Quantitative Volumetric Assessment of Ablative Margins in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Predicting Local Tumor Progression Using Nonrigid Registration Software

Purpose. After radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), pre- and postinterventional contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) images are usually qualitatively interpreted to determine technical success, by eyeballing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of quantitat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of oncology 2019, Vol.2019 (2019), p.1-8
Hauptverfasser: Burgmans, M. C., Slump, Cees, Coenraad, M. J., van der Meer, R. W., van Rijswijk, Catharina S. P., Van Erkel, Arian R., Baetens, T. R., Noortman, W. A., Hendriks, P., de Geus-Oei, L. F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 8
container_issue 2019
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of oncology
container_volume 2019
creator Burgmans, M. C.
Slump, Cees
Coenraad, M. J.
van der Meer, R. W.
van Rijswijk, Catharina S. P.
Van Erkel, Arian R.
Baetens, T. R.
Noortman, W. A.
Hendriks, P.
de Geus-Oei, L. F.
description Purpose. After radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), pre- and postinterventional contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) images are usually qualitatively interpreted to determine technical success, by eyeballing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of quantitative assessment, using a nonrigid CT-CT coregistration algorithm. Materials and Methods. 25 patients treated with RFA for HCC between 2009 and 2014 were retrospectively included. Semiautomated coregistration of pre- and posttreatment CECT was performed independently by two radiologists. In scans with a reliable registration, the tumor and ablation area were delineated to identify the side and size of narrowest RFA margin. In addition, qualitative assessment was performed independently by two other radiologists to determine technical success and the anatomical side and size of narrowest margin. Interobserver agreement rates were determined for both methods, and the outcomes were compared with occurrence of local tumor progression (LTP). Results. CT-CT coregistration was technically feasible in 18/25 patients with almost perfect interobserver agreement for quantitative analysis (κ = 0.88). The interobserver agreement for qualitative RFA margin analysis was κ = 0.64. Using quantitative assessment, negative ablative margins were found in 12/18 patients, with LTP occurring in 8 of these patients. In the remaining 6 patients, quantitative analysis demonstrated complete tumor ablation and no LTP occurred. Conclusion. Feasibility of quantitative RFA margin assessment using nonrigid coregistration of pre- and postablation CT is limited, but appears to be a valuable tool in predicting LTP in HCC patients (p=0.013).
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2019/4049287
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6770329</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A605134357</galeid><sourcerecordid>A605134357</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-7788957d2624bbf2c7f6878c5bbcad8af789adb19a0ebe2e313d68ab73b9fa803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1vFCEYhSdGY2v1zmtD4o2JroWB4cMLk81Grcn63XpL3mGYKc0MrMC08bf4Z2Wza1u98grCeXJeDpyqekzwS0Ka5rjGRB0zzFQtxZ3qkHApFpI1-O6t_UH1IKULjDnDit-vDijhjNCGHla_vszgs8uQ3aVF38M4TzZHZ9AyJZvSZH1GoUfLdtwRHyAOzifkPDqxG8jB2HGcR4hoBdE4HyZ4hT5H2zmTnR_QOhgY0ek8hViOwxCLqQsenaWt-jH46AbXoa92cCnHMqNo30KfryDah9W9HsZkH-3Xo-rs7ZvT1cli_end-9VyvTBMqbwQQkrViK7mNWvbvjaiL7mladrWQCehF1JB1xIF2La2tpTQjktoBW1VDxLTo-r1znczt5PtTMkcYdSb6CaIP3UAp_9WvDvXQ7jUXAhMa1UMnu0NYvgx25T15NL2YcDbMCddUyxJo2pCCvr0H_QizNGXeLpmWPCmfAy7oQYYrXa-D2Wu2ZrqJccNoYw2olAvdpSJIaVo--srE6y33dDbbuh9Nwr-5HbMa_hPGQrwfAecO9_BlftPO1sY28MNTSQjktPf04DOyQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2407656414</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative Volumetric Assessment of Ablative Margins in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Predicting Local Tumor Progression Using Nonrigid Registration Software</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Burgmans, M. C. ; Slump, Cees ; Coenraad, M. J. ; van der Meer, R. W. ; van Rijswijk, Catharina S. P. ; Van Erkel, Arian R. ; Baetens, T. R. ; Noortman, W. A. ; Hendriks, P. ; de Geus-Oei, L. F.</creator><contributor>Iezzi, Roberto</contributor><creatorcontrib>Burgmans, M. C. ; Slump, Cees ; Coenraad, M. J. ; van der Meer, R. W. ; van Rijswijk, Catharina S. P. ; Van Erkel, Arian R. ; Baetens, T. R. ; Noortman, W. A. ; Hendriks, P. ; de Geus-Oei, L. F. ; Iezzi, Roberto</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose. After radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), pre- and postinterventional contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) images are usually qualitatively interpreted to determine technical success, by eyeballing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of quantitative assessment, using a nonrigid CT-CT coregistration algorithm. Materials and Methods. 25 patients treated with RFA for HCC between 2009 and 2014 were retrospectively included. Semiautomated coregistration of pre- and posttreatment CECT was performed independently by two radiologists. In scans with a reliable registration, the tumor and ablation area were delineated to identify the side and size of narrowest RFA margin. In addition, qualitative assessment was performed independently by two other radiologists to determine technical success and the anatomical side and size of narrowest margin. Interobserver agreement rates were determined for both methods, and the outcomes were compared with occurrence of local tumor progression (LTP). Results. CT-CT coregistration was technically feasible in 18/25 patients with almost perfect interobserver agreement for quantitative analysis (κ = 0.88). The interobserver agreement for qualitative RFA margin analysis was κ = 0.64. Using quantitative assessment, negative ablative margins were found in 12/18 patients, with LTP occurring in 8 of these patients. In the remaining 6 patients, quantitative analysis demonstrated complete tumor ablation and no LTP occurred. Conclusion. Feasibility of quantitative RFA margin assessment using nonrigid coregistration of pre- and postablation CT is limited, but appears to be a valuable tool in predicting LTP in HCC patients (p=0.013).