Wildland fire smoke and human health

•Wildland fire smoke exposure is an important and growing risk to public health.•The size of the population at-risk from wildland fire smoke is increasing.•Averting catastrophic wildfire and personal exposure will likely improve health.•Stakeholder cooperation is needed to limit the health effects o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2018-05, Vol.624, p.586-595
1. Verfasser: Cascio, Wayne E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 595
container_issue
container_start_page 586
container_title The Science of the total environment
container_volume 624
creator Cascio, Wayne E.
description •Wildland fire smoke exposure is an important and growing risk to public health.•The size of the population at-risk from wildland fire smoke is increasing.•Averting catastrophic wildfire and personal exposure will likely improve health.•Stakeholder cooperation is needed to limit the health effects of wildland fire.•Research is needed to assess the health benefits of avoiding smoke exposure. [Display omitted] The natural cycle of landscape fire maintains the ecological health of the land, yet adverse health effects associated with exposure to emissions from wildfire produce public health and clinical challenges. Systematic reviews conclude that a positive association exists between exposure to wildfire smoke or wildfire particulate matter (PM2.5) and all-cause mortality and respiratory morbidity. Respiratory morbidity includes asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bronchitis and pneumonia. The epidemiological data linking wildfire smoke exposure to cardiovascular mortality and morbidity is mixed, and inconclusive. More studies are needed to define the risk for common and costly clinical cardiovascular outcomes. Susceptible populations include people with respiratory and possibly cardiovascular diseases, middle-aged and older adults, children, pregnant women and the fetus. The increasing frequency of large wildland fires, the expansion of the wildland-urban interface, the area between unoccupied land and human development; and an increasing and aging U.S. population are increasing the number of people at-risk from wildfire smoke, thus highlighting the necessity for broadening stakeholder cooperation to address the health effects of wildfire. While much is known, many questions remain and require further population-based, clinical and occupational health research. Health effects measured over much wider geographical areas and for longer periods time will better define the risk for adverse health outcomes, identify the sensitive populations and assess the influence of social factors on the relationship between exposure and health outcomes. Improving exposure models and access to large clinical databases foreshadow improved risk analysis facilitating more effective risk management. Fuel and smoke management remains an important component for protecting population health. Improved smoke forecasting and translation of environmental health science into communication of actionable information for use by public health officials, healthcare profession
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.086
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6697173</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S004896971733512X</els_id><sourcerecordid>29272827</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-4dcbb31f1fead78b4b3b7ce036f3d89f0a3107d5fb3a01a0c224a41e9434cec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gu7B666ZZLvJXoRS_IKCl4LHkE0mbup-lN1twX9vlmrRk3MZhpn3fZmHkBugCVDI7jZJb_zQDtjsE0ZBJMASKrMTMgUp8hgoy07JlNJUxnmWiwm56PsNDSUknJMJy5lgkokpuX3zla10YyPnO4z6uv3AaBzLXa2bqERdDeUlOXO66vHqu8_I-vFhvXyOV69PL8vFKjZzlg9xak1RcHDgUFshi7TghTBIeea4lbmjmgMVdu4KriloahhLdQqYpzw1aPiM3B9st7uiRmuwGTpdqW3na919qlZ79XfT-FK9t3uVhRdB8GAgDgama_u-Q3fUAlUjN7VRR25q5KaAqcAtKK9_Rx91P6DCweJwgOH_vcduNMLGoA3YzKBs6_8N-QK6xITr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Wildland fire smoke and human health</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Cascio, Wayne E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cascio, Wayne E.</creatorcontrib><description>•Wildland fire smoke exposure is an important and growing risk to public health.•The size of the population at-risk from wildland fire smoke is increasing.•Averting catastrophic wildfire and personal exposure will likely improve health.•Stakeholder cooperation is needed to limit the health effects of wildland fire.•Research is needed to assess the health benefits of avoiding smoke exposure. [Display omitted] The natural cycle of landscape fire maintains the ecological health of the land, yet adverse health effects associated with exposure to emissions from wildfire produce public health and clinical challenges. Systematic reviews conclude that a positive association exists between exposure to wildfire smoke or wildfire particulate matter (PM2.5) and all-cause mortality and respiratory morbidity. Respiratory morbidity includes asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bronchitis and pneumonia. The epidemiological data linking wildfire smoke exposure to cardiovascular mortality and morbidity is mixed, and inconclusive. More studies are needed to define the risk for common and costly clinical cardiovascular outcomes. Susceptible populations include people with respiratory and possibly cardiovascular diseases, middle-aged and older adults, children, pregnant women and the fetus. The increasing