A New Comprehensive Measure of High-Value Aspects of Primary Care

Abstract Purpose To develop and evaluate a concise measure of primary care that is grounded in the experience of patients, clinicians, and health care payers. Methods We asked crowd-sourced samples of 412 patients, 525 primary care clinicians, and 85 health care payers to describe what provides valu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of family medicine 2019-05, Vol.17 (3), p.221-230
Hauptverfasser: Etz, Rebecca S., PhD, Zyzanski, Stephen J., PhD, Gonzalez, Martha M, Reves, Sarah R., MSN, FNP-C, O’Neal, Jonathan P, Stange, Kurt C., MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Purpose To develop and evaluate a concise measure of primary care that is grounded in the experience of patients, clinicians, and health care payers. Methods We asked crowd-sourced samples of 412 patients, 525 primary care clinicians, and 85 health care payers to describe what provides value in primary care, then asked 70 primary care and health services experts in a 2½ day international conference to provide additional insights. A multidisciplinary team conducted a qualitative analysis of the combined data to develop a parsimonious set of patient-reported items. We evaluated items using factor analysis, Rasch modeling, and association analyses among 2 online samples and 4 clinical samples from diverse patient populations. Results The resulting person-centered primary care measure parsimoniously represents the broad scope of primary care, with 11 domains each represented by a single item: accessibility, advocacy, community context, comprehensiveness, continuity, coordination, family context, goal-oriented care, health promotion, integration, and relationship. Principal axes factor analysis identified a single factor. Factor loadings and corrected item-total correlations were >0.6 in online samples (n = 2,229) and >0.5 in clinical samples (n = 323). Factor scores were fairly normally distributed in online patient samples, and skewed toward higher ratings in point-of-care patient samples. Rasch models showed a broad spread of person and item scores, acceptable item-fit statistics, and little item redundancy. Preliminary concurrent validity analyses supported hypothesized associations. Conclusions The person-centered primary care measure reliably, comprehensively, and parsimoniously assesses the aspects of care thought to represent high-value primary care by patients, clinicians, and payers. The measure is ready for further validation and outcome analyses, and for use in focusing attention on what matters about primary care, while reducing measurement burden.
ISSN:1544-1709
1544-1717
DOI:10.1370/afm.2393