Bottom-up biases in feature-selective attention

Previous studies of feature-selective attention have focused on situations in which attention is directed to one of two spatially superimposed stimuli of equal salience. While such overlapping stimuli should maximize stimulus interactions, it is still unknown how bottom-up biases favoring one or the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of neuroscience 2012-11, Vol.32 (47), p.16953-16958
Hauptverfasser: Andersen, Søren K, Müller, Matthias M, Martinovic, Jasna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 16958
container_issue 47
container_start_page 16953
container_title The Journal of neuroscience
container_volume 32
creator Andersen, Søren K
Müller, Matthias M
Martinovic, Jasna
description Previous studies of feature-selective attention have focused on situations in which attention is directed to one of two spatially superimposed stimuli of equal salience. While such overlapping stimuli should maximize stimulus interactions, it is still unknown how bottom-up biases favoring one or the other stimulus influence the efficiency of feature-selective attention. We examined the integration of bottom-up contrast and top-down feature-selection biases on stimulus processing. Two fully overlapping random dot kinematograms (RDKs) of light and dark dots were presented on a gray background of intermediate luminance. On each trial, human participants attended one RDK to detect brief coherent motion targets, while ignoring any events in the unattended RDK. Concurrently, through changes in background luminance, stimulus contrast could be set to five different levels: the stimuli could either be equal, or one of the two stimuli could have twice or four times the contrast of the other stimulus. This manipulation introduced a bottom-up bias toward the stimulus with the higher contrast while keeping the difference between the stimuli constant. Stimulus processing was measured by means of steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs). SSVEP amplitudes generally increased with higher contrast of the driving stimulus. At earlier levels of processing, attention increased the slope of this linear relation, i.e., attention multiplicatively enhanced SSVEP amplitudes. However, at later levels of processing, attention had an additive effect. These effects of attention can be attributed to the differential integration of gain enhancement and inhibitory stimulus competition at different levels of the visual processing hierarchy.
doi_str_mv 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1767-12.2012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6621795</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1197486057</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-8e24e3a293c6da2bb0680c8c8aff0445f4d86f355cd7d5b584102ab9e391aae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtPwkAQxzdGI_j4CoSjl8LOPtuLiRJUDJFE8bzZbqdaU1rsbkn89paARE-e5vB_zEx-hAyAjkAyPn58mr4-L14msxFopSNgI0aBHZF-pyYRExSOSZ8yTSMltOiRM-8_KKWagj4lPcZBy1ioPhnf1iHUq6hdD9PCevTDohrmaEPbYOSxRBeKDQ5tCFiFoq4uyEluS4-X-3lOlnfT5eQhmi_uZ5ObeeQk8BDFyARyyxLuVGZZmlIVUxe72OY5FULmIotVzqV0mc5k2t0ClNk0QZ6AtcjPyfWudt2mK8xct7yxpVk3xco2X6a2hfmrVMW7eas3RikGOpFdwdW-oKk_W_TBrArvsCxthXXrDUgJnZXH4n8rJFrEikrdWdXO6pra-wbzw0VAzZaLOXAxWy4GmNly6YKD3_8cYj8g-DepoYqd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1197486057</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bottom-up biases in feature-selective attention</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Andersen, Søren K ; Müller, Matthias M ; Martinovic, Jasna</creator><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Søren K ; Müller, Matthias M ; Martinovic, Jasna</creatorcontrib><description>Previous studies of feature-selective attention have focused on situations in which attention is directed to one of two spatially superimposed stimuli of equal salience. While such overlapping stimuli should maximize stimulus interactions, it is still unknown how bottom-up biases favoring one or the other stimulus influence the efficiency of feature-selective attention. We examined the integration of bottom-up contrast and top-down feature-selection biases on stimulus processing. Two fully overlapping random dot kinematograms (RDKs) of light and dark dots were presented on a gray background of intermediate luminance. On each trial, human participants attended one RDK to detect brief coherent motion targets, while ignoring any events in the unattended RDK. Concurrently, through changes in background luminance, stimulus contrast could be set to five different levels: the stimuli could either be equal, or one of the two stimuli could have twice or four times the contrast of the other stimulus. This manipulation introduced a bottom-up bias toward the stimulus with the higher contrast while keeping the difference between the stimuli constant. Stimulus processing was measured by means of steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs). SSVEP amplitudes generally increased with higher contrast of the driving stimulus. At earlier levels of processing, attention increased the slope of this linear relation, i.e., attention multiplicatively enhanced SSVEP amplitudes. However, at later levels of processing, attention had an additive effect. These effects of attention can be attributed to the differential integration of gain enhancement and inhibitory stimulus competition at different levels of the visual processing hierarchy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-6474</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1529-2401</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-2401</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1767-12.2012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23175846</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Society for Neuroscience</publisher><subject>Adult ; Algorithms ; Attention - physiology ; Contrast Sensitivity ; Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology ; Electroencephalography ; Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory - physiology ; Female ; Fixation, Ocular ; Humans ; Male ; Photic Stimulation ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Journal of neuroscience, 2012-11, Vol.32 (47), p.16953-16958</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 the authors 0270-6474/12/3216953-06$15.00/0 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-8e24e3a293c6da2bb0680c8c8aff0445f4d86f355cd7d5b584102ab9e391aae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-8e24e3a293c6da2bb0680c8c8aff0445f4d86f355cd7d5b584102ab9e391aae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6621795/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6621795/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23175846$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Søren K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Matthias M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinovic, Jasna</creatorcontrib><title>Bottom-up biases in feature-selective attention</title><title>The Journal of neuroscience</title><addtitle>J