Computation of Inertial Motion: Neural Strategies to Resolve Ambiguous Otolith Information
According to Einstein's equivalence principle, inertial accelerations during translational motion are physically indistinguishable from gravitational accelerations experienced during tilting movements. Nevertheless, despite ambiguous sensory representation of motion in primary otolith afferents...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of neuroscience 1999-01, Vol.19 (1), p.316-327 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 327 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 316 |
container_title | The Journal of neuroscience |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Angelaki, Dora E McHenry, M. Quinn Dickman, J. David Newlands, Shawn D Hess, Bernhard J. M |
description | According to Einstein's equivalence principle, inertial accelerations during translational motion are physically indistinguishable from gravitational accelerations experienced during tilting movements. Nevertheless, despite ambiguous sensory representation of motion in primary otolith afferents, primate oculomotor responses are appropriately compensatory for the correct translational component of the head movement. The neural computational strategies used by the brain to discriminate the two and to reliably detect translational motion were investigated in the primate vestibulo-ocular system. The experimental protocols consisted of either lateral translations, roll tilts, or combined translation-tilt paradigms. Results using both steady-state sinusoidal and transient motion profiles in darkness or near target viewing demonstrated that semicircular canal signals are necessary sensory cues for the discrimination between different sources of linear acceleration. When the semicircular canals were inactivated, horizontal eye movements (appropriate for translational motion) could no longer be correlated with head translation. Instead, translational eye movements totally reflected the erroneous primary otolith afferent signals and were correlated with the resultant acceleration, regardless of whether it resulted from translation or tilt. Therefore, at least for frequencies in which the vestibulo-ocular reflex is important for gaze stabilization (>0.1 Hz), the oculomotor system discriminates between head translation and tilt primarily by sensory integration mechanisms rather than frequency segregation of otolith afferent information. Nonlinear neural computational schemes are proposed in which not only linear acceleration information from the otolith receptors but also angular velocity signals from the semicircular canals are simultaneously used by the brain to correctly estimate the source of linear acceleration and to elicit appropriate oculomotor responses. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1523/jneurosci.19-01-00316.1999 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6782388</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17141856</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-b2495aafbb1ea6b1526f887a05db3eb7cf68ecbe0999f582693747d1ffcff50e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUctuEzEUtRCohMInII2QYDfFd2b86gKpigoElUZq6YaN5ZlcJ65mxsH2NOLvcZqoghUrP87jnqtDyDugZ8Cq-uP9iFPwsXNnoEoKJaU18HxX6hmZZYYqq4bCczKjlaAlb0TzkryK8Z5SKiiIE3KipKCKw4z8nPthOyWTnB8Lb4vFiCE50xff_f7rvLjOo_LzNgWTcO0wFskXNxh9_4DFxdC69eSnWCyT713aZL31YXi0e01eWNNHfHM8T8nd58sf86_l1fLLYn5xVXaskalsq0YxY2zbAhre5vjcSikMZau2xlZ0lkvsWqR5PctkxVUtGrECaztrGcX6lHw6-G6ndsBVh2PO2uttcIMJv7U3Tv-LjG6j1_5BcyGrWsps8OFoEPyvCWPSg4sd9r0ZMe-muWIMBK_-SwQBDUjGM_H8QOxyTTGgfUoDVO8r1N-uL-9ulrfzhQalKejHCvW-wix--_c-T9JjZxl_f8A3br3ZuYA6DqbvMxv0brfLfqCzWf0HL1CqZQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17141856</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computation of Inertial Motion: Neural Strategies to Resolve Ambiguous Otolith Information</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Angelaki, Dora E ; McHenry, M. Quinn ; Dickman, J. David ; Newlands, Shawn D ; Hess, Bernhard J. M</creator><creatorcontrib>Angelaki, Dora E ; McHenry, M. Quinn ; Dickman, J. David ; Newlands, Shawn D ; Hess, Bernhard J. M</creatorcontrib><description>According to Einstein's equivalence principle, inertial accelerations during translational motion are physically indistinguishable from gravitational accelerations experienced during tilting movements. Nevertheless, despite ambiguous sensory representation of motion in primary otolith afferents, primate oculomotor responses are appropriately compensatory for the correct translational component of the head movement. The neural computational strategies used by the brain to discriminate the two and to reliably detect translational motion were investigated in the primate vestibulo-ocular system. The experimental protocols consisted of either lateral translations, roll tilts, or combined translation-tilt paradigms. Results using both steady-state sinusoidal and transient motion profiles in darkness or near target viewing demonstrated that semicircular canal signals are necessary sensory cues for the discrimination between different sources of linear acceleration. When the semicircular canals were inactivated, horizontal eye movements (appropriate for translational motion) could no longer be correlated with head translation. Instead, translational eye movements totally reflected the erroneous primary otolith afferent signals and were correlated with the resultant acceleration, regardless of whether it resulted from translation or tilt. Therefore, at least for frequencies in which the vestibulo-ocular reflex is important for