Infections in Deep Brain Stimulator Surgery

Introduction: Deep brain stimulation has emerged as an effective treatment for movement disorders such as Parkinson’s disease, dystonia, and essential tremor with estimates of >100,000 deep brain stimulators (DBSs) implanted worldwide since 1980s. Infections rates vary widely in the literature wi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2019-08, Vol.11 (8), p.e5440-e5440
Hauptverfasser: Bernstein, Jacob E, Kashyap, Samir, Ray, Kevin, Ananda, Ajay
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e5440
container_issue 8
container_start_page e5440
container_title Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)
container_volume 11
creator Bernstein, Jacob E
Kashyap, Samir
Ray, Kevin
Ananda, Ajay
description Introduction: Deep brain stimulation has emerged as an effective treatment for movement disorders such as Parkinson’s disease, dystonia, and essential tremor with estimates of >100,000 deep brain stimulators (DBSs) implanted worldwide since 1980s. Infections rates vary widely in the literature with rates as high as 25%. Traditional management of infection after deep brain stimulation is systemic antibiotic therapy with wound incision and debridement (I&D) and removal of implanted DBS hardware. The aim of this study is to evaluate the infections occurring after DBS placement and implantable generator (IPG) placement in order to better prevent and manage these infections.Materials/Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 203 patients who underwent implantation of a DBS at a single institution. For initial electrode placement, patients underwent either unilateral or bilateral electrode placement with implantation of the IPG at the same surgery and IPG replacements occurred as necessary. For patients with unilateral electrodes, repeat surgery for placement of contralateral electrode was performed when desired. Preoperative preparation with ethyl alcohol occurred in all patients while use of intra-operative vancomycin powder was surgeon dependent. All patients received 24 hours of postoperative antibiotics. Primary endpoint was surgical wound infection or brain abscess located near the surgically implanted DBS leads. Infections were classified as early (90 days). Infectious organisms were recorded based on intra-operative wound cultures. Number of lead implantations, IPG replacements and choice of presurgical, intra-operative, and postsurgical antibiotics were recorded and outcomes compared.Results: Two hundred and three patients underwent 391 electrode insertions and 244 IPG replacements. Fourteen patients developed an infection (10 early versus 4 late); 12 after implantation surgery (3%) and 2 after IPG replacement surgery (0.8%). No intracranial abscesses were found. Most common sites were the chest and connector. Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) was the most common organism. Intra-operative vancomycin powder did not decrease infection risk. Vancomycin powder use was shown to increase risk of infection after electrode implantation surgery (Relative Risk 5.5080, p = 0.02063). Complete hardware removal occurred in eight patients, one patient had electrode only removal, three patients with I&D and no removal of hardware, and two patients
doi_str_mv 10.7759/cureus.5440
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6797017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2310864592</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-ffa128a4be558aab8fb9e17bed029d2aa6c84d367a8ae297166c9402c32eb073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtLAzEUhYMottSu_AMDboQyNclk8tgIWl-Fgot2HzKZO3XKdFKTidB_75QWUVf3wP0493EQuiZ4KkSu7mz0EMM0ZwyfoSElXKaSSHb-Sw_QOIQNxphgQbHAl2iQEZ5RKfMhmszbCmxXuzYkdZs8AeySR296uezqbWxM53yyjH4Nfn-FLirTBBif6gitXp5Xs7d08f46nz0sUtv7dmlVGUKlYQXkuTSmkFWhgIgCSkxVSY3hVrIy48JIA1QJwrlVDFObUSiwyEbo_mi7i8UWSgtt502jd77eGr_XztT6b6etP_TafWkulMDkYHB7MvDuM0Lo9LYOFprGtOBi0DTrpyim-ieM0M0_dOOib_vreopgyVmuaE9NjpT1LgQP1c8yBOtDDPoYgz7EkH0DOXR6Ag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2310864592</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Infections in Deep Brain Stimulator Surgery</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Bernstein, Jacob E ; Kashyap, Samir ; Ray, Kevin ; Ananda, Ajay</creator><creatorcontrib>Bernstein, Jacob E ; Kashyap, Samir ; Ray, Kevin ; Ananda, Ajay</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Deep brain stimulation has emerged as an effective treatment for movement disorders such as Parkinson’s disease, dystonia, and essential tremor with estimates of &gt;100,000 deep brain stimulators (DBSs) implanted worldwide since 1980s. Infections rates vary widely in the literature with rates as high as 25%. Traditional management of infection after deep brain stimulation is systemic antibiotic therapy with wound incision and debridement (I&amp;D) and removal of implanted DBS hardware. The aim of this study is to evaluate the infections occurring after DBS placement and implantable generator (IPG) placement in order to better prevent and manage these infections.Materials/Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 203 patients who underwent implantation of a DBS at a single institution. For initial electrode placement, patients underwent either unilateral or bilateral electrode placement with implantation of the IPG at the same surgery and IPG replacements occurred as necessary. For patients with unilateral electrodes, repeat surgery for placement of contralateral electrode was performed when desired. Preoperative preparation with ethyl alcohol occurred in all patients while use of intra-operative vancomycin powder was surgeon dependent. All patients received 24 hours of postoperative antibiotics. Primary endpoint was surgical wound infection or brain abscess located near the surgically implanted DBS leads. Infections were classified as early (&lt;90 days) or late (&gt;90 days). Infectious organisms were recorded based on intra-operative wound cultures. Number of lead implantations, IPG replacements and choice of presurgical, intra-operative, and postsurgical antibiotics were recorded and outcomes compared.Results: Two hundred and three patients underwent 391 electrode insertions and 244 IPG replacements. Fourteen patients developed an infection (10 early versus 4 late); 12 after implantation surgery (3%) and 2 after IPG replacement surgery (0.8%). No intracranial abscesses were found. Most common sites were the chest and connector. Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) was the most common organism. Intra-operative vancomycin powder did not decrease infection risk. Vancomycin powder use was shown to increase risk of infection after electrode implantation surgery (Relative Risk 5.5080, p = 0.02063). Complete hardware removal occurred in eight patients, one patient had electrode only removal, three patients with I&amp;D and no removal of hardware, and two patients with removal of IPG and extensor cables only. All patients were treated with postoperative intravenous antibiotics and no recurrent infections were found in patients with hardware left in place.Discussion/Conclusion: Infections after DBS implantation and IPG replacement occurred in 3% and 0.8% of patients respectively in our study which is lower than reported historically. Early infections were more common. No intracranial infections were found. Intra-operative use of vancomycin was not shown to decrease risk of infection after electrode implantation surgery or IPG replacement. However, in our study it was shown to increase risk of infection after electrode implantation surgery. Treatment includes antibiotic therapy and debridement with or without removal of hardware. DBS hardware can be safely left in place in select patients who may have significant adverse effects if it is removed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.5440</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31632885</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palo Alto: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Abscesses ; Alcohol ; Antibiotics ; Deep brain stimulation ; Diabetes ; Electrodes ; Infections ; Neurology ; Neurosurgery ; Organisms ; Pain ; Parkinson's disease ; Patients ; Surgeons ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2019-08, Vol.11 (8), p.e5440-e5440</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019, Bernstein et al. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019, Bernstein et al. 2019 Bernstein et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-ffa128a4be558aab8fb9e17bed029d2aa6c84d367a8ae297166c9402c32eb073</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797017/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797017/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bernstein, Jacob E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kashyap, Samir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ananda, Ajay</creatorcontrib><title>Infections in Deep Brain Stimulator Surgery</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><description>Introduction: Deep brain stimulation has emerged as an effective treatment for movement disorders such as Parkinson’s disease, dystonia, and essential tremor with estimates of &gt;100,000 deep brain stimulators (DBSs) implanted worldwide since 1980s. Infections rates vary widely in the literature with rates as high as 25%. Traditional management of infection after deep brain stimulation is systemic antibiotic therapy with wound incision and debridement (I&amp;D) and removal of implanted DBS hardware. The aim of this study is to evaluate the infections occurring after DBS placement and implantable generator (IPG) placement in order