What and When: Parallel and Convergent Processing in Motor Control

Successful motor behavior requires making appropriate response (response selection) at the right time (timing adjustment). Earlier psychological studies have suggested that the response selection and timing adjustment processes are performed serially in separate stages. We tested this hypothesis usi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of neuroscience 2000-04, Vol.20 (7), p.2691-2700
Hauptverfasser: Sakai, Katsuyuki, Hikosaka, Okihide, Takino, Ryousuke, Miyauchi, Satoru, Nielsen, Matthew, Tamada, Tomoe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2700
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2691
container_title The Journal of neuroscience
container_volume 20
creator Sakai, Katsuyuki
Hikosaka, Okihide
Takino, Ryousuke
Miyauchi, Satoru
Nielsen, Matthew
Tamada, Tomoe
description Successful motor behavior requires making appropriate response (response selection) at the right time (timing adjustment). Earlier psychological studies have suggested that the response selection and timing adjustment processes are performed serially in separate stages. We tested this hypothesis using functional magnetic resonance imaging. The subjects performed a choice reaction time task in four conditions: two (on-line response selection required or not) by two (on-line timing adjustment required or not). We found that the neural correlates for the two processes were indeed separate: the anterior medial premotor cortex (presupplementary motor area) was selectively active in response selection, whereas the cerebellar posterior lobe was selectively active in timing adjustment. However, the functional separation was only partial in that the lateral premotor cortex and the intraparietal sulcus were active equally for response selection and timing adjustment. The lateral premotor cortex was most active when both processes were required, suggesting that it integrates the information on response selection and the information on timing adjustment; alternatively, it might contribute to the allocation of attentional resources during dual information processing. The intraparietal sulcus was equally active when either response selection or timing adjustment was required, suggesting that it modifies, rather than integrates, these processes. Furthermore, our results suggest that these activations related to response selection and timing adjustment were distinct from sensory or motor processes.
doi_str_mv 10.1523/jneurosci.20-07-02691.2000
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6772247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70997739</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-3fc25d6812222d981981416b562cff9b30938611581198f55945f93f15e7491c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV9PFDEUxRsjkRX5CmTCg2-D97bTuVMeTHSDigEhKuGxme12dkpmW2xn2fjt7bKEP082Tdr0_O7JaQ5jhwhHKLn4cOPtKoZk3BGHEqgEXivMd4BXbJIJVfIK8DWbACco64qqXfY2pZsMECC9YbsIxJWQMGGfr_t2LFo_L65764-Lyza2w2CH-6dp8Hc2Lqwfi8sYjE3J-UXhfHEexhA38hjD8I7tdO2Q7P7Duceuvpz8nn4rzy6-nk4_nZWmBhpL0Rku53WDPK-5ajDvCuuZrLnpOjUToERTI8oGs9RJqSrZKdGhtFQpNGKPfdz63q5mSzs3OVbOqm-jW7bxrw6t0y8V73q9CHe6JuK8omzw_sEghj8rm0a9dMnYYWi9DaukCZQiEuq_IFIDAjhm8HgLmtxHirZ7TIOgN13p7z9Orn5e_Jqeag4aSN93pTdd5eGD5_95Nrot5ylG7xb92kWr0zKXk3HU6_U6G5Le2Il_pUmd-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17803021</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What and When: Parallel and Convergent Processing in Motor Control</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sakai, Katsuyuki ; Hikosaka, Okihide ; Takino, Ryousuke ; Miyauchi, Satoru ; Nielsen, Matthew ; Tamada, Tomoe</creator><creatorcontrib>Sakai, Katsuyuki ; Hikosaka, Okihide ; Takino, Ryousuke ; Miyauchi, Satoru ; Nielsen, Matthew ; Tamada, Tomoe</creatorcontrib><description>Successful motor behavior requires making appropriate response (response selection) at the right time (timing adjustment). Earlier psychological studies have suggested that the response selection and timing adjustment processes are performed serially in separate stages. We tested this hypothesis using functional magnetic resonance imaging. The subjects performed a choice reaction time task in four conditions: two (on-line response selection required or not) by two (on-line timing adjustment required or not). We found that the neural correlates for the two processes were indeed separate: the anterior medial premotor cortex (presupplementary motor area) was selectively active in response selection, whereas the cerebellar posterior lobe was selectively active in timing adjustment. However, the functional separation was only partial in that the lateral premotor cortex