Muscle‐induced loading as an important source of variation in craniofacial skeletal shape
Summary The shape of the craniofacial skeleton is constantly changing through ontogeny and reflects a balance between developmental patterning and mechanical‐load‐induced remodeling. Muscles are a major contributor to producing the mechanical environment that is crucial for “normal” skull developmen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) N.Y. : 2000), 2019-01, Vol.57 (1), p.e23263-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e23263 |
container_title | Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Conith, Andrew J. Lam, Daniel T. Albertson, R. Craig |
description | Summary
The shape of the craniofacial skeleton is constantly changing through ontogeny and reflects a balance between developmental patterning and mechanical‐load‐induced remodeling. Muscles are a major contributor to producing the mechanical environment that is crucial for “normal” skull development. Here, we use an F5 hybrid population of Lake Malawi cichlids to characterize the strength and types of associations between craniofacial bones and muscles. We focus on four bones/bone complexes, with different developmental origins, alongside four muscles with distinct functions. We used micro‐computed tomography to extract 3D information on bones and muscles. 3D geometric morphometrics and volumetric measurements were used to characterize bone and muscle shape, respectively. Linear regressions were performed to test for associations between bone shape and muscle volume. We identified three types of associations between muscles and bones: weak, strong direct (i.e., muscles insert directly onto bone), and strong indirect (i.e., bone is influenced by muscles without a direct connection). In addition, we show that although the shape of some bones is relatively robust to muscle‐induced mechanical stimulus, others appear to be highly sensitive to muscular input. Our results imply that the roles for muscular input on skeletal shape extend beyond specific points of origin or insertion and hold significant potential to influence broader patterns of craniofacial geometry. Thus, changes in the loading environment, either as a normal course of ontogeny or if an organism is exposed to a novel environment, may have pronounced effects on skeletal shape via near and far‐ranging effects of muscular loading. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/dvg.23263 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6819996</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2171706447</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-825f96631e19d74838542938f46a4aa4cef8f0b868fd0e9e3fd7bad940c46dd43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1rVDEUhi9isbW68A9IwI1dTJuvm5tsBKm1FipuVAouwpl8TFMzyTS5d6Q7f4K_sb-kqdMWFVzlwHl4eHPerntB8D7BmB7Y9WKfMirYo26H9FTMlJBnj-_nnp9td09rvcAY95LSJ902w5xIIdVO9-3jVE101z9_hWQn4yyKGWxICwQVQUJhucplhDSimqdiHMoeraEEGENu24RMgRSyBxMgovrdRTfeDuewcs-6LQ-xuud372735f3R58MPs9NPxyeHb09npseKzSTtvRKCEUeUHbhksudUMem5AA7AjfPS43nL6y12yjFvhzlYxbHhwlrOdrs3G-9qmi-dNS6NBaJelbCEcqUzBP33JoVzvchrLSRRSokmeH0nKPlycnXUy1CNixGSy1PVlDBKBWWcNvTVP-hFu0tq32vUQAYsOB8atbehTMm1FucfwhCsbyvTrTL9u7LGvvwz_QN531EDDjbAjxDd1f9N-t3X443yBgqhoq8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2171706447</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Muscle‐induced loading as an important source of variation in craniofacial skeletal shape</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Conith, Andrew J. ; Lam, Daniel T. ; Albertson, R. Craig</creator><creatorcontrib>Conith, Andrew J. ; Lam, Daniel T. ; Albertson, R. Craig</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
The shape of the craniofacial skeleton is constantly changing through ontogeny and reflects a balance between developmental patterning and mechanical‐load‐induced remodeling. Muscles are a major contributor to producing the mechanical environment that is crucial for “normal” skull development. Here, we use an F5 hybrid population of Lake Malawi cichlids to characterize the strength and types of associations between craniofacial bones and muscles. We focus on four bones/bone complexes, with different developmental origins, alongside four muscles with distinct functions. We used micro‐computed tomography to extract 3D information on bones and muscles. 3D geometric morphometrics and volumetric measurements were used to characterize bone and muscle shape, respectively. Linear regressions were performed to test for associations between bone shape and muscle volume. We identified three types of associations between muscles and bones: weak, strong direct (i.e., muscles insert directly onto bone), and strong indirect (i.e., bone is influenced by muscles without a direct connection). In addition, we show that although the shape of some bones is relatively robust to muscle‐induced mechanical stimulus, others appear to be highly sensitive to muscular input. Our results imply that the roles for muscular input on skeletal shape extend beyond specific points of origin or insertion and hold significant potential to influence broader patterns of craniofacial geometry. Thus, changes in the loading environment, either as a normal course of ontogeny or if an organism is exposed to a novel environment, may have pronounced effects on skeletal shape via near and far‐ranging effects of muscular loading.