Bottom-up biases in feature-selective attention
Previous studies of feature-selective attention have focused on situations in which attention is directed to one of two spatially superimposed stimuli of equal salience. While such overlapping stimuli should maximize stimulus interactions, it is still unknown how bottom-up biases favoring one or the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of neuroscience 2012-11, Vol.32 (47), p.16953-16958 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 16958 |
---|---|
container_issue | 47 |
container_start_page | 16953 |
container_title | The Journal of neuroscience |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Andersen, Søren K Müller, Matthias M Martinovic, Jasna |
description | Previous studies of feature-selective attention have focused on situations in which attention is directed to one of two spatially superimposed stimuli of equal salience. While such overlapping stimuli should maximize stimulus interactions, it is still unknown how bottom-up biases favoring one or the other stimulus influence the efficiency of feature-selective attention. We examined the integration of bottom-up contrast and top-down feature-selection biases on stimulus processing. Two fully overlapping random dot kinematograms (RDKs) of light and dark dots were presented on a gray background of intermediate luminance. On each trial, human participants attended one RDK to detect brief coherent motion targets, while ignoring any events in the unattended RDK. Concurrently, through changes in background luminance, stimulus contrast could be set to five different levels: the stimuli could either be equal, or one of the two stimuli could have twice or four times the contrast of the other stimulus. This manipulation introduced a bottom-up bias toward the stimulus with the higher contrast while keeping the difference between the stimuli constant. Stimulus processing was measured by means of steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs). SSVEP amplitudes generally increased with higher contrast of the driving stimulus. At earlier levels of processing, attention increased the slope of this linear relation, i.e., attention multiplicatively enhanced SSVEP amplitudes. However, at later levels of processing, attention had an additive effect. These effects of attention can be attributed to the differential integration of gain enhancement and inhibitory stimulus competition at different levels of the visual processing hierarchy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1767-12.2012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6621795</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1197486057</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-8e24e3a293c6da2bb0680c8c8aff0445f4d86f355cd7d5b584102ab9e391aae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtPwkAQxzdGI_j4CoSjl8LOPtuLiRJUDJFE8bzZbqdaU1rsbkn89paARE-e5vB_zEx-hAyAjkAyPn58mr4-L14msxFopSNgI0aBHZF-pyYRExSOSZ8yTSMltOiRM-8_KKWagj4lPcZBy1ioPhnf1iHUq6hdD9PCevTDohrmaEPbYOSxRBeKDQ5tCFiFoq4uyEluS4-X-3lOlnfT5eQhmi_uZ5ObeeQk8BDFyARyyxLuVGZZmlIVUxe72OY5FULmIotVzqV0mc5k2t0ClNk0QZ6AtcjPyfWudt2mK8xct7yxpVk3xco2X6a2hfmrVMW7eas3RikGOpFdwdW-oKk_W_TBrArvsCxthXXrDUgJnZXH4n8rJFrEikrdWdXO6pra-wbzw0VAzZaLOXAxWy4GmNly6YKD3_8cYj8g-DepoYqd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1197486057</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bottom-up biases in feature-selective attention</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Andersen, Søren K ; Müller, Matthias M ; Martinovic, Jasna</creator><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Søren K ; Müller, Matthias M ; Martinovic, Jasna</creatorcontrib><description>Previous studies of feature-selective attention have focused on situations in which attention is directed to one of two spatially superimposed stimuli of equal salience. While such overlapping stimuli should maximize stimulus interactions, it is still unknown how bottom-up biases favoring one or the other stimulus influence the efficiency of feature-selective attention. We examined the integration of bottom-up contrast and top-down feature-selection biases on stimulus processing. Two fully overlapping random dot kinematograms (RDKs) of light and dark dots were presented on a gray background of intermediate luminance. On each trial, human participants attended one RDK to detect brief coherent motion targets, while ignoring any events in the unattended RDK. Concurrently, through changes in background luminance, stimulus contrast could be set to five different levels: the stimuli could either be equal, or one of the two stimuli could have twice or four times the contrast of the other stimulus. This manipulation introduced a bottom-up bias toward the stimulus with the higher contrast while keeping the difference between the stimuli constant. Stimulus processing was measured by means of steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs). SSVEP amplitudes generally increased with higher contrast of the driving stimulus. At earlier levels of processing, attention increased the slope of this linear relation, i.e., attention multiplicatively enhanced SSVEP amplitudes. However, at later levels of processing, attention had an additive effect. These effects of attention can be attributed to the differential integration of gain enhancement and inhibitory stimulus competition at different levels of the visual processing hierarchy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-6474</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1529-2401</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-2401</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1767-12.2012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23175846</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Society for Neuroscience</publisher><subject>Adult ; Algorithms ; Attention - physiology ; Contrast Sensitivity ; Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology ; Electroencephalography ; Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory - physiology ; Female ; Fixation, Ocular ; Humans ; Male ; Photic Stimulation ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Journal of neuroscience, 2012-11, Vol.32 (47), p.16953-16958</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 the authors 0270-6474/12/3216953-06$15.00/0 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-8e24e3a293c6da2bb0680c8c8aff0445f4d86f355cd7d5b584102ab9e391aae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-8e24e3a293c6da2bb0680c8c8aff0445f4d86f355cd7d5b584102ab9e391aae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6621795/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6621795/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23175846$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Søren K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Matthias M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinovic, Jasna</creatorcontrib><title>Bottom-up biases in feature-selective attention</title><title>The Journal of neuroscience</title><addtitle>J Neurosci</addtitle><description>Previous