Qualitative Investigation of Community Pharmacy Immunization Enhancement Program Implementation

Background: Despite widely available nonseasonal immunization services in community pharmacies, actual pharmacist-administered vaccines are not yet optimal. A flexible choice multicomponent intervention, the “We Immunize” program, was implemented in Alabama and California community pharmacies, with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of pharmacy technology 2019-10, Vol.35 (5), p.208-218
Hauptverfasser: Huston, Sally A., Ha, David R., Hohmann, Lindsey A., Hastings, Tessa J., Garza, Kimberly B., Westrick, Salisa C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 218
container_issue 5
container_start_page 208
container_title The Journal of pharmacy technology
container_volume 35
creator Huston, Sally A.
Ha, David R.
Hohmann, Lindsey A.
Hastings, Tessa J.
Garza, Kimberly B.
Westrick, Salisa C.
description Background: Despite widely available nonseasonal immunization services in community pharmacies, actual pharmacist-administered vaccines are not yet optimal. A flexible choice multicomponent intervention, the “We Immunize” program, was implemented in Alabama and California community pharmacies, with the goal to enhance pneumococcal and zoster immunization delivery. Limited research has been done to qualitatively understand factors influencing immunization service expansion. Objective: Explore pharmacist perceptions of the We Immunize program in terms of its acceptability, impact, and real-world feasibility, and pharmacist-perceived facilitators and barriers influencing success in immunization delivery enhancement. Methods: This practice-focused qualitative research used semistructured telephone interviews with 14 pharmacists at the completion of the 6-month intervention. Results: Major program implementation facilitators were technician inclusion, workflow changes, training and feedback, goal setting, and enhanced personal selling and marketing activities. Multiple pharmacies increased the number of delivered pneumococcal and zoster immunizations, and increased revenue. Many pharmacists felt professional image, knowledge, skills, roles, and personal satisfaction were enhanced, as were technician knowledge, skills, and roles. Program flexibility, along with multiple perceived benefits, increases the potential for success. Conclusions: The We Immunize program appears to have been viewed positively by participating pharmacists and was seen as having a beneficial impact on immunization delivery in the community pharmacies in which it was implemented.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/8755122519852584
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6706950</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_8755122519852584</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2596018383</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-9fa70271f24fedad1dc534b2b2fe60909649487bdcb4ed123683f23a400b979b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9LwzAUx4Mobk7vHnv0Uk3SpEkuggx_DAZO0HNI22TraJOZtIP515utQ1Dw9Hjv-3nfL7wHwDWCtwgxdscZpQhjigSnmHJyAsaIEpESjuApGO_ldK-PwEUIawgxpZydg1FGWOQRHgP51qum7lRXb3Uys1sdunoZO2cTZ5Kpa9ve1t0uWayUb1W5S2aHydeAPNqVsqVute2ShXdLr9oIbJrD5IBcgjOjmqCvjnUCPp4e36cv6fz1eTZ9mKclQahLhVEMYoYMJkZXqkJVSTNS4AIbnUMBRU4E4ayoyoLoCuEs55nBmSIQFoKJIpuA-8F30xetrsqY71UjN75uld9Jp2r5W7H1Si7dVuYM5oLCaHBzNPDus49nkG0dSt00ymrXB4mpyCHiGc8iCge09C4Er81PDIJy_xf59y9xJR1WglpquXa9t_Ea__PfGnmOeg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2596018383</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Qualitative Investigation of Community Pharmacy Immunization Enhancement Program Implementation</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Huston, Sally A. ; Ha, David R. ; Hohmann, Lindsey A. ; Hastings, Tessa J. ; Garza, Kimberly B. ; Westrick, Salisa C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Huston, Sally A. ; Ha, David R. ; Hohmann, Lindsey A. ; Hastings, Tessa J. ; Garza, Kimberly B. ; Westrick, Salisa C.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Despite widely available nonseasonal immunization services in community pharmacies, actual pharmacist-administered vaccines are not yet optimal. A flexible choice multicomponent intervention, the “We Immunize” program, was implemented in Alabama and California community pharmacies, with the goal to enhance pneumococcal and zoster immunization delivery. Limited research has been done to qualitatively understand factors influencing immunization service expansion. Objective: Explore pharmacist perceptions of the We Immunize program in terms of its acceptability, impact, and real-world feasibility, and pharmacist-perceived facilitators and barriers influencing success in immunization delivery enhancement. Methods: This practice-focused