136 Reflections on the foundational scientific knowledge of undergraduate animal science students: a three-year study

In 2015, the University of Arkansas Department of Animal Science developed a strategy for assessing student-learning outcomes within its undergraduate teaching program. The first recognized outcome states that students will demonstrate foundational scientific knowledge in the general animal science...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2019-07, Vol.97 (Supplement_1), p.79-79
Hauptverfasser: Thomas, Lauren R, Powell, Jeremy G, Kegley, Elizabeth B, Jogan, Kathleen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 79
container_issue Supplement_1
container_start_page 79
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 97
creator Thomas, Lauren R
Powell, Jeremy G
Kegley, Elizabeth B
Jogan, Kathleen
description In 2015, the University of Arkansas Department of Animal Science developed a strategy for assessing student-learning outcomes within its undergraduate teaching program. The first recognized outcome states that students will demonstrate foundational scientific knowledge in the general animal science disciplines of physiology, genetics, nutrition, muscle foods, and production animal management. Subsequently, a 58-item assessment tool was developed for direct assessment of student knowledge—focusing primarily on freshmen and senior students. Over the past 3 academic calendar years, 381 students (196 freshmen, 48 sophomores, 19 juniors, 113 seniors, 5 graduates) were assessed, either during an introduction to animal science course or by appointment with outgoing seniors majoring in animal science. Scores were categorized using demographic data collected at the beginning of the assessment tool. Comparison categories included academic class, major, and general student background (rural or urban). Data analysis were performed using the Glimmix procedure of SAS, with student serving as the experimental unit and significance set at P ≤ 0.05. Generally speaking, animal science majors performed better (P < 0.01) than students from other majors, and students with a rural background performed better (P < 0.01) than their urban-backgrounded peers. Overall, senior assessment scores averaged 23-percentage points greater (P < 0.01) than freshmen assessment scores, and the average scores for freshmen and seniors were 43% and 66% respectively. In regards to student performance within each discipline, there was an average improvement of 24 percentage points between freshmen and seniors in all of the measured disciplines except for muscle foods, which only saw a 10-percentage point improvement between the two classes. While the overall improvement in scores is indicative of increased student knowledge, the department would like to see greater improvement in all discipline scores for seniors majoring in animal science.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jas/skz053.180
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6663799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6663799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1340-b91d7fd10802d197b73978b49a14c057fb7b63d67117b411ffce29855f5c7ff73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkF9LwzAUxYMoOKevPucLdMttlqbxQZDhPxAE0eeQJjdbt64ZSavMT2_nVPDpwrnn_DgcQi6BTYApPl2ZNE3rTyb4BEp2REYgcpFxKPgxGTGWQ1aWkJ-Ss5RWjEEulBiRHnhBX9A3aLs6tImGlnZLpD70rTN7yTQ02Rrbrva1pes2fDToFkiDp4MF4yIa15sOqWnrza_ZIk1d74ZUuqJmIEbEbIcmfsu7c3LiTZPw4ueOydvd7ev8IXt6vn-c3zxlFviMZZUCJ70DVrLcgZKV5EqW1UwZmFkmpK9kVXBXSABZzQC8t5irUggvrPRe8jG5PnC3fbVBZ4c-0TR6G4emcaeDqfX_T1sv9SK866IouFRqAEwOABtDShH9XxaY3q-uh9X1YXU9rM6_AOEoenY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>136 Reflections on the foundational scientific knowledge of undergraduate animal science students: a three-year study</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Thomas, Lauren R ; Powell, Jeremy G ; Kegley, Elizabeth B ; Jogan, Kathleen</creator><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Lauren R ; Powell, Jeremy G ; Kegley, Elizabeth B ; Jogan, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><description>In 2015, the University of Arkansas Department of Animal Science developed a strategy for assessing student-learning outcomes within its undergraduate teaching program. The first recognized outcome states that students will demonstrate foundational scientific knowledge in the general animal science disciplines of physiology, genetics, nutrition, muscle foods, and production animal management. Subsequently, a 58-item assessment tool was developed for direct assessment of student knowledge—focusing primarily on freshmen and senior students. Over the past 3 academic calendar years, 381 students (196 freshmen, 48 sophomores, 19 juniors, 113 seniors, 5 graduates) were assessed, either during an introduction to animal science course or by appointment with outgoing seniors majoring in animal science. Scores were categorized using demographic data collected at the beginning of the assessment tool. Comparison categories included academic class, major, and general student background (rural or urban). Data analysis were performed using the Glimmix procedure of SAS, with student serving as the experimental unit and significance set at P ≤ 0.05. Generally speaking, animal science majors performed better (P &lt; 0.01) than students from other majors, and students with a rural background performed better (P &lt; 0.01) than their urban-backgrounded peers. Overall, senior assessment scores averaged 23-percentage points greater (P &lt; 0.01) than freshmen assessment scores, and the average scores for freshmen and seniors were 43% and 66% respectively. In regards to student performance within each discipline, there was an average improvement of 24 percentage points between freshmen and seniors in all of the measured disciplines except for muscle foods, which only saw a 10-percentage point improvement between the two classes. While the overall improvement in scores is indicative of increased student knowledge, the department would like to see greater improvement in all discipline scores for seniors majoring in animal science.