studies of feature-selective attention have focused on situations in which attention is directed to one of two spatially superimposed stimuli of equal salience. While such overlapping stimuli should maximize stimulus interactions, it is still unknown how bottom-up biases favoring one or the other stimulus influence the efficiency of feature-selective attention. We examined the integration of bottom-up contrast and top-down feature-selection biases on stimulus processing. Two fully overlapping random dot kinematograms (RDKs) of light and dark dots were presented on a gray background of intermediate luminance. On each trial, human participants attended one RDK to detect brief coherent motion targets, while ignoring any events in the unattended RDK. Concurrently, through changes in background luminance, stimulus contrast could be set to five different levels: the stimuli could either be equal, or one of the two stimuli could have twice or four times the contrast of the other stimulus. This manipulation introduced a bottom-up bias toward the stimulus with the higher contrast while keeping the difference between the stimuli constant. Stimulus processing was measured by means of steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs). SSVEP amplitudes generally increased with higher contrast of the driving stimulus. At earlier levels of processing, attention increased the slope of this linear relation, i.e., attention multiplicatively enhanced SSVEP amplitudes. However, at later levels of processing, attention had an additive effect. These effects of attention can be attributed to the differential integration of gain enhancement and inhibitory stimulus competition at different levels of the visual processing hierarchy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Contrast Sensitivity</subject><subject>Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fixation, Ocular</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0270-6474</issn><issn>1529-2401</issn><issn>1529-2401</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtPwkAQxzdGI_j4CoSjl8LOPtuLiRJUDJFE8bzZbqdaU1rsbkn89paARE-e5vB_zEx-hAyAjkAyPn58mr4-L14msxFopSNgI0aBHZF-pyYRExSOSZ8yTSMltOiRM-8_KKWagj4lPcZBy1ioPhnf1iHUq6hdD9PCevTDohrmaEPbYOSxRBeKDQ5tCFiFoq4uyEluS4-X-3lOlnfT5eQhmi_uZ5ObeeQk8BDFyARyyxLuVGZZmlIVUxe72OY5FULmIotVzqV0mc5k2t0ClNk0QZ6AtcjPyfWudt2mK8xct7yxpVk3xco2X6a2hfmrVMW7eas3RikGOpFdwdW-oKk_W_TBrArvsCxthXXrDUgJnZXH4n8rJFrEikrdWdXO6pra-wbzw0VAzZaLOXAxWy4GmNly6YKD3_8cYj8g-DepoYqd</recordid><startdate>20121121</startdate><enddate>20121121</enddate><creator>Andersen, Søren K</creator><creator>Müller, Matthias M</creator><creator>Martinovic, Jasna</creator><general>Society for Neuroscience</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121121</creationdate><title>Bottom-up biases in feature-selective attention</title><author>Andersen, Søren K ; Müller, Matthias M ; Martinovic, Jasna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-8e24e3a293c6da2bb0680c8c8aff0445f4d86f355cd7d5b584102ab9e391aae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Contrast Sensitivity</topic><topic>Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fixation, Ocular</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Søren K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Matthias M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinovic, Jasna</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andersen, Søren K</au><au>Müller, Matthias M</au><au>Martinovic, Jasna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bottom-up biases in feature-selective attention</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurosci</addtitle><date>2012-11-21</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>47</issue><spage>16953</spage><epage>16958</epage><pages>16953-16958</pages><issn>0270-6474</issn><issn>1529-2401</issn><eissn>1529-2401</eissn><abstract>Previous studies of feature-selective attention have focused on situations in which attention is directed to one of two spatially superimposed stimuli of equal salience. While such overlapping stimuli should maximize stimulus interactions, it is still unknown how bottom-up biases favoring one or the other stimulus influence the efficiency of feature-selective attention. We examined the integration of bottom-up contrast and top-down feature-selection biases on stimulus processing. Two fully overlapping random dot kinematograms (RDKs) of light and dark dots were presented on a gray background of intermediate luminance. On each trial, human participants attended one RDK to detect brief coherent motion targets, while ignoring any events in the unattended RDK. Concurrently, through changes in background luminance, stimulus contrast could be set to five different levels: the stimuli could either be equal, or one of the two stimuli could have twice or four times the contrast of the other stimulus. This manipulation introduced a bottom-up bias toward the stimulus with the higher contrast while keeping the difference between the stimuli constant. Stimulus processing was measured by means of steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs). SSVEP amplitudes generally increased with higher contrast of the driving stimulus. At earlier levels of processing, attention increased the slope of this linear relation, i.e., attention multiplicatively enhanced SSVEP amplitudes. However, at later levels of processing, attention had an additive effect. These effects of attention can be attributed to the differential integration of gain enhancement and inhibitory stimulus competition at different levels of the visual processing hierarchy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Society for Neuroscience</pub><pmid>23175846</pmid><doi>10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1767-12.2012</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0270-6474 |
ispartof | The Journal of neuroscience, 2012-11, Vol.32 (47), p.16953-16958 |
issn | 0270-6474 1529-2401 1529-2401 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6621795 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Algorithms Attention - physiology Contrast Sensitivity Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology Electroencephalography Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory - physiology Female Fixation, Ocular Humans Male Photic Stimulation Young Adult |
title | Bottom-up biases in feature-selective attention |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T04%3A13%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bottom-up%20biases%20in%20feature-selective%20attention&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20neuroscience&rft.au=Andersen,%20S%C3%B8ren%20K&rft.date=2012-11-21&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=47&rft.spage=16953&rft.epage=16958&rft.pages=16953-16958&rft.issn=0270-6474&rft.eissn=1529-2401&rft_id=info:doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1767-12.2012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1197486057%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1197486057&rft_id=info:pmid/23175846&rfr_iscdi=true |