qualitative research used semistructured telephone interviews with 14 pharmacists at the completion of the 6-month intervention. Results: Major program implementation facilitators were technician inclusion, workflow changes, training and feedback, goal setting, and enhanced personal selling and marketing activities. Multiple pharmacies increased the number of delivered pneumococcal and zoster immunizations, and increased revenue. Many pharmacists felt professional image, knowledge, skills, roles, and personal satisfaction were enhanced, as were technician knowledge, skills, and roles. Program flexibility, along with multiple perceived benefits, increases the potential for success. Conclusions: The We Immunize program appears to have been viewed positively by participating pharmacists and was seen as having a beneficial impact on immunization delivery in the community pharmacies in which it was implemented.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8755-1225</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-4810</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/8755122519852584</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34752512</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Research Reports</subject><ispartof>The Journal of pharmacy technology, 2019-10, Vol.35 (5), p.208-218</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2019 2019 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-9fa70271f24fedad1dc534b2b2fe60909649487bdcb4ed123683f23a400b979b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-9fa70271f24fedad1dc534b2b2fe60909649487bdcb4ed123683f23a400b979b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3497-0406 ; 0000-0002-9294-5225</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6706950/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6706950/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huston, Sally A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ha, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hohmann, Lindsey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hastings, Tessa J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garza, Kimberly B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westrick, Salisa C.</creatorcontrib><title>Qualitative Investigation of Community Pharmacy Immunization Enhancement Program Implementation</title><title>The Journal of pharmacy technology</title><description>Background: Despite widely available nonseasonal immunization services in community pharmacies, actual pharmacist-administered vaccines are not yet optimal. A flexible choice multicomponent intervention, the “We Immunize” program, was implemented in Alabama and California community pharmacies, with the goal to enhance pneumococcal and zoster immunization delivery. Limited research has been done to qualitatively understand factors influencing immunization service expansion. Objective: Explore pharmacist perceptions of the We Immunize program in terms of its acceptability, impact, and real-world feasibility, and pharmacist-perceived facilitators and barriers influencing success in immunization delivery enhancement. Methods: This practice-focused qualitative research used semistructured telephone interviews with 14 pharmacists at the completion of the 6-month intervention. Results: Major program implementation facilitators were technician inclusion, workflow changes, training and feedback, goal setting, and enhanced personal selling and marketing activities. Multiple pharmacies increased the number of delivered pneumococcal and zoster immunizations, and increased revenue. Many pharmacists felt professional image, knowledge, skills, roles, and personal satisfaction were enhanced, as were technician knowledge, skills, and roles. Program flexibility, along with multiple perceived benefits, increases the potential for success. Conclusions: The We Immunize program appears to have been viewed positively by participating pharmacists and was seen as having a beneficial impact on immunization delivery in the community pharmacies in which it was implemented.</description><subject>Research Reports</subject><issn>8755-1225</issn><issn>1549-4810</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc9LwzAUx4Mobk7vHnv0Uk3SpEkuggx_DAZO0HNI22TraJOZtIP515utQ1Dw9Hjv-3nfL7wHwDWCtwgxdscZpQhjigSnmHJyAsaIEpESjuApGO_ldK-PwEUIawgxpZydg1FGWOQRHgP51qum7lRXb3Uys1sdunoZO2cTZ5Kpa9ve1t0uWayUb1W5S2aHydeAPNqVsqVute2ShXdLr9oIbJrD5IBcgjOjmqCvjnUCPp4e36cv6fz1eTZ9mKclQahLhVEMYoYMJkZXqkJVSTNS4AIbnUMBRU4E4ayoyoLoCuEs55nBmSIQFoKJIpuA-8F30xetrsqY71UjN75uld9Jp2r5W7H1Si7dVuYM5oLCaHBzNPDus49nkG0dSt00ymrXB4mpyCHiGc8iCge09C4Er81PDIJy_xf59y9xJR1WglpquXa9t_Ea__PfGnmOeg</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Huston, Sally A.</creator><creator>Ha, David R.</creator><creator>Hohmann, Lindsey A.