Top-down guidance of attention to food cues is enhanced in individuals with overweight/obesity and predicts change in weight at one-year follow up
Background Changing eating behaviour may be challenging for individuals with obesity and this may be related to attentional bias towards food. Previous paradigms used to assess attentional bias to food stimuli have not distinguished between bottom-up processes related to assessment of rewarding stim...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International Journal of Obesity 2019-09, Vol.43 (9), p.1849-1858 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1858 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 1849 |
| container_title | International Journal of Obesity |
| container_volume | 43 |
| creator | Kaisari, Panagiota Kumar, Sudhesh Hattersley, John Dourish, Colin T. Rotshtein, Pia Higgs, Suzanne |
| description | Background
Changing eating behaviour may be challenging for individuals with obesity and this may be related to attentional bias towards food. Previous paradigms used to assess attentional bias to food stimuli have not distinguished between bottom-up processes related to assessment of rewarding stimuli versus top-down processes related to effects of mind-set on attention. We investigated whether attentional bias for food cues varies between individuals with overweight/obesity and healthy weight individuals, due to differential top-down control of attention. We also determined whether top-down biases predict food consumption in the lab and weight change in our sample over one-year.
Methods
Forty-three participants with overweight/obesity and 49 healthy weight participants between the ages of 18 and 58 participated. Participants completed two attention tasks in a counterbalanced order: (i) a priming task assessing bottom-up control of attention and (ii) a working memory task assessing top-down control of attention. Eating behaviour was assessed by a taste test. At one-year follow-up participants returned to the laboratory to assess changes in their body mass index (BMI).
Results
The healthy weight and overweight/obese groups did not differ in demographics and baseline measures (appetite, food liking, taste test food intake). Participants with overweight/obesity showed greater top-down attentional bias towards food cues than did healthy weight participants but had no difference in bottom-up attentional bias. Top down attentional bias towards food cues predicted weight change over one-year but did not predict food intake in the taste test.
Conclusions
The present findings illustrate that the relationship between attentional bias for food, food intake, and body weight is complex. Top-down effects of mind-set on attention, rather than bottom-up control of attention to food may contribute to patterns of eating that result in development and/or maintenance of overweight/obesity. Interventions targeted at top down biases could be effective in facilitating prevention of weight gain. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41366-018-0246-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6760610</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2283957356</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-11a328d57a144c8c490b5d51008e61f472584555b311694e7fb0295aa56a8d693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc2KFDEUhYMoTk_rA7iRgBs3cfKfqo0gg47CgJtxHVJJqjtDdVImVd30a_jEpqhx_AEhkMX97rn33APAK4LfEcyaq8IJkxJh0iBMuUTsCdgQriQSvFVPwQYzrBAWUlyAy1LuMcZCYPocXDDMJae03YAfd2lELp0i3M3BmWg9TD000-TjFFKEU4J9Sg7a2RcYCvRxv0AOhlifC8fgZjMUeArTHqajzycfdvvpKnW-hOkMTXRwzN4FOxVoa-_OL60rVefAFD06e5PrmGFIJziPL8Czvkr6lw__Fnz79PHu-jO6_Xrz5frDLbJc4QkRYhhtnFCGcG4by1vcCScIxo2XpOeKioYLITpGiGy5V32HaSuMEdI0TrZsC96vuuPcHbyz1XE2gx5zOJh81skE_Xclhr3epaOWSmJZA9iCtw8COX2v95n0IRTrh8FEn-aiKVEtZYRiVtE3_6D3ac6x2tOUNqwViglZKbJSNqdSsu8flyFYL4nrNXFdE9dL4npRfv2ni8eOXxFXgK5AqaV6_vx79P9VfwLN17gn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2283957356</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Top-down guidance of attention to food cues is enhanced in individuals with overweight/obesity and predicts change in weight at one-year follow up</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Nature Journals Online</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kaisari, Panagiota ; Kumar, Sudhesh ; Hattersley, John ; Dourish, Colin T. ; Rotshtein, Pia ; Higgs, Suzanne</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaisari, Panagiota ; Kumar, Sudhesh ; Hattersley, John ; Dourish, Colin T. ; Rotshtein, Pia ; Higgs, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Changing eating behaviour may be challenging for individuals with obesity and this may be related to attentional bias towards food. Previous paradigms used to assess attentional bias to food stimuli have not distinguished between bottom-up processes related to assessment of rewarding stimuli versus top-down processes related to effects of mind-set on attention. We investigated whether attentional bias for food cues varies between individuals with overweight/obesity and healthy weight individuals, due to differential top-down control of attention. We also determined whether top-down biases predict food consumption in the lab and weight change in our sample over one-year.
