Mechanisms of rule acquisition and rule following in inductive reasoning
Despite the recent interest in the neuroanatomy of inductive reasoning processes, the regional specificity within prefrontal cortex (PFC) for the different mechanisms involved in induction tasks remains to be determined. In this study, we used fMRI to investigate the contribution of PFC regions to r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of neuroscience 2011-05, Vol.31 (21), p.7763-7774 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7774 |
---|---|
container_issue | 21 |
container_start_page | 7763 |
container_title | The Journal of neuroscience |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Crescentini, Cristiano Seyed-Allaei, Shima De Pisapia, Nicola Jovicich, Jorge Amati, Daniele Shallice, Tim |
description | Despite the recent interest in the neuroanatomy of inductive reasoning processes, the regional specificity within prefrontal cortex (PFC) for the different mechanisms involved in induction tasks remains to be determined. In this study, we used fMRI to investigate the contribution of PFC regions to rule acquisition (rule search and rule discovery) and rule following. Twenty-six healthy young adult participants were presented with a series of images of cards, each consisting of a set of circles numbered in sequence with one colored blue. Participants had to predict the position of the blue circle on the next card. The rules that had to be acquired pertained to the relationship among succeeding stimuli. Responses given by subjects were categorized in a series of phases either tapping rule acquisition (responses given up to and including rule discovery) or rule following (correct responses after rule acquisition). Mid-dorsolateral PFC (mid-DLPFC) was active during rule search and remained active until successful rule acquisition. By contrast, rule following was associated with activation in temporal, motor, and medial/anterior prefrontal cortex. Moreover, frontopolar cortex (FPC) was active throughout the rule acquisition and rule following phases before a rule became familiar. We attributed activation in mid-DLPFC to hypothesis generation and in FPC to integration of multiple separate inferences. The present study provides evidence that brain activation during inductive reasoning involves a complex network of frontal processes and that different subregions respond during rule acquisition and rule following phases. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1523/jneurosci.4579-10.2011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6633120</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>868996994</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-1d85c2848ed212f25fc01f0af2c14b71a18007fa9540d7d250b544a370d4e5ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUV1LAzEQDKLYWv0L5d58uprkkvt4EaSorVQLap9Dmo825S5pL3cV_705WovCwsLs7OwyA8AQwRGiOLnbWNXWzgszIjQr4gBjiNAZ6IdpEWMC0TnoQ5zBOCUZ6YEr7zcQwgyi7BL0MEpRQvKiDyavSqy5Nb7ykdNR3ZYq4mLXGm8a42zErTyA2pWl-zJ2FRkbSraiMXsV1Yp7ZwN8DS40L726OfYBWDw9fo4n8Wz-PB0_zGJBE9zESOZU4JzkSmKENaZaQKQh11ggsswQR3n4UvOCEigziSlcUkJ4kkFJFBUqGYD7g-62XVZKCmWbmpdsW5uK19_MccP-T6xZs5XbszRNEoRhELg9CtRu1yrfsMp4ocqSW-Vaz_I0L4q0KEhgpgemCE77WunTFQRZlwJ7eXtcvM8_xlPWpdDBXQphcfj3x9Par-3JD3D_hvY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>868996994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mechanisms of rule acquisition and rule following in inductive reasoning</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Crescentini, Cristiano ; Seyed-Allaei, Shima ; De Pisapia, Nicola ; Jovicich, Jorge ; Amati, Daniele ; Shallice, Tim</creator><creatorcontrib>Crescentini, Cristiano ; Seyed-Allaei, Shima ; De Pisapia, Nicola ; Jovicich, Jorge ; Amati, Daniele ; Shallice, Tim</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the recent interest in the neuroanatomy of inductive reasoning processes, the regional specificity within prefrontal cortex (PFC) for the different mechanisms involved in induction tasks remains to be determined. In this study, we used fMRI to investigate the contribution of PFC regions to rule acquisition (rule search and rule discovery) and rule following. Twenty-six healthy young adult participants were presented with a series of images of cards, each consisting of a set of circles numbered in sequence with one colored blue. Participants had to predict the position of the blue circle on the next card. The rules that had to be acquired pertained to the relationship among succeeding stimuli. Responses given by subjects were categorized in a series of phases either tapping rule acquisition (responses given up to and including rule discovery) or rule following (correct responses after rule