Significance of Leaders for Sustained Use of Evidence-Based Practices: A Qualitative Focus-Group Study with Mental Health Practitioners

Evidence-based practices that are implemented in mental health services are often challenging to sustain. In this focus-group study, 26 mental health practitioners with high fidelity scores were interviewed regarding their experiences with implementing the illness management and recovery, an evidenc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Community mental health journal 2019-11, Vol.55 (8), p.1344-1353
Hauptverfasser: Egeland, Karina M., Hauge, Mona-Iren, Ruud, Torleif, Ogden, Terje, Heiervang, Kristin Sverdvik
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1353
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1344
container_title Community mental health journal
container_volume 55
creator Egeland, Karina M.
Hauge, Mona-Iren
Ruud, Torleif
Ogden, Terje
Heiervang, Kristin Sverdvik
description Evidence-based practices that are implemented in mental health services are often challenging to sustain. In this focus-group study, 26 mental health practitioners with high fidelity scores were interviewed regarding their experiences with implementing the illness management and recovery, an evidence-based practice for people with severe mental disorders, in their services and how this could influence further use. Findings indicate that high fidelity is not equivalent to successful implementation. Rather, to sustain the practice in services, the practitioners emphasized the importance of their leaders being positive and engaged in the intervention, and hold clear goals and visions for the intervention in the clinic. In addition, the practitioners’ understanding of outcome monitoring as a resource for practice improvement must be improved to avoid random patient experiences becoming the decisive factor in determining further use. Trial registration : ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02077829. Registered 25 February 2014.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10597-019-00430-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6823318</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2311642458</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-e04192ca4b982b475b4363880315a31a648d7c214f819b741c0975e233cfe0833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UstuFDEQHCEQWQI_wAEsceEy0G171h4OSCHKA2kRoCVny-vxbBzN2ovtWZQv4LfxZpLwOHCy7Kqu6m5XVT1HeIMA4m1CaFpRA7Y1AGdQywfVDBvBaipk-7CaASDUTDbsoHqS0hUANIjicXXAEFtA0c6qn0u39q53RntjSejJwurOxkT6EMlyTFk7bztykW7Ak53rbCHWH3Qqr1-iNtkZm96RI_J11IPLOrudJafBjKk-i2HckmUeu2vyw-VL8sn6rAdybvVQblN1dsEXv6fVo14PyT67PQ-ri9OTb8fn9eLz2cfjo0VteCtzbYFjS43mq1bSFRfNirM5kxIYNpqhnnPZCUOR9xLbleBooBWNpYyZ3oJk7LB6P-lux9XGdqZ0FPWgttFtdLxWQTv1N-LdpVqHnZrLIoKyCLycBEx0KTuvfIhaIciGKiFYg4Xx-tYihu-jTVltXDJ2GLS3YUyKlu3POeXNXuzVP9SrMEZfFqAoLWNRoJIXFr2zDClF29-3i6D2SVBTElRJgrpJgtpLv_hz0PuSu68vBDYRUoH82sbf3v-R_QXWW71u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2238820284</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Significance of Leaders for Sustained Use of Evidence-Based Practices: A Qualitative Focus-Group Study with Mental Health Practitioners</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Egeland, Karina M. ; Hauge, Mona-Iren ; Ruud, Torleif ; Ogden, Terje ; Heiervang, Kristin Sverdvik</creator><creatorcontrib>Egeland, Karina M. ; Hauge, Mona-Iren ; Ruud, Torleif ; Ogden, Terje ; Heiervang, Kristin Sverdvik</creatorcontrib><description>Evidence-based practices that are implemented in mental health services are often challenging to sustain. In this focus-group study, 26 mental health practitioners with high fidelity scores were interviewed regarding their experiences with implementing the illness management and recovery, an evidence-based practice for people with severe mental disorders, in their services and how this could influence further use. Findings indicate that high fidelity is not equivalent to successful implementation. Rather, to sustain the practice in services, the practitioners emphasized the importance of their leaders being positive and engaged in the intervention, and hold clear goals and visions for the intervention in the clinic. In addition, the practitioners’ understanding of outcome monitoring as a resource for practice improvement must be improved to avoid random patient experiences becoming the decisive factor in determining further use. Trial registration : ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02077829. Registered 25 February 2014.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-3853</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2789</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10597-019-00430-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31190179</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Community and Environmental Psychology ; Evidence-based practice ; Fidelity ; Focus groups ; Illnesses ; Intervention ; Medical personnel ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Mental health professionals ; Mental health services ; NCT ; NCT02077829 ; Original Paper ; Psychiatry ; Qualitative research ; Recovery</subject><ispartof>Community mental health journal, 2019-11, Vol.55 (8), p.1344-1353</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>Community Mental Health Journal is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved. © 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-e04192ca4b982b475b4363880315a31a648d7c214f819b741c0975e233cfe0833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-e04192ca4b982b475b4363880315a31a648d7c214f819b741c0975e233cfe0833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10597-019-00430-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10597-019-00430-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,12846,26567,27344,27924,27925,30999,33774,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31190179$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Egeland, Karina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauge, Mona-Iren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruud, Torleif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogden, Terje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heiervang, Kristin Sverdvik</creatorcontrib><title>Significance of Leaders for Sustained Use of Evidence-Based Practices: A Qualitative Focus-Group Study with Mental Health Practitioners</title><title>Community mental health journal</title><addtitle>Community Ment Health J</addtitle><addtitle>Community Ment Health J</addtitle><description>Evidence-based practices that are implemented in mental health services are often challenging to sustain. In this focus-group study, 26 mental health practitioners with high fidelity scores were interviewed regarding their experiences with implementing the illness management and recovery, an evidence-based practice for people with severe mental disorders, in their services and how this could influence further use. Findings indicate that high fidelity is not equivalent to successful implementation. Rather, to sustain the practice in services, the practitioners emphasized the importance of their leaders being positive and engaged in the intervention, and hold clear goals and visions for the intervention in the clinic. In addition, the practitioners’ understanding of outcome monitoring as a resource for practice improvement must be improved to avoid random patient experiences becoming the decisive factor in determining further use. Trial registration : ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02077829. Registered 25 February 2014.