Midfrontal neural dynamics distinguish between general control and inhibition-specific processes in the stopping of motor actions
Action inhibition, the suppression of action impulses, is crucial for goal-directed behaviour. In order to dissociate neural mechanisms specific to motor stopping from general control processes which are also relevant for other types of conflict adjustments, we compared midfrontal oscillatory activi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Scientific reports 2019-09, Vol.9 (1), p.13054-11, Article 13054 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 11 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 13054 |
container_title | Scientific reports |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Kaiser, Jakob Simon, Natalie Annette Sauseng, Paul Schütz-Bosbach, Simone |
description | Action inhibition, the suppression of action impulses, is crucial for goal-directed behaviour. In order to dissociate neural mechanisms specific to motor stopping from general control processes which are also relevant for other types of conflict adjustments, we compared midfrontal oscillatory activity in human volunteers via EEG between action inhibition and two other types of motor conflicts, unexpected action activation and unexpected action change. Error rates indicated that action activation was significantly easier than the other two equally demanding tasks. Midfrontal brain oscillations were significantly stronger for inhibition than for both other conflict types. This was driven by increases in the delta range (2–3 Hz), which were higher for inhibition than activation and action change. Increases in the theta range (4–7 Hz) were equally high for inhibition and change, but lower for action activation. These findings suggest that inhibition is facilitated by neural mechanisms specific to motor-stopping, with midfrontal delta being a potentially selective marker of motor inhibition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41598-019-49476-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6737083</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2287989876</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-6ab4ad94a43ebd12624f6dfb114b59fe88dec02eced5bc8ad5744647bf656edc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kTtvFTEQhVcIRKKQP0CBLNHQLPj9aJBQxEsKooHa8tqz9zratRd7lygl_xxfbgiBAjdjeb5zxqPTdU8Jfkkw068qJ8LoHhPTc8OV7PmD7pRiLnrKKH14737Sndd6hdsR1HBiHncnjAgsBRan3Y9PMYwlp9VNKMFWWgk3yc3RVxRiXWPabbHu0QDrNUBCO0hwgHyTlDwhlwKKaR-HuMac-rqAj2P0aCnZQ61QWxete0B1zcvS3FAe0ZzXXJDzB0l90j0a3VTh_LaedV_fvf1y8aG__Pz-48Wby95zxddeuoG7YLjjDIZAqKR8lGEcCOGDMCNoHcBjCh6CGLx2QSjOJVfDKIWE4NlZ9_rou2zD3B6gLeAmu5Q4u3Jjs4v2706Ke7vL361UTGHNmsGLW4OSv21QVzvH6mGaXIK8VUup1opRwkxDn_-DXuWtpLbegVJGG61ko-iR8iXXWmC8-wzB9hCyPYZsW8j2V8iWN9Gz-2vcSX5H2gB2BGprpR2UP7P_Y_sTFMW3ZQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2287989876</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Midfrontal neural dynamics distinguish between general control and inhibition-specific processes in the stopping of motor actions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Nature Free</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Kaiser, Jakob ; Simon, Natalie Annette ; Sauseng, Paul ; Schütz-Bosbach, Simone</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Jakob ; Simon, Natalie Annette ; Sauseng, Paul ; Schütz-Bosbach, Simone</creatorcontrib><description>Action inhibition, the suppression of action impulses, is crucial for goal-directed behaviour. In order to dissociate neural mechanisms specific to motor stopping from general control processes which are also relevant for other types of conflict adjustments, we compared midfrontal oscillatory activity in human volunteers via EEG between action inhibition and two other types of motor conflicts, unexpected action activation and unexpected action change. Error rates indicated that action activation was significantly easier than the other two equally demanding tasks. Midfrontal brain oscillations were significantly stronger for inhibition than for both other conflict types. This was driven by increases in the delta range (2–3 Hz), which were higher for inhibition than activation and action change. Increases in the theta range (4–7 Hz) were equally high for inhibition and change, but lower for action activation. These findings suggest that inhibition is facilitated by neural mechanisms specific to motor-stopping, with midfrontal delta being a potentially selective marker of motor inhibition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-49476-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31506505</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/378/2649/2150 ; 631/477/2811 ; Adult ; Cognition ; Conflict, Psychological ; EEG ; Electroencephalography ; Female ; Frontal Lobe - physiology ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Inhibition ; Inhibition, Psychological ; Male ; Motor task performance ; multidisciplinary ; Oscillations ; Psychomotor Performance ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2019-09, Vol.9 (1), p.13054-11, Article 13054</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-6ab4ad94a43ebd12624f6dfb114b59fe88dec02eced5bc8ad5744647bf656edc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-6ab4ad94a43ebd12624f6dfb114b59fe88dec02eced5bc8ad5744647bf656edc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737083/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6737083/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,41096,42165,51551,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31506505$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Jakob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Natalie Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauseng, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schütz-Bosbach, Simone</creatorcontrib><title>Midfrontal neural dynamics distinguish between general control and inhibition-specific processes in the stopping of motor actions</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Action inhibition, the suppression of action impulses, is crucial for goal-directed behaviour. In order to dissociate neural mechanisms specific to motor stopping from general control processes which are also relevant for other types of conflict adjustments, we compared midfrontal oscillatory activity in human volunteers via EEG between action inhibition and two other types of motor conflicts, unexpected action activation and unexpected action change. Error rates indicated that action activation was significantly easier than the other two equally demanding tasks. Midfrontal brain oscillations were significantly stronger for inhibition than for both other conflict types. This was driven by increases in the delta range (2–3 Hz), which were higher for inhibition than activation and action change. Increases in the theta range (4–7 Hz) were equally high for inhibition and change, but lower for action activation. These findings suggest that inhibition is facilitated by neural mechanisms specific to motor-stopping, with midfrontal delta being a potentially selective marker of motor inhibition.