acquisition). Mid-dorsolateral PFC (mid-DLPFC) was active during rule search and remained active until successful rule acquisition. By contrast, rule following was associated with activation in temporal, motor, and medial/anterior prefrontal cortex. Moreover, frontopolar cortex (FPC) was active throughout the rule acquisition and rule following phases before a rule became familiar. We attributed activation in mid-DLPFC to hypothesis generation and in FPC to integration of multiple separate inferences. The present study provides evidence that brain activation during inductive reasoning involves a complex network of frontal processes and that different subregions respond during rule acquisition and rule following phases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-6474</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-2401</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.4579-10.2011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21613489</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Society for Neuroscience</publisher><subject>Adult ; Brain - physiology ; Brain Mapping - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Problem Solving - physiology ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Journal of neuroscience, 2011-05, Vol.31 (21), p.7763-7774</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 the authors 0270-6474/11/317763-12$15.00/0 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-1d85c2848ed212f25fc01f0af2c14b71a18007fa9540d7d250b544a370d4e5ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-1d85c2848ed212f25fc01f0af2c14b71a18007fa9540d7d250b544a370d4e5ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6633120/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6633120/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21613489$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crescentini, Cristiano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seyed-Allaei, Shima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Pisapia, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jovicich, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amati, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shallice, Tim</creatorcontrib><title>Mechanisms of rule acquisition and rule following in inductive reasoning</title><title>The Journal of neuroscience</title><addtitle>J Neurosci</addtitle><description>Despite the recent interest in the neuroanatomy of inductive reasoning processes, the regional specificity within prefrontal cortex (PFC) for the different mechanisms involved in induction tasks remains to be determined. In this study, we used fMRI to investigate the contribution of PFC regions to rule acquisition (rule search and rule discovery) and rule following. Twenty-six healthy young adult participants were presented with a series of images of cards, each consisting of a set of circles numbered in sequence with one colored blue. Participants had to predict the position of the blue circle on the next card. The rules that had to be acquired pertained to the relationship among succeeding stimuli. Responses given by subjects were categorized in a series of phases either tapping rule acquisition (responses given up to and including rule discovery) or rule following (correct responses after rule acquisition). Mid-dorsolateral PFC (mid-DLPFC) was active during rule search and remained active until successful rule acquisition. By contrast, rule following was associated with activation in temporal, motor, and medial/anterior prefrontal cortex. Moreover, frontopolar cortex (FPC) was active throughout the rule acquisition and rule following phases before a rule became familiar. We attributed activation in mid-DLPFC to hypothesis generation and in FPC to integration of multiple separate inferences. The present study provides evidence that brain activation during inductive reasoning involves a complex network of frontal processes and that different subregions respond during rule acquisition and rule following phases.