frequency of large wildland fires, the expansion of the wildland-urban interface, the area between unoccupied land and human development; and an increasing and aging U.S. population are increasing the number of people at-risk from wildfire smoke, thus highlighting the necessity for broadening stakeholder cooperation to address the health effects of wildfire. While much is known, many questions remain and require further population-based, clinical and occupational health research. Health effects measured over much wider geographical areas and for longer periods time will better define the risk for adverse health outcomes, identify the sensitive populations and assess the influence of social factors on the relationship between exposure and health outcomes. Improving exposure models and access to large clinical databases foreshadow improved risk analysis facilitating more effective risk management. Fuel and smoke management remains an important component for protecting population health. Improved smoke forecasting and translation of environmental health science into communication of actionable information for use by public health officials, healthcare professionals and the public is needed to motivate behaviors that lower exposure and protect public health, particularly among those at high risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.086</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29272827</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Air Pollutants - adverse effects ; Air pollution ; Environmental Exposure - adverse effects ; Health effects ; Humans ; Particulate Matter ; Particulate matter, PM2.5 ; Public Health ; Smoke ; Smoke - adverse effects ; Wildfire emissions ; Wildfires</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2018-05, Vol.624, p.586-595</ispartof><rights>2017</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-4dcbb31f1fead78b4b3b7ce036f3d89f0a3107d5fb3a01a0c224a41e9434cec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-4dcbb31f1fead78b4b3b7ce036f3d89f0a3107d5fb3a01a0c224a41e9434cec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.086$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29272827$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cascio, Wayne E.</creatorcontrib><title>Wildland fire smoke and human health</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><description>•Wildland fire smoke exposure is an important and growing risk to public health.•The size of the population at-risk from wildland fire smoke is increasing.•Averting catastrophic wildfire and personal exposure will likely improve health.•Stakeholder cooperation is needed to limit the health effects of wildland fire.•Research is needed to assess the health benefits of avoiding smoke exposure. [Display omitted] The natural cycle of landscape fire maintains the ecological health of the land, yet adverse health effects associated with exposure to emissions from wildfire produce public health and clinical challenges. Systematic reviews conclude that a positive association exists between exposure to wildfire smoke or wildfire particulate matter (PM2.5) and all-cause mortality and respiratory morbidity. Respiratory morbidity includes asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bronchitis and pneumonia. The epidemiological data linking wildfire smoke exposure to cardiovascular mortality and morbidity is mixed, and inconclusive. More studies are needed to define the risk for common and costly clinical cardiovascular outcomes. Susceptible populations include people with respiratory and possibly cardiovascular diseases, middle-aged and older adults, children, pregnant women and the fetus. The increasing frequency of large wildland fires, the expansion of the wildland-urban interface, the area between unoccupied land and human development; and an increasing and aging U.S. population are increasing the number of people at-risk from wildfire smoke, thus highlighting the necessity for broadening stakeholder cooperation to address the health effects of wildfire. While much is known, many questions remain and require further population-based, clinical and occupational health research. Health effects measured over much wider geographical areas and for longer periods time will better define the risk for adverse health outcomes, identify the sensitive populations and assess the influence of social factors on the relationship between exposure and health outcomes. Improving exposure models and access to large clinical databases foreshadow improved risk analysis facilitating more effective risk management. Fuel and smoke management remains an important component for protecting population health. Improved smoke forecasting and translation of environmental health science into communication of actionable information for use by public health officials, healthcare professionals and the public is needed to motivate behaviors that lower exposure and protect public health, particularly among those at high risk.</description><subject>Air Pollutants - adverse effects</subject><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure - adverse effects</subject><subject>Health effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Particulate Matter</subject><subject>Particulate matter, PM2.5</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Smoke</subject><subject>Smoke - adverse effects</subject><subject>Wildfire emissions</subject><subject>Wildfires</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gu7B666ZZLvJXoRS_IKCl4LHkE0mbup-lN1twX9vlmrRk3MZhpn3fZmHkBugCVDI7jZJb_zQDtjsE0ZBJMASKrMTMgUp8hgoy07JlNJUxnmWiwm56PsNDSUknJMJy5lgkokpuX3zla10YyPnO4z6uv3AaBzLXa2bqERdDeUlOXO66vHqu8_I-vFhvXyOV69PL8vFKjZzlg9xak1RcHDgUFshi7TghTBIeea4lbmjmgMVdu4KriloahhLdQqYpzw1aPiM3B9st7uiRmuwGTpdqW3na919qlZ79XfT-FK9t3uVhRdB8GAgDgama_u-Q3fUAlUjN7VRR25q5KaAqcAtKK9_Rx91P6DCweJwgOH_vcduNMLGoA3YzKBs6_8N-QK6xITr</recordid><startdate>20180515</startdate><enddate>20180515</enddate><creator>Cascio, Wayne E.