Muscle‐induced loading as an important source of variation in craniofacial skeletal shape

Summary The shape of the craniofacial skeleton is constantly changing through ontogeny and reflects a balance between developmental patterning and mechanical‐load‐induced remodeling. Muscles are a major contributor to producing the mechanical environment that is crucial for “normal” skull developmen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) N.Y. : 2000), 2019-01, Vol.57 (1), p.e23263-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Conith, Andrew J., Lam, Daniel T., Albertson, R. Craig
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 1
container_start_page e23263
container_title Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)
container_volume 57
creator Conith, Andrew J.
Lam, Daniel T.
Albertson, R. Craig
description Summary The shape of the craniofacial skeleton is constantly changing through ontogeny and reflects a balance between developmental patterning and mechanical‐load‐induced remodeling. Muscles are a major contributor to producing the mechanical environment that is crucial for “normal” skull development. Here, we use an F5 hybrid population of Lake Malawi cichlids to characterize the strength and types of associations between craniofacial bones and muscles. We focus on four bones/bone complexes, with different developmental origins, alongside four muscles with distinct functions. We used micro‐computed tomography to extract 3D information on bones and muscles. 3D geometric morphometrics and volumetric measurements were used to characterize bone and muscle shape, respectively. Linear regressions were performed to test for associations between bone shape and muscle volume. We identified three types of associations between muscles and bones: weak, strong direct (i.e., muscles insert directly onto bone), and strong indirect (i.e., bone is influenced by muscles without a direct connection). In addition, we show that although the shape of some bones is relatively robust to muscle‐induced mechanical stimulus, others appear to be highly sensitive to muscular input. Our results imply that the roles for muscular input on skeletal shape extend beyond specific points of origin or insertion and hold significant potential to influence broader patterns of craniofacial geometry. Thus, changes in the loading environment, either as a normal course of ontogeny or if an organism is exposed to a novel environment, may have pronounced effects on skeletal shape via near and far‐ranging effects of muscular loading.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/dvg.23263
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6819996</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2171706447</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-825f96631e19d74838542938f46a4aa4cef8f0b868fd0e9e3fd7bad940c46dd43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1rVDEUhi9isbW68A9IwI1dTJuvm5tsBKm1FipuVAouwpl8TFMzyTS5d6Q7f4K_sb-kqdMWFVzlwHl4eHPerntB8D7BmB7Y9WKfMirYo26H9FTMlJBnj-_nnp9td09rvcAY95LSJ902w5xIIdVO9-3jVE101z9_hWQn4yyKGWxICwQVQUJhucplhDSimqdiHMoeraEEGENu24RMgRSyBxMgovrdRTfeDuewcs-6LQ-xuud372735f3R58MPs9NPxyeHb09npseKzSTtvRKCEUeUHbhksudUMem5AA7AjfPS43nL6y12yjFvhzlYxbHhwlrOdrs3G-9qmi-dNS6NBaJelbCEcqUzBP33JoVzvchrLSRRSokmeH0nKPlycnXUy1CNixGSy1PVlDBKBWWcNvTVP-hFu0tq32vUQAYsOB8atbehTMm1FucfwhCsbyvTrTL9u7LGvvwz_QN531EDDjbAjxDd1f9N-t3X443yBgqhoq8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2171706447</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Muscle‐induced loading as an important source of variation in craniofacial skeletal shape</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Conith, Andrew J. ; Lam, Daniel T. ; Albertson, R. Craig</creator><creatorcontrib>Conith, Andrew J. ; Lam, Daniel T. ; Albertson, R. Craig</creatorcontrib><description>Summary The shape of the craniofacial skeleton is constantly changing through ontogeny and reflects a balance between developmental patterning and mechanical‐load‐induced remodeling. Muscles are a major contributor to producing the mechanical environment that is crucial for “normal” skull development. Here, we use an F5 hybrid population of Lake Malawi cichlids to characterize the strength and types of associations between craniofacial bones and muscles. We focus on four bones/bone complexes, with different developmental origins, alongside four muscles with distinct functions. We used micro‐computed tomography to extract 3D information on bones and muscles. 3D geometric morphometrics and volumetric measurements were used to characterize bone and muscle shape, respectively. Linear regressions were performed to test for associations between bone shape and muscle volume. We identified three types of associations between muscles and bones: weak, strong direct (i.e., muscles insert directly onto bone), and strong indirect (i.e., bone is influenced by muscles without a direct connection). In addition, we show that although the shape of some bones is relatively robust to muscle‐induced mechanical stimulus, others appear to be highly sensitive to muscular input. Our results imply that the roles for muscular input on skeletal shape extend beyond specific points of origin or insertion and hold significant potential to influence broader patterns of craniofacial geometry. Thus, changes in the loading environment, either as a normal course of ontogeny or if an organism is exposed to a novel environment, may have pronounced effects on skeletal shape via near and far‐ranging effects of muscular loading.