gaze stabilization (>0.1 Hz), the oculomotor system discriminates between head translation and tilt primarily by sensory integration mechanisms rather than frequency segregation of otolith afferent information. Nonlinear neural computational schemes are proposed in which not only linear acceleration information from the otolith receptors but also angular velocity signals from the semicircular canals are simultaneously used by the brain to correctly estimate the source of linear acceleration and to elicit appropriate oculomotor responses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-6474</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-2401</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.19-01-00316.1999</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9870961</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Soc Neuroscience</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cues ; Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology ; Ear, Inner - physiology ; Eye Movements - physiology ; Gravitation ; Head Movements - physiology ; Macaca mulatta ; Neural Analyzers - physiology ; Orientation - physiology ; Oscillometry ; Otolithic Membrane - physiology ; Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular - physiology ; Space life sciences</subject><ispartof>The Journal of neuroscience, 1999-01, Vol.19 (1), p.316-327</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1999 Society for Neuroscience 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-b2495aafbb1ea6b1526f887a05db3eb7cf68ecbe0999f582693747d1ffcff50e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-b2495aafbb1ea6b1526f887a05db3eb7cf68ecbe0999f582693747d1ffcff50e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6782388/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6782388/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9870961$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Angelaki, Dora E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McHenry, M. Quinn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickman, J. David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newlands, Shawn D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hess, Bernhard J. M</creatorcontrib><title>Computation of Inertial Motion: Neural Strategies to Resolve Ambiguous Otolith Information</title><title>The Journal of neuroscience</title><addtitle>J Neurosci</addtitle><description>According to Einstein's equivalence principle, inertial accelerations during translational motion are physically indistinguishable from gravitational accelerations experienced during tilting movements. Nevertheless, despite ambiguous sensory representation of motion in primary otolith afferents, primate oculomotor responses are appropriately compensatory for the correct translational component of the head movement. The neural computational strategies used by the brain to discriminate the two and to reliably detect translational motion were investigated in the primate vestibulo-ocular system. The experimental protocols consisted of either lateral translations, roll tilts, or combined translation-tilt paradigms. Results using both steady-state sinusoidal and transient motion profiles in darkness or near target viewing demonstrated that semicircular canal signals are necessary sensory cues for the discrimination between different sources of linear acceleration. When the semicircular canals were inactivated, horizontal eye movements (appropriate for translational motion) could no longer be correlated with head translation. Instead, translational eye movements totally reflected the erroneous primary otolith afferent signals and were correlated with the resultant acceleration, regardless of whether it resulted from translation or tilt. Therefore, at least for frequencies in which the vestibulo-ocular reflex is important for gaze stabilization (>0.1 Hz), the oculomotor system discriminates between head translation and tilt primarily by sensory integration mechanisms rather than frequency segregation of otolith afferent information. Nonlinear neural computational schemes are proposed in which not only linear acceleration information from the otolith receptors but also angular velocity signals from the semicircular canals are simultaneously used by the brain to correctly estimate the source of linear acceleration and to elicit appropriate oculomotor responses.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology</subject><subject>Ear, Inner - physiology</subject><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Gravitation</subject><subject>Head Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Macaca mulatta</subject><subject>Neural Analyzers - physiology</subject><subject>Orientation - physiology</subject><subject>Oscillometry</subject><subject>Otolithic Membrane - physiology</subject><subject>Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular - physiology</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><issn>0270-6474</issn><issn>1529-2401</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUctuEzEUtRCohMInII2QYDfFd2b86gKpigoElUZq6YaN5ZlcJ65mxsH2NOLvcZqoghUrP87jnqtDyDugZ8Cq-uP9iFPwsXNnoEoKJaU18HxX6hmZZYYqq4bCczKjlaAlb0TzkryK8Z5SKiiIE3KipKCKw4z8nPthOyWTnB8Lb4vFiCE50xff_f7rvLjOo_LzNgWTcO0wFskXNxh9_4DFxdC69eSnWCyT713aZL31YXi0e01eWNNHfHM8T8nd58sf86_l1fLLYn5xVXaskalsq0YxY2zbAhre5vjcSikMZau2xlZ0lkvsWqR5PctkxVUtGrECaztrGcX6lHw6-G6ndsBVh2PO2uttcIMJv7U3Tv-LjG6j1_5BcyGrWsps8OFoEPyvCWPSg4sd9r0ZMe-muWIMBK_-SwQBDUjGM_H8QOxyTTGgfUoDVO8r1N-uL-9ulrfzhQalKejHCvW-wix--_c-T9JjZxl_f8A3br3ZuYA6DqbvMxv0brfLfqCzWf0HL1CqZQ</recordid><startdate>19990101</startdate><enddate>19990101</enddate><creator>Angelaki, Dora E</creator><creator>McHenry, M. Quinn</creator><creator>Dickman, J. David</creator><creator>Newlands, Shawn D</creator><creator>Hess, Bernhard J. M</creator><general>Soc Neuroscience</general><general>Society for Neuroscience</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990101</creationdate><title>Computation of Inertial Motion: Neural Strategies to Resolve Ambiguous Otolith Information</title><author>Angelaki, Dora E ; McHenry, M. Quinn ; Dickman, J. David ; Newlands, Shawn D ; Hess, Bernhard J. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-b2495aafbb1ea6b1526f887a05db3eb7cf68ecbe0999f582693747d1ffcff50e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology</topic><topic>Ear, Inner - physiology</topic><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Gravitation</topic><topic>Head Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Macaca mulatta</topic><topic>Neural Analyzers - physiology</topic><topic>Orientation - physiology</topic><topic>Oscillometry</topic><topic>Otolithic Membrane - physiology</topic><topic>Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular - physiology</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Angelaki, Dora E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McHenry, M. Quinn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickman, J. David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newlands, Shawn D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hess, Bernhard J. M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Angelaki, Dora E</au><au>McHenry, M. Quinn</au><au>Dickman, J. David</au><au>Newlands, Shawn D</au><au>Hess, Bernhard J. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computation of Inertial Motion: Neural Strategies to Resolve Ambiguous Otolith Information</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurosci</addtitle><date>1999-01-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>316</spage><epage>327</epage><pages>316-327</pages><issn>0270-6474</issn><eissn>1529-2401</eissn><abstract>According to Einstein's equivalence principle, inertial accelerations during translational motion are physically indistinguishable from gravitational accelerations experienced during tilting movements. Nevertheless, despite ambiguous sensory representation of motion in primary otolith afferents, primate oculomotor responses are appropriately compensatory for the correct translational component of the head movement. The neural computational strategies used by the brain to discriminate the two and to reliably detect translational motion were investigated in the primate vestibulo-ocular system. The experimental protocols consisted of either lateral translations, roll tilts, or combined translation-tilt paradigms. Results using both steady-state sinusoidal and transient motion profiles in darkness or near target viewing demonstrated that semicircular canal signals are necessary sensory cues for the discrimination between different sources of linear acceleration. When the semicircular canals were inactivated, horizontal eye movements (appropriate for translational motion) could no longer be correlated with head translation. Instead, translational eye movements totally reflected the erroneous primary otolith afferent signals and were correlated with the resultant acceleration, regardless of whether it resulted from translation or tilt. Therefore, at least for frequencies in which the vestibulo-ocular reflex is important for gaze stabilization (>0.1 Hz), the oculomotor system discriminates between head translation and tilt primarily by sensory integration mechanisms rather than frequency segregation of otolith afferent information. Nonlinear neural computational schemes are proposed in which not only linear acceleration information from the otolith receptors but also angular velocity signals from the semicircular canals are simultaneously used by the brain to correctly estimate the source of linear acceleration and to elicit appropriate oculomotor responses.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Soc Neuroscience</pub><pmid>9870961</pmid><doi>10.1523/jneurosci.19-01-00316.1999</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0270-6474 |
ispartof | The Journal of neuroscience, 1999-01, Vol.19 (1), p.316-327 |
issn | 0270-6474 1529-2401 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6782388 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Animals Cues Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology Ear, Inner - physiology Eye Movements - physiology Gravitation Head Movements - physiology Macaca mulatta Neural Analyzers - physiology Orientation - physiology Oscillometry Otolithic Membrane - physiology Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular - physiology Space life sciences |
title | Computation of Inertial Motion: Neural Strategies to Resolve Ambiguous Otolith Information |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T06%3A25%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computation%20of%20Inertial%20Motion:%20Neural%20Strategies%20to%20Resolve%20Ambiguous%20Otolith%20Information&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20neuroscience&rft.au=Angelaki,%20Dora%20E&rft.date=1999-01-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=316&rft.epage=327&rft.pages=316-327&rft.issn=0270-6474&rft.eissn=1529-2401&rft_id=info:doi/10.1523/jneurosci.19-01-00316.1999&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E17141856%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17141856&rft_id=info:pmid/9870961&rfr_iscdi=true |