Avatar-Based Patient Monitoring With Peripheral Vision: A Multicenter Comparative Eye-Tracking Study

Continuous patient monitoring has been described by the World Health Organization as extremely important and is widely used in anesthesia, intensive care medicine, and emergency medicine. However, current state-of-the-art number- and waveform-based monitoring does not ideally support human users in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of medical Internet research 2019-07, Vol.21 (7), p.e13041-e13041
Hauptverfasser: Pfarr, Juliane, Ganter, Michael T, Spahn, Donat R, Noethiger, Christoph B, Tscholl, David W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e13041
container_issue 7
container_start_page e13041
container_title Journal of medical Internet research
container_volume 21
creator Pfarr, Juliane
Ganter, Michael T
Spahn, Donat R
Noethiger, Christoph B
Tscholl, David W
description Continuous patient monitoring has been described by the World Health Organization as extremely important and is widely used in anesthesia, intensive care medicine, and emergency medicine. However, current state-of-the-art number- and waveform-based monitoring does not ideally support human users in acquiring quick, confident interpretations with low cognitive effort, and there are additional problematic aspects such as alarm fatigue. We developed a visualization technology (Visual Patient), specifically designed to help caregivers gain situation awareness quickly, which presents vital sign information in the form of an animated avatar of the monitored patient. We suspected that because of the way it displays the information as large, colorful, moving graphic objects, caregivers might be able to perform patient monitoring using their peripheral vision, which may facilitate quicker detection of anomalies, independently of acoustic alarms. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that avatar-based monitoring, when observed with peripheral vision only, increases the number of perceptible changes in patient status as well as caregivers' perceived diagnostic confidence compared with a high-fidelity simulation of conventional monitoring, when observed with peripheral vision only. We conducted a multicenter comparative study with a within-participant design in which anesthesiologists with their peripheral field of vision looked at 2 patient-monitoring scenarios and tried to identify changes in patient status. To ensure the best possible experimental conditions, we used an eye tracker, which recorded the eye movements of the participants and confirmed that they only looked at the monitoring scenarios with their peripheral vision. Overall, 30 participants evaluated 18 different patient status changes with each technology (avatar and conventional patient monitoring). With conventional patient monitoring, participants could only detect those 3 changes in patient status that are associated with a change in the auditory pulse tone display, that is, tachycardia (faster beeping), bradycardia (slower beeping), and desaturation (lower pitch of beeping). With the avatar, the median number of detected vital sign changes quadrupled from 3 to 12 (P
doi_str_mv 10.2196/13041
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6668297</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A769355662</galeid><sourcerecordid>A769355662</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-4880387a39fa1698ab4f7effecdcdfd35dacb1bbc74e313619e3809f20d1f9783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl9rFDEUxQex2D_2K0hABH2YNpnMZhIfCutSbaHVQqs-hkxysxudmaxJZul-e7NuW7ogeUi4-Z3DvZdTFMcEn1REsFNCcU1eFAekprzkvCEvn733i8MYf2Fc4VqQV8U-JZQ0vMEHhZmuVFKh_KQiGHSjkoMhoWs_uOSDG-bop0sLdAPBLRcQVId-uOj88BFN0fXYJaczDgHNfL9UIatXgM7XUN4FpX9v5LdpNOvXxZ5VXYTjh_uo-P75_G52UV59-3I5m16VumZ1KmvOMeWNosIqwgRXbW0bsBa00cYaOjFKt6RtdVNDnoARAZRjYStsiBUNp0fF2dZ3ObY9mE1vuWW5DK5XYS29cnL3Z3ALOfcryRjjlWiywfsHg-D_jBCT7F3U0HVqAD9GWVUTISomsMjo2y06Vx1IN1ifHfUGl9OGCTqZMFZl6uQ_VD4Geqf9ANbl-o7gw44gMwnu01yNMcrL26-77Lstq4OPMYB9mpRguQmF_BeKzL15vpYn6jEF9C_WVbCt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259926909</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Avatar-Based Patient Monitoring With Peripheral Vision: A Multicenter Comparative Eye-Tracking Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Pfarr, Juliane ; Ganter, Michael T ; Spahn, Donat R ; Noethiger, Christoph B ; Tscholl, David W</creator><creatorcontrib>Pfarr, Juliane ; Ganter, Michael T ; Spahn, Donat R ; Noethiger, Christoph B ; Tscholl, David W</creatorcontrib><description>Continuous patient monitoring has been described by the World Health Organization as extremely important and is widely used in anesthesia, intensive care medicine, and emergency medicine. However, current state-of-the-art number- and waveform-based monitoring does not ideally support human users in acquiring quick, confident interpretations with low cognitive effort, and there are additional problematic aspects such as alarm fatigue. We developed a visualization technology (Visual Patient), specifically designed to help caregivers gain situation awareness quickly, which presents vital sign information in the form of an animated avatar of the monitored patient. We suspected that because of the way it displays the information as large, colorful, moving graphic objects, caregivers might be able to perform patient monitoring using their peripheral vision, which may facilitate quicker detection of anomalies, independently of acoustic alarms. