Industrial bees: The impact of apicultural intensification on local disease prevalence
It is generally thought that the intensification of farming will result in higher disease prevalences, although there is little specific modelling testing this idea. Focussing on honeybees, we build multi‐colony models to inform how “apicultural intensification” is predicted to impact honeybee patho...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of applied ecology 2019-09, Vol.56 (9), p.2195-2205 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2205 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 2195 |
container_title | The Journal of applied ecology |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Bartlett, Lewis J. Rozins, Carly Brosi, Berry J. Delaplane, Keith S. de Roode, Jacobus C. White, Andrew Wilfert, Lena Boots, Michael |
description | It is generally thought that the intensification of farming will result in higher disease prevalences, although there is little specific modelling testing this idea. Focussing on honeybees, we build multi‐colony models to inform how “apicultural intensification” is predicted to impact honeybee pathogen epidemiology at the apiary scale.
We used both agent‐based and analytical models to show that three linked aspects of apicultural intensification (increased population sizes, changes in population network structure and increased between‐colony transmission) are unlikely to greatly increase disease prevalence in apiaries. Principally this is because even low‐intensity apiculture exhibits high disease prevalence.
The greatest impacts of apicultural intensification are found for diseases with relatively low R0 (basic reproduction number), however, such diseases cause little overall disease prevalence and, therefore, the impacts of intensification are minor. Furthermore, the smallest impacts of intensification are for diseases with high R0 values, which we argue are typical of important honeybee diseases.
Policy Implications: Our findings contradict the idea that apicultural intensification by crowding honeybee colonies in large, dense apiaries leads to notably higher disease prevalences for established honeybee pathogens. More broadly, our work demonstrates the need for informative models of all agricultural systems and management practices in order to understand the implications of management changes on diseases.
We use both computational and mathematical models to understand how intensification of beekeeping at apiary scales from small, low density, less connected arrangements to larger, denser, more connected arrangements might alter pathogen prevalences. We find that honeybee pathogens typically exist at very high prevalences even in low‐intensity apiaries, and that consequently the intensification of apiculture at this local scale is predicted to have little effect on epidemiology. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1365-2664.13461 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6771535</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48579854</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48579854</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4661-c73ca459432acf3c43c600e5a9d755a783262aa5549580a9ccda08a4d824be13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9LwzAcxYMobk7x6EkQvHjplm9-NbkIMqZOBnrYPWRpph1dM5NW2X9va-dAL-YSSN7nfb_vIXQBeAjNGQEVPCFCsCFQJuAA9fcvh6iPMYFEKgw9dBLjCmOsOKXHqEeBSwlM9tH5tMzqWIXcFFcL5-IpOlqaIrqz3T1A8_vJfPyYzJ4fpuO7WWKZEJDYlFrDuGKUGLukllErMHbcqCzl3KSSEkGM4ZwpLrFR1mYGS8MySdjCAR2g2852Uy_WLrOurIIp9CbkaxO22ptc__4p8zf96j-0SFPglDcGNzuD4N9rFyu9zqN1RWFK5-uoCcUgJQbWzrr-I135OpRNOk2IpLhJAapRjTqVDT7G4Jb7ZQDrtmvdNqvbZvV31w3BO-IzL9z2P7l-epn8cJcdt4qVD3uOSZ4qyRn9Agurhdo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2283059419</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Industrial bees: The impact of apicultural intensification on local disease prevalence</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Bartlett, Lewis J. ; Rozins, Carly ; Brosi, Berry J. ; Delaplane, Keith S. ; de Roode, Jacobus C. ; White, Andrew ; Wilfert, Lena ; Boots, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, Lewis J. ; Rozins, Carly ; Brosi, Berry J. ; Delaplane, Keith S. ; de Roode, Jacobus C. ; White, Andrew ; Wilfert, Lena ; Boots, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>It is generally thought that the intensification of farming will result in higher disease prevalences, although there is little specific modelling testing this idea. Focussing on honeybees, we build multi‐colony models to inform how “apicultural intensification” is predicted to impact honeybee pathogen epidemiology at the apiary scale.
We used both agent‐based and analytical models to show that three linked aspects of apicultural intensification (increased population sizes, changes in population network structure and increased between‐colony transmission) are unlikely to greatly increase disease prevalence in apiaries. Principally this is because even low‐intensity apiculture exhibits high disease prevalence.
The greatest impacts of apicultural intensification are found for diseases with relatively low R0 (basic reproduction number), however, such diseases cause little overall disease prevalence and, therefore, the impacts of intensification are minor. Furthermore, the smallest impacts of intensification are for diseases with high R0 values, which we argue are typical of important honeybee diseases.
