Civilian science: the potential of participatory environmental monitoring in areas affected by armed conflicts

Legal and policy initiatives to address the environmental dimensions of armed conflicts and their impact on people, ecosystems and sustainable development are highly dependent on the availability of environmental data from conflict-affected areas. Socio-political and security conditions in these are...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental monitoring and assessment 2019-10, Vol.191 (10), p.618-17, Article 618
Hauptverfasser: Weir, Doug, McQuillan, Dan, Francis, Robert A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 17
container_issue 10
container_start_page 618
container_title Environmental monitoring and assessment
container_volume 191
creator Weir, Doug
McQuillan, Dan
Francis, Robert A.
description Legal and policy initiatives to address the environmental dimensions of armed conflicts and their impact on people, ecosystems and sustainable development are highly dependent on the availability of environmental data from conflict-affected areas. Socio-political and security conditions in these areas often impede data collection, while traditional models of post-conflict environmental assessments are limited in scope. In response, an increasing range of actors is utilising remote sensing and open source data collection to identify and estimate health and ecological risks during and after conflicts. This paper considers the role of participatory citizen science methodologies in complementing both remote monitoring and post-conflict assessments. It examines existing models and mechanisms for environmental data collection and utilisation in conflict contexts, and the extent to which the core values and principles of citizen science are transferable. We find that ‘civilian science’ is feasible and could be well-suited to conflict conditions. In addition to addressing gaps in data collection, it may also empower communities affected by environmental degradation, enhance their environmental human rights, supplement the often limited monitoring capacity of governmental agencies and facilitate cooperation and peacebuilding. The paper concludes by proposing methodological approaches for three common forms of environmental degradation associated with armed conflicts.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10661-019-7773-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6731190</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2285555887</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-25105353079e003328ec4a1ed3dbe7a796c76b84b8b95ea497d9510ac006b8443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UU1r3DAQFaUh2Xz8gF6KIGenI8u2rB4KYUk_INBLchaydpwoeCVX0i7sv88sm6bJobpomHnvzWMeY58EXAkA9SUL6DpRgdCVUkpW-gNbiJaKWrf6I1uA6FTVyU6fsNOcnwBAq0YfsxMpGi2JtmBh6bd-8jbw7DwGh195eUQ-x4KheDvxOPLZpuKdn22JaccxbH2KYU1zGq9j8NT24YH7wG1Cm7kdR3QFV3zYUWdNhYthnLwr-ZwdjXbKePHyn7H77zd3y5_V7e8fv5bXt5VrFJSqbgW0spWgNAJIWffoGitwJVcDKqt051Q39M3QD7pF22i10kSxDmDfbuQZ-3bQnTcDGXBkNtnJzMmvbdqZaL15Pwn-0TzEremUFEIDCVy-CKT4Z4O5mKe4SYE8m7ruW3p9rwglDiiXYs4Jx9cNAsw-InOIyNCtzT4io4nz-a21V8bfTAhQHwB53t8V07_V_1d9BqzanqI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2285555887</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Civilian science: the potential of participatory environmental monitoring in areas affected by armed conflicts</title><source>SpringerLink</source><creator>Weir, Doug ; McQuillan, Dan ; Francis, Robert A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Weir, Doug ; McQuillan, Dan ; Francis, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><description>Legal and policy initiatives to address the environmental dimensions of armed conflicts and their impact on people, ecosystems and sustainable development are highly dependent on the availability of environmental data from conflict-affected areas. Socio-political and security conditions in these areas often impede data collection, while traditional models of post-conflict environmental assessments are limited in scope. In response, an increasing range of actors is utilising remote sensing and open source data collection to identify and estimate health and ecological risks during and after conflicts. This paper considers the role of participatory citizen science methodologies in complementing both remote monitoring and post-conflict assessments. It examines existing models and mechanisms for environmental data collection and utilisation in conflict contexts, and the extent to which the core values and principles of citizen science are transferable. We find that ‘civilian science’ is feasible and could be well-suited to conflict conditions. In addition to addressing gaps in data collection, it may also empower communities affected by environmental degradation, enhance their environmental human rights, supplement the often limited monitoring capacity of governmental agencies and facilitate cooperation and peacebuilding. The paper concludes by proposing methodological approaches for three common forms of environmental degradation associated with armed conflicts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10661-019-7773-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31493019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Armed conflicts ; Assessments ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Conflicts ; Data ; Data collection ; Dimensions ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Ecosystems ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Environment models ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental degradation ; Environmental impact ; Environmental Management ; Environmental monitoring ; Environmental science ; Government agencies ; Human rights ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; Remote monitoring ; Remote sensing ; Security ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2019-10, Vol.191 (10), p.618-17, Article 618</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>Environmental Monitoring and Assessment is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved. © 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-25105353079e003328ec4a1ed3dbe7a796c76b84b8b95ea497d9510ac006b8443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-25105353079e003328ec4a1ed3dbe7a796c76b84b8b95ea497d9510ac006b8443</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4598-0861</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-019-7773-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10661-019-7773-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31493019$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weir, Doug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McQuillan, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francis, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><title>Civilian science: the potential of participatory environmental monitoring in areas affected by armed conflicts</title><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment</title><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><description>Legal and policy initiatives to address the environmental dimensions of armed conflicts and their impact on people, ecosystems and sustainable development are highly dependent on the availability of environmental data from conflict-affected areas. Socio-political