Methods
Forty-three participants with overweight/obesity and 49 healthy weight participants between the ages of 18 and 58 participated. Participants completed two attention tasks in a counterbalanced order: (i) a priming task assessing bottom-up control of attention and (ii) a working memory task assessing top-down control of attention. Eating behaviour was assessed by a taste test. At one-year follow-up participants returned to the laboratory to assess changes in their body mass index (BMI).
Results
The healthy weight and overweight/obese groups did not differ in demographics and baseline measures (appetite, food liking, taste test food intake). Participants with overweight/obesity showed greater top-down attentional bias towards food cues than did healthy weight participants but had no difference in bottom-up attentional bias. Top down attentional bias towards food cues predicted weight change over one-year but did not predict food intake in the taste test.
Conclusions
The present findings illustrate that the relationship between attentional bias for food, food intake, and body weight is complex. Top-down effects of mind-set on attention, rather than bottom-up control of attention to food may contribute to patterns of eating that result in development and/or maintenance of overweight/obesity. Interventions targeted at top down biases could be effective in facilitating prevention of weight gain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0307-0565</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5497</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41366-018-0246-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30464229</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/308 ; 692/499 ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Appetite ; Attention - physiology ; Bias ; Body mass index ; Body size ; Body weight ; Body Weight - physiology ; Body weight gain ; Cues ; Demographics ; Demography ; Eating ; Eating behavior ; Epidemiology ; Feeding Behavior - physiology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Food ; Food consumption ; Food intake ; Health Promotion and Disease Prevention ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Memory tasks ; Memory, Short-Term - physiology ; Mental task performance ; Metabolic Diseases ; Middle Aged ; Obesity ; Obesity - physiopathology ; Obesity - psychology ; Overweight ; Overweight - physiopathology ; Overweight - psychology ; Priming ; Public Health ; Short term memory ; Stimuli ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Taste ; Tasting tests ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>International Journal of Obesity, 2019-09, Vol.43 (9), p.1849-1858</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-11a328d57a144c8c490b5d51008e61f472584555b311694e7fb0295aa56a8d693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-11a328d57a144c8c490b5d51008e61f472584555b311694e7fb0295aa56a8d693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/s41366-018-0246-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/s41366-018-0246-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30464229$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaisari, Panagiota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Sudhesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hattersley, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dourish, Colin T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotshtein, Pia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgs, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><title>Top-down guidance of attention to food cues is enhanced in individuals with overweight/obesity and predicts change in weight at one-year follow up</title><title>International Journal of Obesity</title><addtitle>Int J Obes</addtitle><addtitle>Int J Obes (Lond)</addtitle><description>Background
Changing eating behaviour may be challenging for individuals with obesity and this may be related to attentional bias towards food. Previous paradigms used to assess attentional bias to food stimuli have not distinguished between bottom-up processes related to assessment of rewarding stimuli versus top-down processes related to effects of mind-set on attention. We investigated whether attentional bias for food cues varies between individuals with overweight/obesity and healthy weight individuals, due to differential top-down control of attention. We also determined whether top-down biases predict food consumption in the lab and weight change in our sample over one-year.
Methods
Forty-three participants with overweight/obesity and 49 healthy weight participants between the ages of 18 and 58 participated. Participants completed two attention tasks in a counterbalanced order: (i) a priming task assessing bottom-up control of attention and (ii) a working memory task assessing top-down control of attention. Eating behaviour was assessed by a taste test. At one-year follow-up participants returned to the laboratory to assess changes in their body mass index (BMI).