Policy Implications: Our findings contradict the idea that apicultural intensification by crowding honeybee colonies in large, dense apiaries leads to notably higher disease prevalences for established honeybee pathogens. More broadly, our work demonstrates the need for informative models of all agricultural systems and management practices in order to understand the implications of management changes on diseases.
We use both computational and mathematical models to understand how intensification of beekeeping at apiary scales from small, low density, less connected arrangements to larger, denser, more connected arrangements might alter pathogen prevalences. We find that honeybee pathogens typically exist at very high prevalences even in low‐intensity apiaries, and that consequently the intensification of apiculture at this local scale is predicted to have little effect on epidemiology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13461</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31588148</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; agriculture ; Apiculture ; beekeeping ; Bees ; Colonies ; Disease ; disease prevalence ; Diseases ; Epidemiology ; Impact prediction ; infectious disease ; intensification ; mathematical model ; Mathematical models ; Pathogens ; RESEARCH ARTICLE</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied ecology, 2019-09, Vol.56 (9), p.2195-2205</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors</rights><rights>2019 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society</rights><rights>Journal of Applied Ecology © 2019 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4661-c73ca459432acf3c43c600e5a9d755a783262aa5549580a9ccda08a4d824be13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4661-c73ca459432acf3c43c600e5a9d755a783262aa5549580a9ccda08a4d824be13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6075-458X ; 0000-0003-1503-4871 ; 0000-0002-9233-1151 ; 0000-0002-4418-8071 ; 0000-0003-3763-6136 ; 0000-0001-9323-441X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1365-2664.13461$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1365-2664.13461$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1416,1432,27922,27923,45572,45573,46407,46831</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, Lewis J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozins, Carly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brosi, Berry J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delaplane, Keith S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Roode, Jacobus C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilfert, Lena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boots, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Industrial bees: The impact of apicultural intensification on local disease prevalence</title><title>The Journal of applied ecology</title><description>It is generally thought that the intensification of farming will result in higher disease prevalences, although there is little specific modelling testing this idea. Focussing on honeybees, we build multi‐colony models to inform how “apicultural intensification” is predicted to impact honeybee pathogen epidemiology at the apiary scale.
We used both agent‐based and analytical models to show that three linked aspects of apicultural intensification (increased population sizes, changes in population network structure and increased between‐colony transmission) are unlikely to greatly increase disease prevalence in apiaries. Principally this is because even low‐intensity apiculture exhibits high disease prevalence.
The greatest impacts of apicultural intensification are found for diseases with relatively low R0 (basic reproduction number), however, such diseases cause little overall disease prevalence and, therefore, the impacts of intensification are minor. Furthermore, the smallest impacts of intensification are for diseases with high R0 values, which we argue are typical of important honeybee diseases.
Policy Implications: Our findings contradict the idea that apicultural intensification by crowding honeybee colonies in large, dense apiaries leads to notably higher disease prevalences for established honeybee pathogens. More broadly, our work demonstrates the need for informative models of all agricultural systems and management practices in order to understand the implications of management changes on diseases.
