A balanced evaluation of the evidence for adult neurogenesis in humans: implication for neuropsychiatric disorders

There is a widespread belief that neurogenesis exists in adult human brain, especially in the dentate gyrus, and it is to be maintained and, if possible, augmented with different stimuli including exercise and certain drugs. Here, we examine the evidence for adult human neurogenesis and note importa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brain Structure and Function 2019-09, Vol.224 (7), p.2281-2295
Hauptverfasser: Duque, Alvaro, Spector, Reynold
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2295
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2281
container_title Brain Structure and Function
container_volume 224
creator Duque, Alvaro
Spector, Reynold
description There is a widespread belief that neurogenesis exists in adult human brain, especially in the dentate gyrus, and it is to be maintained and, if possible, augmented with different stimuli including exercise and certain drugs. Here, we examine the evidence for adult human neurogenesis and note important limitations of the methodologies used to study it. A balanced review of the literature and evaluation of the data indicate that adult neurogenesis in human brain is improbable. In fact, in several high-quality recent studies in adult human brain, unlike in adult brains of other species, neurogenesis was not detectable. These findings suggest that the human brain requires a permanent set of neurons to maintain acquired knowledge for decades, which is essential for complex high cognitive functions unique to humans. Thus, stimulation and/or injection of neural stem cells into human brains may not only disrupt brain homeostatic systems, but also disturb normal neuronal circuits. We propose that the focus of research should be the preservation of brain neurons by prevention of damage, not replacement.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00429-019-01917-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6852840</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2252540541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-48090a5dcd43a568eb164660b2dada6cbc00c427d177ed50815fce066e2aa2363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v3CAQxVHVqPnTfoEeKqReenEzYIO9OVSKoqatFCmX5IwwjHeJbNiAHSnfPnidbpMeckAg5jdveDxCPjP4zgDq0wRQ8VUBbLdYXch35Ig1siy4lOz9_izKQ3Kc0h2AWDVs9YEclozXjajZEYnntNW99gYtxQfdT3p0wdPQ0XGD-cZZzDXahUi1nfqRepxiWKPH5BJ1nm6mQft0Rt2w7Z1Zumd6x23To9k4PUZnqHUpRIsxfSQHne4TfnreT8jt5c-bi9_F1fWvPxfnV4URFYxF1cAKtLDGVqUWssGWyUpKaLnVVkvTGgBT8dqyukYroGGiMwhSIteal7I8IT8W3e3UDmgN-jHqXm2jG3R8VEE79bri3Uatw4OSjeBNBVng27NADPcTplENLhns83dhmJLiXJS8lkywjH79D70LU_TZ3kzxbEhUM8UXysSQUsRu_xgGao5ULZGqHKfaRapmG19e2ti3_M0wA-UCpFzya4z_Zr8h-wSsIK8I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2252540541</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A balanced evaluation of the evidence for adult neurogenesis in humans: implication for neuropsychiatric disorders</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><creator>Duque, Alvaro ; Spector, Reynold</creator><creatorcontrib>Duque, Alvaro ; Spector, Reynold</creatorcontrib><description>There is a widespread belief that neurogenesis exists in adult human brain, especially in the dentate gyrus, and it is to be maintained and, if possible, augmented with different stimuli including exercise and certain drugs. Here, we examine the evidence for adult human neurogenesis and note important limitations of the methodologies used to study it. A balanced review of the literature and evaluation of the data indicate that adult neurogenesis in human brain is improbable. In fact, in several high-quality recent studies in adult human brain, unlike in adult brains of other species, neurogenesis was not detectable. These findings suggest that the human brain requires a permanent set of neurons to maintain acquired knowledge for decades, which is essential for complex high cognitive functions unique to humans. Thus, stimulation and/or injection of neural stem cells into human brains may not only disrupt brain homeostatic systems, but also disturb normal neuronal circuits. We propose that the focus of research should be the preservation of brain neurons by prevention of damage, not replacement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-2653</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-2661</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0340-2061</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00429-019-01917-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31278571</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Brain ; Brain Injuries - prevention &amp; control ; Cell Biology ; Cell Differentiation - physiology ; Cognitive ability ; Dentate gyrus ; Humans ; Literature reviews ; Mental disorders ; Mental Disorders - therapy ; Neural stem cells ; Neural Stem Cells - cytology ; Neurogenesis ; Neurogenesis - physiology ; Neurology ; Neurons - physiology ; Neurosciences ; Preservation ; Review ; Stem cells</subject><ispartof>Brain Structure and Function, 2019-09, Vol.224 (7), p.2281-2295</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Brain Structure and Function is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-48090a5dcd43a568eb164660b2dada6cbc00c427d177ed50815fce066e2aa2363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-48090a5dcd43a568eb164660b2dada6cbc00c427d177ed50815fce066e2aa2363</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5086-5438 ; 0000-0001-7892-9555</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00429-019-01917-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00429-019-01917-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31278571$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duque, Alvaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spector, Reynold</creatorcontrib><title>A balanced evaluation of the evidence for adult neurogenesis in humans: implication for neuropsychiatric disorders</title><title>Brain Structure and Function</title><addtitle>Brain Struct Funct</addtitle><addtitle>Brain Struct Funct</addtitle><description>There is a widespread belief that neurogenesis exists in adult human brain, especially in the dentate gyrus, and it is to be maintained and, if possible, augmented with different stimuli including exercise and certain drugs. Here, we examine the evidence for adult human neurogenesis and note important limitations of the methodologies used to study it. A balanced review of the literature and evaluation of the data indicate that adult neurogenesis in human brain is improbable. In fact, in several high-quality recent studies in adult human brain, unlike in adult brains of other species, neurogenesis was not detectable. These findings suggest that the human brain requires a permanent set of neurons to maintain acquired knowledge for decades, which is essential for complex high cognitive functions unique to humans. Thus, stimulation and/or injection of neural stem cells into human brains may not only disrupt brain homeostatic systems, but also disturb normal neuronal circuits. We propose that the focus of research should be the preservation of brain neurons by prevention of damage, not replacement.