Quantitative Volumetric Assessment of Ablative Margins in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Predicting Local Tumor Progression Using Nonrigid Registration Software
Purpose. After radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), pre- and postinterventional contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) images are usually qualitatively interpreted to determine technical success, by eyeballing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of quantitat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of oncology 2019, Vol.2019 (2019), p.1-8 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 8 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2019 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal of oncology |
container_volume | 2019 |
creator | Burgmans, M. C. Slump, Cees Coenraad, M. J. van der Meer, R. W. van Rijswijk, Catharina S. P. Van Erkel, Arian R. Baetens, T. R. Noortman, W. A. Hendriks, P. de Geus-Oei, L. F. |
description | Purpose. After radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), pre- and postinterventional contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) images are usually qualitatively interpreted to determine technical success, by eyeballing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of quantitative assessment, using a nonrigid CT-CT coregistration algorithm. Materials and Methods. 25 patients treated with RFA for HCC between 2009 and 2014 were retrospectively included. Semiautomated coregistration of pre- and posttreatment CECT was performed independently by two radiologists. In scans with a reliable registration, the tumor and ablation area were delineated to identify the side and size of narrowest RFA margin. In addition, qualitative assessment was performed independently by two other radiologists to determine technical success and the anatomical side and size of narrowest margin. Interobserver agreement rates were determined for both methods, and the outcomes were compared with occurrence of local tumor progression (LTP). Results. CT-CT coregistration was technically feasible in 18/25 patients with almost perfect interobserver agreement for quantitative analysis (κ = 0.88). The interobserver agreement for qualitative RFA margin analysis was κ = 0.64. Using quantitative assessment, negative ablative margins were found in 12/18 patients, with LTP occurring in 8 of these patients. In the remaining 6 patients, quantitative analysis demonstrated complete tumor ablation and no LTP occurred. Conclusion. Feasibility of quantitative RFA margin assessment using nonrigid coregistration of pre- and postablation CT is limited, but appears to be a valuable tool in predicting LTP in HCC patients (p=0.013). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2019/4049287 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6770329</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A605134357</galeid><sourcerecordid>A605134357</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-7788957d2624bbf2c7f6878c5bbcad8af789adb19a0ebe2e313d68ab73b9fa803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1vFCEYhSdGY2v1zmtD4o2JroWB4cMLk81Grcn63XpL3mGYKc0MrMC08bf4Z2Wza1u98grCeXJeDpyqekzwS0Ka5rjGRB0zzFQtxZ3qkHApFpI1-O6t_UH1IKULjDnDit-vDijhjNCGHla_vszgs8uQ3aVF38M4TzZHZ9AyJZvSZH1GoUfLdtwRHyAOzifkPDqxG8jB2HGcR4hoBdE4HyZ4hT5H2zmTnR_QOhgY0ek8hViOwxCLqQsenaWt-jH46AbXoa92cCnHMqNo30KfryDah9W9HsZkH-3Xo-rs7ZvT1cli_end-9VyvTBMqbwQQkrViK7mNWvbvjaiL7mladrWQCehF1JB1xIF2La2tpTQjktoBW1VDxLTo-r1znczt5PtTMkcYdSb6CaIP3UAp_9WvDvXQ7jUXAhMa1UMnu0NYvgx25T15NL2YcDbMCddUyxJo2pCCvr0H_QizNGXeLpmWPCmfAy7oQYYrXa-D2Wu2ZrqJccNoYw2olAvdpSJIaVo--srE6y33dDbbuh9Nwr-5HbMa_hPGQrwfAecO9_BlftPO1sY28MNTSQjktPf04DOyQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2407656414</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative Volumetric Assessment of Ablative Margins in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Predicting Local Tumor Progression Using Nonrigid Registration Software</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Burgmans, M. C. ; Slump, Cees ; Coenraad, M. J. ; van der Meer, R. W. ; van Rijswijk, Catharina S. P. ; Van Erkel, Arian R. ; Baetens, T. R. ; Noortman, W. A. ; Hendriks, P. ; de Geus-Oei, L. F.</creator><contributor>Iezzi, Roberto</contributor><creatorcontrib>Burgmans, M. C. ; Slump, Cees ; Coenraad, M. J. ; van der Meer, R. W. ; van Rijswijk, Catharina S. P. ; Van Erkel, Arian R. ; Baetens, T. R. ; Noortman, W. A. ; Hendriks, P. ; de Geus-Oei, L. F. ; Iezzi, Roberto</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose. After radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), pre- and postinterventional contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) images are usually qualitatively interpreted to determine technical success, by eyeballing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of quantitative assessment, using a nonrigid CT-CT coregistration algorithm. Materials and Methods. 25 patients treated with RFA for HCC between 2009 and 2014 were retrospectively included. Semiautomated coregistration of pre- and posttreatment CECT was performed independently by two radiologists. In scans with a reliable registration, the tumor and ablation area were delineated to identify the side and size of narrowest RFA margin. In addition, qualitative assessment was performed independently by two other radiologists to determine technical success and the anatomical side and size of narrowest margin. Interobserver agreement rates were determined for both methods, and the outcomes were compared with occurrence of local tumor progression (LTP). Results. CT-CT coregistration was technically feasible in 18/25 patients with almost perfect interobserver agreement for quantitative analysis (κ = 0.88). The interobserver agreement for qualitative RFA margin analysis was κ = 0.64. Using quantitative assessment, negative ablative margins were found in 12/18 patients, with LTP occurring in 8 of these patients. In the remaining 6 patients, quantitative analysis demonstrated complete tumor ablation and no LTP occurred. Conclusion. Feasibility of quantitative RFA margin assessment using nonrigid coregistration of pre- and postablation CT is limited, but appears to be a valuable tool in predicting LTP in HCC patients (p=0.013).