Development and first clinical use of a novel anatomical and biomechanical testing platform for scoliosis

Previous studies have demonstrated that, by using various three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies, synthetic spine models can be manufactured to mimic a human spine in its gross and radiographic anatomy and the biomechanical performance of bony and ligamentous tissue. These manufacturing proces...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) 2019-09, Vol.5 (3), p.329-336
Hauptverfasser: Bohl, Michael A, McBryan, Sarah, Nakaji, Peter, Chang, Steve W, Turner, Jay D, Kakarla, U Kumar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 336
container_issue 3
container_start_page 329
container_title Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)
container_volume 5
creator Bohl, Michael A
McBryan, Sarah
Nakaji, Peter
Chang, Steve W
Turner, Jay D
Kakarla, U Kumar
description Previous studies have demonstrated that, by using various three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies, synthetic spine models can be manufactured to mimic a human spine in its gross and radiographic anatomy and the biomechanical performance of bony and ligamentous tissue. These manufacturing processes have not, however, been used in combination to create a long-segment, biomimetic model of a patient with scoliosis. The purpose of this study was to describe the development of a biomimetic scoliosis model and early clinical experience using this model as a surgical planning and education platform. Synthetic spine models were printed to mimic the anatomy and biomechanical performance of 2 adult patients with scoliosis. Preoperatively, the models were surgically corrected by the attending surgeon of each patient. Patients then underwent surgical correction of their spinal deformities. Correction of the models was compared to the surgical correction in the patients. Patient 1 had a preoperative coronal Cobb angle of 40° from L1 to S1, as did the patient's synthetic spine model. The patient's spine model was corrected to 17.6°, and the patient achieved a correction of 17.3°. Patient 2 had a preoperative mid-thoracic Cobb angle of 88° and an upper thoracic Cobb angle of 43°. Preoperatively, the patient's spine model was corrected to 19.5° and 9.2° for the mid-thoracic and upper thoracic curves, respectively. Immediately after surgery, the patient's mid-thoracic and upper thoracic Cobb angles measured 18.7° and 9.5°, respectively. In both cases, the use of the spine models preoperatively changed the attending surgeon's operative plan. A novel synthetic spine model for corrective scoliosis procedures is presented, along with early clinical experience using this model as a surgical planning platform. This model has tremendous potential not only as a surgical planning platform but also as an adjunct to patient consent, surgical education, and biomechanical research.
doi_str_mv 10.21037/jss.2019.09.04
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6787359</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>31663044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2384-5ffc6a81543218a5417fc9d3912aa8d8be5d3ffb79639ab4cbb8795766d7d95c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1LAzEQhoMottSevUn-QNtk87W5CFI_oeBFwVtIskkb2d0sm23Bf2_aalEYZgbmmXeYF4BrjOYFRkQsPlOaFwjLOcpBz8C4oJjOKCfo_NTLjxGYphQMolRQJhi_BCOCeYYoHYNw73aujl3j2gHqtoI-9GmAtg5tsLqG2-Rg9FDDNmYuE3qIzWGyh02IjbMbfWQHl4bQrmFX68HHvoE5wWRjHWIK6QpceF0nN_2pE_D--PC2fJ6tXp9elnermS1ISWfMe8t1iRklBS41o1h4KysicaF1WZXGsYp4b4TkRGpDrTGlkExwXolKMksm4Pao221N4yqbH-t1rbo-NLr_UlEH9X_Sho1ax53iohSEySywOArYPqbUO3_axUgdjFfZeLU3XqEcNG_c_D154n9tJt9noIKi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and first clinical use of a novel anatomical and biomechanical testing platform for scoliosis</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bohl, Michael A ; McBryan, Sarah ; Nakaji, Peter ; Chang, Steve W ; Turner, Jay D ; Kakarla, U Kumar</creator><creatorcontrib>Bohl, Michael A ; McBryan, Sarah ; Nakaji, Peter ; Chang, Steve W ; Turner, Jay D ; Kakarla, U Kumar</creatorcontrib><description>Previous studies have demonstrated that, by using various three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies, synthetic spine models can be manufactured to mimic a human spine in its gross and radiographic anatomy and the biomechanical performance of bony and ligamentous tissue. These manufacturing processes have not, however, been used in combination to create a long-segment, biomimetic model of a patient with scoliosis. The purpose of this study was to describe the development of a biomimetic scoliosis model and early clinical experience using this model as a surgical planning and education platform. Synthetic spine models were printed to mimic the anatomy and biomechanical performance of 2 adult patients with scoliosis. Preoperatively, the models were surgically corrected by the attending surgeon of each patient. Patients then underwent surgical correction of their spinal deformities. Correction of