Time origin and structural analysis of the induced CRISPR/cas9 megabase-sized deletions and duplications involving the Cntn6 gene in mice

In a previous study using one-step CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in mouse zygotes, we created five founders carrying a 1,137 kb deletion and two founders carrying the same deletion, plus a 2,274 kb duplication involving the Cntn6 gene (encoding contactin-6). Using these mice, the present study had the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2019-10, Vol.9 (1), p.14161-9, Article 14161
Hauptverfasser: Pristyazhnyuk, Inna E., Minina, Julia, Korablev, Alexey, Serova, Irina, Fishman, Veniamin, Gridina, Maria, Rozhdestvensky, Timofey S., Gubar, Leonid, Skryabin, Boris V., Serov, Oleg L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 9
container_issue 1
container_start_page 14161
container_title Scientific reports
container_volume 9
creator Pristyazhnyuk, Inna E.
Minina, Julia
Korablev, Alexey
Serova, Irina
Fishman, Veniamin
Gridina, Maria
Rozhdestvensky, Timofey S.
Gubar, Leonid
Skryabin, Boris V.
Serov, Oleg L.
description In a previous study using one-step CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in mouse zygotes, we created five founders carrying a 1,137 kb deletion and two founders carrying the same deletion, plus a 2,274 kb duplication involving the Cntn6 gene (encoding contactin-6). Using these mice, the present study had the following aims: ( i ) to establish stage of origin of these rearrangements; ( ii ) to determine the fate of the deleted DNA fragments; and ( iii ) to estimate the scale of unpredicted DNA changes accompanying the rearrangements. The present study demonstrated that all targeted deletions and duplications occurred at the one-cell stage and more often in one pronucleus only. FISH analysis revealed that there were no traces of the deleted DNA fragments either within chromosome 6 or on other chromosomes. These data were consistent with the Southern blot analysis showing that chromosomes with deletion often had close to expected sizes of removed DNA fragments. High-throughput DNA sequencing of two homozygotes for duplication demonstrated that there were no unexpected significant or scale DNA changes either at the gRNA and joint sites or other genome sites. Thus, our data suggested that CRISPR/Cas9 technology could generate megabase-sized deletions and duplications in mouse gametes at a reasonably specific level.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41598-019-50649-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6775113</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2300160445</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-90cc00e97601eb8d5c13379cf2dd22be5bd25af9c0b5592f77a49b6b72cc5ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u3CAUhVHVqommeYEsKqSunQAGM2wqVaM2jRSpVTJ7hOHaIbJhCvZI6RvkrUPGaZpuyoafc-53gYPQKSVnlNTr88ypUOuKUFUJ0nBV8TfomBEuKlYz9vbV-gid5HxHyhBMcareo6OaCrmupTxGD1s_Ao7J9z5gExzOU5rtNCczlK0Z7rPPOHZ4ugXsg5stOLy5vrz5eX1uTVZ4hN60JkOV_e8iORhg8jHkA8vNu8Fbsxz4sI_D3of-wNqEKTS4h_CExaO38AG968yQ4eR5XqHtt6_bzffq6sfF5ebLVWW55FOliLWEgJINodCunbC0rqWyHXOOsRZE65gwnbKkFUKxTkrDVdu0klkroKtX6POC3c3tCM5CmMpb9S750aR7HY3X_yrB3-o-7nUjpaCl1wp9egak-GuGPOm7OKfyVVmzmhDaEM5FcbHFZVPMOUH30oES_RSgXgLUJUB9CFDzUvTx9d1eSv7EVQz1YshFCj2kv73_g30Ez-6pVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2300160445</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Time origin and structural analysis of the induced CRISPR/cas9 megabase-sized deletions and duplications involving the Cntn6 gene in mice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Nature Free</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Pristyazhnyuk, Inna E. ; Minina, Julia ; Korablev, Alexey ; Serova, Irina ; Fishman, Veniamin ; Gridina, Maria ; Rozhdestvensky, Timofey S. ; Gubar, Leonid ; Skryabin, Boris V. ; Serov, Oleg L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pristyazhnyuk, Inna E. ; Minina, Julia ; Korablev, Alexey ; Serova, Irina ; Fishman, Veniamin ; Gridina, Maria ; Rozhdestvensky, Timofey S. ; Gubar, Leonid ; Skryabin, Boris V. ; Serov, Oleg L.