Fracture Resistance of Immature Incisors Following Root Filling with Various Bioactive Endodontic Cements Using an Experimental Bovine Tooth Model
Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to compare the fracture resistance of immature bovine roots when using ProRoot MTA, CEM Cement, and Biodentine as root filling materials. Materials and Methods An immature bovine tooth model was developed by removing the coronal and apical portions of 70...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of dentistry 2019-05, Vol.13 (2), p.156-160 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 160 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 156 |
| container_title | European journal of dentistry |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Sarraf, Pegah Nekoofar, Mohammad Hossein Sheykhrezae, Mohammad Saeed Dummer, Paul M. H. |
| description | Abstract
Objective
The aim of this study was to compare the fracture resistance of immature bovine roots when using ProRoot MTA, CEM Cement, and Biodentine as root filling materials.
Materials and Methods
An immature bovine tooth model was developed by removing the coronal and apical portions of 70 bovine incisors 8 mm above and 12 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). The specimens were then divided into five groups: ProRoot MTA, CEM Cement, Biodentine, gutta-percha/AH26 sealer, and control. All groups received a 5-mm apical plug with a temporary restorative material. Then, the remaining root canal space was filled with one of the afore-mentioned materials. After setting, the specimens were mounted in acrylic resin. Then, 3 mm coronal to the CEJ from the buccal side of the teeth and at a 135°angle to the long axis, the specimens were loaded until fracture.
Results
The specimens in the Biodentine (2196 N) and ProRoot MTA (2103 N) groups had significantly greater fracture resistance in comparison to the control group (
p
= 0.01). No significant difference was found between CEM Cement, gutta-percha and sealer AH26, and control groups. No significant differences occurred between the four experimental groups (
p
= 0.45).
Conclusion
Filling the root canal space with ProRoot MTA and Biodentine contributed to higher fracture resistance values. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1055/s-0039-1695654 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6777150</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2289571928</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3434-7ebd7c40be976b19f98e720e45afc592e4b1940c9c72adcbe6accc9d27d8c7013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhS0EoqVlyxJ5ySbFSfwTb5DoaAZGKqpUtWwtx7npuHLswU6m8Bp94jrMMIIFK9vHx5-vzkHoXUkuSsLYx1QQUsui5JJxRl-g07ImrBCU05fHPeMn6E1KD4Twmkv5Gp3UJSOyEeIUPa2iNuMUAd9AsmnU3gAOPV4Pg_4tr72xKcSEV8G58Gj9Pb4JYcQr69x8eLTjBn_X0YYp4UsbMs3uAC99F7rgR2vwAgbwY8J3afZrj5c_txDtLGqHL8POesC3mbnB30IH7hy96rVL8PawnqG71fJ28bW4uv6yXny-KkxNa1oIaDthKGlBCt6WspcNiIoAZbo3TFZAs0iJkUZUujMtcG2MkV0lusYIUtZn6NOeu53aATqT54naqW0eTcdfKmir_r3xdqPuw05xIUQOMAM-HAAx_JggjWqwyYBz2kNOQ1VVI5koZdVk68XeamJIKUJ__KYkai5SJTUXqQ5F5gfv_x7uaP_TXDYUe8O4sTlg9RCm6HNc_wM-A9E6q6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2289571928</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fracture Resistance of Immature Incisors Following Root Filling with Various Bioactive Endodontic Cements Using an Experimental Bovine Tooth Model</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals Open Access</source><creator>Sarraf, Pegah ; Nekoofar, Mohammad Hossein ; Sheykhrezae, Mohammad Saeed ; Dummer, Paul M. H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sarraf, Pegah ; Nekoofar, Mohammad Hossein ; Sheykhrezae, Mohammad Saeed ; Dummer, Paul M. H.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Objective
The aim of this study was to compare the fracture resistance of immature bovine roots when using ProRoot MTA, CEM Cement, and Biodentine as root filling materials.