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz053.180</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Abstracts</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2019-07, Vol.97 (Supplement_1), p.79-79</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6663799/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6663799/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Lauren R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, Jeremy G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kegley, Elizabeth B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jogan, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><title>136 Reflections on the foundational scientific knowledge of undergraduate animal science students: a three-year study</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>In 2015, the University of Arkansas Department of Animal Science developed a strategy for assessing student-learning outcomes within its undergraduate teaching program. The first recognized outcome states that students will demonstrate foundational scientific knowledge in the general animal science disciplines of physiology, genetics, nutrition, muscle foods, and production animal management. Subsequently, a 58-item assessment tool was developed for direct assessment of student knowledge—focusing primarily on freshmen and senior students. Over the past 3 academic calendar years, 381 students (196 freshmen, 48 sophomores, 19 juniors, 113 seniors, 5 graduates) were assessed, either during an introduction to animal science course or by appointment with outgoing seniors majoring in animal science. Scores were categorized using demographic data collected at the beginning of the assessment tool. Comparison categories included academic class, major, and general student background (rural or urban). Data analysis were performed using the Glimmix procedure of SAS, with student serving as the experimental unit and significance set at P ≤ 0.05. Generally speaking, animal science majors performed better (P &lt; 0.01) than students from other majors, and students with a rural background performed better (P &lt; 0.01) than their urban-backgrounded peers. Overall, senior assessment scores averaged 23-percentage points greater (P &lt; 0.01) than freshmen assessment scores, and the average scores for freshmen and seniors were 43% and 66% respectively. In regards to student performance within each discipline, there was an average improvement of 24 percentage points between freshmen and seniors in all of the measured disciplines except for muscle foods, which only saw a 10-percentage point improvement between the two classes. While the overall improvement in scores is indicative of increased student knowledge, the department would like to see greater improvement in all discipline scores for seniors majoring in animal science.</description><subject>Abstracts</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkF9LwzAUxYMoOKevPucLdMttlqbxQZDhPxAE0eeQJjdbt64ZSavMT2_nVPDpwrnn_DgcQi6BTYApPl2ZNE3rTyb4BEp2REYgcpFxKPgxGTGWQ1aWkJ-Ss5RWjEEulBiRHnhBX9A3aLs6tImGlnZLpD70rTN7yTQ02Rrbrva1pes2fDToFkiDp4MF4yIa15sOqWnrza_ZIk1d74ZUuqJmIEbEbIcmfsu7c3LiTZPw4ueOydvd7ev8IXt6vn-c3zxlFviMZZUCJ70DVrLcgZKV5EqW1UwZmFkmpK9kVXBXSABZzQC8t5irUggvrPRe8jG5PnC3fbVBZ4c-0TR6G4emcaeDqfX_T1sv9SK866IouFRqAEwOABtDShH9XxaY3q-uh9X1YXU9rM6_AOEoenY</recordid><startdate>20190729</startdate><enddate>20190729</enddate><creator>Thomas, Lauren R</creator><creator>Powell, Jeremy G</creator><creator>Kegley, Elizabeth B</creator><creator>Jogan, Kathleen</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190729</creationdate><title>136 Reflections on the foundational scientific knowledge of undergraduate animal science students: a three-year study</title><author>Thomas, Lauren R ; Powell, Jeremy G ; Kegley, Elizabeth B ; Jogan, Kathleen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1340-b91d7fd10802d197b73978b49a14c057fb7b63d67117b411ffce29855f5c7ff73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abstracts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Lauren R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, Jeremy G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kegley, Elizabeth B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jogan, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thomas, Lauren R</au><au>Powell, Jeremy G</au><au>Kegley, Elizabeth B</au><au>Jogan, Kathleen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>136 Reflections on the foundational scientific knowledge of undergraduate animal science students: a three-year study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2019-07-29</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>79</epage><pages>79-79</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>In 2015, the University of Arkansas Department of Animal Science developed a strategy for assessing student-learning outcomes within its undergraduate teaching program. The first recognized outcome states that students will demonstrate foundational scientific knowledge in the general animal science disciplines of physiology, genetics, nutrition, muscle foods, and production animal management. Subsequently, a 58-item assessment tool was developed for direct assessment of student knowledge—focusing primarily on freshmen and senior students. Over the past 3 academic calendar years, 381 students (196 freshmen, 48 sophomores, 19 juniors, 113 seniors, 5 graduates) were assessed, either during an introduction to animal science course or by appointment with outgoing seniors majoring in animal science. Scores were categorized using demographic data collected at the beginning of the assessment tool. Comparison categories included academic class, major, and general student background (rural or urban). Data analysis were performed using the Glimmix procedure of SAS, with student serving as the experimental unit and significance set at P ≤ 0.05. Generally speaking, animal science majors performed better (P &lt; 0.01) than students from other majors, and students with a rural background performed better (P &lt; 0.01) than their urban-backgrounded peers. Overall, senior assessment scores averaged 23-percentage points greater (P &lt; 0.01) than freshmen assessment scores, and the average scores for freshmen and seniors were 43% and 66% respectively. In regards to student performance within each discipline, there was an average improvement of 24 percentage points between freshmen and seniors in all of the measured disciplines except for muscle foods, which only saw a 10-percentage point improvement between the two classes. While the overall improvement in scores is indicative of increased student knowledge, the department would like to see greater improvement in all discipline scores for seniors majoring in animal science.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jas/skz053.180</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2019-07, Vol.97 (Supplement_1), p.79-79
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6663799
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Abstracts
title 136 Reflections on the foundational scientific knowledge of undergraduate animal science students: a three-year study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T01%3A07%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=136%20Reflections%20on%20the%20foundational%20scientific%20knowledge%20of%20undergraduate%20animal%20science%20students:%20a%20three-year%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Thomas,%20Lauren%20R&rft.date=2019-07-29&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=79&rft.pages=79-79&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jas/skz053.180&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral_cross%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6663799%3C/pubmedcentral_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true