Heritable Genome Editing in a Global Context: National and International Policy Challenges

A central problem for the international governance of heritable germline gene editing is that there are important differences in attitudes and values as well as ethical and health care considerations around the world. These differences are reflected in a complicated and diverse regulatory landscape....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Hastings Center report 2019-05, Vol.49 (3), p.30-42
Hauptverfasser: ROSEMANN, ACHIM, BALEN, ADAM, NERLICH, BRIGITTE, HAUSKELLER, CHRISTINE, SLEEBOOM-FAULKNER, MARGARET, HARTLEY, SARAH, ZHANG, XINQING, LEE, NICK
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 42
container_issue 3
container_start_page 30
container_title The Hastings Center report
container_volume 49
creator ROSEMANN, ACHIM
BALEN, ADAM
NERLICH, BRIGITTE
HAUSKELLER, CHRISTINE
SLEEBOOM-FAULKNER, MARGARET
HARTLEY, SARAH
ZHANG, XINQING
LEE, NICK
description A central problem for the international governance of heritable germline gene editing is that there are important differences in attitudes and values as well as ethical and health care considerations around the world. These differences are reflected in a complicated and diverse regulatory landscape. Several publications have discussed whether reproductive uses would be legally permissible in individual countries and whether clinical applications could emerge in the context of regulatory gaps and gray areas. Systematic comparative studies that explore issues related to the governance of this technology from different national and international perspectives are needed to address the lack of knowledge in this area. In this research report, we contribute to filling this gap by presenting views of stakeholders in the United Kingdom on challenges to the governance of heritable genome editing. We present findings from a multistakeholder study conducted in the United Kingdom between October 2016 and January 2018 and funded by the Wellcome Trust. This research included interviews, literature analysis, and a workshop. We involved leading U.K. scientists, in vitro fertilization clinicians, and representatives from regulatory bodies, patient organizations, and other civil societal organizations, as well as fertility companies. Part one of this article explores stakeholder perceptions of possible global developments in heritable genome editing and associated risks and governance challenges. Part two presents a range of policy options that were generated during the workshop in relation to the challenges discussed in part one.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hast.1006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6773219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26775959</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26775959</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4656-4de837552a4720843278f56864989ea08b541cfca23099bf00044c37505a03643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9LAzEQxYMotlYPfgBlwYuCa_N_NxehlNoKBQ9W8Bay22ybst3UZKv225ultahgLhmY33u8mQHgHME7BCHuzpWvm4ofgDZiDMeI8tdD0IZQkBgSQlvgxPsFDI-m5Bi0CMJcYI7b4HaknalVVupoqCu71NFgampTzSJTRSoaljZTZdS3Va0_61NwVKjS67Pd3wEvD4NJfxSPn4aP_d44zilnPKZTnZIk5FA0wTClBCdpwXjKqUiFVjDNGEV5kStMoBBZ0cSieVBApiDhlHTA_dZ3tc6WeprrqnaqlCtnlsptpFVG_u5UZi5n9l3yJCEYiWBwvTNw9m2tfS2Xxue6LFWl7dpLjBnGHFGGA3r1B13YtavCeIESHBHBwgY74GZL5c5673SxD4OgbG4gmxs0FQ_s5c_0e_J76QHoboEPU-rN_05y1Hue7CwvtoqFr63bK3CYlwkmyBf13JdE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2296139503</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Heritable Genome Editing in a Global Context: National and International Policy Challenges</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>ROSEMANN, ACHIM ; BALEN, ADAM ; NERLICH, BRIGITTE ; HAUSKELLER, CHRISTINE ; SLEEBOOM-FAULKNER, MARGARET ; HARTLEY, SARAH ; ZHANG, XINQING ; LEE, NICK</creator><creatorcontrib>ROSEMANN, ACHIM ; BALEN, ADAM ; NERLICH, BRIGITTE ; HAUSKELLER, CHRISTINE ; SLEEBOOM-FAULKNER, MARGARET ; HARTLEY, SARAH ; ZHANG, XINQING ; LEE, NICK</creatorcontrib><description>A central problem for the international governance of heritable germline gene editing is that there are important differences in attitudes and values as well as ethical and health care considerations around the world. These differences are reflected in a complicated and diverse regulatory landscape. Several publications have discussed whether reproductive uses would be legally permissible in individual countries and whether clinical applications could emerge in the context of regulatory gaps and gray areas. Systematic comparative studies that explore issues related to the governance of this technology from different national and international perspectives are needed to address the lack of knowledge in this area. In this research report, we contribute to filling this gap by presenting views of stakeholders in the United Kingdom on challenges to the governance of heritable genome editing. We present findings from a multistakeholder study conducted in the United Kingdom between October 2016 and January 2018 and funded by the Wellcome Trust. This research included interviews, literature analysis, and a workshop. We involved leading U.K. scientists, in vitro fertilization clinicians, and representatives from regulatory bodies, patient organizations, and other civil societal organizations, as well as fertility companies. Part one of this article explores stakeholder perceptions of possible global developments in heritable genome editing and associated risks and governance challenges. Part two presents a range of policy options that were generated during the workshop in relation to the challenges discussed in part one.