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1687-8450</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1687-8450</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2019/4049287</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31641353</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Publishing Corporation</publisher><subject>Ablation ; Ablation (Surgery) ; CT imaging ; Development and progression ; Electrodes ; Hepatitis ; Hepatoma ; Liver cancer ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Patients ; Registration ; Success</subject><ispartof>Journal of oncology, 2019, Vol.2019 (2019), p.1-8</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 P. Hendriks et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 P. Hendriks et al. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 P. Hendriks et al. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-7788957d2624bbf2c7f6878c5bbcad8af789adb19a0ebe2e313d68ab73b9fa803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-7788957d2624bbf2c7f6878c5bbcad8af789adb19a0ebe2e313d68ab73b9fa803</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4992-9967</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6770329/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6770329/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,4010,27900,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31641353$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Iezzi, Roberto</contributor><creatorcontrib>Burgmans, M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slump, Cees</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coenraad, M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Meer, R. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Rijswijk, Catharina S. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Erkel, Arian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baetens, T. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noortman, W. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendriks, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Geus-Oei, L. F.</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative Volumetric Assessment of Ablative Margins in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Predicting Local Tumor Progression Using Nonrigid Registration Software</title><title>Journal of oncology</title><addtitle>J Oncol</addtitle><description>Purpose. After radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), pre- and postinterventional contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) images are usually qualitatively interpreted to determine technical success, by eyeballing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of quantitative assessment, using a nonrigid CT-CT coregistration algorithm. Materials and Methods. 25 patients treated with RFA for HCC between 2009 and 2014 were retrospectively included. Semiautomated coregistration of pre- and posttreatment CECT was performed independently by two radiologists. In scans with a reliable registration, the tumor and ablation area were delineated to identify the side and size of narrowest RFA margin. In addition, qualitative assessment was performed independently by two other radiologists to determine technical success and the anatomical side and size of narrowest margin. Interobserver agreement rates were determined for both methods, and the outcomes were compared with occurrence of local tumor progression (LTP). Results. CT-CT coregistration was technically feasible in 18/25 patients with almost perfect interobserver agreement for quantitative analysis (κ = 0.88). The interobserver agreement for qualitative RFA margin analysis was κ = 0.64. Using quantitative assessment, negative ablative margins were found in 12/18 patients, with LTP occurring in 8 of these patients. In the remaining 6 patients, quantitative analysis demonstrated complete tumor ablation and no LTP occurred. Conclusion. Feasibility of quantitative RFA margin assessment using nonrigid coregistration of pre- and postablation CT is limited, but appears to be a valuable tool in predicting LTP in HCC patients (p=0.013).</description><subject>Ablation</subject><subject>Ablation (Surgery)</subject><subject>CT imaging</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Hepatitis</subject><subject>Hepatoma</subject><subject>Liver cancer</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Registration</subject><subject>Success</subject><issn>1687-8450</issn><issn>1687-8450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1vFCEYhSdGY2v1zmtD4o2JroWB4cMLk81Grcn63XpL3mGYKc0MrMC08bf4Z2Wza1u98grCeXJeDpyqekzwS0Ka5rjGRB0zzFQtxZ3qkHApFpI1-O6t_UH1IKULjDnDit-vDijhjNCGHla_vszgs8uQ3aVF38M4TzZHZ9AyJZvSZH1GoUfLdtwRHyAOzifkPDqxG8jB2HGcR4hoBdE4HyZ4hT5H2zmTnR_QOhgY0ek8hViOwxCLqQsenaWt-jH46AbXoa92cCnHMqNo30KfryDah9W9HsZkH-3Xo-rs7ZvT1cli_end-9VyvTBMqbwQQkrViK7mNWvbvjaiL7mladrWQCehF1JB1xIF2La2tpTQjktoBW1VDxLTo-r1znczt5PtTMkcYdSb6CaIP3UAp_9WvDvXQ7jUXAhMa1UMnu0NYvgx25T15NL2YcDbMCddUyxJo2pCCvr0H_QizNGXeLpmWPCmfAy7oQYYrXa-D2Wu2ZrqJccNoYw2olAvdpSJIaVo--srE6y33dDbbuh9Nwr-5HbMa_hPGQrwfAecO9_BlftPO1sY28MNTSQjktPf04DOyQ</recordid><startdate>2019</startdate><enddate>2019</enddate><creator>Burgmans, M. C.</creator><creator>Slump, Cees</creator><creator>Coenraad, M. J.</creator><creator>van der Meer, R. W.</creator><creator>van Rijswijk, Catharina S. P.</creator><creator>Van Erkel, Arian R.</creator><creator>Baetens, T. R.