to better prevent and manage these infections.Materials/Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 203 patients who underwent implantation of a DBS at a single institution. For initial electrode placement, patients underwent either unilateral or bilateral electrode placement with implantation of the IPG at the same surgery and IPG replacements occurred as necessary. For patients with unilateral electrodes, repeat surgery for placement of contralateral electrode was performed when desired. Preoperative preparation with ethyl alcohol occurred in all patients while use of intra-operative vancomycin powder was surgeon dependent. All patients received 24 hours of postoperative antibiotics. Primary endpoint was surgical wound infection or brain abscess located near the surgically implanted DBS leads. Infections were classified as early (&lt;90 days) or late (&gt;90 days). Infectious organisms were recorded based on intra-operative wound cultures. Number of lead implantations, IPG replacements and choice of presurgical, intra-operative, and postsurgical antibiotics were recorded and outcomes compared.Results: Two hundred and three patients underwent 391 electrode insertions and 244 IPG replacements. Fourteen patients developed an infection (10 early versus 4 late); 12 after implantation surgery (3%) and 2 after IPG replacement surgery (0.8%). No intracranial abscesses were found. Most common sites were the chest and connector. Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) was the most common organism. Intra-operative vancomycin powder did not decrease infection risk. Vancomycin powder use was shown to increase risk of infection after electrode implantation surgery (Relative Risk 5.5080, p = 0.02063). Complete hardware removal occurred in eight patients, one patient had electrode only removal, three patients with I&amp;D and no removal of hardware, and two patients with removal of IPG and extensor cables only. All patients were treated with postoperative intravenous antibiotics and no recurrent infections were found in patients with hardware left in place.Discussion/Conclusion: Infections after DBS implantation and IPG replacement occurred in 3% and 0.8% of patients respectively in our study which is lower than reported historically. Early infections were more common. No intracranial infections were found. Intra-operative use of vancomycin was not shown to decrease risk of infection after electrode implantation surgery or IPG replacement. However, in our study it was shown to increase risk of infection after electrode implantation surgery. Treatment includes antibiotic therapy and debridement with or without removal of hardware. DBS hardware can be safely left in place in select patients who may have significant adverse effects if it is removed.</description><subject>Abscesses</subject><subject>Alcohol</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Deep brain stimulation</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Organisms</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Parkinson's disease</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtLAzEUhYMottSu_AMDboQyNclk8tgIWl-Fgot2HzKZO3XKdFKTidB_75QWUVf3wP0493EQuiZ4KkSu7mz0EMM0ZwyfoSElXKaSSHb-Sw_QOIQNxphgQbHAl2iQEZ5RKfMhmszbCmxXuzYkdZs8AeySR296uezqbWxM53yyjH4Nfn-FLirTBBif6gitXp5Xs7d08f46nz0sUtv7dmlVGUKlYQXkuTSmkFWhgIgCSkxVSY3hVrIy48JIA1QJwrlVDFObUSiwyEbo_mi7i8UWSgtt502jd77eGr_XztT6b6etP_TafWkulMDkYHB7MvDuM0Lo9LYOFprGtOBi0DTrpyim-ieM0M0_dOOib_vreopgyVmuaE9NjpT1LgQP1c8yBOtDDPoYgz7EkH0DOXR6Ag</recordid><startdate>20190820</startdate><enddate>20190820</enddate><creator>Bernstein, Jacob E</creator><creator>Kashyap, Samir</creator><creator>Ray, Kevin</creator><creator>Ananda, Ajay</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><general>Cureus</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190820</creationdate><title>Infections in Deep Brain Stimulator Surgery</title><author>Bernstein, Jacob E ; Kashyap, Samir ; Ray, Kevin ; Ananda, Ajay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-ffa128a4be558aab8fb9e17bed029d2aa6c84d367a8ae297166c9402c32eb073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abscesses</topic><topic>Alcohol</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Deep brain stimulation</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Organisms</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Parkinson's disease</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bernstein, Jacob E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kashyap, Samir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ananda, Ajay</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bernstein, Jacob E</au><au>Kashyap, Samir</au><au>Ray, Kevin</au><au>Ananda, Ajay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Infections in Deep Brain Stimulator