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180515</creationdate><title>Wildland fire smoke and human health</title><author>Cascio, Wayne E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-4dcbb31f1fead78b4b3b7ce036f3d89f0a3107d5fb3a01a0c224a41e9434cec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Air Pollutants - adverse effects</topic><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure - adverse effects</topic><topic>Health effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Particulate Matter</topic><topic>Particulate matter, PM2.5</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Smoke</topic><topic>Smoke - adverse effects</topic><topic>Wildfire emissions</topic><topic>Wildfires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cascio, Wayne E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cascio, Wayne E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Wildland fire smoke and human health</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><date>2018-05-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>624</volume><spage>586</spage><epage>595</epage><pages>586-595</pages><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>•Wildland fire smoke exposure is an important and growing risk to public health.•The size of the population at-risk from wildland fire smoke is increasing.•Averting catastrophic wildfire and personal exposure will likely improve health.•Stakeholder cooperation is needed to limit the health effects of wildland fire.•Research is needed to assess the health benefits of avoiding smoke exposure. [Display omitted] The natural cycle of landscape fire maintains the ecological health of the land, yet adverse health effects associated with exposure to emissions from wildfire produce public health and clinical challenges. Systematic reviews conclude that a positive association exists between exposure to wildfire smoke or wildfire particulate matter (PM2.5) and all-cause mortality and respiratory morbidity. Respiratory morbidity includes asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bronchitis and pneumonia. The epidemiological data linking wildfire smoke exposure to cardiovascular mortality and morbidity is mixed, and inconclusive. More studies are needed to define the risk for common and costly clinical cardiovascular outcomes. Susceptible populations include people with respiratory and possibly cardiovascular diseases, middle-aged and older adults, children, pregnant women and the fetus. The increasing frequency of large wildland fires, the expansion of the wildland-urban interface, the area between unoccupied land and human development; and an increasing and aging U.S. population are increasing the number of people at-risk from wildfire smoke, thus highlighting the necessity for broadening stakeholder cooperation to address the health effects of wildfire. While much is known, many questions remain and require further population-based, clinical and occupational health research. Health effects measured over much wider geographical areas and for longer periods time will better define the risk for adverse health outcomes, identify the sensitive populations and assess the influence of social factors on the relationship between exposure and health outcomes. Improving exposure models and access to large clinical databases foreshadow improved risk analysis facilitating more effective risk management. Fuel and smoke management remains an important component for protecting population health. Improved smoke forecasting and translation of environmental health science into communication of actionable information for use by public health officials, healthcare professionals and the public is needed to motivate behaviors that lower exposure and protect public health, particularly among those at high risk.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>29272827</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.086</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-9697
ispartof The Science of the total environment, 2018-05, Vol.624, p.586-595
issn 0048-9697
1879-1026
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6697173
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Air Pollutants - adverse effects
Air pollution
Environmental Exposure - adverse effects
Health effects
Humans
Particulate Matter
Particulate matter, PM2.5
Public Health
Smoke
Smoke - adverse effects
Wildfire emissions
Wildfires
title Wildland fire smoke and human health
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T00%3A13%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wildland%20fire%20smoke%20and%20human%20health&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Cascio,%20Wayne%20E.&rft.date=2018-05-15&rft.volume=624&rft.spage=586&rft.epage=595&rft.pages=586-595&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.086&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E29272827%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/29272827&rft_els_id=S004896971733512X&rfr_iscdi=true