Beyond the common metrics: Expanding the impact of the KL2 mentored career development program using alternative impact assessment frameworks
While the Common Metrics for career development seek information on the impact of the consortium in the training and retention of translational researchers, additional appraisal of the implementation of research outcomes is needed to fully understand the return on investment in research. A recent sy...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical and translational science 2019-02, Vol.3 (1), p.1-4 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 4 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | Journal of clinical and translational science |
| container_volume | 3 |
| creator | Boateng, Beatrice A Indelicato, Nia Fischer, Ellen P Delgado, Pedro L Aitken, Mary E James, Laura P |
| description | While the Common Metrics for career development seek information on the impact of the consortium in the training and retention of translational researchers, additional appraisal of the implementation of research outcomes is needed to fully understand the return on investment in research. A recent systematic review of methodological frameworks for the assessment of the impact of biomedical research identified five broad categories of impact: (1) primary research-related, (2) policymaking, (3) health and health systems, (4) health-related and societal, and (5) broader economic impact [13]. Similar to other research impact frameworks, the Becker list attempts to capture important but lesser known aspects of research and track post-publication impact of an individual’s research in five categories: advancement of knowledge, clinical implementation, community benefit, legislation and policy, and economic benefit. Implications There is increasing interest to assessing the impact of training programs such as the KL2 Scholars Mentored Career Development Program to demonstrate the value and return on research investments. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/cts.2019.375 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6676494</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2272736129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-a60937c6d7c7c8f04de3e28ddadbbeb66e5f724cd5b0c52cff0b3f14f45502613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtv1DAUhS0EolXpjjWyxIYFM_jtCQskqMpDjMQG1pZjX09TkjjYzkB_BP8ZZ1pGhZWv7_3u0bEPQk8pWVNC9StX8poR2qy5lg_QKSOyWW2Uog_v1SfoPOdrQgjdMKU4f4xOOBVEUKlO0e93cBNHj8sVYBeHIY54gJI6l1_jy1-THX037g7TbpisKziGw-3zllVwLDGBx84mgIQ97KGP09LGU4q7ZAc852Xf9gXSaEu3P-rYnCHnAxsqCD9j-p6foEfB9hnO784z9O395deLj6vtlw-fLt5uV44LVlZWkYZrp7x22m0CER44sI331rcttEqBDJoJ52VLnGQuBNLyQEUQUhKmKD9Db251p7kdwLvqItneTKkbbLox0Xbm38nYXZld3BultBKNqAIv7gRS_DFDLmbosoO-tyPEORvGNNNcUdZU9Pl_6HWc62f0CyXlYkmTSr28pVyKOScIRzOUmCVqU6M2S9SmRl3xZ_cfcIT_Bsv_AGGqqLk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2255455070</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Beyond the common metrics: Expanding the impact of the KL2 mentored career development program using alternative impact assessment frameworks</title><source>Cambridge Journals Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Boateng, Beatrice A ; Indelicato, Nia ; Fischer, Ellen P ; Delgado, Pedro L ; Aitken, Mary E ; James, Laura P</creator><creatorcontrib>Boateng, Beatrice A ; Indelicato, Nia ; Fischer, Ellen P ; Delgado, Pedro L ; Aitken, Mary E ; James, Laura P</creatorcontrib><description>While the Common Metrics for career development seek information on the impact of the consortium in the training and retention of translational researchers, additional appraisal of the implementation of research outcomes is needed to fully understand the return on investment in research. A recent systematic review of methodological frameworks for the assessment of the impact of biomedical research identified five broad categories of impact: (1) primary research-related, (2) policymaking, (3) health and health systems, (4) health-related and societal, and (5) broader economic impact [13]. Similar to other research impact frameworks, the Becker list attempts to capture important but lesser known aspects of research and track post-publication impact of an individual’s research in five categories: advancement of knowledge, clinical implementation, community benefit, legislation and policy, and economic benefit. Implications There is increasing interest to assessing the impact of training programs such as the KL2 Scholars Mentored Career Development Program to demonstrate the value and return on research investments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2059-8661</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2059-8661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/cts.2019.375</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31404156</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Annual reports ; Career development planning ; Consortia ; Education ; Interviews ; Legislation ; Library associations ; Medical libraries ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Researchers ; Scholars ; Science ; Scientists ; Systematic review ; Training</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical and translational science, 2019-02, Vol.3 (1), p.1-4</ispartof><rights>2019 This article is published under (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2019 2019 The Association for Clinical and Translational Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-a60937c6d7c7c8f04de3e28ddadbbeb66e5f724cd5b0c52cff0b3f14f45502613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-a60937c6d7c7c8f04de3e28ddadbbeb66e5f724cd5b0c52cff0b3f14f45502613</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8977-0666</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6676494/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6676494/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31404156$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boateng, Beatrice A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Indelicato, Nia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Ellen P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delgado, Pedro L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aitken, Mary E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Laura P</creatorcontrib><title>Beyond the common metrics: Expanding the impact of the KL2 mentored career development program using alternative impact assessment frameworks</title><title>Journal of clinical and translational science</title><addtitle>J Clin Transl Sci</addtitle><description>While the Common Metrics for career development seek information on the impact of the consortium in the training and retention of translational researchers, additional appraisal of the implementation of research outcomes is needed to fully understand the return on investment in research. A recent systematic review of methodological frameworks for the assessment of the impact of biomedical research identified five broad categories of impact: (1) primary research-related, (2) policymaking, (3) health and health systems, (4) health-related and societal, and (5) broader economic impact [13]. Similar to other research impact frameworks, the Becker list attempts to capture important but lesser known aspects of research and track post-publication impact of an individual’s research in five categories: advancement of knowledge, clinical implementation, community benefit, legislation and policy, and economic benefit. Implications There is increasing interest to assessing the impact of training programs such as the KL2 Scholars Mentored Career Development Program to demonstrate the value and return on research investments.