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Problem Solving - physiology</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0270-6474</issn><issn>1529-2401</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUV1LAzEQDKLYWv0L5d58uprkkvt4EaSorVQLap9Dmo825S5pL3cV_705WovCwsLs7OwyA8AQwRGiOLnbWNXWzgszIjQr4gBjiNAZ6IdpEWMC0TnoQ5zBOCUZ6YEr7zcQwgyi7BL0MEpRQvKiDyavSqy5Nb7ykdNR3ZYq4mLXGm8a42zErTyA2pWl-zJ2FRkbSraiMXsV1Yp7ZwN8DS40L726OfYBWDw9fo4n8Wz-PB0_zGJBE9zESOZU4JzkSmKENaZaQKQh11ggsswQR3n4UvOCEigziSlcUkJ4kkFJFBUqGYD7g-62XVZKCmWbmpdsW5uK19_MccP-T6xZs5XbszRNEoRhELg9CtRu1yrfsMp4ocqSW-Vaz_I0L4q0KEhgpgemCE77WunTFQRZlwJ7eXtcvM8_xlPWpdDBXQphcfj3x9Par-3JD3D_hvY</recordid><startdate>20110525</startdate><enddate>20110525</enddate><creator>Crescentini, Cristiano</creator><creator>Seyed-Allaei, Shima</creator><creator>De Pisapia, Nicola</creator><creator>Jovicich, Jorge</creator><creator>Amati, Daniele</creator><creator>Shallice, Tim</creator><general>Society for Neuroscience</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110525</creationdate><title>Mechanisms of rule acquisition and rule following in inductive reasoning</title><author>Crescentini, Cristiano ; Seyed-Allaei, Shima ; De Pisapia, Nicola ; Jovicich, Jorge ; Amati, Daniele ; Shallice, Tim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-1d85c2848ed212f25fc01f0af2c14b71a18007fa9540d7d250b544a370d4e5ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Problem Solving - physiology</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crescentini, Cristiano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seyed-Allaei, Shima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Pisapia, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jovicich, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amati, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shallice, Tim</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crescentini, Cristiano</au><au>Seyed-Allaei, Shima</au><au>De Pisapia, Nicola</au><au>Jovicich, Jorge</au><au>Amati, Daniele</au><au>Shallice, Tim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mechanisms of rule acquisition and rule following in inductive reasoning</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurosci</addtitle><date>2011-05-25</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>7763</spage><epage>7774</epage><pages>7763-7774</pages><issn>0270-6474</issn><eissn>1529-2401</eissn><abstract>Despite the recent interest in the neuroanatomy of inductive reasoning processes, the regional specificity within prefrontal cortex (PFC) for the different mechanisms involved in induction tasks remains to be determined. In this study, we used fMRI to investigate the contribution of PFC regions to rule acquisition (rule search and rule discovery) and rule following. Twenty-six healthy young adult participants were presented with a series of images of cards, each consisting of a set of circles numbered in sequence with one colored blue. Participants had to predict the position of the blue circle on the next card. The rules that had to be acquired pertained to the relationship among succeeding stimuli. Responses given by subjects were categorized in a series of phases either tapping rule acquisition (responses given up to and including rule discovery) or rule following (correct responses after rule acquisition). Mid-dorsolateral PFC (mid-DLPFC) was active during rule search and remained active until successful rule acquisition. By contrast, rule following was associated with activation in temporal, motor, and medial/anterior prefrontal cortex. Moreover, frontopolar cortex (FPC) was active throughout the rule acquisition and rule following phases before a rule became familiar. We attributed activation in mid-DLPFC to hypothesis generation and in FPC to integration of multiple separate inferences. The present study provides evidence that brain activation during inductive reasoning involves a complex network of frontal processes and that different subregions respond during rule acquisition and rule following phases.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Society for Neuroscience</pub><pmid>21613489</pmid><doi>10.1523/jneurosci.4579-10.2011</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0270-6474 |
ispartof | The Journal of neuroscience, 2011-05, Vol.31 (21), p.7763-7774 |
issn | 0270-6474 1529-2401 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6633120 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Brain - physiology Brain Mapping - methods Female Humans Male Photic Stimulation - methods Problem Solving - physiology Psychomotor Performance - physiology Reaction Time - physiology Young Adult |
title | Mechanisms of rule acquisition and rule following in inductive reasoning |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T22%3A58%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mechanisms%20of%20rule%20acquisition%20and%20rule%20following%20in%20inductive%20reasoning&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20neuroscience&rft.au=Crescentini,%20Cristiano&rft.date=2011-05-25&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=7763&rft.epage=7774&rft.pages=7763-7774&rft.issn=0270-6474&rft.eissn=1529-2401&rft_id=info:doi/10.1523/jneurosci.4579-10.2011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E868996994%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=868996994&rft_id=info:pmid/21613489&rfr_iscdi=true |