and the intraparietal sulcus were active equally for response selection and timing adjustment. The lateral premotor cortex was most active when both processes were required, suggesting that it integrates the information on response selection and the information on timing adjustment; alternatively, it might contribute to the allocation of attentional resources during dual information processing. The intraparietal sulcus was equally active when either response selection or timing adjustment was required, suggesting that it modifies, rather than integrates, these processes. Furthermore, our results suggest that these activations related to response selection and timing adjustment were distinct from sensory or motor processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-6474</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-2401</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.20-07-02691.2000</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10729350</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Soc Neuroscience</publisher><subject>Adult ; Auditory Perception - physiology ; Brain Mapping ; Choice Behavior - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Visual Perception - physiology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of neuroscience, 2000-04, Vol.20 (7), p.2691-2700</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2000 Society for Neuroscience 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-3fc25d6812222d981981416b562cff9b30938611581198f55945f93f15e7491c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-3fc25d6812222d981981416b562cff9b30938611581198f55945f93f15e7491c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6772247/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6772247/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10729350$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sakai, Katsuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hikosaka, Okihide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takino, Ryousuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyauchi, Satoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamada, Tomoe</creatorcontrib><title>What and When: Parallel and Convergent Processing in Motor Control</title><title>The Journal of neuroscience</title><addtitle>J Neurosci</addtitle><description>Successful motor behavior requires making appropriate response (response selection) at the right time (timing adjustment). Earlier psychological studies have suggested that the response selection and timing adjustment processes are performed serially in separate stages. We tested this hypothesis using functional magnetic resonance imaging. The subjects performed a choice reaction time task in four conditions: two (on-line response selection required or not) by two (on-line timing adjustment required or not). We found that the neural correlates for the two processes were indeed separate: the anterior medial premotor cortex (presupplementary motor area) was selectively active in response selection, whereas the cerebellar posterior lobe was selectively active in timing adjustment. However, the functional separation was only partial in that the lateral premotor cortex and the intraparietal sulcus were active equally for response selection and timing adjustment. The lateral premotor cortex was most active when both processes were required, suggesting that it integrates the information on response selection and the information on timing adjustment; alternatively, it might contribute to the allocation of attentional resources during dual information processing. The intraparietal sulcus was equally active when either response selection or timing adjustment was required, suggesting that it modifies, rather than integrates, these processes. Furthermore, our results suggest that these activations related to response selection and timing adjustment were distinct from sensory or motor processes.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Auditory Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Choice Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><issn>0270-6474</issn><issn>1529-2401</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV9PFDEUxRsjkRX5CmTCg2-D97bTuVMeTHSDigEhKuGxme12dkpmW2xn2fjt7bKEP082Tdr0_O7JaQ5jhwhHKLn4cOPtKoZk3BGHEqgEXivMd4BXbJIJVfIK8DWbACco64qqXfY2pZsMECC9YbsIxJWQMGGfr_t2LFo_L65764-Lyza2w2CH-6dp8Hc2Lqwfi8sYjE3J-UXhfHEexhA38hjD8I7tdO2Q7P7Duceuvpz8nn4rzy6-nk4_nZWmBhpL0Rku53WDPK-5ajDvCuuZrLnpOjUToERTI8oGs9RJqSrZKdGhtFQpNGKPfdz63q5mSzs3OVbOqm-jW7bxrw6t0y8V73q9CHe6JuK8omzw_sEghj8rm0a9dMnYYWi9DaukCZQiEuq_IFIDAjhm8HgLmtxHirZ7TIOgN13p7z9Orn5e_Jqeag4aSN93pTdd5eGD5_95Nrot5ylG7xb92kWr0zKXk3HU6_U6G5Le2Il_pUmd-w</recordid><startdate>20000401</startdate><enddate>20000401</enddate><creator>Sakai, Katsuyuki</creator><creator>Hikosaka, Okihide</creator><creator>Takino, Ryousuke</creator><creator>Miyauchi, Satoru</creator><creator>Nielsen, Matthew</creator><creator>Tamada, Tomoe</creator><general>Soc