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-954X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-968X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/dvg.23263</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30418689</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological Variation, Population ; bone ; Bones ; cichlid ; Cichlids ; Computed tomography ; craniofacial ; geometric morphometrics ; Information processing ; Mechanical loading ; Mechanical properties ; Morphometry ; muscle ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Muscles ; Ontogeny ; Pattern formation ; Shape effects ; Skeleton ; Skull - diagnostic imaging ; Skull - growth & development ; Skull - physiology ; Weight-Bearing ; X-Ray Microtomography</subject><ispartof>Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000), 2019-01, Vol.57 (1), p.e23263-n/a</ispartof><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-825f96631e19d74838542938f46a4aa4cef8f0b868fd0e9e3fd7bad940c46dd43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-825f96631e19d74838542938f46a4aa4cef8f0b868fd0e9e3fd7bad940c46dd43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4120-1840 ; 0000-0001-9357-6620</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fdvg.23263$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fdvg.23263$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30418689$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Conith, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Daniel T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albertson, R. Craig</creatorcontrib><title>Muscle‐induced loading as an important source of variation in craniofacial skeletal shape</title><title>Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)</title><addtitle>Genesis</addtitle><description>Summary
The shape of the craniofacial skeleton is constantly changing through ontogeny and reflects a balance between developmental patterning and mechanical‐load‐induced remodeling. Muscles are a major contributor to producing the mechanical environment that is crucial for “normal” skull development. Here, we use an F5 hybrid population of Lake Malawi cichlids to characterize the strength and types of associations between craniofacial bones and muscles. We focus on four bones/bone complexes, with different developmental origins, alongside four muscles with distinct functions. We used micro‐computed tomography to extract 3D information on bones and muscles. 3D geometric morphometrics and volumetric measurements were used to characterize bone and muscle shape, respectively. Linear regressions were performed to test for associations between bone shape and muscle volume. We identified three types of associations between muscles and bones: weak, strong direct (i.e., muscles insert directly onto bone), and strong indirect (i.e., bone is influenced by muscles without a direct connection). In addition, we show that although the shape of some bones is relatively robust to muscle‐induced mechanical stimulus, others appear to be highly sensitive to muscular input. Our results imply that the roles for muscular input on skeletal shape extend beyond specific points of origin or insertion and hold significant potential to influence broader patterns of craniofacial geometry. Thus, changes in the loading environment, either as a normal course of ontogeny or if an organism is exposed to a novel environment, may have pronounced effects on skeletal shape via near and far‐ranging effects of muscular loading.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological Variation, Population</subject><subject>bone</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>cichlid</subject><subject>Cichlids</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>craniofacial</subject><subject>geometric morphometrics</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Mechanical loading</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Morphometry</subject><subject>muscle</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Ontogeny</subject><subject>Pattern formation</subject><subject>Shape effects</subject><subject>Skeleton</subject><subject>Skull - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Skull - growth & development</subject><subject>Skull - physiology</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing</subject><subject>X-Ray Microtomography</subject><issn>1526-954X</issn><issn>1526-968X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1rVDEUhi9isbW68A9IwI1dTJuvm5tsBKm1FipuVAouwpl8TFMzyTS5d6Q7f4K_sb-kqdMWFVzlwHl4eHPerntB8D7BmB7Y9WKfMirYo26H9FTMlJBnj-_nnp9td09rvcAY95LSJ902w5xIIdVO9-3jVE101z9_hWQn4yyKGWxICwQVQUJhucplhDSimqdiHMoeraEEGENu24RMgRSyBxMgovrdRTfeDuewcs-6LQ-xuud372735f3R58MPs9NPxyeHb09npseKzSTtvRKCEUeUHbhksudUMem5AA7AjfPS43nL6y12yjFvhzlYxbHhwlrOdrs3G-9qmi-dNS6NBaJelbCEcqUzBP33JoVzvchrLSRRSokmeH0nKPlycnXUy1CNixGSy1PVlDBKBWWcNvTVP-hFu0tq32vUQAYsOB8atbehTMm1FucfwhCsbyvTrTL9u7LGvvwz_QN531EDDjbAjxDd1f9N-t3X443yBgqhoq8</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Conith, Andrew J.</creator><creator>Lam, Daniel T.