Surgery</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><date>2019-08-20</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e5440</spage><epage>e5440</epage><pages>e5440-e5440</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Deep brain stimulation has emerged as an effective treatment for movement disorders such as Parkinson’s disease, dystonia, and essential tremor with estimates of &gt;100,000 deep brain stimulators (DBSs) implanted worldwide since 1980s. Infections rates vary widely in the literature with rates as high as 25%. Traditional management of infection after deep brain stimulation is systemic antibiotic therapy with wound incision and debridement (I&amp;D) and removal of implanted DBS hardware. The aim of this study is to evaluate the infections occurring after DBS placement and implantable generator (IPG) placement in order to better prevent and manage these infections.Materials/Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 203 patients who underwent implantation of a DBS at a single institution. For initial electrode placement, patients underwent either unilateral or bilateral electrode placement with implantation of the IPG at the same surgery and IPG replacements occurred as necessary. For patients with unilateral electrodes, repeat surgery for placement of contralateral electrode was performed when desired. Preoperative preparation with ethyl alcohol occurred in all patients while use of intra-operative vancomycin powder was surgeon dependent. All patients received 24 hours of postoperative antibiotics. Primary endpoint was surgical wound infection or brain abscess located near the surgically implanted DBS leads. Infections were classified as early (&lt;90 days) or late (&gt;90 days). Infectious organisms were recorded based on intra-operative wound cultures. Number of lead implantations, IPG replacements and choice of presurgical, intra-operative, and postsurgical antibiotics were recorded and outcomes compared.Results: Two hundred and three patients underwent 391 electrode insertions and 244 IPG replacements. Fourteen patients developed an infection (10 early versus 4 late); 12 after implantation surgery (3%) and 2 after IPG replacement surgery (0.8%). No intracranial abscesses were found. Most common sites were the chest and connector. Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) was the most common organism. Intra-operative vancomycin powder did not decrease infection risk. Vancomycin powder use was shown to increase risk of infection after electrode implantation surgery (Relative Risk 5.5080, p = 0.02063). Complete hardware removal occurred in eight patients, one patient had electrode only removal, three patients with I&amp;D and no removal of hardware, and two patients with removal of IPG and extensor cables only. All patients were treated with postoperative intravenous antibiotics and no recurrent infections were found in patients with hardware left in place.Discussion/Conclusion: Infections after DBS implantation and IPG replacement occurred in 3% and 0.8% of patients respectively in our study which is lower than reported historically. Early infections were more common. No intracranial infections were found. Intra-operative use of vancomycin was not shown to decrease risk of infection after electrode implantation surgery or IPG replacement. However, in our study it was shown to increase risk of infection after electrode implantation surgery. Treatment includes antibiotic therapy and debridement with or without removal of hardware. DBS hardware can be safely left in place in select patients who may have significant adverse effects if it is removed.</abstract><cop>Palo Alto</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><pmid>31632885</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.5440</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-8184
ispartof Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2019-08, Vol.11 (8), p.e5440-e5440
issn 2168-8184
2168-8184
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6797017
source PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Abscesses
Alcohol
Antibiotics
Deep brain stimulation
Diabetes
Electrodes
Infections
Neurology
Neurosurgery
Organisms
Pain
Parkinson's disease
Patients
Surgeons
Surgery
title Infections in Deep Brain Stimulator Surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T23%3A49%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Infections%20in%20Deep%20Brain%20Stimulator%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Bernstein,%20Jacob%20E&rft.date=2019-08-20&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e5440&rft.epage=e5440&rft.pages=e5440-e5440&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.5440&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2310864592%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2310864592&rft_id=info:pmid/31632885&rfr_iscdi=true