</creatorcontrib><description>In a previous study using one-step CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in mouse zygotes, we created five founders carrying a 1,137 kb deletion and two founders carrying the same deletion, plus a 2,274 kb duplication involving the Cntn6 gene (encoding contactin-6). Using these mice, the present study had the following aims: ( i ) to establish stage of origin of these rearrangements; ( ii ) to determine the fate of the deleted DNA fragments; and ( iii ) to estimate the scale of unpredicted DNA changes accompanying the rearrangements. The present study demonstrated that all targeted deletions and duplications occurred at the one-cell stage and more often in one pronucleus only. FISH analysis revealed that there were no traces of the deleted DNA fragments either within chromosome 6 or on other chromosomes. These data were consistent with the Southern blot analysis showing that chromosomes with deletion often had close to expected sizes of removed DNA fragments. High-throughput DNA sequencing of two homozygotes for duplication demonstrated that there were no unexpected significant or scale DNA changes either at the gRNA and joint sites or other genome sites. Thus, our data suggested that CRISPR/Cas9 technology could generate megabase-sized deletions and duplications in mouse gametes at a reasonably specific level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50649-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31578377</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>14 ; 14/32 ; 45 ; 45/23 ; 45/70 ; 45/77 ; 631/1647/1511 ; 631/1647/767/1424 ; 631/208/1405 ; 64 ; 64/60 ; 692/699/375/366/1373 ; Animals ; Cell Adhesion Molecules, Neuronal - genetics ; Cells, Cultured ; Chromosome 6 ; Chromosome deletion ; Chromosomes ; Chromosomes - genetics ; Clonal deletion ; Contactin ; CRISPR ; CRISPR-Cas Systems ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA sequencing ; Gametes ; Gene Deletion ; Gene Duplication ; Genome editing ; Genomes ; Germ Cells - metabolism ; gRNA ; Homozygote ; Homozygotes ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred C57BL ; multidisciplinary ; Pronucleus ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Structural analysis ; Zygotes</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2019-10, Vol.9 (1), p.14161-9, Article 14161</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-90cc00e97601eb8d5c13379cf2dd22be5bd25af9c0b5592f77a49b6b72cc5ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-90cc00e97601eb8d5c13379cf2dd22be5bd25af9c0b5592f77a49b6b72cc5ef3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0226-4213</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775113/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775113/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,41120,42189,51576,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31578377$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pristyazhnyuk, Inna E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minina, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korablev, Alexey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serova, Irina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fishman, Veniamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gridina, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozhdestvensky, Timofey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gubar, Leonid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skryabin, Boris V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serov, Oleg L.</creatorcontrib><title>Time origin and structural analysis of the induced CRISPR/cas9 megabase-sized deletions and duplications involving the Cntn6 gene in mice</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>In a previous study using one-step CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in mouse zygotes, we created five founders carrying a 1,137 kb deletion and two founders carrying the same deletion, plus a 2,274 kb duplication involving the Cntn6 gene (encoding contactin-6). Using these mice, the present study had the following aims: ( i ) to establish stage of origin of these rearrangements; ( ii ) to determine the fate of the deleted DNA fragments; and ( iii ) to estimate the scale of unpredicted DNA changes accompanying the rearrangements. The present study demonstrated that all targeted deletions and duplications occurred at the one-cell stage and more often in one pronucleus only. FISH analysis revealed that there were no traces of the deleted DNA fragments either within chromosome 6 or on other chromosomes. These data were consistent with the Southern blot analysis showing that chromosomes with deletion often had close to expected sizes of removed DNA fragments. High-throughput DNA sequencing of two homozygotes for duplication demonstrated that there were no unexpected significant or scale DNA changes either at the gRNA and joint sites or other genome sites. Thus, our data suggested that CRISPR/Cas9 technology could generate megabase-sized deletions and duplications in mouse gametes at a reasonably specific level.