and security conditions in these areas often impede data collection, while traditional models of post-conflict environmental assessments are limited in scope. In response, an increasing range of actors is utilising remote sensing and open source data collection to identify and estimate health and ecological risks during and after conflicts. This paper considers the role of participatory citizen science methodologies in complementing both remote monitoring and post-conflict assessments. It examines existing models and mechanisms for environmental data collection and utilisation in conflict contexts, and the extent to which the core values and principles of citizen science are transferable. We find that ‘civilian science’ is feasible and could be well-suited to conflict conditions. In addition to addressing gaps in data collection, it may also empower communities affected by environmental degradation, enhance their environmental human rights, supplement the often limited monitoring capacity of governmental agencies and facilitate cooperation and peacebuilding. The paper concludes by proposing methodological approaches for three common forms of environmental degradation associated with armed conflicts.</description><subject>Armed conflicts</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Conflicts</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Dimensions</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environment models</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental degradation</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>Remote monitoring</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>0167-6369</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UU1r3DAQFaUh2Xz8gF6KIGenI8u2rB4KYUk_INBLchaydpwoeCVX0i7sv88sm6bJobpomHnvzWMeY58EXAkA9SUL6DpRgdCVUkpW-gNbiJaKWrf6I1uA6FTVyU6fsNOcnwBAq0YfsxMpGi2JtmBh6bd-8jbw7DwGh195eUQ-x4KheDvxOPLZpuKdn22JaccxbH2KYU1zGq9j8NT24YH7wG1Cm7kdR3QFV3zYUWdNhYthnLwr-ZwdjXbKePHyn7H77zd3y5_V7e8fv5bXt5VrFJSqbgW0spWgNAJIWffoGitwJVcDKqt051Q39M3QD7pF22i10kSxDmDfbuQZ-3bQnTcDGXBkNtnJzMmvbdqZaL15Pwn-0TzEremUFEIDCVy-CKT4Z4O5mKe4SYE8m7ruW3p9rwglDiiXYs4Jx9cNAsw-InOIyNCtzT4io4nz-a21V8bfTAhQHwB53t8V07_V_1d9BqzanqI</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Weir, Doug</creator><creator>McQuillan, Dan</creator><creator>Francis, Robert A.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4598-0861</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Civilian science: the potential of participatory environmental monitoring in areas affected by armed conflicts</title><author>Weir, Doug ; McQuillan, Dan ; Francis, Robert A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-25105353079e003328ec4a1ed3dbe7a796c76b84b8b95ea497d9510ac006b8443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Armed conflicts</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Conflicts</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Dimensions</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environment models</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental degradation</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>Remote monitoring</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weir, Doug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McQuillan, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francis, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weir, Doug</au><au>McQuillan, Dan</au><au>Francis, Robert A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Civilian science: the potential of participatory environmental monitoring in areas affected by armed conflicts</atitle><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle><stitle>Environ Monit Assess</stitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>191</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>618</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>618-17</pages><artnum>618</artnum><issn>0167-6369</issn><eissn>1573-2959</eissn><abstract>Legal and policy initiatives to address the environmental dimensions of armed conflicts and their impact on people, ecosystems and sustainable development are highly dependent on the availability of environmental data from conflict-affected areas. Socio-political and security conditions in these areas often impede data collection, while traditional models of post-conflict environmental assessments are limited in scope. In response, an increasing range of actors is utilising remote sensing and open source data collection to identify and estimate health and ecological risks during and after conflicts. This paper considers the role of participatory citizen science methodologies in complementing both remote monitoring and post-conflict assessments. It examines existing models and mechanisms for environmental data collection and utilisation in conflict contexts, and the extent to which the core values and principles of citizen science are transferable. We find that ‘civilian science’ is feasible and could be well-suited to conflict conditions. In addition to addressing gaps in data collection, it may also empower communities affected by environmental degradation, enhance their environmental human rights, supplement the often limited monitoring capacity of governmental agencies and facilitate cooperation and peacebuilding. The paper concludes by proposing methodological approaches for three common forms of environmental degradation associated with armed conflicts.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>31493019</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10661-019-7773-9</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4598-0861</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-6369
ispartof Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2019-10, Vol.191 (10), p.618-17, Article 618
issn 0167-6369
1573-2959
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6731190
source SpringerLink
subjects Armed conflicts
Assessments
Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution
Conflicts
Data
Data collection
Dimensions
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecology
Ecosystems
Ecotoxicology
Environment
Environment models
Environmental assessment
Environmental degradation
Environmental impact
Environmental Management
Environmental monitoring
Environmental science
Government agencies
Human rights
Monitoring/Environmental Analysis
Remote monitoring
Remote sensing
Security
Sustainable development
title Civilian science: the potential of participatory environmental monitoring in areas affected by armed conflicts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A58%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Civilian%20science:%20the%20potential%20of%20participatory%20environmental%20monitoring%20in%20areas%20affected%20by%20armed%20conflicts&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20monitoring%20and%20assessment&rft.au=Weir,%20Doug&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=191&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=618&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=618-17&rft.artnum=618&rft.issn=0167-6369&rft.eissn=1573-2959&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10661-019-7773-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2285555887%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2285555887&rft_id=info:pmid/31493019&rfr_iscdi=true