Endocrine disruption in aquatic systems: up‐scaling research to address ecological consequences

ABSTRACT Endocrine‐disrupting chemicals (EDCs) can alter biological function in organisms at environmentally relevant concentrations and are a significant threat to aquatic biodiversity, but there is little understanding of exposure consequences for populations, communities and ecosystems. The perva...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 2018-02, Vol.93 (1), p.626-641
Hauptverfasser: Windsor, Fredric M., Ormerod, Steve J., Tyler, Charles R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 641
container_issue 1
container_start_page 626
container_title Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
container_volume 93
creator Windsor, Fredric M.
Ormerod, Steve J.
Tyler, Charles R.
description ABSTRACT Endocrine‐disrupting chemicals (EDCs) can alter biological function in organisms at environmentally relevant concentrations and are a significant threat to aquatic biodiversity, but there is little understanding of exposure consequences for populations, communities and ecosystems. The pervasive nature of EDCs within aquatic environments and their multiple sub‐lethal effects make assessments of their impact especially important but also highly challenging. Herein, we review the data on EDC effects in aquatic systems focusing on studies assessing populations and ecosystems, and including how biotic and abiotic processes may affect, and be affected by, responses to EDCs. Recent research indicates a significant influence of behavioural responses (e.g. enhancing feeding rates), transgenerational effects and trophic cascades in the ecological consequences of EDC exposure. In addition, interactions between EDCs and other chemical, physical and biological factors generate uncertainty in our understanding of the ecological effects of EDCs within aquatic ecosystems. We illustrate how effect thresholds for EDCs generated from individual‐based experimental bioassays of the types commonly applied using chemical test guidelines [e.g. Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD)] may not necessarily reflect the hazards associated with endocrine disruption. We argue that improved risk assessment for EDCs in aquatic ecosystems urgently requires more ecologically oriented research as well as field‐based assessments at population‐, community‐ and food‐web levels.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/brv.12360
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6849538</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1987604225</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-ed7aa451647df45d80780b43802a8a549c500090976b27678f067e10834d58883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctKAzEARYMovhf-gARcuRhNZvIaF4KKLygIouIupElaU6ZJm8wo3fkJfqNfYrRVdGE2eR1OLrkA7GB0gPM47MfnA1xWDC2BdUxYXWBBH5e_1qTgdYXXwEZKI4TyAatWwVopeE0JJ-tAnXsTdHTeQuNS7CatCx46D9W0U63TMM1Sa8fpCHaT99e3pFXj_BBGm6yK-gm2ASpj8jZBq0MThi4TUAef7LSzXtu0BVYGqkl2ezFvgvuL87uzq6J3c3l9dtIrNCEVKqzhShGKGeFmQKgRiAvUJ5VApRKKklpThFCNas76JWdcDBDjFiNREUOFENUmOJ57J11_bI22vo2qkZPoxirOZFBO_r3x7kkOw7NkgtS0-hTsLQQx5OyplaPQRZ8zS1wLzhApS5qp_TmlY0gp2sHPCxjJzzZkbkN-tZHZ3d-Rfsjv78_A4Rx4cY2d_W-Sp7cPc-UHhcmWJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1987604225</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Endocrine disruption in aquatic systems: up‐scaling research to address ecological consequences</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Windsor, Fredric M. ; Ormerod, Steve J. ; Tyler, Charles R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Windsor, Fredric M. ; Ormerod, Steve J. ; Tyler, Charles R.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Endocrine‐disrupting chemicals (EDCs) can alter biological function in organisms at environmentally relevant concentrations and are a significant threat to aquatic biodiversity, but there is little understanding of exposure consequences for populations, communities and ecosystems. The pervasive nature of EDCs within aquatic environments and their multiple sub‐lethal effects make assessments of their impact especially important but also highly challenging. Herein, we review the data on EDC effects in aquatic systems focusing on studies assessing populations and ecosystems, and including how biotic and abiotic processes may affect, and be affected by, responses to EDCs. Recent research indicates a significant influence of behavioural responses (e.g. enhancing feeding rates), transgenerational effects and trophic cascades in the ecological consequences of EDC exposure. In addition, interactions between EDCs and other chemical, physical and biological factors generate uncertainty in our understanding of the ecological effects of EDCs within aquatic ecosystems. We illustrate how effect thresholds for EDCs generated from individual‐based experimental bioassays of the types commonly applied using chemical test guidelines [e.g. Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD)] may not necessarily reflect the hazards associated with endocrine disruption. We argue that improved risk assessment for EDCs in aquatic ecosystems urgently requires more ecologically oriented research as well as field‐based assessments at population‐, community‐ and food‐web levels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-7931</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-185X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/brv.12360</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28795474</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Aquatic environment ; aquatic pollution ; Bioassays ; Biodiversity ; Biological effects ; Cascades ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Ecological effects ; Ecological risk assessment ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystem assessment ; ecotoxicology ; Endocrine disruptors ; Endocrine Disruptors - toxicity ; endocrine‐disrupting chemicals ; Environmental impact ; Exposure ; Feeding rates ; Food webs ; Hazard assessment ; Lethal effects ; Operational hazards ; Original ; Population studies ; Populations ; Research Design ; Risk assessment ; Scaling ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</subject><ispartof>Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2018-02, Vol.93 (1), p.626-641</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors. Biological Reviews published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society.</rights><rights>Biological Reviews © 2018 Cambridge Philosophical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-ed7aa451647df45d80780b43802a8a549c500090976b27678f067e10834d58883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-ed7aa451647df45d80780b43802a8a549c500090976b27678f067e10834d58883</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5030-3470</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbrv.12360$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbrv.12360$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28795474$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Windsor, Fredric M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ormerod, Steve J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Charles R.</creatorcontrib><title>Endocrine disruption in aquatic systems: up‐scaling research to address ecological consequences</title><title>Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society</title><addtitle>Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Endocrine‐disrupting chemicals (EDCs) can alter biological function in organisms at environmentally relevant concentrations and are a significant threat to aquatic biodiversity, but there is little understanding of exposure consequences for populations, communities and ecosystems. The pervasive nature of EDCs within aquatic environments and their multiple sub‐lethal effects make assessments of their impact especially important but also highly challenging. Herein, we review the data on EDC effects in aquatic systems focusing on studies assessing populations and ecosystems, and including how biotic and abiotic processes may affect, and be affected by, responses to EDCs. Recent research indicates a significant influence of behavioural responses (e.g. enhancing feeding rates), transgenerational effects and trophic cascades in the ecological consequences of EDC exposure. In addition, interactions between EDCs and other chemical, physical and biological factors generate uncertainty in our understanding of the ecological effects of EDCs within aquatic ecosystems. We illustrate how effect thresholds for EDCs generated from individual‐based experimental bioassays of the types commonly applied using chemical test guidelines [e.g. Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD)] may not necessarily reflect the hazards associated with endocrine disruption. We argue that improved risk assessment for EDCs in aquatic ecosystems urgently requires more ecologically oriented research as well as field‐based assessments at population‐, community‐ and food‐web levels.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Aquatic environment</subject><subject>aquatic pollution</subject><subject>Bioassays</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological effects</subject><subject>Cascades</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecological risk assessment</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystem assessment</subject><subject>ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Endocrine disruptors</subject><subject>Endocrine Disruptors - toxicity</subject><subject>endocrine‐disrupting chemicals</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Feeding rates</subject><subject>Food webs</subject><subject>Hazard assessment</subject><subject>Lethal effects</subject><subject>Operational hazards</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</subject><issn>1464-7931</issn><issn>1469-185X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctKAzEARYMovhf-gARcuRhNZvIaF4KKLygIouIupElaU6ZJm8wo3fkJfqNfYrRVdGE2eR1OLrkA7GB0gPM47MfnA1xWDC2BdUxYXWBBH5e_1qTgdYXXwEZKI4TyAatWwVopeE0JJ-tAnXsTdHTeQuNS7CatCx46D9W0U63TMM1Sa8fpCHaT99e3pFXj_BBGm6yK-gm2ASpj8jZBq0MThi4TUAef7LSzXtu0BVYGqkl2ezFvgvuL87uzq6J3c3l9dtIrNCEVKqzhShGKGeFmQKgRiAvUJ5VApRKKklpThFCNas76JWdcDBDjFiNREUOFENUmOJ57J11_bI22vo2qkZPoxirOZFBO_r3x7kkOw7NkgtS0-hTsLQQx5OyplaPQRZ8zS1wLzhApS5qp_TmlY0gp2sHPCxjJzzZkbkN-tZHZ3d-Rfsjv78_A4Rx4cY2d_W-Sp7cPc-UHhcmWJA</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Windsor, Fredric M.</creator><creator>Ormerod, Steve J.