The hippocampal code for space in Mongolian gerbils
Large parts of our knowledge about the physiology of the hippocampus in the intact brain are derived from studies in rats and mice. While many of those findings fit well to the limited data available from humans and primates, there are also marked differences, for example, in hippocampal oscillation...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hippocampus 2019-09, Vol.29 (9), p.787-801 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 801 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 787 |
container_title | Hippocampus |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Mankin, Emily A. Thurley, Kay Chenani, Alireza Haas, Olivia V. Debs, Luca Henke, Josephine Galinato, Melissa Leutgeb, Jill K. Leutgeb, Stefan Leibold, Christian |
description | Large parts of our knowledge about the physiology of the hippocampus in the intact brain are derived from studies in rats and mice. While many of those findings fit well to the limited data available from humans and primates, there are also marked differences, for example, in hippocampal oscillation frequencies and in the persistence of theta oscillations. To test whether the distinct sensory specializations of the visual and auditory system of primates play a key role in explaining these differences, we recorded basic hippocampal physiological properties in Mongolian gerbils, a rodent species with high visual acuity, and good low‐frequency hearing, similar to humans. We found that gerbils show only minor differences to rats regarding hippocampal place field activity, theta properties (frequency, persistence, phase precession, theta compression), and sharp wave ripple events. The only major difference between rats and gerbils was a considerably higher degree of head direction selectivity of gerbil place fields, which may be explained by their visual system being able to better resolve distant cues. Thus, differences in sensory specializations between rodent species only affect hippocampal circuit dynamics to a minor extent, which implies that differences to other mammalian lineages, such as bats and primates, cannot be solely explained by specialization in the auditory or visual system. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/hipo.23075 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6690818</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2200770761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4485-dd599141d331f7c505abebcfbff4219ae13efbb59e081685e59c7b3fcee025803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1P3DAQhq0K1AXaS38AisQFIYXOxHESX5AQ4mMlED3Qs-U4412vsnGw2Vb8e7zsgmgPnGakefRoZl7GfiCcIkDxc-5Gf1pwqMUXtocgmxyh4jvrXkAuK44Tth_jAgBRAHxlk8SWVQNij_GHOWVJMHqjl6PuM-M7yqwPWRy1ocwN2Z0fZr53eshmFFrXx29s1-o-0vdtPWC_ry4fLm7y2_vr6cX5bW7KshF51wkpscSOc7S1ESB0S62xrbVlgVITcrJtKyRBg1UjSEhTt9waIihEA_yAnW2846pdUmdoeAq6V2NwSx2elddO_TsZ3FzN_B9VVTIpmyQ43gqCf1xRfFJLFw31vR7Ir6IqCoC6hrrChB79hy78KgzpvETVBda8QZmokw1lgo8xkH1fBkGts1DrLNRrFgk-_Lj-O_r2_ATgBvjrenr-RKVupr_uN9IXzG2T8Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2272173819</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The hippocampal code for space in Mongolian gerbils</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Mankin, Emily A. ; Thurley, Kay ; Chenani, Alireza ; Haas, Olivia V. ; Debs, Luca ; Henke, Josephine ; Galinato, Melissa ; Leutgeb, Jill K. ; Leutgeb, Stefan ; Leibold, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Mankin, Emily A. ; Thurley, Kay ; Chenani, Alireza ; Haas, Olivia V. ; Debs, Luca ; Henke, Josephine ; Galinato, Melissa ; Leutgeb, Jill K. ; Leutgeb, Stefan ; Leibold, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>Large parts of our knowledge about the physiology of the hippocampus in the intact brain are derived from studies in rats and mice. While many of those findings fit well to the limited data available from humans and primates, there are also marked differences, for example, in hippocampal oscillation frequencies and in the persistence of theta oscillations. To test whether the distinct sensory specializations of the visual and auditory system of primates play a key role in explaining these differences, we recorded basic hippocampal physiological properties in Mongolian gerbils, a rodent species with high visual acuity, and good low‐frequency hearing, similar to humans. We found that gerbils show only minor differences to rats regarding hippocampal place field activity, theta properties (frequency, persistence, phase precession, theta compression), and sharp wave ripple events. The only major difference between rats and gerbils was a considerably higher degree of head direction selectivity of gerbil place fields, which may be explained by their visual system being able to better resolve distant cues. Thus, differences in sensory specializations between rodent species only affect hippocampal circuit dynamics to a minor extent, which implies that differences to other mammalian lineages, such as bats and primates, cannot be solely explained by specialization in the auditory or visual system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1050-9631</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-1063</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hipo.23075</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30746805</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Acuity ; Algorithms ; Animals ; Auditory Perception - physiology ; Auditory system ; CA1 Region, Hippocampal - physiology ; CA3 Region, Hippocampal - physiology ; Compression ; Cues ; Electrodes, Implanted ; Electroencephalography ; Female ; gerbil ; Gerbillinae - physiology ; head direction ; Hippocampus ; Hippocampus - physiology ; Locomotion - physiology ; Male ; place cells ; Rats ; Rodents ; Sensory evaluation ; Sensory integration ; Space Perception - physiology ; Specialization ; theta rhythm ; Theta Rhythm - physiology ; Theta rhythms ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Visual system</subject><ispartof>Hippocampus, 2019-09, Vol.29 (9), p.787-801</ispartof><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4485-dd599141d331f7c505abebcfbff4219ae13efbb59e081685e59c7b3fcee025803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4485-dd599141d331f7c505abebcfbff4219ae13efbb59e081685e59c7b3fcee025803</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4857-1083 ; 0000-0002-4859-8000 ; 0000-0003-3367-6536 ; 0000-0002-2014-842X ; 0000-0003-2163-913X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhipo.23075$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhipo.23075$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30746805$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mankin, Emily A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thurley, Kay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chenani, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haas, Olivia V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debs, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henke, Josephine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galinato, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leutgeb, Jill K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leutgeb, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leibold, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>The hippocampal code for space in Mongolian gerbils</title><title>Hippocampus</title><addtitle>Hippocampus</addtitle><description>Large parts of our knowledge about the physiology of the hippocampus in the intact brain are derived from studies in rats and mice. While many of those findings fit well to the limited data available from humans and primates, there are also marked differences, for example, in hippocampal oscillation frequencies and in the persistence of theta oscillations. To test whether the distinct sensory specializations of the visual and auditory system of primates play a key role in explaining these differences, we recorded basic hippocampal physiological properties in Mongolian gerbils, a rodent species with high visual acuity, and good low‐frequency hearing, similar to humans. We found that gerbils show only minor differences to rats regarding hippocampal place field activity, theta properties (frequency, persistence, phase precession, theta compression), and sharp wave ripple events. The only major difference between rats and gerbils was a considerably higher degree of head direction selectivity of gerbil place fields, which may be explained by their visual system being able to better resolve distant cues. Thus, differences in sensory specializations between rodent species only affect hippocampal circuit dynamics to a minor extent, which implies that differences to other mammalian lineages, such as bats and primates, cannot be solely explained by specialization in the auditory or visual system.</description><subject>Acuity</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Auditory Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Auditory system</subject><subject>CA1 Region, Hippocampal - physiology</subject><subject>CA3 Region, Hippocampal - physiology</subject><subject>Compression</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Electrodes, Implanted</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>gerbil</subject><subject>Gerbillinae - physiology</subject><subject>head direction</subject><subject>Hippocampus</subject><subject>Hippocampus - physiology</subject><subject>Locomotion - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>place cells</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Sensory evaluation</subject><subject>Sensory integration</subject><subject>Space Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Specialization</subject><subject>theta rhythm</subject><subject>Theta Rhythm - physiology</subject><subject>Theta rhythms</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Visual system</subject><issn>1050-9631</issn><issn>1098-1063</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1P3DAQhq0K1AXaS38AisQFIYXOxHESX5AQ4mMlED3Qs-U4412vsnGw2Vb8e7zsgmgPnGakefRoZl7GfiCcIkDxc-5Gf1pwqMUXtocgmxyh4jvrXkAuK44Tth_jAgBRAHxlk8SWVQNij_GHOWVJMHqjl6PuM-M7yqwPWRy1ocwN2Z0fZr53eshmFFrXx29s1-o-0vdtPWC_ry4fLm7y2_vr6cX5bW7KshF51wkpscSOc7S1ESB0S62xrbVlgVITcrJtKyRBg1UjSEhTt9waIihEA_yAnW2846pdUmdoeAq6V2NwSx2elddO_TsZ3FzN_B9VVTIpmyQ43gqCf1xRfFJLFw31vR7Ir6IqCoC6hrrChB79hy78KgzpvETVBda8QZmokw1lgo8xkH1fBkGts1DrLNRrFgk-_Lj-O_r2_ATgBvjrenr-RKVupr_uN9IXzG2T8Q</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Mankin, Emily A.</creator><creator>Thurley, Kay</creator><creator>Chenani, Alireza</creator><creator>Haas, Olivia V.</creator><creator>Debs, Luca</creator><creator>Henke, Josephine</creator><creator>Galinato, Melissa</creator><creator>Leutgeb, Jill K.