</description><subject>Community and Environmental Psychology</subject><subject>Evidence-based practice</subject><subject>Fidelity</subject><subject>Focus groups</subject><subject>Illnesses</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mental health professionals</subject><subject>Mental health services</subject><subject>NCT</subject><subject>NCT02077829</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><issn>0010-3853</issn><issn>1573-2789</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UstuFDEQHCEQWQI_wAEsceEy0G171h4OSCHKA2kRoCVny-vxbBzN2ovtWZQv4LfxZpLwOHCy7Kqu6m5XVT1HeIMA4m1CaFpRA7Y1AGdQywfVDBvBaipk-7CaASDUTDbsoHqS0hUANIjicXXAEFtA0c6qn0u39q53RntjSejJwurOxkT6EMlyTFk7bztykW7Ak53rbCHWH3Qqr1-iNtkZm96RI_J11IPLOrudJafBjKk-i2HckmUeu2vyw-VL8sn6rAdybvVQblN1dsEXv6fVo14PyT67PQ-ri9OTb8fn9eLz2cfjo0VteCtzbYFjS43mq1bSFRfNirM5kxIYNpqhnnPZCUOR9xLbleBooBWNpYyZ3oJk7LB6P-lux9XGdqZ0FPWgttFtdLxWQTv1N-LdpVqHnZrLIoKyCLycBEx0KTuvfIhaIciGKiFYg4Xx-tYihu-jTVltXDJ2GLS3YUyKlu3POeXNXuzVP9SrMEZfFqAoLWNRoJIXFr2zDClF29-3i6D2SVBTElRJgrpJgtpLv_hz0PuSu68vBDYRUoH82sbf3v-R_QXWW71u</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Egeland, Karina M.</creator><creator>Hauge, Mona-Iren</creator><creator>Ruud, Torleif</creator><creator>Ogden, Terje</creator><creator>Heiervang, Kristin Sverdvik</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>3HK</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Significance of Leaders for Sustained Use of Evidence-Based Practices: A Qualitative Focus-Group Study with Mental Health Practitioners</title><author>Egeland, Karina M. ; Hauge, Mona-Iren ; Ruud, Torleif ; Ogden, Terje ; Heiervang, Kristin Sverdvik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-e04192ca4b982b475b4363880315a31a648d7c214f819b741c0975e233cfe0833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Community and Environmental Psychology</topic><topic>Evidence-based practice</topic><topic>Fidelity</topic><topic>Focus groups</topic><topic>Illnesses</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mental health professionals</topic><topic>Mental health services</topic><topic>NCT</topic><topic>NCT02077829</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Egeland, Karina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauge, Mona-Iren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruud, Torleif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogden, Terje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heiervang, Kristin Sverdvik</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Community mental health journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Egeland, Karina M.</au><au>Hauge, Mona-Iren</au><au>Ruud, Torleif</au><au>Ogden, Terje</au><au>Heiervang, Kristin Sverdvik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Significance of Leaders for Sustained Use of Evidence-Based Practices: A Qualitative Focus-Group Study with Mental Health Practitioners</atitle><jtitle>Community mental health journal</jtitle><stitle>Community Ment Health J</stitle><addtitle>Community Ment Health J</addtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1344</spage><epage>1353</epage><pages>1344-1353</pages><issn>0010-3853</issn><eissn>1573-2789</eissn><abstract>Evidence-based practices that are implemented in mental health services are often challenging to sustain. In this focus-group study, 26 mental health practitioners with high fidelity scores were interviewed regarding their experiences with implementing the illness management and recovery, an evidence-based practice for people with severe mental disorders, in their services and how this could influence further use. Findings indicate that high fidelity is not equivalent to successful implementation. Rather, to sustain the practice in services, the practitioners emphasized the importance of their leaders being positive and engaged in the intervention, and hold clear goals and visions for the intervention in the clinic. In addition, the practitioners’ understanding of outcome monitoring as a resource for practice improvement must be improved to avoid random patient experiences becoming the decisive factor in determining further use. Trial registration : ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02077829. Registered 25 February 2014.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>31190179</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10597-019-00430-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-3853
ispartof Community mental health journal, 2019-11, Vol.55 (8), p.1344-1353
issn 0010-3853
1573-2789
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6823318
source NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives; SpringerNature Journals; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Community and Environmental Psychology
Evidence-based practice
Fidelity
Focus groups
Illnesses
Intervention
Medical personnel
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mental disorders
Mental health
Mental health professionals
Mental health services
NCT
NCT02077829
Original Paper
Psychiatry
Qualitative research
Recovery
title Significance of Leaders for Sustained Use of Evidence-Based Practices: A Qualitative Focus-Group Study with Mental Health Practitioners
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T00%3A06%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Significance%20of%20Leaders%20for%20Sustained%20Use%20of%20Evidence-Based%20Practices:%20A%20Qualitative%20Focus-Group%20Study%20with%20Mental%20Health%20Practitioners&rft.jtitle=Community%20mental%20health%20journal&rft.au=Egeland,%20Karina%20M.&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1344&rft.epage=1353&rft.pages=1344-1353&rft.issn=0010-3853&rft.eissn=1573-2789&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10597-019-00430-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2311642458%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2238820284&rft_id=info:pmid/31190179&rfr_iscdi=true