</description><subject>14</subject><subject>14/32</subject><subject>45</subject><subject>45/23</subject><subject>45/70</subject><subject>45/77</subject><subject>631/1647/1511</subject><subject>631/1647/767/1424</subject><subject>631/208/1405</subject><subject>64</subject><subject>64/60</subject><subject>692/699/375/366/1373</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cell Adhesion Molecules, Neuronal - genetics</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Chromosome 6</subject><subject>Chromosome deletion</subject><subject>Chromosomes</subject><subject>Chromosomes - genetics</subject><subject>Clonal deletion</subject><subject>Contactin</subject><subject>CRISPR</subject><subject>CRISPR-Cas Systems</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA sequencing</subject><subject>Gametes</subject><subject>Gene Deletion</subject><subject>Gene Duplication</subject><subject>Genome editing</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Germ Cells - metabolism</subject><subject>gRNA</subject><subject>Homozygote</subject><subject>Homozygotes</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred C57BL</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Pronucleus</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Structural analysis</subject><subject>Zygotes</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u3CAUhVHVqommeYEsKqSunQAGM2wqVaM2jRSpVTJ7hOHaIbJhCvZI6RvkrUPGaZpuyoafc-53gYPQKSVnlNTr88ypUOuKUFUJ0nBV8TfomBEuKlYz9vbV-gid5HxHyhBMcareo6OaCrmupTxGD1s_Ao7J9z5gExzOU5rtNCczlK0Z7rPPOHZ4ugXsg5stOLy5vrz5eX1uTVZ4hN60JkOV_e8iORhg8jHkA8vNu8Fbsxz4sI_D3of-wNqEKTS4h_CExaO38AG968yQ4eR5XqHtt6_bzffq6sfF5ebLVWW55FOliLWEgJINodCunbC0rqWyHXOOsRZE65gwnbKkFUKxTkrDVdu0klkroKtX6POC3c3tCM5CmMpb9S750aR7HY3X_yrB3-o-7nUjpaCl1wp9egak-GuGPOm7OKfyVVmzmhDaEM5FcbHFZVPMOUH30oES_RSgXgLUJUB9CFDzUvTx9d1eSv7EVQz1YshFCj2kv73_g30Ez-6pVQ</recordid><startdate>20191002</startdate><enddate>20191002</enddate><creator>Pristyazhnyuk, Inna E.</creator><creator>Minina, Julia</creator><creator>Korablev, Alexey</creator><creator>Serova, Irina</creator><creator>Fishman, Veniamin</creator><creator>Gridina, Maria</creator><creator>Rozhdestvensky, Timofey S.</creator><creator>Gubar, Leonid</creator><creator>Skryabin, Boris V.</creator><creator>Serov, Oleg L.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0226-4213</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191002</creationdate><title>Time origin and structural analysis of the induced CRISPR/cas9 megabase-sized deletions and duplications involving the Cntn6 gene in mice</title><author>Pristyazhnyuk, Inna E. ; Minina, Julia ; Korablev, Alexey ; Serova, Irina ; Fishman, Veniamin ; Gridina, Maria ; Rozhdestvensky, Timofey S. ; Gubar, Leonid ; Skryabin, Boris V. ; Serov, Oleg L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-90cc00e97601eb8d5c13379cf2dd22be5bd25af9c0b5592f77a49b6b72cc5ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>14</topic><topic>14/32</topic><topic>45</topic><topic>45/23</topic><topic>45/70</topic><topic>45/77</topic><topic>631/1647/1511</topic><topic>631/1647/767/1424</topic><topic>631/208/1405</topic><topic>64</topic><topic>64/60</topic><topic>692/699/375/366/1373</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cell Adhesion Molecules, Neuronal - genetics</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Chromosome 6</topic><topic>Chromosome deletion</topic><topic>Chromosomes</topic><topic>Chromosomes - genetics</topic><topic>Clonal deletion</topic><topic>Contactin</topic><topic>CRISPR</topic><topic>CRISPR-Cas Systems</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA sequencing</topic><topic>Gametes</topic><topic>Gene Deletion</topic><topic>Gene Duplication</topic><topic>Genome editing</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Germ Cells - metabolism</topic><topic>gRNA</topic><topic>Homozygote</topic><topic>Homozygotes</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred C57BL</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Pronucleus</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Structural analysis</topic><topic>Zygotes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pristyazhnyuk, Inna E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minina, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korablev, Alexey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serova, Irina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fishman, Veniamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gridina, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozhdestvensky, Timofey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gubar, Leonid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skryabin, Boris V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serov, Oleg L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pristyazhnyuk, Inna E.