</creator><creator>Noortman, W. A.</creator><creator>Hendriks, P.</creator><creator>de Geus-Oei, L. F.</creator><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4992-9967</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2019</creationdate><title>Quantitative Volumetric Assessment of Ablative Margins in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Predicting Local Tumor Progression Using Nonrigid Registration Software</title><author>Burgmans, M. C. ; Slump, Cees ; Coenraad, M. J. ; van der Meer, R. W. ; van Rijswijk, Catharina S. P. ; Van Erkel, Arian R. ; Baetens, T. R. ; Noortman, W. A. ; Hendriks, P. ; de Geus-Oei, L. F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-7788957d2624bbf2c7f6878c5bbcad8af789adb19a0ebe2e313d68ab73b9fa803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Ablation</topic><topic>Ablation (Surgery)</topic><topic>CT imaging</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Hepatitis</topic><topic>Hepatoma</topic><topic>Liver cancer</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Registration</topic><topic>Success</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burgmans, M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slump, Cees</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coenraad, M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Meer, R. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Rijswijk, Catharina S. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Erkel, Arian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baetens, T. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noortman, W. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendriks, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Geus-Oei, L. F.</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burgmans, M. C.</au><au>Slump, Cees</au><au>Coenraad, M. J.</au><au>van der Meer, R. W.</au><au>van Rijswijk, Catharina S. P.</au><au>Van Erkel, Arian R.</au><au>Baetens, T. R.</au><au>Noortman, W. A.</au><au>Hendriks, P.</au><au>de Geus-Oei, L. F.</au><au>Iezzi, Roberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative Volumetric Assessment of Ablative Margins in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Predicting Local Tumor Progression Using Nonrigid Registration Software</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Oncol</addtitle><date>2019</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>2019</volume><issue>2019</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>1-8</pages><issn>1687-8450</issn><eissn>1687-8450</eissn><abstract>Purpose. After radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), pre- and postinterventional contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) images are usually qualitatively interpreted to determine technical success, by eyeballing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of quantitative assessment, using a nonrigid CT-CT coregistration algorithm. Materials and Methods. 25 patients treated with RFA for HCC between 2009 and 2014 were retrospectively included. Semiautomated coregistration of pre- and posttreatment CECT was performed independently by two radiologists. In scans with a reliable registration, the tumor and ablation area were delineated to identify the side and size of narrowest RFA margin. In addition, qualitative assessment was performed independently by two other radiologists to determine technical success and the anatomical side and size of narrowest margin. Interobserver agreement rates were determined for both methods, and the outcomes were compared with occurrence of local tumor progression (LTP). Results. CT-CT coregistration was technically feasible in 18/25 patients with almost perfect interobserver agreement for quantitative analysis (κ = 0.88). The interobserver agreement for qualitative RFA margin analysis was κ = 0.64. Using quantitative assessment, negative ablative margins were found in 12/18 patients, with LTP occurring in 8 of these patients. In the remaining 6 patients, quantitative analysis demonstrated complete tumor ablation and no LTP occurred. Conclusion. Feasibility of quantitative RFA margin assessment using nonrigid coregistration of pre- and postablation CT is limited, but appears to be a valuable tool in predicting LTP in HCC patients (p=0.013).</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</pub><pmid>31641353</pmid><doi>10.1155/2019/4049287</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4992-9967</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1687-8450
ispartof Journal of oncology, 2019, Vol.2019 (2019), p.1-8
issn 1687-8450
1687-8450
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6770329
source Wiley Online Library Open Access; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Ablation
Ablation (Surgery)
CT imaging
Development and progression
Electrodes
Hepatitis
Hepatoma
Liver cancer
Magnetic resonance imaging
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Patients
Registration
Success
title Quantitative Volumetric Assessment of Ablative Margins in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Predicting Local Tumor Progression Using Nonrigid Registration Software
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T08%3A12%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20Volumetric%20Assessment%20of%20Ablative%20Margins%20in%20Hepatocellular%20Carcinoma:%20Predicting%20Local%20Tumor%20Progression%20Using%20Nonrigid%20Registration%20Software&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oncology&rft.au=Burgmans,%20M.%20C.&rft.date=2019&rft.volume=2019&rft.issue=2019&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=1-8&rft.issn=1687-8450&rft.eissn=1687-8450&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2019/4049287&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA605134357%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2407656414&rft_id=info:pmid/31641353&rft_galeid=A605134357&rfr_iscdi=true