</creator><creator>Leutgeb, Stefan</creator><creator>Leibold, Christian</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4857-1083</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4859-8000</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3367-6536</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2014-842X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2163-913X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>The hippocampal code for space in Mongolian gerbils</title><author>Mankin, Emily A. ; Thurley, Kay ; Chenani, Alireza ; Haas, Olivia V. ; Debs, Luca ; Henke, Josephine ; Galinato, Melissa ; Leutgeb, Jill K. ; Leutgeb, Stefan ; Leibold, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4485-dd599141d331f7c505abebcfbff4219ae13efbb59e081685e59c7b3fcee025803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acuity</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Auditory Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Auditory system</topic><topic>CA1 Region, Hippocampal - physiology</topic><topic>CA3 Region, Hippocampal - physiology</topic><topic>Compression</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Electrodes, Implanted</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>gerbil</topic><topic>Gerbillinae - physiology</topic><topic>head direction</topic><topic>Hippocampus</topic><topic>Hippocampus - physiology</topic><topic>Locomotion - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>place cells</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Sensory evaluation</topic><topic>Sensory integration</topic><topic>Space Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Specialization</topic><topic>theta rhythm</topic><topic>Theta Rhythm - physiology</topic><topic>Theta rhythms</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Visual system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mankin, Emily A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thurley, Kay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chenani, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haas, Olivia V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debs, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henke, Josephine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galinato, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leutgeb, Jill K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leutgeb, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leibold, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Hippocampus</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mankin, Emily A.</au><au>Thurley, Kay</au><au>Chenani, Alireza</au><au>Haas, Olivia V.</au><au>Debs, Luca</au><au>Henke, Josephine</au><au>Galinato, Melissa</au><au>Leutgeb, Jill K.</au><au>Leutgeb, Stefan</au><au>Leibold, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The hippocampal code for space in Mongolian gerbils</atitle><jtitle>Hippocampus</jtitle><addtitle>Hippocampus</addtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>787</spage><epage>801</epage><pages>787-801</pages><issn>1050-9631</issn><eissn>1098-1063</eissn><abstract>Large parts of our knowledge about the physiology of the hippocampus in the intact brain are derived from studies in rats and mice. While many of those findings fit well to the limited data available from humans and primates, there are also marked differences, for example, in hippocampal oscillation frequencies and in the persistence of theta oscillations. To test whether the distinct sensory specializations of the visual and auditory system of primates play a key role in explaining these differences, we recorded basic hippocampal physiological properties in Mongolian gerbils, a rodent species with high visual acuity, and good low‐frequency hearing, similar to humans. We found that gerbils show only minor differences to rats regarding hippocampal place field activity, theta properties (frequency, persistence, phase precession, theta compression), and sharp wave ripple events. The only major difference between rats and gerbils was a considerably higher degree of head direction selectivity of gerbil place fields, which may be explained by their visual system being able to better resolve distant cues. Thus, differences in sensory specializations between rodent species only affect hippocampal circuit dynamics to a minor extent, which implies that differences to other mammalian lineages, such as bats and primates, cannot be solely explained by specialization in the auditory or visual system.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>30746805</pmid><doi>10.1002/hipo.23075</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4857-1083</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4859-8000</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3367-6536</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2014-842X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2163-913X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1050-9631 |
ispartof | Hippocampus, 2019-09, Vol.29 (9), p.787-801 |
issn | 1050-9631 1098-1063 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6690818 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Acuity Algorithms Animals Auditory Perception - physiology Auditory system CA1 Region, Hippocampal - physiology CA3 Region, Hippocampal - physiology Compression Cues Electrodes, Implanted Electroencephalography Female gerbil Gerbillinae - physiology head direction Hippocampus Hippocampus - physiology Locomotion - physiology Male place cells Rats Rodents Sensory evaluation Sensory integration Space Perception - physiology Specialization theta rhythm Theta Rhythm - physiology Theta rhythms Visual Perception - physiology Visual system |
title | The hippocampal code for space in Mongolian gerbils |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T22%3A31%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20hippocampal%20code%20for%20space%20in%20Mongolian%20gerbils&rft.jtitle=Hippocampus&rft.au=Mankin,%20Emily%20A.&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=787&rft.epage=801&rft.pages=787-801&rft.issn=1050-9631&rft.eissn=1098-1063&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hipo.23075&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2200770761%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2272173819&rft_id=info:pmid/30746805&rfr_iscdi=true |