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain Injuries - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Cell Biology</subject><subject>Cell Differentiation - physiology</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Dentate gyrus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Neural stem cells</subject><subject>Neural Stem Cells - cytology</subject><subject>Neurogenesis</subject><subject>Neurogenesis - physiology</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurons - physiology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Stem cells</subject><issn>1863-2653</issn><issn>1863-2661</issn><issn>0340-2061</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v3CAQxVHVqPnTfoEeKqReenEzYIO9OVSKoqatFCmX5IwwjHeJbNiAHSnfPnidbpMeckAg5jdveDxCPjP4zgDq0wRQ8VUBbLdYXch35Ig1siy4lOz9_izKQ3Kc0h2AWDVs9YEclozXjajZEYnntNW99gYtxQfdT3p0wdPQ0XGD-cZZzDXahUi1nfqRepxiWKPH5BJ1nm6mQft0Rt2w7Z1Zumd6x23To9k4PUZnqHUpRIsxfSQHne4TfnreT8jt5c-bi9_F1fWvPxfnV4URFYxF1cAKtLDGVqUWssGWyUpKaLnVVkvTGgBT8dqyukYroGGiMwhSIteal7I8IT8W3e3UDmgN-jHqXm2jG3R8VEE79bri3Uatw4OSjeBNBVng27NADPcTplENLhns83dhmJLiXJS8lkywjH79D70LU_TZ3kzxbEhUM8UXysSQUsRu_xgGao5ULZGqHKfaRapmG19e2ti3_M0wA-UCpFzya4z_Zr8h-wSsIK8I</recordid><startdate>20190901</startdate><enddate>20190901</enddate><creator>Duque, Alvaro</creator><creator>Spector, Reynold</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5086-5438</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7892-9555</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190901</creationdate><title>A balanced evaluation of the evidence for adult neurogenesis in humans: implication for neuropsychiatric disorders</title><author>Duque, Alvaro ; Spector, Reynold</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-48090a5dcd43a568eb164660b2dada6cbc00c427d177ed50815fce066e2aa2363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain Injuries - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Cell Biology</topic><topic>Cell Differentiation - physiology</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Dentate gyrus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Neural stem cells</topic><topic>Neural Stem Cells - cytology</topic><topic>Neurogenesis</topic><topic>Neurogenesis - physiology</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurons - physiology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Stem cells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duque, Alvaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spector, Reynold</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Brain Structure and Function</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duque, Alvaro</au><au>Spector, Reynold</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A balanced evaluation of the evidence for adult neurogenesis in humans: implication for neuropsychiatric disorders</atitle><jtitle>Brain Structure and Function</jtitle><stitle>Brain Struct Funct</stitle><addtitle>Brain Struct Funct</addtitle><date>2019-09-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>224</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2281</spage><epage>2295</epage><pages>2281-2295</pages><issn>1863-2653</issn><eissn>1863-2661</eissn><eissn>0340-2061</eissn><abstract>There is a widespread belief that neurogenesis exists in adult human brain, especially in the dentate gyrus, and it is to be maintained and, if possible, augmented with different stimuli including exercise and certain drugs. Here, we examine the evidence for adult human neurogenesis and note important limitations of the methodologies used to study it. A balanced review of the literature and evaluation of the data indicate that adult neurogenesis in human brain is improbable. In fact, in several high-quality recent studies in adult human brain, unlike in adult brains of other species, neurogenesis was not detectable. These findings suggest that the human brain requires a permanent set of neurons to maintain acquired knowledge for decades, which is essential for complex high cognitive functions unique to humans. Thus, stimulation and/or injection of neural stem cells into human brains may not only disrupt brain homeostatic systems, but also disturb normal neuronal circuits. We propose that the focus of research should be the preservation of brain neurons by prevention of damage, not replacement.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>31278571</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00429-019-01917-6</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5086-5438</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7892-9555</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1863-2653
ispartof Brain Structure and Function, 2019-09, Vol.224 (7), p.2281-2295
issn 1863-2653
1863-2661
0340-2061
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6852840
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink (Online service)
subjects Animals
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Brain
Brain Injuries - prevention & control
Cell Biology
Cell Differentiation - physiology
Cognitive ability
Dentate gyrus
Humans
Literature reviews
Mental disorders
Mental Disorders - therapy
Neural stem cells
Neural Stem Cells - cytology
Neurogenesis
Neurogenesis - physiology
Neurology
Neurons - physiology
Neurosciences
Preservation
Review
Stem cells
title A balanced evaluation of the evidence for adult neurogenesis in humans: implication for neuropsychiatric disorders
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T09%3A45%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20balanced%20evaluation%20of%20the%20evidence%20for%20adult%20neurogenesis%20in%20humans:%20implication%20for%20neuropsychiatric%20disorders&rft.jtitle=Brain%20Structure%20and%20Function&rft.au=Duque,%20Alvaro&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.volume=224&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2281&rft.epage=2295&rft.pages=2281-2295&rft.issn=1863-2653&rft.eissn=1863-2661&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00429-019-01917-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2252540541%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2252540541&rft_id=info:pmid/31278571&rfr_iscdi=true