The relationship between expected engagement and talking therapy outcome
The aim of the study was to investigate whether client‐reported expected engagement with therapy predicted therapy outcome. It was hypothesized that higher expected engagement with cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) or person‐centred experiential therapy (PCET) would predict more symptomatic improv...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical psychology and psychotherapy 2019-07, Vol.26 (4), p.492-501 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 501 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 492 |
| container_title | Clinical psychology and psychotherapy |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | Harrison, Phillippa Hardy, Gillian E. Barkham, Michael |
| description | The aim of the study was to investigate whether client‐reported expected engagement with therapy predicted therapy outcome. It was hypothesized that higher expected engagement with cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) or person‐centred experiential therapy (PCET) would predict more symptomatic improvement following therapy and higher likelihood of therapy completion. The Sheffield Expected Engagement with Therapy Scale was administered to 96 clients at pre‐therapy assessment with all meeting a diagnosis of moderate or severe depression with 53 receiving CBT and 43 receiving PCET. Higher expected engagement predicted more symptomatic improvement in CBT but not PCET. Expected engagement only predicted improvement in CBT when clients rated the credibility of CBT as low or moderate. Expected engagement did not predict therapy completion in either therapy. Assessment of expected engagement could be a useful tool in prediction of symptomatic improvement in CBT. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cpp.2369 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6772155</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2215019925</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4389-98c85ba869d9cd479e503221e78760d03048770a5c54d6de9d73319639aee3263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1LHDEYRkOpdFct9BfIQG-8GX0z2cnHTaEsfhQE90KvQzZ53Z3tTDImM7X7781Wa6vgVQI5HE54CPlC4YQCVKe2708qxtUHMqWgVAlSqI-7O2clU6qekP2UNgAghBSfyIRRoBKomJLLmzUWEVszNMGnddMXSxweEH2Bv3u0A7oC_cqssEM_FMa7YjDtz8avimGN0fTbIoyDDR0ekr070yb8_HwekNvzs5v5ZXl1ffFj_v2qtDMmVamklfXSSK6csm4mFNbAqopiDuPggMFMCgGmtvXMcYfKCcao4kwZRFZxdkC-PXn7cdmhszkrmlb3selM3OpgGv36xTdrvQq_NBeionWdBcfPghjuR0yD7ppksW2NxzAmnWNqoEpVO_TrG3QTxujz9zLFJaMVZfyf0MaQUsS7lxgKejePzvPo3TwZPfo__gX8u0cGyifgoWlx-65IzxeLP8JHRYWYyQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2268312136</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The relationship between expected engagement and talking therapy outcome</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Harrison, Phillippa ; Hardy, Gillian E. ; Barkham, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Phillippa ; Hardy, Gillian E. ; Barkham, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the study was to investigate whether client‐reported expected engagement with therapy predicted therapy outcome. It was hypothesized that higher expected engagement with cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) or person‐centred experiential therapy (PCET) would predict more symptomatic improvement following therapy and higher likelihood of therapy completion. The Sheffield Expected Engagement with Therapy Scale was administered to 96 clients at pre‐therapy assessment with all meeting a diagnosis of moderate or severe depression with 53 receiving CBT and 43 receiving PCET. Higher expected engagement predicted more symptomatic improvement in CBT but not PCET. Expected engagement only predicted improvement in CBT when clients rated the credibility of CBT as low or moderate. Expected engagement did not predict therapy completion in either therapy. Assessment of expected engagement could be a useful tool in prediction of symptomatic improvement in CBT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1063-3995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0879</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2369</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31018017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley and Sons, Limited</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cognitive ability ; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy - methods ; cognitive behavioural therapy ; Depressive Disorder - psychology ; Depressive Disorder - therapy ; engagement ; expectations ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Mental depression ; outcome prediction ; Patient Participation - psychology ; Patient Participation - statistics & numerical data ; Person-Centered Psychotherapy - methods ; person‐centred experiential therapy ; talking therapy ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Clinical psychology and psychotherapy, 2019-07, Vol.26 (4), p.492-501</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2019 The Authors Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4389-98c85ba869d9cd479e503221e78760d03048770a5c54d6de9d73319639aee3263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4389-98c85ba869d9cd479e503221e78760d03048770a5c54d6de9d73319639aee3263</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9637-815X ; 0000-0002-5039-7822 ; 0000-0003-1687-6376</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcpp.2369$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcpp.2369$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31018017$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Phillippa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Gillian E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barkham, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>The relationship between expected engagement and talking therapy outcome</title><title>Clinical psychology and psychotherapy</title><addtitle>Clin Psychol Psychother</addtitle><description>The aim of the study was to investigate whether client‐reported expected engagement with therapy predicted therapy outcome. It was hypothesized that higher expected engagement with cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) or person‐centred experiential therapy (PCET) would predict more symptomatic improvement following therapy and higher likelihood of therapy completion. The Sheffield Expected Engagement with Therapy Scale was administered to 96 clients at pre‐therapy assessment with all meeting a diagnosis of moderate or severe depression with 53 receiving CBT and 43 receiving PCET. Higher expected engagement predicted more symptomatic improvement in CBT but not PCET. Expected engagement only predicted improvement in CBT when clients rated the credibility of CBT as low or moderate. Expected engagement did not predict therapy completion in either therapy. Assessment of expected engagement could be a useful tool in prediction of symptomatic improvement in CBT.