</description><subject>Annual reports</subject><subject>Career development planning</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Library associations</subject><subject>Medical libraries</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Scholars</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>2059-8661</issn><issn>2059-8661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtv1DAUhS0EolXpjjWyxIYFM_jtCQskqMpDjMQG1pZjX09TkjjYzkB_BP8ZZ1pGhZWv7_3u0bEPQk8pWVNC9StX8poR2qy5lg_QKSOyWW2Uog_v1SfoPOdrQgjdMKU4f4xOOBVEUKlO0e93cBNHj8sVYBeHIY54gJI6l1_jy1-THX037g7TbpisKziGw-3zllVwLDGBx84mgIQ97KGP09LGU4q7ZAc852Xf9gXSaEu3P-rYnCHnAxsqCD9j-p6foEfB9hnO784z9O395deLj6vtlw-fLt5uV44LVlZWkYZrp7x22m0CER44sI331rcttEqBDJoJ52VLnGQuBNLyQEUQUhKmKD9Db251p7kdwLvqItneTKkbbLox0Xbm38nYXZld3BultBKNqAIv7gRS_DFDLmbosoO-tyPEORvGNNNcUdZU9Pl_6HWc62f0CyXlYkmTSr28pVyKOScIRzOUmCVqU6M2S9SmRl3xZ_cfcIT_Bsv_AGGqqLk</recordid><startdate>20190201</startdate><enddate>20190201</enddate><creator>Boateng, Beatrice A</creator><creator>Indelicato, Nia</creator><creator>Fischer, Ellen P</creator><creator>Delgado, Pedro L</creator><creator>Aitken, Mary E</creator><creator>James, Laura P</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8977-0666</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190201</creationdate><title>Beyond the common metrics: Expanding the impact of the KL2 mentored career development program using alternative impact assessment frameworks</title><author>Boateng, Beatrice A ; Indelicato, Nia ; Fischer, Ellen P ; Delgado, Pedro L ; Aitken, Mary E ; James, Laura P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-a60937c6d7c7c8f04de3e28ddadbbeb66e5f724cd5b0c52cff0b3f14f45502613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Annual reports</topic><topic>Career development planning</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Library associations</topic><topic>Medical libraries</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Scholars</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boateng, Beatrice A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Indelicato, Nia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Ellen P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delgado, Pedro L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aitken, Mary E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Laura P</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical and translational science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boateng, Beatrice A</au><au>Indelicato, Nia</au><au>Fischer, Ellen P</au><au>Delgado, Pedro L</au><au>Aitken, Mary E</au><au>James, Laura P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Beyond the common metrics: Expanding the impact of the KL2 mentored career development program using alternative impact assessment frameworks</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical and translational science</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Transl Sci</addtitle><date>2019-02-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>4</epage><pages>1-4</pages><issn>2059-8661</issn><eissn>2059-8661</eissn><abstract>While the Common Metrics for career development seek information on the impact of the consortium in the training and retention of translational researchers, additional appraisal of the implementation of research outcomes is needed to fully understand the return on investment in research. A recent systematic review of methodological frameworks for the assessment of the impact of biomedical research identified five broad categories of impact: (1) primary research-related, (2) policymaking, (3) health and health systems, (4) health-related and societal, and (5) broader economic impact [13]. Similar to other research impact frameworks, the Becker list attempts to capture important but lesser known aspects of research and track post-publication impact of an individual’s research in five categories: advancement of knowledge, clinical implementation, community benefit, legislation and policy, and economic benefit. Implications There is increasing interest to assessing the impact of training programs such as the KL2 Scholars Mentored Career Development Program to demonstrate the value and return on research investments.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>31404156</pmid><doi>10.1017/cts.2019.375</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8977-0666</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2059-8661 |
| ispartof | Journal of clinical and translational science, 2019-02, Vol.3 (1), p.1-4 |
| issn | 2059-8661 2059-8661 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6676494 |
| source | Cambridge Journals Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Annual reports Career development planning Consortia Education Interviews Legislation Library associations Medical libraries Medical research Medicine Researchers Scholars Science Scientists Systematic review Training |
| title | Beyond the common metrics: Expanding the impact of the KL2 mentored career development program using alternative impact assessment frameworks |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T05%3A46%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Beyond%20the%20common%20metrics:%20Expanding%20the%20impact%20of%20the%20KL2%20mentored%20career%20development%20program%20using%20alternative%20impact%20assessment%20frameworks&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20and%20translational%20science&rft.au=Boateng,%20Beatrice%20A&rft.date=2019-02-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=4&rft.pages=1-4&rft.issn=2059-8661&rft.eissn=2059-8661&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/cts.2019.375&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2272736129%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2255455070&rft_id=info:pmid/31404156&rfr_iscdi=true |