Effects of short-term sprint interval and moderate-intensity continuous training on liver fat content, lipoprotein profile, and substrate uptake: a randomized trial
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and increased liver fat content (LFC) alter lipoprotein profile and composition and impair liver substrate uptake. Exercise training mitigates T2D and reduces LFC, but the benefits of different training intensities in terms of lipoprotein classes and liver substrate uptake are...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied physiology (1985) 2019-06, Vol.126 (6), p.1756-1768 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1768 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1756 |
container_title | Journal of applied physiology (1985) |
container_volume | 126 |
creator | Motiani, Kumail K Savolainen, Anna M Toivanen, Jussi Eskelinen, Jari-Joonas Yli-Karjanmaa, Minna Virtanen, Kirsi A Saunavaara, Virva Heiskanen, Marja A Parkkola, Riitta Haaparanta-Solin, Merja Solin, Olof Savisto, Nina Löyttyniemi, Eliisa Knuuti, Juhani Nuutila, Pirjo Kalliokoski, Kari K Hannukainen, Jarna C |
description | Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and increased liver fat content (LFC) alter lipoprotein profile and composition and impair liver substrate uptake. Exercise training mitigates T2D and reduces LFC, but the benefits of different training intensities in terms of lipoprotein classes and liver substrate uptake are unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) or sprint interval training (SIT) on LFC, liver substrate uptake, and lipoprotein profile in subjects with normoglycemia or prediabetes/T2D. We randomized 54 subjects (normoglycemic group,
= 28; group with prediabetes/T2D,
= 26; age = 40-55 yr) to perform either MICT or SIT for 2 wk and measured LFC with magnetic resonance spectroscopy, lipoprotein composition with NMR, and liver glucose uptake (GU) and fatty acid uptake (FAU) using PET. At baseline, the group with prediabetes/T2D had higher LFC, impaired lipoprotein profile, and lower whole body insulin sensitivity and aerobic capacity compared with the normoglycemic group. Both training modes improved aerobic capacity (
< 0.001) and lipoprotein profile (reduced LDL and increased large HDL subclasses; all
< 0.05) with no training regimen (SIT vs. MICT) or group effect (normoglycemia vs. prediabetes/T2D). LFC tended to be reduced in the group with prediabetes/T2D compared with the normoglycemic group posttraining (
= 0.051). When subjects were divided according to LFC (high LFC, >5.6%; low LFC, |
doi_str_mv | 10.1152/japplphysiol.00900.2018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6620664</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2211323036</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-a4bc60d9035dcd45a725f4b7424158c87caf1c6a0997bffb7449310910fb6b503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUstuFDEQtBCILIFfAEtccshs_J4ZDkgoCg8pUi5wtjweO-vFYw-2Z6XN9_CheDchChyslrqqS13tAuAdRmuMObnYqnn282afXfRrhHqE1gTh7hlYVZQ0WCD8HKy6lqOm5V17Al7lvEUIM8bxS3BCUd93mPAV-H1lrdElw2hh3sRUmmLSBPOcXCiwPpN2ykMVRjjF0SRVTHPohuzKHuoYigtLXDIsSbngwi2MAXq3MwlaVY4EE8p5bc1xTrEYF2Ct1nlzflTNy5DLQRYuc1E_zQeoYKpAnNydGausU_41eGGVz-bNQz0FPz5ffb_82lzffPl2-em60dVXaRQbtEBjjygf9ci4agm3bGgZYZh3umu1slgLVc23g7UVYD3FqMfIDmLgiJ6Cj_e68zJMZtR186S8rLeYVNrLqJz8FwluI2_jTgpBkBCsCpw9CKT4azG5yMllbbxXwdQjSUIwpoQiKir1_X_UbVxSqPYqi3HBKe9oZbX3LJ1izsnYx2UwkockyKdJkMckyEMS6uTbp14e5_5-Pf0DJrm4nw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2245653583</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of short-term sprint interval and moderate-intensity continuous training on liver fat content, lipoprotein profile, and substrate uptake: a randomized trial</title><source>American Physiological Society</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Motiani, Kumail K ; Savolainen, Anna M ; Toivanen, Jussi ; Eskelinen, Jari-Joonas ; Yli-Karjanmaa, Minna ; Virtanen, Kirsi A ; Saunavaara, Virva ; Heiskanen, Marja A ; Parkkola, Riitta ; Haaparanta-Solin, Merja ; Solin, Olof ; Savisto, Nina ; Löyttyniemi, Eliisa ; Knuuti, Juhani ; Nuutila, Pirjo ; Kalliokoski, Kari K ; Hannukainen, Jarna C</creator><creatorcontrib>Motiani, Kumail K ; Savolainen, Anna M ; Toivanen, Jussi ; Eskelinen, Jari-Joonas ; Yli-Karjanmaa, Minna ; Virtanen, Kirsi A ; Saunavaara, Virva ; Heiskanen, Marja A ; Parkkola, Riitta ; Haaparanta-Solin, Merja ; Solin, Olof ; Savisto, Nina ; Löyttyniemi, Eliisa ; Knuuti, Juhani ; Nuutila, Pirjo ; Kalliokoski, Kari K ; Hannukainen, Jarna C</creatorcontrib><description>Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and increased liver fat content (LFC) alter lipoprotein profile and composition and impair liver substrate uptake. Exercise training mitigates T2D and reduces LFC, but the benefits of different training intensities in terms of lipoprotein classes and liver substrate uptake are unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) or sprint interval training (SIT) on LFC, liver substrate uptake, and lipoprotein profile in subjects with normoglycemia or prediabetes/T2D. We randomized 54 subjects (normoglycemic group,
= 28; group with prediabetes/T2D,
= 26; age = 40-55 yr) to perform either MICT or SIT for 2 wk and measured LFC with magnetic resonance spectroscopy, lipoprotein composition with NMR, and liver glucose uptake (GU) and fatty acid uptake (FAU) using PET. At baseline, the group with prediabetes/T2D had higher LFC, impaired lipoprotein profile, and lower whole body insulin sensitivity and aerobic capacity compared with the normoglycemic group. Both training modes improved aerobic capacity (
< 0.001) and lipoprotein profile (reduced LDL and increased large HDL subclasses; all