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cognitive Behavioral Therapy - methods</subject><subject>cognitive behavioural therapy</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder - psychology</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder - therapy</subject><subject>engagement</subject><subject>expectations</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>outcome prediction</subject><subject>Patient Participation - psychology</subject><subject>Patient Participation - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Person-Centered Psychotherapy - methods</subject><subject>person‐centred experiential therapy</subject><subject>talking therapy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1063-3995</issn><issn>1099-0879</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1LHDEYRkOpdFct9BfIQG-8GX0z2cnHTaEsfhQE90KvQzZ53Z3tTDImM7X7781Wa6vgVQI5HE54CPlC4YQCVKe2708qxtUHMqWgVAlSqI-7O2clU6qekP2UNgAghBSfyIRRoBKomJLLmzUWEVszNMGnddMXSxweEH2Bv3u0A7oC_cqssEM_FMa7YjDtz8avimGN0fTbIoyDDR0ekr070yb8_HwekNvzs5v5ZXl1ffFj_v2qtDMmVamklfXSSK6csm4mFNbAqopiDuPggMFMCgGmtvXMcYfKCcao4kwZRFZxdkC-PXn7cdmhszkrmlb3selM3OpgGv36xTdrvQq_NBeionWdBcfPghjuR0yD7ppksW2NxzAmnWNqoEpVO_TrG3QTxujz9zLFJaMVZfyf0MaQUsS7lxgKejePzvPo3TwZPfo__gX8u0cGyifgoWlx-65IzxeLP8JHRYWYyQ</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Harrison, Phillippa</creator><creator>Hardy, Gillian E.</creator><creator>Barkham, Michael</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons, Limited</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9637-815X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5039-7822</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1687-6376</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>The relationship between expected engagement and talking therapy outcome</title><author>Harrison, Phillippa ; Hardy, Gillian E. ; Barkham, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4389-98c85ba869d9cd479e503221e78760d03048770a5c54d6de9d73319639aee3263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cognitive Behavioral Therapy - methods</topic><topic>cognitive behavioural therapy</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder - psychology</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder - therapy</topic><topic>engagement</topic><topic>expectations</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>outcome prediction</topic><topic>Patient Participation - psychology</topic><topic>Patient Participation - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Person-Centered Psychotherapy - methods</topic><topic>person‐centred experiential therapy</topic><topic>talking therapy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Phillippa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Gillian E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barkham, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Backfiles (Open access)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical psychology and psychotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harrison, Phillippa</au><au>Hardy, Gillian E.</au><au>Barkham, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The relationship between expected engagement and talking therapy outcome</atitle><jtitle>Clinical psychology and psychotherapy</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Psychol Psychother</addtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>492</spage><epage>501</epage><pages>492-501</pages><issn>1063-3995</issn><eissn>1099-0879</eissn><abstract>The aim of the study was to investigate whether client‐reported expected engagement with therapy predicted therapy outcome. It was hypothesized that higher expected engagement with cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) or person‐centred experiential therapy (PCET) would predict more symptomatic improvement following therapy and higher likelihood of therapy completion. The Sheffield Expected Engagement with Therapy Scale was administered to 96 clients at pre‐therapy assessment with all meeting a diagnosis of moderate or severe depression with 53 receiving CBT and 43 receiving PCET. Higher expected engagement predicted more symptomatic improvement in CBT but not PCET. Expected engagement only predicted improvement in CBT when clients rated the credibility of CBT as low or moderate. Expected engagement did not predict therapy completion in either therapy. Assessment of expected engagement could be a useful tool in prediction of symptomatic improvement in CBT.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons, Limited</pub><pmid>31018017</pmid><doi>10.1002/cpp.2369</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9637-815X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5039-7822</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1687-6376</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1063-3995 |
| ispartof | Clinical psychology and psychotherapy, 2019-07, Vol.26 (4), p.492-501 |
| issn | 1063-3995 1099-0879 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6772155 |
| source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE |
| subjects | Adult Cognitive ability Cognitive Behavioral Therapy - methods cognitive behavioural therapy Depressive Disorder - psychology Depressive Disorder - therapy engagement expectations Female Humans Male Mental depression outcome prediction Patient Participation - psychology Patient Participation - statistics & numerical data Person-Centered Psychotherapy - methods person‐centred experiential therapy talking therapy Treatment Outcome |
| title | The relationship between expected engagement and talking therapy outcome |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T22%3A02%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20relationship%20between%20expected%20engagement%20and%20talking%20therapy%20outcome&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20psychology%20and%20psychotherapy&rft.au=Harrison,%20Phillippa&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=492&rft.epage=501&rft.pages=492-501&rft.issn=1063-3995&rft.eissn=1099-0879&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cpp.2369&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2215019925%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2268312136&rft_id=info:pmid/31018017&rfr_iscdi=true |