Neurosci</addtitle><description>Previous studies of feature-selective attention have focused on situations in which attention is directed to one of two spatially superimposed stimuli of equal salience. While such overlapping stimuli should maximize stimulus interactions, it is still unknown how bottom-up biases favoring one or the other stimulus influence the efficiency of feature-selective attention. We examined the integration of bottom-up contrast and top-down feature-selection biases on stimulus processing. Two fully overlapping random dot kinematograms (RDKs) of light and dark dots were presented on a gray background of intermediate luminance. On each trial, human participants attended one RDK to detect brief coherent motion targets, while ignoring any events in the unattended RDK. Concurrently, through changes in background luminance, stimulus contrast could be set to five different levels: the stimuli could either be equal, or one of the two stimuli could have twice or four times the contrast of the other stimulus. This manipulation introduced a bottom-up bias toward the stimulus with the higher contrast while keeping the difference between the stimuli constant. Stimulus processing was measured by means of steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs). SSVEP amplitudes generally increased with higher contrast of the driving stimulus. At earlier levels of processing, attention increased the slope of this linear relation, i.e., attention multiplicatively enhanced SSVEP amplitudes. However, at later levels of processing, attention had an additive effect. These effects of attention can be attributed to the differential integration of gain enhancement and inhibitory stimulus competition at different levels of the visual processing hierarchy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Contrast Sensitivity</subject><subject>Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fixation, Ocular</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0270-6474</issn><issn>1529-2401</issn><issn>1529-2401</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtPwkAQxzdGI_j4CoSjl8LOPtuLiRJUDJFE8bzZbqdaU1rsbkn89paARE-e5vB_zEx-hAyAjkAyPn58mr4-L14msxFopSNgI0aBHZF-pyYRExSOSZ8yTSMltOiRM-8_KKWagj4lPcZBy1ioPhnf1iHUq6hdD9PCevTDohrmaEPbYOSxRBeKDQ5tCFiFoq4uyEluS4-X-3lOlnfT5eQhmi_uZ5ObeeQk8BDFyARyyxLuVGZZmlIVUxe72OY5FULmIotVzqV0mc5k2t0ClNk0QZ6AtcjPyfWudt2mK8xct7yxpVk3xco2X6a2hfmrVMW7eas3RikGOpFdwdW-oKk_W_TBrArvsCxthXXrDUgJnZXH4n8rJFrEikrdWdXO6pra-wbzw0VAzZaLOXAxWy4GmNly6YKD3_8cYj8g-DepoYqd</recordid><startdate>20121121</startdate><enddate>20121121</enddate><creator>Andersen, Søren K</creator><creator>Müller, Matthias M</creator><creator>Martinovic, Jasna</creator><general>Society for Neuroscience</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121121</creationdate><title>Bottom-up biases in feature-selective attention</title><author>Andersen, Søren K ; Müller, Matthias M ; Martinovic, Jasna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-8e24e3a293c6da2bb0680c8c8aff0445f4d86f355cd7d5b584102ab9e391aae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Contrast Sensitivity</topic><topic>Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fixation, Ocular</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Søren K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Matthias M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinovic, Jasna</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andersen, Søren K</au><au>Müller, Matthias M</au><au>Martinovic, Jasna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bottom-up biases in feature-selective attention</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurosci</addtitle><date>2012-11-21</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>47</issue><spage>16953</spage><epage>16958</epage><pages>16953-16958</pages><issn>0270-6474</issn><issn>1529-2401</issn><eissn>1529-2401</eissn><abstract>Previous studies of feature-selective attention have focused on situations in which attention is directed to one of two spatially superimposed stimuli of equal salience. While such overlapping stimuli should maximize stimulus interactions, it is still unknown how bottom-up biases favoring one or the other stimulus influence the efficiency of feature-selective attention. We examined the integration of bottom-up contrast and top-down feature-selection biases on stimulus processing. Two fully overlapping random dot kinematograms (RDKs) of light and dark dots were presented on a gray background of intermediate luminance. On each trial, human participants attended one RDK to detect brief coherent motion targets, while ignoring any events in the unattended RDK. Concurrently, through changes in background luminance, stimulus contrast could be set to five different levels: the stimuli could either be equal, or one of the two stimuli could have twice or four times the contrast of the other stimulus. This manipulation introduced a bottom-up bias toward the stimulus with the higher contrast while keeping the difference between the stimuli constant. Stimulus processing was measured by means of steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs). SSVEP amplitudes generally increased with higher contrast of the driving stimulus. At earlier levels of processing, attention increased the slope of this linear relation, i.e., attention multiplicatively enhanced SSVEP amplitudes. However, at later levels of processing, attention had an additive effect. These effects of attention can be attributed to the differential integration of gain enhancement and inhibitory stimulus competition at different levels of the visual processing hierarchy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Society for Neuroscience</pub><pmid>23175846</pmid><doi>10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1767-12.2012</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0270-6474
ispartof The Journal of neuroscience, 2012-11, Vol.32 (47), p.16953-16958
issn 0270-6474
1529-2401
1529-2401
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6621795
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Algorithms
Attention - physiology
Contrast Sensitivity
Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology
Electroencephalography
Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory - physiology
Female
Fixation, Ocular
Humans
Male
Photic Stimulation
Young Adult
title Bottom-up biases in feature-selective attention
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T04%3A13%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bottom-up%20biases%20in%20feature-selective%20attention&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20neuroscience&rft.au=Andersen,%20S%C3%B8ren%20K&rft.date=2012-11-21&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=47&rft.spage=16953&rft.epage=16958&rft.pages=16953-16958&rft.issn=0270-6474&rft.eissn=1529-2401&rft_id=info:doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1767-12.2012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1197486057%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1197486057&rft_id=info:pmid/23175846&rfr_iscdi=true