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that avatar-based monitoring, when observed with peripheral vision only, increases the number of perceptible changes in patient status as well as caregivers' perceived diagnostic confidence compared with a high-fidelity simulation of conventional monitoring, when observed with peripheral vision only. We conducted a multicenter comparative study with a within-participant design in which anesthesiologists with their peripheral field of vision looked at 2 patient-monitoring scenarios and tried to identify changes in patient status. To ensure the best possible experimental conditions, we used an eye tracker, which recorded the eye movements of the participants and confirmed that they only looked at the monitoring scenarios with their peripheral vision. Overall, 30 participants evaluated 18 different patient status changes with each technology (avatar and conventional patient monitoring). With conventional patient monitoring, participants could only detect those 3 changes in patient status that are associated with a change in the auditory pulse tone display, that is, tachycardia (faster beeping), bradycardia (slower beeping), and desaturation (lower pitch of beeping). With the avatar, the median number of detected vital sign changes quadrupled from 3 to 12 (P&lt;.001) in scenario 1, and more than doubled from 3 to 8 (P&lt;.001) in scenario 2. Median perceived diagnostic confidence was confident for both scenarios with the avatar and unconfident in scenario 1 (P&lt;.001), and very unconfident in scenario 2 (P=.024) with conventional monitoring. This study introduces the concept of peripheral vision monitoring. The test performed showed clearly that an avatar-based display is superior to a standard numeric display for peripheral vision. Avatar-based monitoring could potentially make much more of the patient monitoring information available to caregivers for longer time periods per case. Our results indicate that the optimal information transmission would consist of a combination of auditory and avatar-based monitoring.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1438-8871</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1439-4456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1438-8871</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2196/13041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31317870</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: Journal of Medical Internet Research</publisher><subject>Adult ; Caregivers ; Comparative analysis ; Eye Movements - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Information management ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Monitoring, Physiologic - methods ; Original Paper ; Patient monitoring equipment</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical Internet research, 2019-07, Vol.21 (7), p.e13041-e13041</ispartof><rights>Juliane Pfarr, Michael T Ganter, Donat R Spahn, Christoph B Noethiger, David W Tscholl. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 17.07.2019.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Journal of Medical Internet Research</rights><rights>Juliane Pfarr, Michael T Ganter, Donat R Spahn, Christoph B Noethiger, David W Tscholl. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 17.07.2019. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-4880387a39fa1698ab4f7effecdcdfd35dacb1bbc74e313619e3809f20d1f9783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-4880387a39fa1698ab4f7effecdcdfd35dacb1bbc74e313619e3809f20d1f9783</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3677-3705 ; 0000-0002-0713-7734 ; 0000-0003-1234-1833 ; 0000-0002-0336-1421 ; 0000-0002-4782-183X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31317870$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pfarr, Juliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganter, Michael T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spahn, Donat R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noethiger, Christoph B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tscholl, David W</creatorcontrib><title>Avatar-Based Patient Monitoring With Peripheral Vision: A Multicenter Comparative Eye-Tracking Study</title><title>Journal of medical Internet research</title><addtitle>J Med Internet Res</addtitle><description>Continuous patient monitoring has been described by the World Health Organization as extremely important and is widely used in anesthesia, intensive care medicine, and emergency medicine. However, current state-of-the-art number- and waveform-based monitoring does not ideally support human users in acquiring quick, confident interpretations with low cognitive effort, and there are additional problematic aspects such as alarm fatigue. We developed a visualization technology (Visual Patient), specifically designed to help caregivers gain situation awareness quickly, which presents vital sign information in the form of an animated avatar of the monitored patient. We suspected that because of the way it displays the information as large, colorful, moving graphic objects, caregivers might be able to perform patient monitoring using their peripheral vision, which may facilitate quicker detection of anomalies, independently of acoustic alarms. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that avatar-based monitoring, when observed with peripheral vision only, increases the number of perceptible changes in patient status as well as caregivers' perceived diagnostic confidence compared with a high-fidelity simulation of conventional monitoring, when observed with peripheral vision only. We conducted a multicenter comparative study with a within-participant design in which anesthesiologists with their peripheral field of vision looked at 2 patient-monitoring scenarios and tried to identify changes in patient status. To ensure the best possible experimental conditions, we used an eye tracker, which recorded the eye movements of the participants and confirmed that they only looked at the monitoring scenarios with their peripheral vision. Overall, 30 participants evaluated 18 different patient status changes with each technology (avatar and conventional patient monitoring). With conventional patient monitoring, participants could only detect those 3 changes in patient status that are associated with a change in the auditory pulse tone display, that is, tachycardia (faster beeping), bradycardia (slower beeping), and desaturation (lower pitch of beeping). With the avatar, the median number of detected vital sign changes quadrupled from 3 to 12 (P&lt;.001) in scenario 1, and more than doubled from 3 to 8 (P&lt;.001) in scenario 2. Median perceived diagnostic confidence was confident for both scenarios with the avatar and unconfident in scenario 1 (P&lt;.001), and very unconfident in scenario 2 (P=.024) with conventional monitoring. This study introduces the concept of peripheral vision monitoring. The test performed showed clearly that an avatar-based display is superior to a standard numeric display for peripheral vision. Avatar-based monitoring could potentially make much more of the patient monitoring information available to caregivers for longer time periods per case. Our results indicate that the optimal information transmission would consist of a combination of auditory and avatar-based monitoring.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic - methods</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Patient monitoring equipment</subject><issn>1438-8871</issn><issn>1439-4456</issn><issn>1438-8871</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl9rFDEUxQex2D_2K0hABH2YNpnMZhIfCutSbaHVQqs-hkxysxudmaxJZul-e7NuW7ogeUi4-Z3DvZdTFMcEn1REsFNCcU1eFAekprzkvCEvn733i8MYf2Fc4VqQV8U-JZQ0vMEHhZmuVFKh_KQiGHSjkoMhoWs_uOSDG-bop0sLdAPBLRcQVId-uOj88BFN0fXYJaczDgHNfL9UIatXgM7XUN4FpX9v5LdpNOvXxZ5VXYTjh_uo-P75_G52UV59-3I5m16VumZ1KmvOMeWNosIqwgRXbW0bsBa00cYaOjFKt6RtdVNDnoARAZRjYStsiBUNp0fF2dZ3ObY9mE1vuWW5DK5XYS29cnL3Z3ALOfcryRjjlWiywfsHg-D_jBCT7F3U0HVqAD9GWVUTISomsMjo2y06Vx1IN1ifHfUGl9OGCTqZMFZl6uQ_VD4Geqf9ANbl-o7gw44gMwnu01yNMcrL26-77Lstq4OPMYB9mpRguQmF_BeKzL15vpYn6jEF9C_WVbCt</recordid><startdate>20190717</startdate><enddate>20190717</enddate><creator>Pfarr, Juliane</creator><creator>Ganter, Michael T</creator><creator>Spahn, Donat R</creator><creator>Noethiger, Christoph B</creator><creator>Tscholl, David W</creator><general>Journal of Medical Internet Research</general><general>JMIR Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3677-3705</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0713-7734</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1234-1833</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0336-1421</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4782-183X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190717</creationdate><title>Avatar-Based Patient Monitoring With Peripheral Vision: A Multicenter Comparative Eye-Tracking Study</title><author>Pfarr, Juliane ; Ganter, Michael T ; Spahn, Donat R ; Noethiger, Christoph B ; Tscholl, David W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-4880387a39fa1698ab4f7effecdcdfd35dacb1bbc74e313619e3809f20d1f9783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic - methods</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Patient monitoring equipment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pfarr, Juliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganter, Michael T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spahn, Donat R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noethiger, Christoph B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tscholl, David W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical Internet research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pfarr, Juliane</au><au>Ganter, Michael T</au><au>Spahn, Donat R</au><au>Noethiger, Christoph B</au><au>Tscholl, David W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Avatar-Based Patient Monitoring With Peripheral