A balanced evaluation of the evidence for adult neurogenesis in humans: implication for neuropsychiatric disorders
There is a widespread belief that neurogenesis exists in adult human brain, especially in the dentate gyrus, and it is to be maintained and, if possible, augmented with different stimuli including exercise and certain drugs. Here, we examine the evidence for adult human neurogenesis and note importa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Brain Structure and Function 2019-09, Vol.224 (7), p.2281-2295 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2295 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 2281 |
container_title | Brain Structure and Function |
container_volume | 224 |
creator | Duque, Alvaro Spector, Reynold |
description | There is a widespread belief that neurogenesis exists in adult human brain, especially in the dentate gyrus, and it is to be maintained and, if possible, augmented with different stimuli including exercise and certain drugs. Here, we examine the evidence for adult human neurogenesis and note important limitations of the methodologies used to study it. A balanced review of the literature and evaluation of the data indicate that adult neurogenesis in human brain is improbable. In fact, in several high-quality recent studies in adult human brain, unlike in adult brains of other species, neurogenesis was not detectable. These findings suggest that the human brain requires a permanent set of neurons to maintain acquired knowledge for decades, which is essential for complex high cognitive functions unique to humans. Thus, stimulation and/or injection of neural stem cells into human brains may not only disrupt brain homeostatic systems, but also disturb normal neuronal circuits. We propose that the focus of research should be the preservation of brain neurons by prevention of damage, not replacement. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00429-019-01917-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6852840</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2252540541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-48090a5dcd43a568eb164660b2dada6cbc00c427d177ed50815fce066e2aa2363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v3CAQxVHVqPnTfoEeKqReenEzYIO9OVSKoqatFCmX5IwwjHeJbNiAHSnfPnidbpMeckAg5jdveDxCPjP4zgDq0wRQ8VUBbLdYXch35Ig1siy4lOz9_izKQ3Kc0h2AWDVs9YEclozXjajZEYnntNW99gYtxQfdT3p0wdPQ0XGD-cZZzDXahUi1nfqRepxiWKPH5BJ1nm6mQft0Rt2w7Z1Zumd6x23To9k4PUZnqHUpRIsxfSQHne4TfnreT8jt5c-bi9_F1fWvPxfnV4URFYxF1cAKtLDGVqUWssGWyUpKaLnVVkvTGgBT8dqyukYroGGiMwhSIteal7I8IT8W3e3UDmgN-jHqXm2jG3R8VEE79bri3Uatw4OSjeBNBVng27NADPcTplENLhns83dhmJLiXJS8lkywjH79D70LU_TZ3kzxbEhUM8UXysSQUsRu_xgGao5ULZGqHKfaRapmG19e2ti3_M0wA-UCpFzya4z_Zr8h-wSsIK8I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2252540541</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A balanced evaluation of the evidence for adult neurogenesis in humans: implication for neuropsychiatric disorders</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><creator>Duque, Alvaro ; Spector, Reynold</creator><creatorcontrib>Duque, Alvaro ; Spector, Reynold</creatorcontrib><description>There is a widespread belief that neurogenesis exists in adult human brain, especially in the dentate gyrus, and it is to be maintained and, if possible, augmented with different stimuli including exercise and certain drugs. Here, we examine the evidence for adult human neurogenesis and note important limitations of the methodologies used to study it. A balanced review of the literature and evaluation of the data indicate that adult neurogenesis in human brain is improbable. In fact, in several high-quality recent studies in adult human brain, unlike in adult brains of other species, neurogenesis was not detectable. These findings suggest that the human brain requires a permanent set of neurons to maintain acquired knowledge for decades, which is essential for complex high cognitive functions unique to humans. Thus, stimulation and/or injection of neural stem cells into human brains may not only disrupt brain homeostatic systems, but also disturb normal neuronal circuits. We propose that the focus of research should be the preservation of brain neurons by prevention of damage, not replacement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-2653</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-2661</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0340-2061</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00429-019-01917-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31278571</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Brain ; Brain Injuries - prevention & control ; Cell Biology ; Cell Differentiation - physiology ; Cognitive ability ; Dentate gyrus ; Humans ; Literature reviews ; Mental disorders ; Mental Disorders - therapy ; Neural stem cells ; Neural Stem Cells - cytology ; Neurogenesis ; Neurogenesis - physiology ; Neurology ; Neurons - physiology ; Neurosciences ; Preservation ; Review ; Stem cells</subject><ispartof>Brain Structure and Function, 2019-09, Vol.224 (7), p.2281-2295</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Brain Structure and Function is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-48090a5dcd43a568eb164660b2dada6cbc00c427d177ed50815fce066e2aa2363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-48090a5dcd43a568eb164660b2dada6cbc00c427d177ed50815fce066e2aa2363</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5086-5438 ; 0000-0001-7892-9555</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00429-019-01917-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00429-019-01917-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31278571$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duque, Alvaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spector, Reynold</creatorcontrib><title>A balanced evaluation of the evidence for adult neurogenesis in humans: implication for neuropsychiatric disorders</title><title>Brain Structure and Function</title><addtitle>Brain Struct Funct</addtitle><addtitle>Brain Struct Funct</addtitle><description>There is a widespread belief that neurogenesis exists in adult human brain, especially in the dentate gyrus, and it is to be maintained and, if possible, augmented with different stimuli including exercise and certain drugs. Here, we examine the evidence for adult human neurogenesis and note important limitations of the methodologies used to study it. A balanced review of the literature and evaluation of the data indicate that adult neurogenesis in human brain is improbable. In fact, in several high-quality recent studies in adult human brain, unlike in adult brains of other species, neurogenesis was not detectable. These findings suggest that the human brain requires a permanent set of neurons to maintain acquired knowledge for decades, which is essential for complex high cognitive functions unique to humans. Thus, stimulation and/or injection of neural stem cells into human brains may not only disrupt brain homeostatic systems, but also disturb normal neuronal circuits. We propose that the focus of research should be the preservation of brain neurons by prevention of damage, not replacement.