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-0334</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-146X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hast.1006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31269262</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley</publisher><subject>Delivery of Health Care - organization &amp; administration ; Fertility ; Gene Editing ; Genome editing ; Genomes ; Humans ; Internationality ; Interviews as Topic ; Public Policy ; Qualitative Research ; Stakeholder Participation ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>The Hastings Center report, 2019-05, Vol.49 (3), p.30-42</ispartof><rights>2019 The Hastings Center</rights><rights>2019 The Hastings Center.</rights><rights>2019 The Authors. The Hastings Center Report published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of The Hastings Center.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4656-4de837552a4720843278f56864989ea08b541cfca23099bf00044c37505a03643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4656-4de837552a4720843278f56864989ea08b541cfca23099bf00044c37505a03643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26775959$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26775959$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,804,886,1418,27928,27929,45578,45579,58021,58254</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31269262$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ROSEMANN, ACHIM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BALEN, ADAM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NERLICH, BRIGITTE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAUSKELLER, CHRISTINE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SLEEBOOM-FAULKNER, MARGARET</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARTLEY, SARAH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHANG, XINQING</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEE, NICK</creatorcontrib><title>Heritable Genome Editing in a Global Context: National and International Policy Challenges</title><title>The Hastings Center report</title><addtitle>Hastings Cent Rep</addtitle><description>A central problem for the international governance of heritable germline gene editing is that there are important differences in attitudes and values as well as ethical and health care considerations around the world. These differences are reflected in a complicated and diverse regulatory landscape. Several publications have discussed whether reproductive uses would be legally permissible in individual countries and whether clinical applications could emerge in the context of regulatory gaps and gray areas. Systematic comparative studies that explore issues related to the governance of this technology from different national and international perspectives are needed to address the lack of knowledge in this area. In this research report, we contribute to filling this gap by presenting views of stakeholders in the United Kingdom on challenges to the governance of heritable genome editing. We present findings from a multistakeholder study conducted in the United Kingdom between October 2016 and January 2018 and funded by the Wellcome Trust. This research included interviews, literature analysis, and a workshop. We involved leading U.K. scientists, in vitro fertilization clinicians, and representatives from regulatory bodies, patient organizations, and other civil societal organizations, as well as fertility companies. Part one of this article explores stakeholder perceptions of possible global developments in heritable genome editing and associated risks and governance challenges. Part two presents a range of policy options that were generated during the workshop in relation to the challenges discussed in part one.</description><subject>Delivery of Health Care - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Gene Editing</subject><subject>Genome editing</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internationality</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Stakeholder Participation</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0093-0334</issn><issn>1552-146X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9LAzEQxYMotlYPfgBlwYuCa_N_NxehlNoKBQ9W8Bay22ybst3UZKv225ultahgLhmY33u8mQHgHME7BCHuzpWvm4ofgDZiDMeI8tdD0IZQkBgSQlvgxPsFDI-m5Bi0CMJcYI7b4HaknalVVupoqCu71NFgampTzSJTRSoaljZTZdS3Va0_61NwVKjS67Pd3wEvD4NJfxSPn4aP_d44zilnPKZTnZIk5FA0wTClBCdpwXjKqUiFVjDNGEV5kStMoBBZ0cSieVBApiDhlHTA_dZ3tc6WeprrqnaqlCtnlsptpFVG_u5UZi5n9l3yJCEYiWBwvTNw9m2tfS2Xxue6LFWl7dpLjBnGHFGGA3r1B13YtavCeIESHBHBwgY74GZL5c5673SxD4OgbG4gmxs0FQ_s5c_0e_J76QHoboEPU-rN_05y1Hue7CwvtoqFr63bK3CYlwkmyBf13JdE</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>ROSEMANN, ACHIM</creator><creator>BALEN, ADAM</creator><creator>NERLICH, BRIGITTE</creator><creator>HAUSKELLER, CHRISTINE</creator><creator>SLEEBOOM-FAULKNER, MARGARET</creator><creator>HARTLEY, SARAH</creator><creator>ZHANG, XINQING</creator><creator>LEE, NICK</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Heritable