We use both computational and mathematical models to understand how intensification of beekeeping at apiary scales from small, low density, less connected arrangements to larger, denser, more connected arrangements might alter pathogen prevalences. We find that honeybee pathogens typically exist at very high prevalences even in low‐intensity apiaries, and that consequently the intensification of apiculture at this local scale is predicted to have little effect on epidemiology.</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>agriculture</subject><subject>Apiculture</subject><subject>beekeeping</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Colonies</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>disease prevalence</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Impact prediction</subject><subject>infectious disease</subject><subject>intensification</subject><subject>mathematical model</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>RESEARCH ARTICLE</subject><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM9LwzAcxYMobk7x6EkQvHjplm9-NbkIMqZOBnrYPWRpph1dM5NW2X9va-dAL-YSSN7nfb_vIXQBeAjNGQEVPCFCsCFQJuAA9fcvh6iPMYFEKgw9dBLjCmOsOKXHqEeBSwlM9tH5tMzqWIXcFFcL5-IpOlqaIrqz3T1A8_vJfPyYzJ4fpuO7WWKZEJDYlFrDuGKUGLukllErMHbcqCzl3KSSEkGM4ZwpLrFR1mYGS8MySdjCAR2g2852Uy_WLrOurIIp9CbkaxO22ptc__4p8zf96j-0SFPglDcGNzuD4N9rFyu9zqN1RWFK5-uoCcUgJQbWzrr-I135OpRNOk2IpLhJAapRjTqVDT7G4Jb7ZQDrtmvdNqvbZvV31w3BO-IzL9z2P7l-epn8cJcdt4qVD3uOSZ4qyRn9Agurhdo</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Bartlett, Lewis J.</creator><creator>Rozins, Carly</creator><creator>Brosi, Berry J.</creator><creator>Delaplane, Keith S.</creator><creator>de Roode, Jacobus C.</creator><creator>White, Andrew</creator><creator>Wilfert, Lena</creator><creator>Boots, Michael</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6075-458X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1503-4871</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9233-1151</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4418-8071</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3763-6136</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9323-441X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>Industrial bees</title><author>Bartlett, Lewis J. ; Rozins, Carly ; Brosi, Berry J. ; Delaplane, Keith S. ; de Roode, Jacobus C. ; White, Andrew ; Wilfert, Lena ; Boots, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4661-c73ca459432acf3c43c600e5a9d755a783262aa5549580a9ccda08a4d824be13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>agriculture</topic><topic>Apiculture</topic><topic>beekeeping</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Colonies</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>disease prevalence</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Impact prediction</topic><topic>infectious disease</topic><topic>intensification</topic><topic>mathematical model</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>RESEARCH ARTICLE</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, Lewis J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozins, Carly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brosi, Berry J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delaplane, Keith S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Roode, Jacobus C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilfert, Lena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boots, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bartlett, Lewis J.</au><au>Rozins, Carly</au><au>Brosi, Berry J.</au><au>Delaplane, Keith S.</au><au>de Roode, Jacobus C.</au><au>White, Andrew</au><au>Wilfert, Lena</au><au>Boots, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Industrial bees: The impact of apicultural intensification on local disease prevalence</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2195</spage><epage>2205</epage><pages>2195-2205</pages><issn>0021-8901</issn><eissn>1365-2664</eissn><abstract>It is generally thought that the intensification of farming will result in higher disease prevalences, although there is little specific modelling testing this idea. Focussing on honeybees, we build multi‐colony models to inform how “apicultural intensification” is predicted to impact honeybee pathogen epidemiology at the apiary scale.
We used both agent‐based and analytical models to show that three linked aspects of apicultural intensification (increased population sizes, changes in population network structure and increased between‐colony transmission) are unlikely to greatly increase disease prevalence in apiaries. Principally this is because even low‐intensity apiculture exhibits high disease prevalence.
The greatest impacts of apicultural intensification are found for diseases with relatively low R0 (basic reproduction number), however, such diseases cause little overall disease prevalence and, therefore, the impacts of intensification are minor. Furthermore, the smallest impacts of intensification are for diseases with high R0 values, which we argue are typical of important honeybee diseases.
Policy Implications: Our findings contradict the idea that apicultural intensification by crowding honeybee colonies in large, dense apiaries leads to notably higher disease prevalences for established honeybee pathogens. More broadly, our work demonstrates the need for informative models of all agricultural systems and management practices in order to understand the implications of management changes on diseases.
We use both computational and mathematical models to understand how intensification of beekeeping at apiary scales from small, low density, less connected arrangements to larger, denser, more connected arrangements might alter pathogen prevalences. We find that honeybee pathogens typically exist at very high prevalences even in low‐intensity apiaries, and that consequently the intensification of apiculture at this local scale is predicted to have little effect on epidemiology.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><pmid>31588148</pmid><doi>10.1111/1365-2664.13461</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6075-458X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1503-4871</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9233-1151</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4418-8071</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3763-6136</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9323-441X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8901 |
ispartof | The Journal of applied ecology, 2019-09, Vol.56 (9), p.2195-2205 |
issn | 0021-8901 1365-2664 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6771535 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Agricultural practices agriculture Apiculture beekeeping Bees Colonies Disease disease prevalence Diseases Epidemiology Impact prediction infectious disease intensification mathematical model Mathematical models Pathogens RESEARCH ARTICLE |
title | Industrial bees: The impact of apicultural intensification on local disease prevalence |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T15%3A20%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Industrial%20bees:%20The%20impact%20of%20apicultural%20intensification%20on%20local%20disease%20prevalence&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Bartlett,%20Lewis%20J.&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2195&rft.epage=2205&rft.pages=2195-2205&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2664.13461&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E48579854%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2283059419&rft_id=info:pmid/31588148&rft_jstor_id=48579854&rfr_iscdi=true |