</description><subject>631/378/2649/2150</subject><subject>631/477/2811</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Conflict, Psychological</subject><subject>EEG</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Frontal Lobe - physiology</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inhibition</subject><subject>Inhibition, Psychological</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motor task performance</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Oscillations</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kTtvFTEQhVcIRKKQP0CBLNHQLPj9aJBQxEsKooHa8tqz9zratRd7lygl_xxfbgiBAjdjeb5zxqPTdU8Jfkkw068qJ8LoHhPTc8OV7PmD7pRiLnrKKH14737Sndd6hdsR1HBiHncnjAgsBRan3Y9PMYwlp9VNKMFWWgk3yc3RVxRiXWPabbHu0QDrNUBCO0hwgHyTlDwhlwKKaR-HuMac-rqAj2P0aCnZQ61QWxete0B1zcvS3FAe0ZzXXJDzB0l90j0a3VTh_LaedV_fvf1y8aG__Pz-48Wby95zxddeuoG7YLjjDIZAqKR8lGEcCOGDMCNoHcBjCh6CGLx2QSjOJVfDKIWE4NlZ9_rou2zD3B6gLeAmu5Q4u3Jjs4v2706Ke7vL361UTGHNmsGLW4OSv21QVzvH6mGaXIK8VUup1opRwkxDn_-DXuWtpLbegVJGG61ko-iR8iXXWmC8-wzB9hCyPYZsW8j2V8iWN9Gz-2vcSX5H2gB2BGprpR2UP7P_Y_sTFMW3ZQ</recordid><startdate>20190910</startdate><enddate>20190910</enddate><creator>Kaiser, Jakob</creator><creator>Simon, Natalie Annette</creator><creator>Sauseng, Paul</creator><creator>Schütz-Bosbach, Simone</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190910</creationdate><title>Midfrontal neural dynamics distinguish between general control and inhibition-specific processes in the stopping of motor actions</title><author>Kaiser, Jakob ; Simon, Natalie Annette ; Sauseng, Paul ; Schütz-Bosbach, Simone</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-6ab4ad94a43ebd12624f6dfb114b59fe88dec02eced5bc8ad5744647bf656edc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>631/378/2649/2150</topic><topic>631/477/2811</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Conflict, Psychological</topic><topic>EEG</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Frontal Lobe - physiology</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inhibition</topic><topic>Inhibition, Psychological</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motor task performance</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Oscillations</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Jakob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Natalie Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauseng, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schütz-Bosbach, Simone</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaiser, Jakob</au><au>Simon, Natalie Annette</au><au>Sauseng, Paul</au><au>Schütz-Bosbach, Simone</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Midfrontal neural dynamics distinguish between general control and inhibition-specific processes in the stopping of motor actions</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2019-09-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13054</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>13054-11</pages><artnum>13054</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Action inhibition, the suppression of action impulses, is crucial for goal-directed behaviour. In order to dissociate neural mechanisms specific to motor stopping from general control processes which are also relevant for other types of conflict adjustments, we compared midfrontal oscillatory activity in human volunteers via EEG between action inhibition and two other types of motor conflicts, unexpected action activation and unexpected action change. Error rates indicated that action activation was significantly easier than the other two equally demanding tasks. Midfrontal brain oscillations were significantly stronger for inhibition than for both other conflict types. This was driven by increases in the delta range (2–3 Hz), which were higher for inhibition than activation and action change. Increases in the theta range (4–7 Hz) were equally high for inhibition and change, but lower for action activation. These findings suggest that inhibition is facilitated by neural mechanisms specific to motor-stopping, with midfrontal delta being a potentially selective marker of motor inhibition.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>31506505</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-019-49476-4</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-2322 |
ispartof | Scientific reports, 2019-09, Vol.9 (1), p.13054-11, Article 13054 |
issn | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6737083 |
source | MEDLINE; Nature Free; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Springer Nature OA Free Journals |
subjects | 631/378/2649/2150 631/477/2811 Adult Cognition Conflict, Psychological EEG Electroencephalography Female Frontal Lobe - physiology Humanities and Social Sciences Humans Inhibition Inhibition, Psychological Male Motor task performance multidisciplinary Oscillations Psychomotor Performance Science Science (multidisciplinary) Young Adult |
title | Midfrontal neural dynamics distinguish between general control and inhibition-specific processes in the stopping of motor actions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T17%3A39%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Midfrontal%20neural%20dynamics%20distinguish%20between%20general%20control%20and%20inhibition-specific%20processes%20in%20the%20stopping%20of%20motor%20actions&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Kaiser,%20Jakob&rft.date=2019-09-10&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13054&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=13054-11&rft.artnum=13054&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-019-49476-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2287989876%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2287989876&rft_id=info:pmid/31506505&rfr_iscdi=true |