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1687-8450</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1687-8450</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2019/4049287</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31641353</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Publishing Corporation</publisher><subject>Ablation ; Ablation (Surgery) ; CT imaging ; Development and progression ; Electrodes ; Hepatitis ; Hepatoma ; Liver cancer ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Patients ; Registration ; Success</subject><ispartof>Journal of oncology, 2019, Vol.2019 (2019), p.1-8</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 P. Hendriks et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 P. Hendriks et al. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 P. Hendriks et al. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-7788957d2624bbf2c7f6878c5bbcad8af789adb19a0ebe2e313d68ab73b9fa803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-7788957d2624bbf2c7f6878c5bbcad8af789adb19a0ebe2e313d68ab73b9fa803</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4992-9967</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6770329/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6770329/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,4010,27900,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31641353$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Iezzi, Roberto</contributor><creatorcontrib>Burgmans, M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slump, Cees</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coenraad, M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Meer, R. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Rijswijk, Catharina S. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Erkel, Arian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baetens, T. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noortman, W. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendriks, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Geus-Oei, L. F.</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative Volumetric Assessment of Ablative Margins in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Predicting Local Tumor Progression Using Nonrigid Registration Software</title><title>Journal of oncology</title><addtitle>J Oncol</addtitle><description>Purpose. After radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), pre- and postinterventional contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) images are usually qualitatively interpreted to determine technical success, by eyeballing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of quantitative assessment, using a nonrigid CT-CT coregistration algorithm. Materials and Methods. 25 patients treated with RFA for HCC between 2009 and 2014 were retrospectively included. Semiautomated coregistration of pre- and posttreatment CECT was performed independently by two radiologists. In scans with a reliable registration, the tumor and ablation area were delineated to identify the side and size of narrowest RFA margin. In addition, qualitative assessment was performed independently by two other radiologists to determine technical success and the anatomical side and size of narrowest margin. Interobserver agreement rates were determined for both methods, and the outcomes were compared with occurrence of local tumor progression (LTP). Results. CT-CT coregistration was technically feasible in 18/25 patients with almost perfect interobserver agreement for quantitative analysis (κ = 0.88). The interobserver agreement for qualitative RFA margin analysis was κ = 0.64. Using quantitative assessment, negative ablative margins were found in 12/18 patients, with LTP occurring in 8 of these patients. In the remaining 6 patients, quantitative analysis demonstrated complete tumor ablation and no LTP occurred. Conclusion. Feasibility of quantitative RFA margin assessment using nonrigid coregistration of pre- and postablation CT is limited, but appears to be a valuable tool in predicting LTP in HCC patients (p=0.013).</description><subject>Ablation</subject><subject>Ablation (Surgery)</subject><subject>CT imaging</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Hepatitis</subject><subject>Hepatoma</subject><subject>Liver cancer</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Registration</subject><subject>Success</subject><issn>1687-8450</issn><issn>1687-8450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1vFCEYhSdGY2v1zmtD4o2JroWB4cMLk81Grcn63XpL3mGYKc0MrMC08bf4Z2Wza1u98grCeXJeDpyqekzwS0Ka5rjGRB0zzFQtxZ3qkHApFpI1-O6t_UH1IKULjDnDit-vDijhjNCGHla_vszgs8uQ3aVF38M4TzZHZ9AyJZvSZH1GoUfLdtwRHyAOzifkPDqxG8jB2HGcR4hoBdE4HyZ4hT5H2zmTnR_QOhgY0ek8hViOwxCLqQsenaWt-jH46AbXoa92cCnHMqNo30KfryDah9W9HsZkH-3Xo-rs7ZvT1cli_end-9VyvTBMqbwQQkrViK7mNWvbvjaiL7mladrWQCehF1JB1xIF2La2tpTQjktoBW1VDxLTo-r1znczt5PtTMkcYdSb6CaIP3UAp_9WvDvXQ7jUXAhMa1UMnu0NYvgx25T15NL2YcDbMCddUyxJo2pCCvr0H_QizNGXeLpmWPCmfAy7oQYYrXa-D2Wu2ZrqJccNoYw2olAvdpSJIaVo--srE6y33dDbbuh9Nwr-5HbMa_hPGQrwfAecO9_BlftPO1sY28MNTSQjktPf04DOyQ</recordid><startdate>2019</startdate><enddate>2019</enddate><creator>Burgmans, M. C.</creator><creator>Slump, Cees</creator><creator>Coenraad, M. J.</creator><creator>van der Meer, R. W.</creator><creator>van Rijswijk, Catharina S. P.</creator><creator>Van Erkel, Arian R.</creator><creator>Baetens, T. R.</creator><creator>Noortman, W. A.</creator><creator>Hendriks, P.</creator><creator>de Geus-Oei, L. F.</creator><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4992-9967</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2019</creationdate><title>Quantitative Volumetric Assessment of Ablative Margins in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Predicting Local Tumor Progression Using Nonrigid Registration Software</title><author>Burgmans, M. C. ; Slump, Cees ; Coenraad, M. J. ; van der Meer, R. W. ; van Rijswijk, Catharina S. P. ; Van Erkel, Arian R. ; Baetens, T. R. ; Noortman, W. A. ; Hendriks, P. ; de Geus-Oei, L. F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-7788957d2624bbf2c7f6878c5bbcad8af789adb19a0ebe2e313d68ab73b9fa803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Ablation</topic><topic>Ablation (Surgery)</topic><topic>CT imaging</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Hepatitis</topic><topic>Hepatoma</topic><topic>Liver cancer</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Registration</topic><topic>Success</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burgmans, M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slump, Cees</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coenraad, M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Meer, R. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Rijswijk, Catharina S. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Erkel, Arian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baetens, T. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noortman, W. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendriks, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Geus-Oei, L. F.</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burgmans, M. C.</au><au>Slump, Cees</au><au>Coenraad, M. J.</au><au>van der Meer, R. W.</au><au>van Rijswijk, Catharina S. P.</au><au>Van Erkel, Arian R.</au><au>Baetens, T. R.</au><au>Noortman, W. A.</au><au>Hendriks, P.</au><au>de Geus-Oei, L. F.</au><au>Iezzi, Roberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative Volumetric Assessment of Ablative Margins in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Predicting Local Tumor Progression Using Nonrigid Registration Software</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Oncol</addtitle><date>2019</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>2019</volume><issue>2019</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>1-8</pages><issn>1687-8450</issn><eissn>1687-8450</eissn><abstract>Purpose. After radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), pre- and postinterventional contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) images are usually qualitatively interpreted to determine technical success, by eyeballing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of quantitative assessment, using a nonrigid CT-CT coregistration algorithm. Materials and Methods. 25 patients treated with RFA for HCC between 2009 and 2014 were retrospectively included. Semiautomated coregistration of pre- and posttreatment CECT was performed independently by two radiologists. In scans with a reliable registration, the tumor and ablation area were delineated to identify the side and size of narrowest RFA margin. In addition, qualitative assessment was performed independently by two other radiologists to determine technical success and the anatomical side and size of narrowest margin. Interobserver agreement rates were determined for both methods, and the outcomes were compared with occurrence of local tumor progression (LTP). Results. CT-CT coregistration was technically feasible in 18/25 patients with almost perfect interobserver agreement for quantitative analysis (κ = 0.88). The interobserver agreement for qualitative RFA margin analysis was κ = 0.64. Using quantitative assessment, negative ablative margins were found in 12/18 patients, with LTP occurring in 8 of these patients. In the remaining 6 patients, quantitative analysis demonstrated complete tumor ablation and no LTP occurred. Conclusion. Feasibility of quantitative RFA margin assessment using nonrigid coregistration of pre- and postablation CT is limited, but appears to be a valuable tool in predicting LTP in HCC patients (p=0.013).</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</pub><pmid>31641353</pmid><doi>10.1155/2019/4049287</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4992-9967</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1687-8450 |
ispartof | Journal of oncology, 2019, Vol.2019 (2019), p.1-8 |
issn | 1687-8450 1687-8450 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6770329 |
source | Wiley Online Library Open Access; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Ablation Ablation (Surgery) CT imaging Development and progression Electrodes Hepatitis Hepatoma Liver cancer Magnetic resonance imaging Medical research Medicine, Experimental Patients Registration Success |
title | Quantitative Volumetric Assessment of Ablative Margins in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Predicting Local Tumor Progression Using Nonrigid Registration Software |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T08%3A12%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20Volumetric%20Assessment%20of%20Ablative%20Margins%20in%20Hepatocellular%20Carcinoma:%20Predicting%20Local%20Tumor%20Progression%20Using%20Nonrigid%20Registration%20Software&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oncology&rft.au=Burgmans,%20M.%20C.&rft.date=2019&rft.volume=2019&rft.issue=2019&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=1-8&rft.issn=1687-8450&rft.eissn=1687-8450&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2019/4049287&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA605134357%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2407656414&rft_id=info:pmid/31641353&rft_galeid=A605134357&rfr_iscdi=true |