYN3HbT1HX3NgsgZRA-fPyIYNvajaQTbPyQZ6AVXP2x9H5FVKWwBouWhfkiMBsoFGNhviLtYp-72OXmekF1d09GHW8SfGREfMGSPdRbTeZGrCzeILi9TeJbcuJvuwUL_QOawJy2lxSjQ4ejLd36KfMb5P1PqEOuFr8sLpKeGbx_uYXH_9cn36vTq__HZ2enJemaZlubJj44STsu-kbVGbTnZWMG2lEdo6YUU_DOPIRsYlOONGZq0VbhiN4xxcI47J50Psbh1ntAaXHPWkdtGXne5U0F79-7L4W3UT9qobWgmdKAEfHgNi-LViymr2yeA06QXLlqq04V0PrZQFZQfUxJBSRPfUhoF60KO2quhRD3oUCFX0lJp3f8_3VPHHRwE-HYDylbj3GFUyHhdTDEQ0Wdng_xP_G0n4pOY</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Badea, Alexandra</creator><creator>Delpratt, Natalie A.</creator><creator>Anderson, R.J.</creator><creator>Dibb, Russell</creator><creator>Qi, Yi</creator><creator>Wei, Hongjiang</creator><creator>Liu, Chunlei</creator><creator>Wetsel, William C.</creator><creator>Avants, Brian B.</creator><creator>Colton, Carol</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6621-4560</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8816-4832</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Multivariate MR biomarkers better predict cognitive dysfunction in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease</title><author>Badea, Alexandra ; Delpratt, Natalie A. ; Anderson, R.J. ; Dibb, Russell ; Qi, Yi ; Wei, Hongjiang ; Liu, Chunlei ; Wetsel, William C. ; Avants, Brian B. ; Colton, Carol</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-db4f3f99769d5eac696d31ad9c3adf3d3788bb1b1290fcfb1ddd3f8bcf220f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Alzheimer Disease - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Alzheimer Disease - pathology</topic><topic>Alzheimer's disease</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Brain - pathology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping - methods</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - pathology</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Fornix, Brain - pathology</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Hippocampus - pathology</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Magnetics</topic><topic>Maze Learning</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory Disorders - pathology</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Knockout</topic><topic>Mouse models</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Neurodegenerative Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neurodegenerative Diseases - genetics</topic><topic>Neuroimaging</topic><topic>Predictive modeling</topic><topic>Spatial Memory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Badea, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delpratt, Natalie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, R.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dibb, Russell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Hongjiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chunlei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wetsel, William C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avants, Brian B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colton, Carol</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Badea, Alexandra</au><au>Delpratt, Natalie A.</au><au>Anderson, R.J.</au><au>Dibb, Russell</au><au>Qi, Yi</au><au>Wei, Hongjiang</au><au>Liu, Chunlei</au><au>Wetsel, William C.</au><au>Avants, Brian B.</au><au>Colton, Carol</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multivariate MR biomarkers better predict cognitive dysfunction in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>60</volume><spage>52</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>52-67</pages><issn>0730-725X</issn><eissn>1873-5894</eissn><abstract>To understand multifactorial conditions such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) we need brain signatures that predict the impact of multiple pathologies and their interactions. To help uncover the relationships between pathology affected brain circuits and cognitive markers we have used mouse models that represent, at least in part, the complex interactions altered in AD, while being raised in uniform environments and with known genotype alterations. In particular, we aimed to understand the relationship between vulnerable brain circuits and memory deficits measured in the Morris water maze, and we tested several predictive modeling approaches. We used in vivo manganese enhanced MRI traditional voxel based analyses to reveal regional differences in volume (morphometry), signal intensity (activity), and magnetic susceptibility (iron deposition, demyelination). These regions included hippocampus, olfactory areas, entorhinal cortex and cerebellum, as well as the frontal association area. The properties of these regions, extracted from each of the imaging markers, were used to predict spatial memory. We next used eigenanatomy, which reduces dimensionality to produce sets of regions that explain the variance in the data. For each imaging marker, eigenanatomy revealed networks underpinning a range of cognitive functions including memory, motor function, and associative learning, allowing the detection of associations between context, location, and responses. Finally, the integration of multivariate markers in a supervised sparse canonical correlation approach outperformed single predictor models and had significant correlates to spatial memory. Among a priori selected regions, expected to play a role in memory dysfunction, the fornix also provided good predictors, raising the possibility of investigating how disease propagation within brain networks leads to cognitive deterioration. Our cross-sectional results support that modeling approaches integrating multivariate imaging markers provide sensitive predictors of AD-like behaviors. Such strategies for mapping brain circuits responsible for behaviors may help in the future predict disease progression, or response to interventions.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30940494</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.mri.2019.03.022</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6621-4560</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8816-4832</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0730-725X |
ispartof | Magnetic resonance imaging, 2019-07, Vol.60, p.52-67 |
issn | 0730-725X 1873-5894 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6859063 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Alzheimer Disease - diagnostic imaging Alzheimer Disease - pathology Alzheimer's disease Animals Behavior Behavior, Animal Biomarkers Brain - pathology Brain Mapping - methods Cognition Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnostic imaging Cognitive Dysfunction - pathology Contrast Media Cross-Sectional Studies Disease Models, Animal Disease Progression Fornix, Brain - pathology Genotype Hippocampus - pathology Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods Magnetic Resonance Imaging Magnetics Maze Learning Memory Memory Disorders - pathology Mice Mice, Knockout Mouse models Multivariate analysis Neurodegenerative Diseases - diagnostic imaging Neurodegenerative Diseases - genetics Neuroimaging Predictive modeling Spatial Memory |
title | Multivariate MR biomarkers better predict cognitive dysfunction in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T08%3A38%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multivariate%20MR%20biomarkers%20better%20predict%20cognitive%20dysfunction%20in%20mouse%20models%20of%20Alzheimer's%20disease&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Badea,%20Alexandra&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=60&rft.spage=52&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=52-67&rft.issn=0730-725X&rft.eissn=1873-5894&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.mri.2019.03.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2202670599%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2202670599&rft_id=info:pmid/30940494&rft_els_id=S0730725X18306805&rfr_iscdi=true |