Results
The healthy weight and overweight/obese groups did not differ in demographics and baseline measures (appetite, food liking, taste test food intake). Participants with overweight/obesity showed greater top-down attentional bias towards food cues than did healthy weight participants but had no difference in bottom-up attentional bias. Top down attentional bias towards food cues predicted weight change over one-year but did not predict food intake in the taste test.
Conclusions
The present findings illustrate that the relationship between attentional bias for food, food intake, and body weight is complex. Top-down effects of mind-set on attention, rather than bottom-up control of attention to food may contribute to patterns of eating that result in development and/or maintenance of overweight/obesity. Interventions targeted at top down biases could be effective in facilitating prevention of weight gain.</description><subject>692/308</subject><subject>692/499</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Appetite</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Body Weight - physiology</subject><subject>Body weight gain</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Eating</subject><subject>Eating behavior</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food consumption</subject><subject>Food intake</subject><subject>Health Promotion and Disease Prevention</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Memory tasks</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</subject><subject>Mental task performance</subject><subject>Metabolic Diseases</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Obesity - physiopathology</subject><subject>Obesity - psychology</subject><subject>Overweight</subject><subject>Overweight - physiopathology</subject><subject>Overweight - psychology</subject><subject>Priming</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Short term memory</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Taste</subject><subject>Tasting tests</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0307-0565</issn><issn>1476-5497</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc2KFDEUhYMoTk_rA7iRgBs3cfKfqo0gg47CgJtxHVJJqjtDdVImVd30a_jEpqhx_AEhkMX97rn33APAK4LfEcyaq8IJkxJh0iBMuUTsCdgQriQSvFVPwQYzrBAWUlyAy1LuMcZCYPocXDDMJae03YAfd2lELp0i3M3BmWg9TD000-TjFFKEU4J9Sg7a2RcYCvRxv0AOhlifC8fgZjMUeArTHqajzycfdvvpKnW-hOkMTXRwzN4FOxVoa-_OL60rVefAFD06e5PrmGFIJziPL8Czvkr6lw__Fnz79PHu-jO6_Xrz5frDLbJc4QkRYhhtnFCGcG4by1vcCScIxo2XpOeKioYLITpGiGy5V32HaSuMEdI0TrZsC96vuuPcHbyz1XE2gx5zOJh81skE_Xclhr3epaOWSmJZA9iCtw8COX2v95n0IRTrh8FEn-aiKVEtZYRiVtE3_6D3ac6x2tOUNqwViglZKbJSNqdSsu8flyFYL4nrNXFdE9dL4npRfv2ni8eOXxFXgK5AqaV6_vx79P9VfwLN17gn</recordid><startdate>20190901</startdate><enddate>20190901</enddate><creator>Kaisari, Panagiota</creator><creator>Kumar, Sudhesh</creator><creator>Hattersley, John</creator><creator>Dourish, Colin T.</creator><creator>Rotshtein, Pia</creator><creator>Higgs, Suzanne</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190901</creationdate><title>Top-down guidance of attention to food cues is enhanced in individuals with overweight/obesity and predicts change in weight at one-year follow up</title><author>Kaisari, Panagiota ; Kumar, Sudhesh ; Hattersley, John ; Dourish, Colin T. ; Rotshtein, Pia ; Higgs, Suzanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-11a328d57a144c8c490b5d51008e61f472584555b311694e7fb0295aa56a8d693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>692/308</topic><topic>692/499</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Appetite</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Body Weight - physiology</topic><topic>Body weight gain</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Eating</topic><topic>Eating behavior</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food consumption</topic><topic>Food intake</topic><topic>Health Promotion and Disease Prevention</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Memory tasks</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</topic><topic>Mental task performance</topic><topic>Metabolic Diseases</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Obesity - physiopathology</topic><topic>Obesity - psychology</topic><topic>Overweight</topic><topic>Overweight - physiopathology</topic><topic>Overweight - psychology</topic><topic>Priming</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Short term memory</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Taste</topic><topic>Tasting tests</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaisari, Panagiota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Sudhesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hattersley, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dourish, Colin T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotshtein, Pia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgs, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International Journal of Obesity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaisari, Panagiota</au><au>Kumar, Sudhesh</au><au>Hattersley, John</au><au>Dourish, Colin T.</au><au>Rotshtein, Pia</au><au>Higgs, Suzanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Top-down guidance of attention to food cues is enhanced in individuals with overweight/obesity and predicts change in weight at one-year follow up</atitle><jtitle>International Journal of Obesity</jtitle><stitle>Int J Obes</stitle><addtitle>Int J Obes (Lond)</addtitle><date>2019-09-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1849</spage><epage>1858</epage><pages>1849-1858</pages><issn>0307-0565</issn><eissn>1476-5497</eissn><abstract>Background
