Radial Approach Expertise and Clinical Outcomes of Percutanous Coronary Interventions Performed Using Femoral Approach
We sought to evaluate the impact of experience and proficiency with radial approach (RA) on clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) performed via femoral approach (FA) in the “real-world” national registry. A total of 539 invasive cardiologists performing PCIs in 151 invasive...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical medicine 2019-09, Vol.8 (9), p.1484 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1484 |
container_title | Journal of clinical medicine |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Tokarek, Tomasz Dziewierz, Artur Plens, Krzysztof Rakowski, Tomasz Zabojszcz, Michał Dudek, Dariusz Siudak, Zbigniew |
description | We sought to evaluate the impact of experience and proficiency with radial approach (RA) on clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) performed via femoral approach (FA) in the “real-world” national registry. A total of 539 invasive cardiologists performing PCIs in 151 invasive cardiology centers in Poland between 2014 and 2017 were included. Proficiency threshold was set at >300 PCIs during four consecutive years per individual operator. The majority of operators performed >75% of all PCIs via RA (449 (65.4%)), 143 (20.8%) in 50–75% of cases, 62 (9.0%) in 25–50% and only 33 (4.8%) invasive cardiologists were using RA in |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/jcm8091484 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6780122</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2295484814</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-53d3b08b4038de20e027d622223ee1ceea9c29801c2a24d1cf815dee6196d20e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUUtLAzEQDqLYUr34C3IUoZrXdrMXoRQfhUJF9BzSZLZGdpM12S36740oWucyA_PxPWYQOqPkkvOKXL2aVpKKCikO0JiRspwSLvnh3jxCpym9klxSCkbLYzTitBBECDZGu0dtnW7wvOti0OYF37x3EHuXAGtv8aJx3pm8Xw-9CS0kHGr8ANEMvfZhSHgRYvA6fuCl7yHuwPcu-PQFqUNsweLn5PwW30Ib4p7MCTqqdZPg9KdP0PPtzdPifrpa3y0X89XU8KLopwW3fEPkRuQcFhgBwko7Y7k4ADUAujKskoQappmw1NSSFhZgRquZzXA-QdffvN2wyW5M9pdtqC66NptWQTv1f-Pdi9qGnZqVmTXLTND5D0EMbwOkXrUuGWga7SHnV4xVRb69pCJDL76hJoaUItS_MpSor1-pv1_xT1jFiCo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2295484814</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radial Approach Expertise and Clinical Outcomes of Percutanous Coronary Interventions Performed Using Femoral Approach</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Tokarek, Tomasz ; Dziewierz, Artur ; Plens, Krzysztof ; Rakowski, Tomasz ; Zabojszcz, Michał ; Dudek, Dariusz ; Siudak, Zbigniew</creator><creatorcontrib>Tokarek, Tomasz ; Dziewierz, Artur ; Plens, Krzysztof ; Rakowski, Tomasz ; Zabojszcz, Michał ; Dudek, Dariusz ; Siudak, Zbigniew</creatorcontrib><description>We sought to evaluate the impact of experience and proficiency with radial approach (RA) on clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) performed via femoral approach (FA) in the “real-world” national registry. A total of 539 invasive cardiologists performing PCIs in 151 invasive cardiology centers in Poland between 2014 and 2017 were included. Proficiency threshold was set at >300 PCIs during four consecutive years per individual operator. The majority of operators performed >75% of all PCIs via RA (449 (65.4%)), 143 (20.8%) in 50–75% of cases, 62 (9.0%) in 25–50% and only 33 (4.8%) invasive cardiologists were using RA in <25% of all PCIs. Operators with the highest proficiency in RA were associated with increased risk of periprocedural death, stroke and bleeding complications at access site during angiography via FA. Similarly, higher prevalence of periprocedural mortality during PCI with FA was observed in most experienced radial operators as compared to other groups. The detrimental effect of FA utilization by the most experienced radial operators was observed in both stable angina and acute coronary syndromes. Higher experience and utilization of RA might be linked to worse outcomes of PCIs performed via femoral artery in both stable and acute settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm8091484</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31540442</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>MDPI</publisher><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2019-09, Vol.8 (9), p.1484</ispartof><rights>2019 by the authors. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-53d3b08b4038de20e027d622223ee1ceea9c29801c2a24d1cf815dee6196d20e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-53d3b08b4038de20e027d622223ee1ceea9c29801c2a24d1cf815dee6196d20e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2100-5076 ; 0000-0001-6478-6186 ; 0000-0002-5913-3815 ; 0000-0002-0836-1877</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6780122/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6780122/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27907,27908,53774,53776</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tokarek, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dziewierz, Artur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plens, Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakowski, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zabojszcz, Michał</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dudek, Dariusz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siudak, Zbigniew</creatorcontrib><title>Radial Approach Expertise and Clinical Outcomes of Percutanous Coronary Interventions Performed Using Femoral Approach</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><description>We sought to evaluate the impact of experience and proficiency with radial approach (RA) on clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) performed via femoral approach (FA) in the “real-world” national registry. A total of 539 invasive cardiologists performing PCIs in 151 invasive cardiology centers in Poland between 2014 and 2017 were included. Proficiency threshold was set at >300 PCIs during four consecutive years per individual operator. The majority of operators performed >75% of all PCIs via RA (449 (65.4%)), 143 (20.8%) in 50–75% of cases, 62 (9.0%) in 25–50% and only 33 (4.8%) invasive cardiologists were using RA in <25% of all PCIs. Operators with the highest proficiency in RA were associated with increased risk of periprocedural death, stroke and bleeding complications at access site during angiography via FA. Similarly, higher prevalence of periprocedural mortality during PCI with FA was observed in most experienced radial operators as compared to other groups. The detrimental effect of FA utilization by the most experienced radial operators was observed in both stable angina and acute coronary syndromes. Higher experience and utilization of RA might be linked to worse outcomes of PCIs performed via femoral artery in both stable and acute settings.