Neuroscience</general><general>Society for Neuroscience</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000401</creationdate><title>What and When: Parallel and Convergent Processing in Motor Control</title><author>Sakai, Katsuyuki ; Hikosaka, Okihide ; Takino, Ryousuke ; Miyauchi, Satoru ; Nielsen, Matthew ; Tamada, Tomoe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-3fc25d6812222d981981416b562cff9b30938611581198f55945f93f15e7491c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Auditory Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Choice Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sakai, Katsuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hikosaka, Okihide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takino, Ryousuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyauchi, Satoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamada, Tomoe</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sakai, Katsuyuki</au><au>Hikosaka, Okihide</au><au>Takino, Ryousuke</au><au>Miyauchi, Satoru</au><au>Nielsen, Matthew</au><au>Tamada, Tomoe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What and When: Parallel and Convergent Processing in Motor Control</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurosci</addtitle><date>2000-04-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2691</spage><epage>2700</epage><pages>2691-2700</pages><issn>0270-6474</issn><eissn>1529-2401</eissn><abstract>Successful motor behavior requires making appropriate response (response selection) at the right time (timing adjustment). Earlier psychological studies have suggested that the response selection and timing adjustment processes are performed serially in separate stages. We tested this hypothesis using functional magnetic resonance imaging. The subjects performed a choice reaction time task in four conditions: two (on-line response selection required or not) by two (on-line timing adjustment required or not). We found that the neural correlates for the two processes were indeed separate: the anterior medial premotor cortex (presupplementary motor area) was selectively active in response selection, whereas the cerebellar posterior lobe was selectively active in timing adjustment. However, the functional separation was only partial in that the lateral premotor cortex and the intraparietal sulcus were active equally for response selection and timing adjustment. The lateral premotor cortex was most active when both processes were required, suggesting that it integrates the information on response selection and the information on timing adjustment; alternatively, it might contribute to the allocation of attentional resources during dual information processing. The intraparietal sulcus was equally active when either response selection or timing adjustment was required, suggesting that it modifies, rather than integrates, these processes. Furthermore, our results suggest that these activations related to response selection and timing adjustment were distinct from sensory or motor processes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Soc Neuroscience</pub><pmid>10729350</pmid><doi>10.1523/jneurosci.20-07-02691.2000</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0270-6474
ispartof The Journal of neuroscience, 2000-04, Vol.20 (7), p.2691-2700
issn 0270-6474
1529-2401
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6772247
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Auditory Perception - physiology
Brain Mapping
Choice Behavior - physiology
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Reaction Time - physiology
Task Performance and Analysis
Visual Perception - physiology
title What and When: Parallel and Convergent Processing in Motor Control
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T02%3A38%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20and%20When:%20Parallel%20and%20Convergent%20Processing%20in%20Motor%20Control&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20neuroscience&rft.au=Sakai,%20Katsuyuki&rft.date=2000-04-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2691&rft.epage=2700&rft.pages=2691-2700&rft.issn=0270-6474&rft.eissn=1529-2401&rft_id=info:doi/10.1523/jneurosci.20-07-02691.2000&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70997739%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17803021&rft_id=info:pmid/10729350&rfr_iscdi=true