< 0.05) with no training regimen (SIT vs. MICT) or group effect (normoglycemia vs. prediabetes/T2D). LFC tended to be reduced in the group with prediabetes/T2D compared with the normoglycemic group posttraining (
= 0.051). When subjects were divided according to LFC (high LFC, >5.6%; low LFC, <5.6%), training reduced LFC in subjects with high LFC (
= 0.009), and only MICT increased insulin-stimulated liver GU (
= 0.03). Short-term SIT and MICT are effective in reducing LFC in subjects with fatty liver and in improving lipoprotein profile regardless of baseline glucose tolerance. Short-term MICT is more efficient in improving liver insulin sensitivity compared with SIT.
In the short term, both sprint interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) reduce liver fat content and improve lipoprotein profile; however, MICT seems to be preferable in improving liver insulin sensitivity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8750-7587</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-1601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00900.2018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30998125</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Physiological Society</publisher><subject>Aerobic capacity ; Composition ; Diabetes mellitus ; Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent) ; Fatty acids ; Fatty liver ; Glucose ; Glucose tolerance ; High density lipoprotein ; Insulin ; Lipoproteins ; Liver ; Low density lipoprotein ; Magnetic resonance spectroscopy ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Risk factors ; Sensitivity ; Short term ; Substrates ; Training</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied physiology (1985), 2019-06, Vol.126 (6), p.1756-1768</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Physiological Society Jun 2019</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 the American Physiological Society 2019 American Physiological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-a4bc60d9035dcd45a725f4b7424158c87caf1c6a0997bffb7449310910fb6b503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-a4bc60d9035dcd45a725f4b7424158c87caf1c6a0997bffb7449310910fb6b503</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7366-0120 ; 0000-0002-8893-7126</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3038,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30998125$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Motiani, Kumail K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savolainen, Anna M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toivanen, Jussi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eskelinen, Jari-Joonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yli-Karjanmaa, Minna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virtanen, Kirsi A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunavaara, Virva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heiskanen, Marja A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parkkola, Riitta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haaparanta-Solin, Merja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solin, Olof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savisto, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Löyttyniemi, Eliisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knuuti, Juhani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuutila, Pirjo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalliokoski, Kari K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannukainen, Jarna C</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of short-term sprint interval and moderate-intensity continuous training on liver fat content, lipoprotein profile, and substrate uptake: a randomized trial</title><title>Journal of applied physiology (1985)</title><addtitle>J Appl Physiol (1985)</addtitle><description>Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and increased liver fat content (LFC) alter lipoprotein profile and composition and impair liver substrate uptake. Exercise training mitigates T2D and reduces LFC, but the benefits of different training intensities in terms of lipoprotein classes and liver substrate uptake are unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) or sprint interval training (SIT) on LFC, liver substrate uptake, and lipoprotein profile in subjects with normoglycemia or prediabetes/T2D. We randomized 54 subjects (normoglycemic group,
= 28; group with prediabetes/T2D,
= 26; age = 40-55 yr) to perform either MICT or SIT for 2 wk and measured LFC with magnetic resonance spectroscopy, lipoprotein composition with NMR, and liver glucose uptake (GU) and fatty acid uptake (FAU) using PET. At baseline, the group with prediabetes/T2D had higher LFC, impaired lipoprotein profile, and lower whole body insulin sensitivity and aerobic capacity compared with the normoglycemic group. Both training modes improved aerobic capacity (
< 0.001) and lipoprotein profile (reduced LDL and increased large HDL subclasses; all
< 0.05) with no training regimen (SIT vs. MICT) or group effect (normoglycemia vs. prediabetes/T2D). LFC tended to be reduced in the group with prediabetes/T2D compared with the normoglycemic group posttraining (
= 0.051). When subjects were divided according to LFC (high LFC, >5.6%; low LFC, <5.6%), training reduced LFC in subjects with high LFC (
= 0.009), and only MICT increased insulin-stimulated liver GU (
= 0.03). Short-term SIT and MICT are effective in reducing LFC in subjects with fatty liver and in improving lipoprotein profile regardless of baseline glucose tolerance. Short-term MICT is more efficient in improving liver insulin sensitivity compared with SIT.