Materials and Methods
An immature bovine tooth model was developed by removing the coronal and apical portions of 70 bovine incisors 8 mm above and 12 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). The specimens were then divided into five groups: ProRoot MTA, CEM Cement, Biodentine, gutta-percha/AH26 sealer, and control. All groups received a 5-mm apical plug with a temporary restorative material. Then, the remaining root canal space was filled with one of the afore-mentioned materials. After setting, the specimens were mounted in acrylic resin. Then, 3 mm coronal to the CEJ from the buccal side of the teeth and at a 135°angle to the long axis, the specimens were loaded until fracture.
Results
The specimens in the Biodentine (2196 N) and ProRoot MTA (2103 N) groups had significantly greater fracture resistance in comparison to the control group (
p
= 0.01). No significant difference was found between CEM Cement, gutta-percha and sealer AH26, and control groups. No significant differences occurred between the four experimental groups (
p
= 0.45).
Conclusion
Filling the root canal space with ProRoot MTA and Biodentine contributed to higher fracture resistance values.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1305-7456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1305-7464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1695654</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31509877</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd</publisher><subject>Original ; Original Article</subject><ispartof>European journal of dentistry, 2019-05, Vol.13 (2), p.156-160</ispartof><rights>Dental Investigation Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3434-7ebd7c40be976b19f98e720e45afc592e4b1940c9c72adcbe6accc9d27d8c7013</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6777150/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6777150/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,20870,27901,27902,53766,53768,54562,54590</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31509877$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sarraf, Pegah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nekoofar, Mohammad Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheykhrezae, Mohammad Saeed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dummer, Paul M. H.</creatorcontrib><title>Fracture Resistance of Immature Incisors Following Root Filling with Various Bioactive Endodontic Cements Using an Experimental Bovine Tooth Model</title><title>European journal of dentistry</title><addtitle>Eur J Dent</addtitle><description>Abstract
Objective
The aim of this study was to compare the fracture resistance of immature bovine roots when using ProRoot MTA, CEM Cement, and Biodentine as root filling materials.
Materials and Methods
An immature bovine tooth model was developed by removing the coronal and apical portions of 70 bovine incisors 8 mm above and 12 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). The specimens were then divided into five groups: ProRoot MTA, CEM Cement, Biodentine, gutta-percha/AH26 sealer, and control. All groups received a 5-mm apical plug with a temporary restorative material. Then, the remaining root canal space was filled with one of the afore-mentioned materials. After setting, the specimens were mounted in acrylic resin. Then, 3 mm coronal to the CEJ from the buccal side of the teeth and at a 135°angle to the long axis, the specimens were loaded until fracture.
Results
The specimens in the Biodentine (2196 N) and ProRoot MTA (2103 N) groups had significantly greater fracture resistance in comparison to the control group (
p
= 0.01). No significant difference was found between CEM Cement, gutta-percha and sealer AH26, and control groups. No significant differences occurred between the four experimental groups (
p
= 0.45).