the models was compared to the surgical correction in the patients. Patient 1 had a preoperative coronal Cobb angle of 40° from L1 to S1, as did the patient's synthetic spine model. The patient's spine model was corrected to 17.6°, and the patient achieved a correction of 17.3°. Patient 2 had a preoperative mid-thoracic Cobb angle of 88° and an upper thoracic Cobb angle of 43°. Preoperatively, the patient's spine model was corrected to 19.5° and 9.2° for the mid-thoracic and upper thoracic curves, respectively. Immediately after surgery, the patient's mid-thoracic and upper thoracic Cobb angles measured 18.7° and 9.5°, respectively. In both cases, the use of the spine models preoperatively changed the attending surgeon's operative plan. A novel synthetic spine model for corrective scoliosis procedures is presented, along with early clinical experience using this model as a surgical planning platform. This model has tremendous potential not only as a surgical planning platform but also as an adjunct to patient consent, surgical education, and biomechanical research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2414-469X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2414-4630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21037/jss.2019.09.04</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31663044</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>China: AME Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Original Study</subject><ispartof>Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2019-09, Vol.5 (3), p.329-336</ispartof><rights>2019 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2019 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved. 2019 Journal of Spine Surgery.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2384-5ffc6a81543218a5417fc9d3912aa8d8be5d3ffb79639ab4cbb8795766d7d95c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6787359/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6787359/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31663044$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bohl, Michael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McBryan, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakaji, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Steve W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Jay D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakarla, U Kumar</creatorcontrib><title>Development and first clinical use of a novel anatomical and biomechanical testing platform for scoliosis</title><title>Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)</title><addtitle>J Spine Surg</addtitle><description>Previous studies have demonstrated that, by using various three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies, synthetic spine models can be manufactured to mimic a human spine in its gross and radiographic anatomy and the biomechanical performance of bony and ligamentous tissue. These manufacturing processes have not, however, been used in combination to create a long-segment, biomimetic model of a patient with scoliosis. The purpose of this study was to describe the development of a biomimetic scoliosis model and early clinical experience using this model as a surgical planning and education platform. Synthetic spine models were printed to mimic the anatomy and biomechanical performance of 2 adult patients with scoliosis. Preoperatively, the models were surgically corrected by the attending surgeon of each patient. Patients then underwent surgical correction of their spinal deformities. Correction of the models was compared to the surgical correction in the patients. Patient 1 had a preoperative coronal Cobb angle of 40° from L1 to S1, as did the patient's synthetic spine model. The patient's spine model was corrected to 17.6°, and the patient achieved a correction of 17.3°. Patient 2 had a preoperative mid-thoracic Cobb angle of 88° and an upper thoracic Cobb angle of 43°. Preoperatively, the patient's spine model was corrected to 19.5° and 9.2° for the mid-thoracic and upper thoracic curves, respectively. Immediately after surgery, the patient's mid-thoracic and upper thoracic Cobb angles measured 18.7° and 9.5°, respectively. In both cases, the use of the spine models preoperatively changed the attending surgeon's operative plan. A novel synthetic spine model for corrective scoliosis procedures is presented, along with early clinical experience using this model as a surgical planning platform. This model has tremendous potential not only as a surgical planning platform but also as an adjunct to patient consent, surgical education, and biomechanical research.