</au><au>Minina, Julia</au><au>Korablev, Alexey</au><au>Serova, Irina</au><au>Fishman, Veniamin</au><au>Gridina, Maria</au><au>Rozhdestvensky, Timofey S.</au><au>Gubar, Leonid</au><au>Skryabin, Boris V.</au><au>Serov, Oleg L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Time origin and structural analysis of the induced CRISPR/cas9 megabase-sized deletions and duplications involving the Cntn6 gene in mice</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2019-10-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>14161</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>14161-9</pages><artnum>14161</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>In a previous study using one-step CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in mouse zygotes, we created five founders carrying a 1,137 kb deletion and two founders carrying the same deletion, plus a 2,274 kb duplication involving the Cntn6 gene (encoding contactin-6). Using these mice, the present study had the following aims: ( i ) to establish stage of origin of these rearrangements; ( ii ) to determine the fate of the deleted DNA fragments; and ( iii ) to estimate the scale of unpredicted DNA changes accompanying the rearrangements. The present study demonstrated that all targeted deletions and duplications occurred at the one-cell stage and more often in one pronucleus only. FISH analysis revealed that there were no traces of the deleted DNA fragments either within chromosome 6 or on other chromosomes. These data were consistent with the Southern blot analysis showing that chromosomes with deletion often had close to expected sizes of removed DNA fragments. High-throughput DNA sequencing of two homozygotes for duplication demonstrated that there were no unexpected significant or scale DNA changes either at the gRNA and joint sites or other genome sites. Thus, our data suggested that CRISPR/Cas9 technology could generate megabase-sized deletions and duplications in mouse gametes at a reasonably specific level.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>31578377</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-019-50649-4</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0226-4213</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-2322
ispartof Scientific reports, 2019-10, Vol.9 (1), p.14161-9, Article 14161
issn 2045-2322
2045-2322
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6775113
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Nature Free; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects 14
14/32
45
45/23
45/70
45/77
631/1647/1511
631/1647/767/1424
631/208/1405
64
64/60
692/699/375/366/1373
Animals
Cell Adhesion Molecules, Neuronal - genetics
Cells, Cultured
Chromosome 6
Chromosome deletion
Chromosomes
Chromosomes - genetics
Clonal deletion
Contactin
CRISPR
CRISPR-Cas Systems
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
DNA sequencing
Gametes
Gene Deletion
Gene Duplication
Genome editing
Genomes
Germ Cells - metabolism
gRNA
Homozygote
Homozygotes
Humanities and Social Sciences
Mice
Mice, Inbred C57BL
multidisciplinary
Pronucleus
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
Structural analysis
Zygotes
title Time origin and structural analysis of the induced CRISPR/cas9 megabase-sized deletions and duplications involving the Cntn6 gene in mice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T18%3A57%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Time%20origin%20and%20structural%20analysis%20of%20the%20induced%20CRISPR/cas9%20megabase-sized%20deletions%20and%20duplications%20involving%20the%20Cntn6%20gene%20in%20mice&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Pristyazhnyuk,%20Inna%20E.&rft.date=2019-10-02&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=14161&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=14161-9&rft.artnum=14161&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-019-50649-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2300160445%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2300160445&rft_id=info:pmid/31578377&rfr_iscdi=true