In the short term, both sprint interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) reduce liver fat content and improve lipoprotein profile; however, MICT seems to be preferable in improving liver insulin sensitivity.</description><subject>Aerobic capacity</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</subject><subject>Fatty acids</subject><subject>Fatty liver</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Glucose tolerance</subject><subject>High density lipoprotein</subject><subject>Insulin</subject><subject>Lipoproteins</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Low density lipoprotein</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance spectroscopy</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Short term</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>8750-7587</issn><issn>1522-1601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdUstuFDEQtBCILIFfAEtccshs_J4ZDkgoCg8pUi5wtjweO-vFYw-2Z6XN9_CheDchChyslrqqS13tAuAdRmuMObnYqnn282afXfRrhHqE1gTh7hlYVZQ0WCD8HKy6lqOm5V17Al7lvEUIM8bxS3BCUd93mPAV-H1lrdElw2hh3sRUmmLSBPOcXCiwPpN2ykMVRjjF0SRVTHPohuzKHuoYigtLXDIsSbngwi2MAXq3MwlaVY4EE8p5bc1xTrEYF2Ct1nlzflTNy5DLQRYuc1E_zQeoYKpAnNydGausU_41eGGVz-bNQz0FPz5ffb_82lzffPl2-em60dVXaRQbtEBjjygf9ci4agm3bGgZYZh3umu1slgLVc23g7UVYD3FqMfIDmLgiJ6Cj_e68zJMZtR186S8rLeYVNrLqJz8FwluI2_jTgpBkBCsCpw9CKT4azG5yMllbbxXwdQjSUIwpoQiKir1_X_UbVxSqPYqi3HBKe9oZbX3LJ1izsnYx2UwkockyKdJkMckyEMS6uTbp14e5_5-Pf0DJrm4nw</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Motiani, Kumail K</creator><creator>Savolainen, Anna M</creator><creator>Toivanen, Jussi</creator><creator>Eskelinen, Jari-Joonas</creator><creator>Yli-Karjanmaa, Minna</creator><creator>Virtanen, Kirsi A</creator><creator>Saunavaara, Virva</creator><creator>Heiskanen, Marja A</creator><creator>Parkkola, Riitta</creator><creator>Haaparanta-Solin, Merja</creator><creator>Solin, Olof</creator><creator>Savisto, Nina</creator><creator>Löyttyniemi, Eliisa</creator><creator>Knuuti, Juhani</creator><creator>Nuutila, Pirjo</creator><creator>Kalliokoski, Kari K</creator><creator>Hannukainen, Jarna C</creator><general>American Physiological Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7366-0120</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8893-7126</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Effects of short-term sprint interval and moderate-intensity continuous training on liver fat content, lipoprotein profile, and substrate uptake: a randomized trial</title><author>Motiani, Kumail K ; Savolainen, Anna M ; Toivanen, Jussi ; Eskelinen, Jari-Joonas ; Yli-Karjanmaa, Minna ; Virtanen, Kirsi A ; Saunavaara, Virva ; Heiskanen, Marja A ; Parkkola, Riitta ; Haaparanta-Solin, Merja ; Solin, Olof ; Savisto, Nina ; Löyttyniemi, Eliisa ; Knuuti, Juhani ; Nuutila, Pirjo ; Kalliokoski, Kari K ; Hannukainen, Jarna C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-a4bc60d9035dcd45a725f4b7424158c87caf1c6a0997bffb7449310910fb6b503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aerobic capacity</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</topic><topic>Fatty acids</topic><topic>Fatty liver</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Glucose tolerance</topic><topic>High density lipoprotein</topic><topic>Insulin</topic><topic>Lipoproteins</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Low density lipoprotein</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance spectroscopy</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Short term</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Motiani, Kumail K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savolainen, Anna M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toivanen, Jussi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eskelinen, Jari-Joonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yli-Karjanmaa, Minna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virtanen, Kirsi A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunavaara, Virva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heiskanen, Marja A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parkkola, Riitta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haaparanta-Solin, Merja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solin, Olof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savisto, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Löyttyniemi, Eliisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knuuti, Juhani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuutila, