Outcomes and Complications After Repair of Complete Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture with the Cortical Button Technique

Numerous surgical techniques have been described for the repair of complete distal biceps tendon ruptures. However, the outcome of repair with cortical button fixation has not been extensively evaluated. The hypothesis of the present study was that elbow strength and range of motion would be less th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JB & JS open access 2019-07, Vol.4 (3), p.e0013-e0013
Hauptverfasser: Huynh, Tiffany, Leiter, Jeff, MacDonald, Peter B., Dubberley, James, Stranges, Gregory, Old, Jason, Marsh, Jonathon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0013
container_issue 3
container_start_page e0013
container_title JB & JS open access
container_volume 4
creator Huynh, Tiffany
Leiter, Jeff
MacDonald, Peter B.
Dubberley, James
Stranges, Gregory
Old, Jason
Marsh, Jonathon
description Numerous surgical techniques have been described for the repair of complete distal biceps tendon ruptures. However, the outcome of repair with cortical button fixation has not been extensively evaluated. The hypothesis of the present study was that elbow strength and range of motion would be less than normal after repair but that ongoing disability would be minimal as measured with use of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with complete distal biceps tendon rupture that was repaired with cortical button fixation via a 1-incision anterior approach. Outcome was assessed on the basis of elbow range-of-motion and strength measurements, DASH scores, and radiographs of the operatively treated elbow. Descriptive statistics were generated for patient demographics and outcome variables. Strength was assessed with limb-symmetry index, and range of motion was evaluated with paired t tests. Sixty male patients consented to this study. The average age at the time of follow-up was 49.6 ± 7.8 years, and the average time from injury to follow-up was 3.7 ± 1.7 years. The mechanism of injury included lifting heavy objects (62%) and sporting activities (25%). Elbow flexion and supination range of motion were not different between the operatively treated and contralateral arms. The operatively treated elbow demonstrated decreased flexion strength (96% of that on the contralateral side) and supination strength (91% of that on the contralateral side). The findings did not change when controlling for hand dominance. The mean DASH score was 7.9 ± 11.4, which is not significantly different from the normative value for the general population. Postoperative complications included heterotopic ossification (Brooker class I [29 patients] or II [5 patients]), neurapraxia (7 patients), and rerupture (3 patients). The repair of complete distal biceps tendon ruptures with cortical button fixation was associated with decreased strength in elbow flexion and forearm supination compared with the contralateral arm, although the differences were small and likely were not clinically important. The complication rate was relatively high; however, most complications were minor and were associated with minimal disability, as reflected by the DASH scores. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
doi_str_mv 10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6766377</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2302470280</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3566-8298285e3842da5d283791e943c7798beb6bbffc443da4b0c87ce0e57fd594713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1v1DAQhiMEolXpvSfkI5ds_ZXYviBtl1KoKq1UtmfLcSbEkMTBdlj13-NlS1UOlkeaZx6P_BbFBcErSnB9eXt1-221Xa-IWmGMCXtVnFIuaCkor16_qE-K8xh_HBDJFWbV2-KEkUpRrtRpEbdLsn6EiMzUoo0f58FZk5yfIlp3CQK6h9m4gHx37EIC9MnFZAZ05SzMEe1gav2E7pc5LQHQ3qUepR4yHlJ2ZW5JKQM7sP3kfi3wrnjTmSHC-dN9Vjx8vt5tvpR325uvm_VdaVlV16WkSlJZAZOctqZqqWRCEVCcWSGUbKCpm6brLOesNbzBVgoLGCrRtZXigrCz4uPROy_NCK2FKQUz6Dm40YRH7Y3T_3cm1-vv_reuRV0zIbLgw5Mg-Lx3THp00cIwmAn8EjVlOP8yphJnFB9RG3yMAbrnZwjWh7j0IS69XWui9N-48sj7l-s9D_wLJwP8COz9kJOIP4dlD0H3YIbUa0xUjRUmJc0VFtlZ5oNr9gdL3KI5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2302470280</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcomes and Complications After Repair of Complete Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture with the Cortical Button Technique</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Huynh, Tiffany ; Leiter, Jeff ; MacDonald, Peter B. ; Dubberley, James ; Stranges, Gregory ; Old, Jason ; Marsh, Jonathon</creator><creatorcontrib>Huynh, Tiffany ; Leiter, Jeff ; MacDonald, Peter B. ; Dubberley, James ; Stranges, Gregory ; Old, Jason ; Marsh, Jonathon</creatorcontrib><description>Numerous surgical techniques have been described for the repair of complete distal biceps tendon ruptures. However, the outcome of repair with cortical button fixation has not been extensively evaluated. The hypothesis of the present study was that elbow strength and range of motion would be less than normal after repair but that ongoing disability would be minimal as measured with use of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with complete distal biceps tendon rupture that was repaired with cortical button fixation via a 1-incision anterior approach. Outcome was assessed on the basis of elbow range-of-motion and strength measurements, DASH scores, and radiographs of the operatively treated elbow. Descriptive statistics were generated for patient demographics and outcome variables. Strength was assessed with limb-symmetry index, and range of motion was evaluated with paired t tests. Sixty male patients consented to this study. The average age at the time of follow-up was 49.6 ± 7.8 years, and the average time from injury to follow-up was 3.7 ± 1.7 years. The mechanism of injury included lifting heavy objects (62%) and sporting activities (25%). Elbow flexion and supination range of motion were not different between the operatively treated and contralateral arms. The operatively treated elbow demonstrated decreased flexion strength (96% of that on the contralateral side) and supination strength (91% of that on the contralateral side). The findings did not change when controlling for hand dominance. The mean DASH score was 7.9 ± 11.4, which is not significantly different from the normative value for the general population. Postoperative complications included heterotopic ossification (Brooker class I [29 patients] or II [5 patients]), neurapraxia (7 patients), and rerupture (3 patients). The repair of complete distal biceps tendon ruptures with cortical button fixation was associated with decreased strength in elbow flexion and forearm supination compared with the contralateral arm, although the differences were small and likely were not clinically important. The complication rate was relatively high; however, most complications were minor and were associated with minimal disability, as reflected by the DASH scores. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2472-7245</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2472-7245</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31592499</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wolters Kluwer</publisher><subject>Scientific</subject><ispartof>JB &amp; JS open access, 2019-07, Vol.4 (3), p.e0013-e0013</ispartof><rights>Wolters Kluwer</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3566-8298285e3842da5d283791e943c7798beb6bbffc443da4b0c87ce0e57fd594713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3566-8298285e3842da5d283791e943c7798beb6bbffc443da4b0c87ce0e57fd594713</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0537-121X ; 0000-0002-8399-6071 ; 0000-0002-0147-9012 ; 0000-0003-3293-1320 ; 0000-0002-0721-9094 ; 0000-0003-0125-0469 ; 0000-0001-8916-8755</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6766377/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6766377/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31592499$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huynh, Tiffany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leiter, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, Peter B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubberley, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stranges, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Old, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsh, Jonathon</creatorcontrib><title>Outcomes and Complications After Repair of Complete Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture with the Cortical Button Technique</title><title>JB &amp; JS open access</title><addtitle>JB JS Open Access</addtitle><description>Numerous surgical techniques have been described for the repair of complete distal biceps tendon ruptures. However, the outcome of repair with cortical button fixation has not been extensively evaluated. The hypothesis of the present study was that elbow strength and range of motion would be less than normal after repair but that ongoing disability would be minimal as measured with use of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with complete distal biceps tendon rupture that was repaired with cortical button fixation via a 1-incision anterior approach. Outcome was assessed on the basis of elbow range-of-motion and strength measurements, DASH scores, and radiographs of the operatively treated elbow. Descriptive statistics were generated for patient demographics and outcome variables. Strength was assessed with limb-symmetry index, and range of motion was evaluated with paired t tests. Sixty male patients consented to this study. The average age at the time of follow-up was 49.6 ± 7.8 years, and the average time from injury to follow-up was 3.7 ± 1.7 years. The mechanism of injury included lifting heavy objects (62%) and sporting activities (25%). Elbow flexion and supination range of motion were not different between the operatively treated and contralateral arms. The operatively treated elbow demonstrated decreased flexion strength (96% of that on the contralateral side) and supination strength (91% of that on the contralateral side). The findings did not change when controlling for hand dominance. The mean DASH score was 7.9 ± 11.4, which is not significantly different from the normative value for the general population. Postoperative complications included heterotopic ossification (Brooker class I [29 patients] or II [5 patients]), neurapraxia (7 patients), and rerupture (3 patients). The repair of complete distal biceps tendon ruptures with cortical button fixation was associated with decreased strength in elbow flexion and forearm supination compared with the contralateral arm, although the differences were small and likely were not clinically important. The complication rate was relatively high; however, most complications were minor and were associated with minimal disability, as reflected by the DASH scores. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><subject>Scientific</subject><issn>2472-7245</issn><issn>2472-7245</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkU1v1DAQhiMEolXpvSfkI5ds_ZXYviBtl1KoKq1UtmfLcSbEkMTBdlj13-NlS1UOlkeaZx6P_BbFBcErSnB9eXt1-221Xa-IWmGMCXtVnFIuaCkor16_qE-K8xh_HBDJFWbV2-KEkUpRrtRpEbdLsn6EiMzUoo0f58FZk5yfIlp3CQK6h9m4gHx37EIC9MnFZAZ05SzMEe1gav2E7pc5LQHQ3qUepR4yHlJ2ZW5JKQM7sP3kfi3wrnjTmSHC-dN9Vjx8vt5tvpR325uvm_VdaVlV16WkSlJZAZOctqZqqWRCEVCcWSGUbKCpm6brLOesNbzBVgoLGCrRtZXigrCz4uPROy_NCK2FKQUz6Dm40YRH7Y3T_3cm1-vv_reuRV0zIbLgw5Mg-Lx3THp00cIwmAn8EjVlOP8yphJnFB9RG3yMAbrnZwjWh7j0IS69XWui9N-48sj7l-s9D_wLJwP8COz9kJOIP4dlD0H3YIbUa0xUjRUmJc0VFtlZ5oNr9gdL3KI5</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Huynh, Tiffany</creator><creator>Leiter, Jeff</creator><creator>MacDonald, Peter B.