</description><subject>Original Study</subject><issn>2414-469X</issn><issn>2414-4630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkE1LAzEQhoMottSevUn-QNtk87W5CFI_oeBFwVtIskkb2d0sm23Bf2_aalEYZgbmmXeYF4BrjOYFRkQsPlOaFwjLOcpBz8C4oJjOKCfo_NTLjxGYphQMolRQJhi_BCOCeYYoHYNw73aujl3j2gHqtoI-9GmAtg5tsLqG2-Rg9FDDNmYuE3qIzWGyh02IjbMbfWQHl4bQrmFX68HHvoE5wWRjHWIK6QpceF0nN_2pE_D--PC2fJ6tXp9elnermS1ISWfMe8t1iRklBS41o1h4KysicaF1WZXGsYp4b4TkRGpDrTGlkExwXolKMksm4Pao221N4yqbH-t1rbo-NLr_UlEH9X_Sho1ax53iohSEySywOArYPqbUO3_axUgdjFfZeLU3XqEcNG_c_D154n9tJt9noIKi</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Bohl, Michael A</creator><creator>McBryan, Sarah</creator><creator>Nakaji, Peter</creator><creator>Chang, Steve W</creator><creator>Turner, Jay D</creator><creator>Kakarla, U Kumar</creator><general>AME Publishing Company</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>Development and first clinical use of a novel anatomical and biomechanical testing platform for scoliosis</title><author>Bohl, Michael A ; McBryan, Sarah ; Nakaji, Peter ; Chang, Steve W ; Turner, Jay D ; Kakarla, U Kumar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2384-5ffc6a81543218a5417fc9d3912aa8d8be5d3ffb79639ab4cbb8795766d7d95c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Original Study</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bohl, Michael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McBryan, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakaji, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Steve W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Jay D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakarla, U Kumar</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bohl, Michael A</au><au>McBryan, Sarah</au><au>Nakaji, Peter</au><au>Chang, Steve W</au><au>Turner, Jay D</au><au>Kakarla, U Kumar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and first clinical use of a novel anatomical and biomechanical testing platform for scoliosis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)</jtitle><addtitle>J Spine Surg</addtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>329</spage><epage>336</epage><pages>329-336</pages><issn>2414-469X</issn><eissn>2414-4630</eissn><abstract>Previous studies have demonstrated that, by using various three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies, synthetic spine models can be manufactured to mimic a human spine in its gross and radiographic anatomy and the biomechanical performance of bony and ligamentous tissue. These manufacturing processes have not, however, been used in combination to create a long-segment, biomimetic model of a patient with scoliosis. The purpose of this study was to describe the development of a biomimetic scoliosis model and early clinical experience using this model as a surgical planning and education platform. Synthetic spine models were printed to mimic the anatomy and biomechanical performance of 2 adult patients with scoliosis. Preoperatively, the models were surgically corrected by the attending surgeon of each patient. Patients then underwent surgical correction of their spinal deformities. Correction of the models was compared to the surgical correction in the patients. Patient 1 had a preoperative coronal Cobb angle of 40° from L1 to S1, as did the patient's synthetic spine model. The patient's spine model was corrected to 17.6°, and the patient achieved a correction of 17.3°. Patient 2 had a preoperative mid-thoracic Cobb angle of 88° and an upper thoracic Cobb angle of 43°. Preoperatively, the patient's spine model was corrected to 19.5° and 9.2° for the mid-thoracic and upper thoracic curves, respectively. Immediately after surgery, the patient's mid-thoracic and upper thoracic Cobb angles measured 18.7° and 9.5°, respectively. In both cases, the use of the spine models preoperatively changed the attending surgeon's operative plan. A novel synthetic spine model for corrective scoliosis procedures is presented, along with early clinical experience using this model as a surgical planning platform. This model has tremendous potential not only as a surgical planning platform but also as an adjunct to patient consent, surgical education, and biomechanical research.</abstract><cop>China</cop><pub>AME Publishing Company</pub><pmid>31663044</pmid><doi>10.21037/jss.2019.09.04</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2414-469X
ispartof Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2019-09, Vol.5 (3), p.329-336
issn 2414-469X
2414-4630
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6787359
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Original Study
title Development and first clinical use of a novel anatomical and biomechanical testing platform for scoliosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T09%3A18%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20first%20clinical%20use%20of%20a%20novel%20anatomical%20and%20biomechanical%20testing%20platform%20for%20scoliosis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20spine%20surgery%20(Hong%20Kong)&rft.au=Bohl,%20Michael%20A&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=329&rft.epage=336&rft.pages=329-336&rft.issn=2414-469X&rft.eissn=2414-4630&rft_id=info:doi/10.21037/jss.2019.09.04&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E31663044%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/31663044&rfr_iscdi=true