</description><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUUtLAzEQDqLYUr34C3IUoZrXdrMXoRQfhUJF9BzSZLZGdpM12S36740oWucyA_PxPWYQOqPkkvOKXL2aVpKKCikO0JiRspwSLvnh3jxCpym9klxSCkbLYzTitBBECDZGu0dtnW7wvOti0OYF37x3EHuXAGtv8aJx3pm8Xw-9CS0kHGr8ANEMvfZhSHgRYvA6fuCl7yHuwPcu-PQFqUNsweLn5PwW30Ib4p7MCTqqdZPg9KdP0PPtzdPifrpa3y0X89XU8KLopwW3fEPkRuQcFhgBwko7Y7k4ADUAujKskoQappmw1NSSFhZgRquZzXA-QdffvN2wyW5M9pdtqC66NptWQTv1f-Pdi9qGnZqVmTXLTND5D0EMbwOkXrUuGWga7SHnV4xVRb69pCJDL76hJoaUItS_MpSor1-pv1_xT1jFiCo</recordid><startdate>20190918</startdate><enddate>20190918</enddate><creator>Tokarek, Tomasz</creator><creator>Dziewierz, Artur</creator><creator>Plens, Krzysztof</creator><creator>Rakowski, Tomasz</creator><creator>Zabojszcz, Michał</creator><creator>Dudek, Dariusz</creator><creator>Siudak, Zbigniew</creator><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2100-5076</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6478-6186</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5913-3815</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0836-1877</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190918</creationdate><title>Radial Approach Expertise and Clinical Outcomes of Percutanous Coronary Interventions Performed Using Femoral Approach</title><author>Tokarek, Tomasz ; Dziewierz, Artur ; Plens, Krzysztof ; Rakowski, Tomasz ; Zabojszcz, Michał ; Dudek, Dariusz ; Siudak, Zbigniew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-53d3b08b4038de20e027d622223ee1ceea9c29801c2a24d1cf815dee6196d20e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tokarek, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dziewierz, Artur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plens, Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakowski, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zabojszcz, Michał</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dudek, Dariusz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siudak, Zbigniew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tokarek, Tomasz</au><au>Dziewierz, Artur</au><au>Plens, Krzysztof</au><au>Rakowski, Tomasz</au><au>Zabojszcz, Michał</au><au>Dudek, Dariusz</au><au>Siudak, Zbigniew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radial Approach Expertise and Clinical Outcomes of Percutanous Coronary Interventions Performed Using Femoral Approach</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><date>2019-09-18</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1484</spage><pages>1484-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>We sought to evaluate the impact of experience and proficiency with radial approach (RA) on clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) performed via femoral approach (FA) in the “real-world” national registry. A total of 539 invasive cardiologists performing PCIs in 151 invasive cardiology centers in Poland between 2014 and 2017 were included. Proficiency threshold was set at >300 PCIs during four consecutive years per individual operator. The majority of operators performed >75% of all PCIs via RA (449 (65.4%)), 143 (20.8%) in 50–75% of cases, 62 (9.0%) in 25–50% and only 33 (4.8%) invasive cardiologists were using RA in <25% of all PCIs. Operators with the highest proficiency in RA were associated with increased risk of periprocedural death, stroke and bleeding complications at access site during angiography via FA. Similarly, higher prevalence of periprocedural mortality during PCI with FA was observed in most experienced radial operators as compared to other groups. The detrimental effect of FA utilization by the most experienced radial operators was observed in both stable angina and acute coronary syndromes. Higher experience and utilization of RA might be linked to worse outcomes of PCIs performed via femoral artery in both stable and acute settings.</abstract><pub>MDPI</pub><pmid>31540442</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm8091484</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2100-5076</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6478-6186</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5913-3815</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0836-1877</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2077-0383 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical medicine, 2019-09, Vol.8 (9), p.1484 |
issn | 2077-0383 2077-0383 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6780122 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
title | Radial Approach Expertise and Clinical Outcomes of Percutanous Coronary Interventions Performed Using Femoral Approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T07%3A29%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radial%20Approach%20Expertise%20and%20Clinical%20Outcomes%20of%20Percutanous%20Coronary%20Interventions%20Performed%20Using%20Femoral%20Approach&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Tokarek,%20Tomasz&rft.date=2019-09-18&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1484&rft.pages=1484-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm8091484&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2295484814%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2295484814&rft_id=info:pmid/31540442&rfr_iscdi=true |