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain Injuries - prevention & control</subject><subject>Cell Biology</subject><subject>Cell Differentiation - physiology</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Dentate gyrus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Neural stem cells</subject><subject>Neural Stem Cells - cytology</subject><subject>Neurogenesis</subject><subject>Neurogenesis - physiology</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurons - physiology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Stem cells</subject><issn>1863-2653</issn><issn>1863-2661</issn><issn>0340-2061</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v3CAQxVHVqPnTfoEeKqReenEzYIO9OVSKoqatFCmX5IwwjHeJbNiAHSnfPnidbpMeckAg5jdveDxCPjP4zgDq0wRQ8VUBbLdYXch35Ig1siy4lOz9_izKQ3Kc0h2AWDVs9YEclozXjajZEYnntNW99gYtxQfdT3p0wdPQ0XGD-cZZzDXahUi1nfqRepxiWKPH5BJ1nm6mQft0Rt2w7Z1Zumd6x23To9k4PUZnqHUpRIsxfSQHne4TfnreT8jt5c-bi9_F1fWvPxfnV4URFYxF1cAKtLDGVqUWssGWyUpKaLnVVkvTGgBT8dqyukYroGGiMwhSIteal7I8IT8W3e3UDmgN-jHqXm2jG3R8VEE79bri3Uatw4OSjeBNBVng27NADPcTplENLhns83dhmJLiXJS8lkywjH79D70LU_TZ3kzxbEhUM8UXysSQUsRu_xgGao5ULZGqHKfaRapmG19e2ti3_M0wA-UCpFzya4z_Zr8h-wSsIK8I</recordid><startdate>20190901</startdate><enddate>20190901</enddate><creator>Duque, Alvaro</creator><creator>Spector, Reynold</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5086-5438</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7892-9555</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190901</creationdate><title>A balanced evaluation of the evidence for adult neurogenesis in humans: implication for neuropsychiatric disorders</title><author>Duque, Alvaro ; Spector, Reynold</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-48090a5dcd43a568eb164660b2dada6cbc00c427d177ed50815fce066e2aa2363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain Injuries - prevention & control</topic><topic>Cell Biology</topic><topic>Cell Differentiation - physiology</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Dentate gyrus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Neural stem cells</topic><topic>Neural Stem Cells - cytology</topic><topic>Neurogenesis</topic><topic>Neurogenesis - physiology</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurons - physiology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Stem cells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duque, Alvaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spector, Reynold</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Brain Structure and Function</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duque, Alvaro</au><au>Spector, Reynold</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A balanced evaluation of the evidence for adult neurogenesis in humans: implication for neuropsychiatric disorders</atitle><jtitle>Brain Structure and Function</jtitle><stitle>Brain Struct Funct</stitle><addtitle>Brain Struct Funct</addtitle><date>2019-09-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>224</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2281</spage><epage>2295</epage><pages>2281-2295</pages><issn>1863-2653</issn><eissn>1863-2661</eissn><eissn>0340-2061</eissn><abstract>There is a widespread belief that neurogenesis exists in adult human brain, especially in the dentate gyrus, and it is to be maintained and, if possible, augmented with different stimuli including exercise and certain drugs. Here, we examine the evidence for adult human neurogenesis and note important limitations of the methodologies used to study it. A balanced review of the literature and evaluation of the data indicate that adult neurogenesis in human brain is improbable. In fact, in several high-quality recent studies in adult human brain, unlike in adult brains of other species, neurogenesis was not detectable. These findings suggest that the human brain requires a permanent set of neurons to maintain acquired knowledge for decades, which is essential for complex high cognitive functions unique to humans. Thus, stimulation and/or injection of neural stem cells into human brains may not only disrupt brain homeostatic systems, but also disturb normal neuronal circuits. We propose that the focus of research should be the preservation of brain neurons by prevention of damage, not replacement.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>31278571</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00429-019-01917-6</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5086-5438</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7892-9555</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1863-2653 |
ispartof | Brain Structure and Function, 2019-09, Vol.224 (7), p.2281-2295 |
issn | 1863-2653 1863-2661 0340-2061 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6852840 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink (Online service) |
subjects | Animals Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Brain Brain Injuries - prevention & control Cell Biology Cell Differentiation - physiology Cognitive ability Dentate gyrus Humans Literature reviews Mental disorders Mental Disorders - therapy Neural stem cells Neural Stem Cells - cytology Neurogenesis Neurogenesis - physiology Neurology Neurons - physiology Neurosciences Preservation Review Stem cells |
title | A balanced evaluation of the evidence for adult neurogenesis in humans: implication for neuropsychiatric disorders |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T09%3A45%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20balanced%20evaluation%20of%20the%20evidence%20for%20adult%20neurogenesis%20in%20humans:%20implication%20for%20neuropsychiatric%20disorders&rft.jtitle=Brain%20Structure%20and%20Function&rft.au=Duque,%20Alvaro&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.volume=224&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2281&rft.epage=2295&rft.pages=2281-2295&rft.issn=1863-2653&rft.eissn=1863-2661&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00429-019-01917-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2252540541%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2252540541&rft_id=info:pmid/31278571&rfr_iscdi=true |