Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Outcomes of Peak–Trough-Based Versus Trough-Based Vancomycin Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Approaches: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

Background Vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is based on achieving 24-h area under the concentration–time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration cure breakpoints (AUC 24 /MIC). Approaches to vancomycin TDM vary, with no head-to-head randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparisons to date...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics 2019-10, Vol.44 (5), p.639-652
Hauptverfasser: Al-Sulaiti, Fatima Khalifa, Nader, Ahmed Mohamed, Saad, Mohamed Omar, Shaukat, Adila, Parakadavathu, Rakesh, Elzubair, Ahmed, Al-Badriyeh, Daoud, Elewa, Hazem, Awaisu, Ahmed
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 652
container_issue 5
container_start_page 639
container_title European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics
container_volume 44
creator Al-Sulaiti, Fatima Khalifa
Nader, Ahmed Mohamed
Saad, Mohamed Omar
Shaukat, Adila
Parakadavathu, Rakesh
Elzubair, Ahmed
Al-Badriyeh, Daoud
Elewa, Hazem
Awaisu, Ahmed
description Background Vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is based on achieving 24-h area under the concentration–time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration cure breakpoints (AUC 24 /MIC). Approaches to vancomycin TDM vary, with no head-to-head randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparisons to date. Objectives We aimed to compare clinical and pharmacokinetic outcomes between peak–trough-based and trough-only-based vancomycin TDM approaches and to determine the relationship between vancomycin AUC 24 /MIC and cure rates. Methods A multicentered pragmatic parallel-group RCT was conducted in Hamad Medical Corporation hospitals in Qatar. Adult non-dialysis patients initiated on vancomycin were randomized to peak–trough-based or trough-only-based vancomycin TDM. Primary endpoints included vancomycin AUC 24 /MIC ratio breakpoint for cure and clinical effectiveness (therapeutic cure vs therapeutic failure). Descriptive, inferential, and classification and regression tree (CART) statistical analyses were applied. NONMEM.v.7.3 was used to conduct population pharmacokinetic analyses and AUC 24 calculations. Results Sixty-five patients were enrolled [trough-only-based-TDM ( n  = 35) and peak–trough-based-TDM ( n  = 30)]. Peak–trough-based TDM was significantly associated with higher therapeutic cure rates compared to trough-only-based TDM [76.7% vs 48.6%; p value = 0.02]. No statistically significant differences were observed for all-cause mortality, neutropenia, or nephrotoxicity between the two groups. Compared to trough-only-based TDM, peak–trough-based TDM was associated with less vancomycin total daily doses by 12.05 mg/kg/day ( p value = 0.027). CART identified creatinine clearance (CL CR ), AUC 24 /MIC, and TDM approach as significant determinants of therapeutic outcomes. All patients [ n  = 19,100%] with CL CR  ≤ 7.85 L/h, AUC 24 /MIC ≤ 1256, who received peak–trough-based TDM achieved therapeutic cure. AUC 24 /MIC > 565 was identified to be correlated with cure in trough-only-based TDM recipients [ n  = 11,84.6%]. No minimum AUC 24 /MIC breakpoint was detected by CART in the peak–trough-based group. Conclusion Maintenance of target vancomycin exposures and implementation of peak–trough-based vancomycin TDM may improve vancomycin-associated cure rates. Larger scale RCTs are warranted to confirm these findings.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13318-019-00551-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6746691</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2199185012</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-5d3311fc9555825c1f0a5c0a21f660a276716ab3cff2f70bb332f4b1e567e4553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi0EoqvSF-CAfOQS8J-1k3BAWhYKSEVdoYWrNfHaWbeJndoJUnviHXgM3oonwWFLRS_4Mtb4m9-M50PoKSUvKCHly0Q5p1VBaF0QIgQt6AO0YJSUOVWRh2hBeFkVZS3lETpJ6YLkw6taCPkYHXFS05pxvkA_153zTkOHwe_wZg-xBx0unTej0_h8GnXoTcLB4o2By1_ff2xjmNp98QaS2eGvJqYp4fs58LnmWjuPt3sTYTDTjHobpxZ_Ct6NITrf4tUwxAB6b9IrvMKbCG0Ps-5zniP07iaT1sGPMXRdvm6jg-4JemShS-bkNh6jL6fvtusPxdn5-4_r1VmhBWVjIXZ5M9Tq_FdRMaGpJSA0AUatlDmUsqQSGq6tZbYkTcM5s8uGGiFLsxSCH6PXB-4wNb3ZaZPHgE4N0fUQr1UAp-6_eLdXbfimZLmUsqYZ8PwWEMPVZNKoepe06TrwJkxJMVrXtBKEsixlB6mOIaVo7F0bStRstDoYrbLR6o_RauY_-3fAu5K_tmYBPwjSMC_bRHURpujz0v6H_Q1s3Lhx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2199185012</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Outcomes of Peak–Trough-Based Versus Trough-Based Vancomycin Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Approaches: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Al-Sulaiti, Fatima Khalifa ; Nader, Ahmed Mohamed ; Saad, Mohamed Omar ; Shaukat, Adila ; Parakadavathu, Rakesh ; Elzubair, Ahmed ; Al-Badriyeh, Daoud ; Elewa, Hazem ; Awaisu, Ahmed</creator><creatorcontrib>Al-Sulaiti, Fatima Khalifa ; Nader, Ahmed Mohamed ; Saad, Mohamed Omar ; Shaukat, Adila ; Parakadavathu, Rakesh ; Elzubair, Ahmed ; Al-Badriyeh, Daoud ; Elewa, Hazem ; Awaisu, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><description>Background Vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is based on achieving 24-h area under the concentration–time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration cure breakpoints (AUC 24 /MIC). Approaches to vancomycin TDM vary, with no head-to-head randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparisons to date. Objectives We aimed to compare clinical and pharmacokinetic outcomes between peak–trough-based and trough-only-based vancomycin TDM approaches and to determine the relationship between vancomycin AUC 24 /MIC and cure rates. Methods A multicentered pragmatic parallel-group RCT was conducted in Hamad Medical Corporation hospitals in Qatar. Adult non-dialysis patients initiated on vancomycin were randomized to peak–trough-based or trough-only-based vancomycin TDM. Primary endpoints included vancomycin AUC 24 /MIC ratio breakpoint for cure and clinical effectiveness (therapeutic cure vs therapeutic failure). Descriptive, inferential, and classification and regression tree (CART) statistical analyses were applied. NONMEM.v.7.3 was used to conduct population pharmacokinetic analyses and AUC 24 calculations. Results Sixty-five patients were enrolled [trough-only-based-TDM ( n  = 35) and peak–trough-based-TDM ( n  = 30)]. Peak–trough-based TDM was significantly associated with higher therapeutic cure rates compared to trough-only-based TDM [76.7% vs 48.6%; p value = 0.02]. No statistically significant differences were observed for all-cause mortality, neutropenia, or nephrotoxicity between the two groups. Compared to trough-only-based TDM, peak–trough-based TDM was associated with less vancomycin total daily doses by 12.05 mg/kg/day ( p value = 0.027). CART identified creatinine clearance (CL CR ), AUC 24 /MIC, and TDM approach as significant determinants of therapeutic outcomes. All patients [ n  = 19,100%] with CL CR  ≤ 7.85 L/h, AUC 24 /MIC ≤ 1256, who received peak–trough-based TDM achieved therapeutic cure. AUC 24 /MIC &gt; 565 was identified to be correlated with cure in trough-only-based TDM recipients [ n  = 11,84.6%]. No minimum AUC 24 /MIC breakpoint was detected by CART in the peak–trough-based group. Conclusion Maintenance of target vancomycin exposures and implementation of peak–trough-based vancomycin TDM may improve vancomycin-associated cure rates. Larger scale RCTs are warranted to confirm these findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-7966</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2107-0180</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2107-0180</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13318-019-00551-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30919233</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Adult ; Area Under Curve ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Drug Monitoring - methods ; Female ; Human Physiology ; Humans ; Male ; Medical Biochemistry ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests - methods ; Original ; Original Research Article ; Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Pharmacy ; Qatar ; Treatment Outcome ; Vancomycin - pharmacokinetics</subject><ispartof>European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2019-10, Vol.44 (5), p.639-652</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-5d3311fc9555825c1f0a5c0a21f660a276716ab3cff2f70bb332f4b1e567e4553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-5d3311fc9555825c1f0a5c0a21f660a276716ab3cff2f70bb332f4b1e567e4553</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9029-8925</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13318-019-00551-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13318-019-00551-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30919233$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Al-Sulaiti, Fatima Khalifa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nader, Ahmed Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saad, Mohamed Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaukat, Adila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parakadavathu, Rakesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elzubair, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Badriyeh, Daoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elewa, Hazem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Awaisu, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Outcomes of Peak–Trough-Based Versus Trough-Based Vancomycin Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Approaches: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics</title><addtitle>Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet</addtitle><description>Background Vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is based on achieving 24-h area under the concentration–time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration cure breakpoints (AUC 24 /MIC). Approaches to vancomycin TDM vary, with no head-to-head randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparisons to date. Objectives We aimed to compare clinical and pharmacokinetic outcomes between peak–trough-based and trough-only-based vancomycin TDM approaches and to determine the relationship between vancomycin AUC 24 /MIC and cure rates. Methods A multicentered pragmatic parallel-group RCT was conducted in Hamad Medical Corporation hospitals in Qatar. Adult non-dialysis patients initiated on vancomycin were randomized to peak–trough-based or trough-only-based vancomycin TDM. Primary endpoints included vancomycin AUC 24 /MIC ratio breakpoint for cure and clinical effectiveness (therapeutic cure vs therapeutic failure). Descriptive, inferential, and classification and regression tree (CART) statistical analyses were applied. NONMEM.v.7.3 was used to conduct population pharmacokinetic analyses and AUC 24 calculations. Results Sixty-five patients were enrolled [trough-only-based-TDM ( n  = 35) and peak–trough-based-TDM ( n  = 30)]. Peak–trough-based TDM was significantly associated with higher therapeutic cure rates compared to trough-only-based TDM [76.7% vs 48.6%; p value = 0.02]. No statistically significant differences were observed for all-cause mortality, neutropenia, or nephrotoxicity between the two groups. Compared to trough-only-based TDM, peak–trough-based TDM was associated with less vancomycin total daily doses by 12.05 mg/kg/day ( p value = 0.027). CART identified creatinine clearance (CL CR ), AUC 24 /MIC, and TDM approach as significant determinants of therapeutic outcomes. All patients [ n  = 19,100%] with CL CR  ≤ 7.85 L/h, AUC 24 /MIC ≤ 1256, who received peak–trough-based TDM achieved therapeutic cure. AUC 24 /MIC &gt; 565 was identified to be correlated with cure in trough-only-based TDM recipients [ n  = 11,84.6%]. No minimum AUC 24 /MIC breakpoint was detected by CART in the peak–trough-based group. Conclusion Maintenance of target vancomycin exposures and implementation of peak–trough-based vancomycin TDM may improve vancomycin-associated cure rates. Larger scale RCTs are warranted to confirm these findings.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Area Under Curve</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Drug Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human Physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Biochemistry</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests - methods</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Research Article</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Qatar</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vancomycin - pharmacokinetics</subject><issn>0378-7966</issn><issn>2107-0180</issn><issn>2107-0180</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi0EoqvSF-CAfOQS8J-1k3BAWhYKSEVdoYWrNfHaWbeJndoJUnviHXgM3oonwWFLRS_4Mtb4m9-M50PoKSUvKCHly0Q5p1VBaF0QIgQt6AO0YJSUOVWRh2hBeFkVZS3lETpJ6YLkw6taCPkYHXFS05pxvkA_153zTkOHwe_wZg-xBx0unTej0_h8GnXoTcLB4o2By1_ff2xjmNp98QaS2eGvJqYp4fs58LnmWjuPt3sTYTDTjHobpxZ_Ct6NITrf4tUwxAB6b9IrvMKbCG0Ps-5zniP07iaT1sGPMXRdvm6jg-4JemShS-bkNh6jL6fvtusPxdn5-4_r1VmhBWVjIXZ5M9Tq_FdRMaGpJSA0AUatlDmUsqQSGq6tZbYkTcM5s8uGGiFLsxSCH6PXB-4wNb3ZaZPHgE4N0fUQr1UAp-6_eLdXbfimZLmUsqYZ8PwWEMPVZNKoepe06TrwJkxJMVrXtBKEsixlB6mOIaVo7F0bStRstDoYrbLR6o_RauY_-3fAu5K_tmYBPwjSMC_bRHURpujz0v6H_Q1s3Lhx</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Al-Sulaiti, Fatima Khalifa</creator><creator>Nader, Ahmed Mohamed</creator><creator>Saad, Mohamed Omar</creator><creator>Shaukat, Adila</creator><creator>Parakadavathu, Rakesh</creator><creator>Elzubair, Ahmed</creator><creator>Al-Badriyeh, Daoud</creator><creator>Elewa, Hazem</creator><creator>Awaisu, Ahmed</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9029-8925</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Outcomes of Peak–Trough-Based Versus Trough-Based Vancomycin Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Approaches: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>Al-Sulaiti, Fatima Khalifa ; Nader, Ahmed Mohamed ; Saad, Mohamed Omar ; Shaukat, Adila ; Parakadavathu, Rakesh ; Elzubair, Ahmed ; Al-Badriyeh, Daoud ; Elewa, Hazem ; Awaisu, Ahmed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-5d3311fc9555825c1f0a5c0a21f660a276716ab3cff2f70bb332f4b1e567e4553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Area Under Curve</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Drug Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human Physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Biochemistry</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests - methods</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Research Article</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Qatar</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vancomycin - pharmacokinetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Al-Sulaiti, Fatima Khalifa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nader, Ahmed Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saad, Mohamed Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaukat, Adila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parakadavathu, Rakesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elzubair, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Badriyeh, Daoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elewa, Hazem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Awaisu, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Al-Sulaiti, Fatima