Genome Editing in a Global Context</title><author>ROSEMANN, ACHIM ; BALEN, ADAM ; NERLICH, BRIGITTE ; HAUSKELLER, CHRISTINE ; SLEEBOOM-FAULKNER, MARGARET ; HARTLEY, SARAH ; ZHANG, XINQING ; LEE, NICK</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4656-4de837552a4720843278f56864989ea08b541cfca23099bf00044c37505a03643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Delivery of Health Care - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Gene Editing</topic><topic>Genome editing</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internationality</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Stakeholder Participation</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ROSEMANN, ACHIM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BALEN, ADAM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NERLICH, BRIGITTE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAUSKELLER, CHRISTINE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SLEEBOOM-FAULKNER, MARGARET</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARTLEY, SARAH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHANG, XINQING</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEE, NICK</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Hastings Center report</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ROSEMANN, ACHIM</au><au>BALEN, ADAM</au><au>NERLICH, BRIGITTE</au><au>HAUSKELLER, CHRISTINE</au><au>SLEEBOOM-FAULKNER, MARGARET</au><au>HARTLEY, SARAH</au><au>ZHANG, XINQING</au><au>LEE, NICK</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Heritable Genome Editing in a Global Context: National and International Policy Challenges</atitle><jtitle>The Hastings Center report</jtitle><addtitle>Hastings Cent Rep</addtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>30</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>30-42</pages><issn>0093-0334</issn><eissn>1552-146X</eissn><abstract>A central problem for the international governance of heritable germline gene editing is that there are important differences in attitudes and values as well as ethical and health care considerations around the world. These differences are reflected in a complicated and diverse regulatory landscape. Several publications have discussed whether reproductive uses would be legally permissible in individual countries and whether clinical applications could emerge in the context of regulatory gaps and gray areas. Systematic comparative studies that explore issues related to the governance of this technology from different national and international perspectives are needed to address the lack of knowledge in this area. In this research report, we contribute to filling this gap by presenting views of stakeholders in the United Kingdom on challenges to the governance of heritable genome editing. We present findings from a multistakeholder study conducted in the United Kingdom between October 2016 and January 2018 and funded by the Wellcome Trust. This research included interviews, literature analysis, and a workshop. We involved leading U.K. scientists, in vitro fertilization clinicians, and representatives from regulatory bodies, patient organizations, and other civil societal organizations, as well as fertility companies. Part one of this article explores stakeholder perceptions of possible global developments in heritable genome editing and associated risks and governance challenges. Part two presents a range of policy options that were generated during the workshop in relation to the challenges discussed in part one.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><pmid>31269262</pmid><doi>10.1002/hast.1006</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0093-0334
ispartof The Hastings Center report, 2019-05, Vol.49 (3), p.30-42
issn 0093-0334
1552-146X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6773219
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Delivery of Health Care - organization & administration
Fertility
Gene Editing
Genome editing
Genomes
Humans
Internationality
Interviews as Topic
Public Policy
Qualitative Research
Stakeholder Participation
United Kingdom
title Heritable Genome Editing in a Global Context: National and International Policy Challenges
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T14%3A39%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Heritable%20Genome%20Editing%20in%20a%20Global%20Context:%20National%20and%20International%20Policy%20Challenges&rft.jtitle=The%20Hastings%20Center%20report&rft.au=ROSEMANN,%20ACHIM&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=30-42&rft.issn=0093-0334&rft.eissn=1552-146X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hast.1006&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E26775959%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2296139503&rft_id=info:pmid/31269262&rft_jstor_id=26775959&rfr_iscdi=true