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-954X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-968X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/dvg.23263</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30418689</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological Variation, Population ; bone ; Bones ; cichlid ; Cichlids ; Computed tomography ; craniofacial ; geometric morphometrics ; Information processing ; Mechanical loading ; Mechanical properties ; Morphometry ; muscle ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Muscles ; Ontogeny ; Pattern formation ; Shape effects ; Skeleton ; Skull - diagnostic imaging ; Skull - growth &amp; development ; Skull - physiology ; Weight-Bearing ; X-Ray Microtomography</subject><ispartof>Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000), 2019-01, Vol.57 (1), p.e23263-n/a</ispartof><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-825f96631e19d74838542938f46a4aa4cef8f0b868fd0e9e3fd7bad940c46dd43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-825f96631e19d74838542938f46a4aa4cef8f0b868fd0e9e3fd7bad940c46dd43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4120-1840 ; 0000-0001-9357-6620</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fdvg.23263$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fdvg.23263$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30418689$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Conith, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Daniel T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albertson, R. Craig</creatorcontrib><title>Muscle‐induced loading as an important source of variation in craniofacial skeletal shape</title><title>Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)</title><addtitle>Genesis</addtitle><description>Summary The shape of the craniofacial skeleton is constantly changing through ontogeny and reflects a balance between developmental patterning and mechanical‐load‐induced remodeling. Muscles are a major contributor to producing the mechanical environment that is crucial for “normal” skull development. Here, we use an F5 hybrid population of Lake Malawi cichlids to characterize the strength and types of associations between craniofacial bones and muscles. We focus on four bones/bone complexes, with different developmental origins, alongside four muscles with distinct functions. We used micro‐computed tomography to extract 3D information on bones and muscles. 3D geometric morphometrics and volumetric measurements were used to characterize bone and muscle shape, respectively. Linear regressions were performed to test for associations between bone shape and muscle volume. We identified three types of associations between muscles and bones: weak, strong direct (i.e., muscles insert directly onto bone), and strong indirect (i.e., bone is influenced by muscles without a direct connection). In addition, we show that although the shape of some bones is relatively robust to muscle‐induced mechanical stimulus, others appear to be highly sensitive to muscular input. Our results imply that the roles for muscular input on skeletal shape extend beyond specific points of origin or insertion and hold significant potential to influence broader patterns of craniofacial geometry. Thus, changes in the loading environment, either as a normal course of ontogeny or if an organism is exposed to a novel environment, may have pronounced effects on skeletal shape via near and far‐ranging effects of muscular loading.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological Variation, Population</subject><subject>bone</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>cichlid</subject><subject>Cichlids</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>craniofacial</subject><subject>geometric morphometrics</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Mechanical loading</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Morphometry</subject><subject>muscle</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Ontogeny</subject><subject>Pattern formation</subject><subject>Shape effects</subject><subject>Skeleton</subject><subject>Skull - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Skull - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Skull - physiology</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing</subject><subject>X-Ray Microtomography</subject><issn>1526-954X</issn><issn>1526-968X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1rVDEUhi9isbW68A9IwI1dTJuvm5tsBKm1FipuVAouwpl8TFMzyTS5d6Q7f4K_sb-kqdMWFVzlwHl4eHPerntB8D7BmB7Y9WKfMirYo26H9FTMlJBnj-_nnp9td09rvcAY95LSJ902w5xIIdVO9-3jVE101z9_hWQn4yyKGWxICwQVQUJhucplhDSimqdiHMoeraEEGENu24RMgRSyBxMgovrdRTfeDuewcs-6LQ-xuud372735f3R58MPs9NPxyeHb09npseKzSTtvRKCEUeUHbhksudUMem5AA7AjfPS43nL6y12yjFvhzlYxbHhwlrOdrs3G-9qmi-dNS6NBaJelbCEcqUzBP33JoVzvchrLSRRSokmeH0nKPlycnXUy1CNixGSy1PVlDBKBWWcNvTVP-hFu0tq32vUQAYsOB8atbehTMm1FucfwhCsbyvTrTL9u7LGvvwz_QN531EDDjbAjxDd1f9N-t3X443yBgqhoq8</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Conith, Andrew J.</creator><creator>Lam, Daniel T.