</creator><creator>Albertson, R. Craig</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4120-1840</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9357-6620</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Muscle‐induced loading as an important source of variation in craniofacial skeletal shape</title><author>Conith, Andrew J. ; Lam, Daniel T. ; Albertson, R. Craig</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-825f96631e19d74838542938f46a4aa4cef8f0b868fd0e9e3fd7bad940c46dd43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological Variation, Population</topic><topic>bone</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>cichlid</topic><topic>Cichlids</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>craniofacial</topic><topic>geometric morphometrics</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Mechanical loading</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Morphometry</topic><topic>muscle</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Ontogeny</topic><topic>Pattern formation</topic><topic>Shape effects</topic><topic>Skeleton</topic><topic>Skull - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Skull - growth & development</topic><topic>Skull - physiology</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing</topic><topic>X-Ray Microtomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Conith, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Daniel T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albertson, R. Craig</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Conith, Andrew J.</au><au>Lam, Daniel T.</au><au>Albertson, R. Craig</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Muscle‐induced loading as an important source of variation in craniofacial skeletal shape</atitle><jtitle>Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)</jtitle><addtitle>Genesis</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e23263</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e23263-n/a</pages><issn>1526-954X</issn><eissn>1526-968X</eissn><abstract>Summary
The shape of the craniofacial skeleton is constantly changing through ontogeny and reflects a balance between developmental patterning and mechanical‐load‐induced remodeling. Muscles are a major contributor to producing the mechanical environment that is crucial for “normal” skull development. Here, we use an F5 hybrid population of Lake Malawi cichlids to characterize the strength and types of associations between craniofacial bones and muscles. We focus on four bones/bone complexes, with different developmental origins, alongside four muscles with distinct functions. We used micro‐computed tomography to extract 3D information on bones and muscles. 3D geometric morphometrics and volumetric measurements were used to characterize bone and muscle shape, respectively. Linear regressions were performed to test for associations between bone shape and muscle volume. We identified three types of associations between muscles and bones: weak, strong direct (i.e., muscles insert directly onto bone), and strong indirect (i.e., bone is influenced by muscles without a direct connection). In addition, we show that although the shape of some bones is relatively robust to muscle‐induced mechanical stimulus, others appear to be highly sensitive to muscular input. Our results imply that the roles for muscular input on skeletal shape extend beyond specific points of origin or insertion and hold significant potential to influence broader patterns of craniofacial geometry. Thus, changes in the loading environment, either as a normal course of ontogeny or if an organism is exposed to a novel environment, may have pronounced effects on skeletal shape via near and far‐ranging effects of muscular loading.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>30418689</pmid><doi>10.1002/dvg.23263</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4120-1840</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9357-6620</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1526-954X |
ispartof | Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000), 2019-01, Vol.57 (1), p.e23263-n/a |
issn | 1526-954X 1526-968X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6819996 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Animals Biological Variation, Population bone Bones cichlid Cichlids Computed tomography craniofacial geometric morphometrics Information processing Mechanical loading Mechanical properties Morphometry muscle Muscle, Skeletal - physiology Muscles Ontogeny Pattern formation Shape effects Skeleton Skull - diagnostic imaging Skull - growth & development Skull - physiology Weight-Bearing X-Ray Microtomography |
title | Muscle‐induced loading as an important source of variation in craniofacial skeletal shape |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T16%3A56%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Muscle%E2%80%90induced%20loading%20as%20an%20important%20source%20of%20variation%20in%20craniofacial%20skeletal%20shape&rft.jtitle=Genesis%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.%20:%202000)&rft.au=Conith,%20Andrew%20J.&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e23263&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e23263-n/a&rft.issn=1526-954X&rft.eissn=1526-968X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/dvg.23263&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2171706447%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2171706447&rft_id=info:pmid/30418689&rfr_iscdi=true |