</creator><creator>Hastings, Tessa J.</creator><creator>Garza, Kimberly B.</creator><creator>Westrick, Salisa C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3497-0406</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9294-5225</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Qualitative Investigation of Community Pharmacy Immunization Enhancement Program Implementation</title><author>Huston, Sally A. ; Ha, David R. ; Hohmann, Lindsey A. ; Hastings, Tessa J. ; Garza, Kimberly B. ; Westrick, Salisa C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-9fa70271f24fedad1dc534b2b2fe60909649487bdcb4ed123683f23a400b979b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Research Reports</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huston, Sally A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ha, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hohmann, Lindsey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hastings, Tessa J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garza, Kimberly B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westrick, Salisa C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of pharmacy technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huston, Sally A.</au><au>Ha, David R.</au><au>Hohmann, Lindsey A.</au><au>Hastings, Tessa J.</au><au>Garza, Kimberly B.</au><au>Westrick, Salisa C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Qualitative Investigation of Community Pharmacy Immunization Enhancement Program Implementation</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of pharmacy technology</jtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>208</spage><epage>218</epage><pages>208-218</pages><issn>8755-1225</issn><eissn>1549-4810</eissn><abstract>Background: Despite widely available nonseasonal immunization services in community pharmacies, actual pharmacist-administered vaccines are not yet optimal. A flexible choice multicomponent intervention, the “We Immunize” program, was implemented in Alabama and California community pharmacies, with the goal to enhance pneumococcal and zoster immunization delivery. Limited research has been done to qualitatively understand factors influencing immunization service expansion. Objective: Explore pharmacist perceptions of the We Immunize program in terms of its acceptability, impact, and real-world feasibility, and pharmacist-perceived facilitators and barriers influencing success in immunization delivery enhancement. Methods: This practice-focused qualitative research used semistructured telephone interviews with 14 pharmacists at the completion of the 6-month intervention. Results: Major program implementation facilitators were technician inclusion, workflow changes, training and feedback, goal setting, and enhanced personal selling and marketing activities. Multiple pharmacies increased the number of delivered pneumococcal and zoster immunizations, and increased revenue. Many pharmacists felt professional image, knowledge, skills, roles, and personal satisfaction were enhanced, as were technician knowledge, skills, and roles. Program flexibility, along with multiple perceived benefits, increases the potential for success. Conclusions: The We Immunize program appears to have been viewed positively by participating pharmacists and was seen as having a beneficial impact on immunization delivery in the community pharmacies in which it was implemented.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>34752512</pmid><doi>10.1177/8755122519852584</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3497-0406</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9294-5225</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 8755-1225
ispartof The Journal of pharmacy technology, 2019-10, Vol.35 (5), p.208-218
issn 8755-1225
1549-4810
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6706950
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SAGE Complete; PubMed Central
subjects Research Reports
title Qualitative Investigation of Community Pharmacy Immunization Enhancement Program Implementation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T08%3A55%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Qualitative%20Investigation%20of%20Community%20Pharmacy%20Immunization%20Enhancement%20Program%20Implementation&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20pharmacy%20technology&rft.au=Huston,%20Sally%20A.&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=208&rft.epage=218&rft.pages=208-218&rft.issn=8755-1225&rft.eissn=1549-4810&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/8755122519852584&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2596018383%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2596018383&rft_id=info:pmid/34752512&rft_sage_id=10.1177_8755122519852584&rfr_iscdi=true