Khalifa</au><au>Nader, Ahmed Mohamed</au><au>Saad, Mohamed Omar</au><au>Shaukat, Adila</au><au>Parakadavathu, Rakesh</au><au>Elzubair, Ahmed</au><au>Al-Badriyeh, Daoud</au><au>Elewa, Hazem</au><au>Awaisu, Ahmed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Outcomes of Peak–Trough-Based Versus Trough-Based Vancomycin Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Approaches: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet</addtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>639</spage><epage>652</epage><pages>639-652</pages><issn>0378-7966</issn><issn>2107-0180</issn><eissn>2107-0180</eissn><abstract>Background Vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is based on achieving 24-h area under the concentration–time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration cure breakpoints (AUC 24 /MIC). Approaches to vancomycin TDM vary, with no head-to-head randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparisons to date. Objectives We aimed to compare clinical and pharmacokinetic outcomes between peak–trough-based and trough-only-based vancomycin TDM approaches and to determine the relationship between vancomycin AUC 24 /MIC and cure rates. Methods A multicentered pragmatic parallel-group RCT was conducted in Hamad Medical Corporation hospitals in Qatar. Adult non-dialysis patients initiated on vancomycin were randomized to peak–trough-based or trough-only-based vancomycin TDM. Primary endpoints included vancomycin AUC 24 /MIC ratio breakpoint for cure and clinical effectiveness (therapeutic cure vs therapeutic failure). Descriptive, inferential, and classification and regression tree (CART) statistical analyses were applied. NONMEM.v.7.3 was used to conduct population pharmacokinetic analyses and AUC 24 calculations. Results Sixty-five patients were enrolled [trough-only-based-TDM ( n  = 35) and peak–trough-based-TDM ( n  = 30)]. Peak–trough-based TDM was significantly associated with higher therapeutic cure rates compared to trough-only-based TDM [76.7% vs 48.6%; p value = 0.02]. No statistically significant differences were observed for all-cause mortality, neutropenia, or nephrotoxicity between the two groups. Compared to trough-only-based TDM, peak–trough-based TDM was associated with less vancomycin total daily doses by 12.05 mg/kg/day ( p value = 0.027). CART identified creatinine clearance (CL CR ), AUC 24 /MIC, and TDM approach as significant determinants of therapeutic outcomes. All patients [ n  = 19,100%] with CL CR  ≤ 7.85 L/h, AUC 24 /MIC ≤ 1256, who received peak–trough-based TDM achieved therapeutic cure. AUC 24 /MIC &gt; 565 was identified to be correlated with cure in trough-only-based TDM recipients [ n  = 11,84.6%]. No minimum AUC 24 /MIC breakpoint was detected by CART in the peak–trough-based group. Conclusion Maintenance of target vancomycin exposures and implementation of peak–trough-based vancomycin TDM may improve vancomycin-associated cure rates. Larger scale RCTs are warranted to confirm these findings.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>30919233</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13318-019-00551-1</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9029-8925</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-7966
ispartof European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2019-10, Vol.44 (5), p.639-652
issn 0378-7966
2107-0180
2107-0180
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6746691
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Adult
Area Under Curve
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Drug Monitoring - methods
Female
Human Physiology
Humans
Male
Medical Biochemistry
Microbial Sensitivity Tests - methods
Original
Original Research Article
Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology
Pharmacology/Toxicology
Pharmacy
Qatar
Treatment Outcome
Vancomycin - pharmacokinetics
title Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Outcomes of Peak–Trough-Based Versus Trough-Based Vancomycin Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Approaches: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T11%3A11%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20and%20Pharmacokinetic%20Outcomes%20of%20Peak%E2%80%93Trough-Based%20Versus%20Trough-Based%20Vancomycin%20Therapeutic%20Drug%20Monitoring%20Approaches:%20A%20Pragmatic%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20drug%20metabolism%20and%20pharmacokinetics&rft.au=Al-Sulaiti,%20Fatima%20Khalifa&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=639&rft.epage=652&rft.pages=639-652&rft.issn=0378-7966&rft.eissn=2107-0180&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13318-019-00551-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2199185012%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2199185012&rft_id=info:pmid/30919233&rfr_iscdi=true