</creator><creator>Tyler, Charles R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5030-3470</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>Endocrine disruption in aquatic systems: up‐scaling research to address ecological consequences</title><author>Windsor, Fredric M. ; Ormerod, Steve J. ; Tyler, Charles R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-ed7aa451647df45d80780b43802a8a549c500090976b27678f067e10834d58883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Aquatic environment</topic><topic>aquatic pollution</topic><topic>Bioassays</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological effects</topic><topic>Cascades</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecological risk assessment</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystem assessment</topic><topic>ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Endocrine disruptors</topic><topic>Endocrine Disruptors - toxicity</topic><topic>endocrine‐disrupting chemicals</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Feeding rates</topic><topic>Food webs</topic><topic>Hazard assessment</topic><topic>Lethal effects</topic><topic>Operational hazards</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Windsor, Fredric M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ormerod, Steve J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Charles R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Windsor, Fredric M.</au><au>Ormerod, Steve J.</au><au>Tyler, Charles R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Endocrine disruption in aquatic systems: up‐scaling research to address ecological consequences</atitle><jtitle>Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society</jtitle><addtitle>Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc</addtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>626</spage><epage>641</epage><pages>626-641</pages><issn>1464-7931</issn><eissn>1469-185X</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Endocrine‐disrupting chemicals (EDCs) can alter biological function in organisms at environmentally relevant concentrations and are a significant threat to aquatic biodiversity, but there is little understanding of exposure consequences for populations, communities and ecosystems. The pervasive nature of EDCs within aquatic environments and their multiple sub‐lethal effects make assessments of their impact especially important but also highly challenging. Herein, we review the data on EDC effects in aquatic systems focusing on studies assessing populations and ecosystems, and including how biotic and abiotic processes may affect, and be affected by, responses to EDCs. Recent research indicates a significant influence of behavioural responses (e.g. enhancing feeding rates), transgenerational effects and trophic cascades in the ecological consequences of EDC exposure. In addition, interactions between EDCs and other chemical, physical and biological factors generate uncertainty in our understanding of the ecological effects of EDCs within aquatic ecosystems. We illustrate how effect thresholds for EDCs generated from individual‐based experimental bioassays of the types commonly applied using chemical test guidelines [e.g. Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD)] may not necessarily reflect the hazards associated with endocrine disruption. We argue that improved risk assessment for EDCs in aquatic ecosystems urgently requires more ecologically oriented research as well as field‐based assessments at population‐, community‐ and food‐web levels.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>28795474</pmid><doi>10.1111/brv.12360</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5030-3470</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1464-7931
ispartof Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2018-02, Vol.93 (1), p.626-641
issn 1464-7931
1469-185X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6849538
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animals
Aquatic ecosystems
Aquatic environment
aquatic pollution
Bioassays
Biodiversity
Biological effects
Cascades
Conservation of Natural Resources
Ecological effects
Ecological risk assessment
Ecosystem
Ecosystem assessment
ecotoxicology
Endocrine disruptors
Endocrine Disruptors - toxicity
endocrine‐disrupting chemicals
Environmental impact
Exposure
Feeding rates
Food webs
Hazard assessment
Lethal effects
Operational hazards
Original
Population studies
Populations
Research Design
Risk assessment
Scaling
Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity
title Endocrine disruption in aquatic systems: up‐scaling research to address ecological consequences
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T09%3A11%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endocrine%20disruption%20in%20aquatic%20systems:%20up%E2%80%90scaling%20research%20to%20address%20ecological%20consequences&rft.jtitle=Biological%20reviews%20of%20the%20Cambridge%20Philosophical%20Society&rft.au=Windsor,%20Fredric%20M.&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=626&rft.epage=641&rft.pages=626-641&rft.issn=1464-7931&rft.eissn=1469-185X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/brv.12360&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1987604225%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1987604225&rft_id=info:pmid/28795474&rfr_iscdi=true