</creator><creator>Dubberley, James</creator><creator>Stranges, Gregory</creator><creator>Old, Jason</creator><creator>Marsh, Jonathon</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0537-121X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8399-6071</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0147-9012</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3293-1320</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0721-9094</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0125-0469</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8916-8755</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Outcomes and Complications After Repair of Complete Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture with the Cortical Button Technique</title><author>Huynh, Tiffany ; Leiter, Jeff ; MacDonald, Peter B. ; Dubberley, James ; Stranges, Gregory ; Old, Jason ; Marsh, Jonathon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3566-8298285e3842da5d283791e943c7798beb6bbffc443da4b0c87ce0e57fd594713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Scientific</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huynh, Tiffany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leiter, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, Peter B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubberley, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stranges, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Old, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsh, Jonathon</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JB &amp; JS open access</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huynh, Tiffany</au><au>Leiter, Jeff</au><au>MacDonald, Peter B.</au><au>Dubberley, James</au><au>Stranges, Gregory</au><au>Old, Jason</au><au>Marsh, Jonathon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcomes and Complications After Repair of Complete Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture with the Cortical Button Technique</atitle><jtitle>JB &amp; JS open access</jtitle><addtitle>JB JS Open Access</addtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0013</spage><epage>e0013</epage><pages>e0013-e0013</pages><issn>2472-7245</issn><eissn>2472-7245</eissn><abstract>Numerous surgical techniques have been described for the repair of complete distal biceps tendon ruptures. However, the outcome of repair with cortical button fixation has not been extensively evaluated. The hypothesis of the present study was that elbow strength and range of motion would be less than normal after repair but that ongoing disability would be minimal as measured with use of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with complete distal biceps tendon rupture that was repaired with cortical button fixation via a 1-incision anterior approach. Outcome was assessed on the basis of elbow range-of-motion and strength measurements, DASH scores, and radiographs of the operatively treated elbow. Descriptive statistics were generated for patient demographics and outcome variables. Strength was assessed with limb-symmetry index, and range of motion was evaluated with paired t tests. Sixty male patients consented to this study. The average age at the time of follow-up was 49.6 ± 7.8 years, and the average time from injury to follow-up was 3.7 ± 1.7 years. The mechanism of injury included lifting heavy objects (62%) and sporting activities (25%). Elbow flexion and supination range of motion were not different between the operatively treated and contralateral arms. The operatively treated elbow demonstrated decreased flexion strength (96% of that on the contralateral side) and supination strength (91% of that on the contralateral side). The findings did not change when controlling for hand dominance. The mean DASH score was 7.9 ± 11.4, which is not significantly different from the normative value for the general population. Postoperative complications included heterotopic ossification (Brooker class I [29 patients] or II [5 patients]), neurapraxia (7 patients), and rerupture (3 patients). The repair of complete distal biceps tendon ruptures with cortical button fixation was associated with decreased strength in elbow flexion and forearm supination compared with the contralateral arm, although the differences were small and likely were not clinically important. The complication rate was relatively high; however, most complications were minor and were associated with minimal disability, as reflected by the DASH scores. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer</pub><pmid>31592499</pmid><doi>10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00013</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0537-121X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8399-6071</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0147-9012</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3293-1320</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0721-9094</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0125-0469</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8916-8755</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2472-7245
ispartof JB & JS open access, 2019-07, Vol.4 (3), p.e0013-e0013
issn 2472-7245
2472-7245
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6766377
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Scientific
title Outcomes and Complications After Repair of Complete Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture with the Cortical Button Technique
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T13%3A34%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcomes%20and%20Complications%20After%20Repair%20of%20Complete%20Distal%20Biceps%20Tendon%20Rupture%20with%20the%20Cortical%20Button%20Technique&rft.jtitle=JB%20&%20JS%20open%20access&rft.au=Huynh,%20Tiffany&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0013&rft.epage=e0013&rft.pages=e0013-e0013&rft.issn=2472-7245&rft.eissn=2472-7245&rft_id=info:doi/10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2302470280%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2302470280&rft_id=info:pmid/31592499&rfr_iscdi=true