Vision: A Multicenter Comparative Eye-Tracking Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical Internet research</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Internet Res</addtitle><date>2019-07-17</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e13041</spage><epage>e13041</epage><pages>e13041-e13041</pages><issn>1438-8871</issn><issn>1439-4456</issn><eissn>1438-8871</eissn><abstract>Continuous patient monitoring has been described by the World Health Organization as extremely important and is widely used in anesthesia, intensive care medicine, and emergency medicine. However, current state-of-the-art number- and waveform-based monitoring does not ideally support human users in acquiring quick, confident interpretations with low cognitive effort, and there are additional problematic aspects such as alarm fatigue. We developed a visualization technology (Visual Patient), specifically designed to help caregivers gain situation awareness quickly, which presents vital sign information in the form of an animated avatar of the monitored patient. We suspected that because of the way it displays the information as large, colorful, moving graphic objects, caregivers might be able to perform patient monitoring using their peripheral vision, which may facilitate quicker detection of anomalies, independently of acoustic alarms. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that avatar-based monitoring, when observed with peripheral vision only, increases the number of perceptible changes in patient status as well as caregivers' perceived diagnostic confidence compared with a high-fidelity simulation of conventional monitoring, when observed with peripheral vision only. We conducted a multicenter comparative study with a within-participant design in which anesthesiologists with their peripheral field of vision looked at 2 patient-monitoring scenarios and tried to identify changes in patient status. To ensure the best possible experimental conditions, we used an eye tracker, which recorded the eye movements of the participants and confirmed that they only looked at the monitoring scenarios with their peripheral vision. Overall, 30 participants evaluated 18 different patient status changes with each technology (avatar and conventional patient monitoring). With conventional patient monitoring, participants could only detect those 3 changes in patient status that are associated with a change in the auditory pulse tone display, that is, tachycardia (faster beeping), bradycardia (slower beeping), and desaturation (lower pitch of beeping). With the avatar, the median number of detected vital sign changes quadrupled from 3 to 12 (P&lt;.001) in scenario 1, and more than doubled from 3 to 8 (P&lt;.001) in scenario 2. Median perceived diagnostic confidence was confident for both scenarios with the avatar and unconfident in scenario 1 (P&lt;.001), and very unconfident in scenario 2 (P=.024) with conventional monitoring. This study introduces the concept of peripheral vision monitoring. The test performed showed clearly that an avatar-based display is superior to a standard numeric display for peripheral vision. Avatar-based monitoring could potentially make much more of the patient monitoring information available to caregivers for longer time periods per case. Our results indicate that the optimal information transmission would consist of a combination of auditory and avatar-based monitoring.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>Journal of Medical Internet Research</pub><pmid>31317870</pmid><doi>10.2196/13041</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3677-3705</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0713-7734</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1234-1833</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0336-1421</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4782-183X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1438-8871
ispartof Journal of medical Internet research, 2019-07, Vol.21 (7), p.e13041-e13041
issn 1438-8871
1439-4456
1438-8871
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6668297
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Caregivers
Comparative analysis
Eye Movements - physiology
Female
Humans
Information management
Male
Middle Aged
Monitoring, Physiologic - methods
Original Paper
Patient monitoring equipment
title Avatar-Based Patient Monitoring With Peripheral Vision: A Multicenter Comparative Eye-Tracking Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T10%3A40%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Avatar-Based%20Patient%20Monitoring%20With%20Peripheral%20Vision:%20A%20Multicenter%20Comparative%20Eye-Tracking%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20Internet%20research&rft.au=Pfarr,%20Juliane&rft.date=2019-07-17&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e13041&rft.epage=e13041&rft.pages=e13041-e13041&rft.issn=1438-8871&rft.eissn=1438-8871&rft_id=info:doi/10.2196/13041&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA769355662%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259926909&rft_id=info:pmid/31317870&rft_galeid=A769355662&rfr_iscdi=true