</creator><creator>Albertson, R. Craig</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4120-1840</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9357-6620</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Muscle‐induced loading as an important source of variation in craniofacial skeletal shape</title><author>Conith, Andrew J. ; Lam, Daniel T. ; Albertson, R. Craig</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-825f96631e19d74838542938f46a4aa4cef8f0b868fd0e9e3fd7bad940c46dd43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological Variation, Population</topic><topic>bone</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>cichlid</topic><topic>Cichlids</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>craniofacial</topic><topic>geometric morphometrics</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Mechanical loading</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Morphometry</topic><topic>muscle</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Ontogeny</topic><topic>Pattern formation</topic><topic>Shape effects</topic><topic>Skeleton</topic><topic>Skull - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Skull - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Skull - physiology</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing</topic><topic>X-Ray Microtomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Conith, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Daniel T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albertson, R. Craig</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Conith, Andrew J.</au><au>Lam, Daniel T.</au><au>Albertson, R. Craig</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Muscle‐induced loading as an important source of variation in craniofacial skeletal shape</atitle><jtitle>Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)</jtitle><addtitle>Genesis</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e23263</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e23263-n/a</pages><issn>1526-954X</issn><eissn>1526-968X</eissn><abstract>Summary The shape of the craniofacial skeleton is constantly changing through ontogeny and reflects a balance between developmental patterning and mechanical‐load‐induced remodeling. Muscles are a major contributor to producing the mechanical environment that is crucial for “normal” skull development. Here, we use an F5 hybrid population of Lake Malawi cichlids to characterize the strength and types of associations between craniofacial bones and muscles. We focus on four bones/bone complexes, with different developmental origins, alongside four muscles with distinct functions. We used micro‐computed tomography to extract 3D information on bones and muscles. 3D geometric morphometrics and volumetric measurements were used to characterize bone and muscle shape, respectively. Linear regressions were performed to test for associations between bone shape and muscle volume. We identified three types of associations between muscles and bones: weak, strong direct (i.e., muscles insert directly onto bone), and strong indirect (i.e., bone is influenced by muscles without a direct connection). In addition, we show that although the shape of some bones is relatively robust to muscle‐induced mechanical stimulus, others appear to be highly sensitive to muscular input. Our results imply that the roles for muscular input on skeletal shape extend beyond specific points of origin or insertion and hold significant potential to influence broader patterns of craniofacial geometry. Thus, changes in the loading environment, either as a normal course of ontogeny or if an organism is exposed to a novel environment, may have pronounced effects on skeletal shape via near and far‐ranging effects of muscular loading.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>30418689</pmid><doi>10.1002/dvg.23263</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4120-1840</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9357-6620</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-954X
ispartof Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000), 2019-01, Vol.57 (1), p.e23263-n/a
issn 1526-954X
1526-968X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6819996
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Animals
Biological Variation, Population
bone
Bones
cichlid
Cichlids
Computed tomography
craniofacial
geometric morphometrics
Information processing
Mechanical loading
Mechanical properties
Morphometry
muscle
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Muscles
Ontogeny
Pattern formation
Shape effects
Skeleton
Skull - diagnostic imaging
Skull - growth & development
Skull - physiology
Weight-Bearing
X-Ray Microtomography
title Muscle‐induced loading as an important source of variation in craniofacial skeletal shape
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T16%3A56%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Muscle%E2%80%90induced%20loading%20as%20an%20important%20source%20of%20variation%20in%20craniofacial%20skeletal%20shape&rft.jtitle=Genesis%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.%20:%202000)&rft.au=Conith,%20Andrew%20J.&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e23263&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e23263-n/a&rft.issn=1526-954X&rft.eissn=1526-968X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/dvg.23263&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2171706447%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2171706447&rft_id=info:pmid/30418689&rfr_iscdi=true