Changing eating behaviour may be challenging for individuals with obesity and this may be related to attentional bias towards food. Previous paradigms used to assess attentional bias to food stimuli have not distinguished between bottom-up processes related to assessment of rewarding stimuli versus top-down processes related to effects of mind-set on attention. We investigated whether attentional bias for food cues varies between individuals with overweight/obesity and healthy weight individuals, due to differential top-down control of attention. We also determined whether top-down biases predict food consumption in the lab and weight change in our sample over one-year.
Methods
Forty-three participants with overweight/obesity and 49 healthy weight participants between the ages of 18 and 58 participated. Participants completed two attention tasks in a counterbalanced order: (i) a priming task assessing bottom-up control of attention and (ii) a working memory task assessing top-down control of attention. Eating behaviour was assessed by a taste test. At one-year follow-up participants returned to the laboratory to assess changes in their body mass index (BMI).
Results
The healthy weight and overweight/obese groups did not differ in demographics and baseline measures (appetite, food liking, taste test food intake). Participants with overweight/obesity showed greater top-down attentional bias towards food cues than did healthy weight participants but had no difference in bottom-up attentional bias. Top down attentional bias towards food cues predicted weight change over one-year but did not predict food intake in the taste test.
Conclusions
The present findings illustrate that the relationship between attentional bias for food, food intake, and body weight is complex. Top-down effects of mind-set on attention, rather than bottom-up control of attention to food may contribute to patterns of eating that result in development and/or maintenance of overweight/obesity. Interventions targeted at top down biases could be effective in facilitating prevention of weight gain.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>30464229</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41366-018-0246-3</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0307-0565 |
| ispartof | International Journal of Obesity, 2019-09, Vol.43 (9), p.1849-1858 |
| issn | 0307-0565 1476-5497 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6760610 |
| source | MEDLINE; Nature Journals Online; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | 692/308 692/499 Adolescent Adult Appetite Attention - physiology Bias Body mass index Body size Body weight Body Weight - physiology Body weight gain Cues Demographics Demography Eating Eating behavior Epidemiology Feeding Behavior - physiology Female Follow-Up Studies Food Food consumption Food intake Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Humans Internal Medicine Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Memory tasks Memory, Short-Term - physiology Mental task performance Metabolic Diseases Middle Aged Obesity Obesity - physiopathology Obesity - psychology Overweight Overweight - physiopathology Overweight - psychology Priming Public Health Short term memory Stimuli Surveys and Questionnaires Taste Tasting tests Young Adult |
| title | Top-down guidance of attention to food cues is enhanced in individuals with overweight/obesity and predicts change in weight at one-year follow up |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T22%3A52%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Top-down%20guidance%20of%20attention%20to%20food%20cues%20is%20enhanced%20in%20individuals%20with%20overweight/obesity%20and%20predicts%20change%20in%20weight%20at%20one-year%20follow%20up&rft.jtitle=International%20Journal%20of%20Obesity&rft.au=Kaisari,%20Panagiota&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1849&rft.epage=1858&rft.pages=1849-1858&rft.issn=0307-0565&rft.eissn=1476-5497&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41366-018-0246-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2283957356%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2283957356&rft_id=info:pmid/30464229&rfr_iscdi=true |