Conclusion
Filling the root canal space with ProRoot MTA and Biodentine contributed to higher fracture resistance values.</description><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><issn>1305-7456</issn><issn>1305-7464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0U6</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhS0EoqVlyxJ5ySbFSfwTb5DoaAZGKqpUtWwtx7npuHLswU6m8Bp94jrMMIIFK9vHx5-vzkHoXUkuSsLYx1QQUsui5JJxRl-g07ImrBCU05fHPeMn6E1KD4Twmkv5Gp3UJSOyEeIUPa2iNuMUAd9AsmnU3gAOPV4Pg_4tr72xKcSEV8G58Gj9Pb4JYcQr69x8eLTjBn_X0YYp4UsbMs3uAC99F7rgR2vwAgbwY8J3afZrj5c_txDtLGqHL8POesC3mbnB30IH7hy96rVL8PawnqG71fJ28bW4uv6yXny-KkxNa1oIaDthKGlBCt6WspcNiIoAZbo3TFZAs0iJkUZUujMtcG2MkV0lusYIUtZn6NOeu53aATqT54naqW0eTcdfKmir_r3xdqPuw05xIUQOMAM-HAAx_JggjWqwyYBz2kNOQ1VVI5koZdVk68XeamJIKUJ__KYkai5SJTUXqQ5F5gfv_x7uaP_TXDYUe8O4sTlg9RCm6HNc_wM-A9E6q6w</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Sarraf, Pegah</creator><creator>Nekoofar, Mohammad Hossein</creator><creator>Sheykhrezae, Mohammad Saeed</creator><creator>Dummer, Paul M. H.</creator><general>Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd</general><scope>0U6</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Fracture Resistance of Immature Incisors Following Root Filling with Various Bioactive Endodontic Cements Using an Experimental Bovine Tooth Model</title><author>Sarraf, Pegah ; Nekoofar, Mohammad Hossein ; Sheykhrezae, Mohammad Saeed ; Dummer, Paul M. H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3434-7ebd7c40be976b19f98e720e45afc592e4b1940c9c72adcbe6accc9d27d8c7013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sarraf, Pegah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nekoofar, Mohammad Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheykhrezae, Mohammad Saeed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dummer, Paul M. H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Thieme Connect Journals Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European journal of dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sarraf, Pegah</au><au>Nekoofar, Mohammad Hossein</au><au>Sheykhrezae, Mohammad Saeed</au><au>Dummer, Paul M. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fracture Resistance of Immature Incisors Following Root Filling with Various Bioactive Endodontic Cements Using an Experimental Bovine Tooth Model</atitle><jtitle>European journal of dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Dent</addtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>156</spage><epage>160</epage><pages>156-160</pages><issn>1305-7456</issn><eissn>1305-7464</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Objective
The aim of this study was to compare the fracture resistance of immature bovine roots when using ProRoot MTA, CEM Cement, and Biodentine as root filling materials.
Materials and Methods
An immature bovine tooth model was developed by removing the coronal and apical portions of 70 bovine incisors 8 mm above and 12 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). The specimens were then divided into five groups: ProRoot MTA, CEM Cement, Biodentine, gutta-percha/AH26 sealer, and control. All groups received a 5-mm apical plug with a temporary restorative material. Then, the remaining root canal space was filled with one of the afore-mentioned materials. After setting, the specimens were mounted in acrylic resin. Then, 3 mm coronal to the CEJ from the buccal side of the teeth and at a 135°angle to the long axis, the specimens were loaded until fracture.
Results
The specimens in the Biodentine (2196 N) and ProRoot MTA (2103 N) groups had significantly greater fracture resistance in comparison to the control group (
p
= 0.01). No significant difference was found between CEM Cement, gutta-percha and sealer AH26, and control groups. No significant differences occurred between the four experimental groups (
p
= 0.45).
Conclusion
Filling the root canal space with ProRoot MTA and Biodentine contributed to higher fracture resistance values.</abstract><cop>A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India</cop><pub>Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd</pub><pmid>31509877</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-0039-1695654</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1305-7456 |
| ispartof | European journal of dentistry, 2019-05, Vol.13 (2), p.156-160 |
| issn | 1305-7456 1305-7464 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6777150 |
| source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Thieme Connect Journals Open Access |
| subjects | Original Original Article |
| title | Fracture Resistance of Immature Incisors Following Root Filling with Various Bioactive Endodontic Cements Using an Experimental Bovine Tooth Model |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T01%3A53%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fracture%20Resistance%20of%20Immature%20Incisors%20Following%20Root%20Filling%20with%20Various%20Bioactive%20Endodontic%20Cements%20Using%20an%20Experimental%20Bovine%20Tooth%20Model&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20dentistry&rft.au=Sarraf,%20Pegah&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=156&rft.epage=160&rft.pages=156-160&rft.issn=1305-7456&rft.eissn=1305-7464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-0039-1695654&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2289571928%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2289571928&rft_id=info:pmid/31509877&rfr_iscdi=true |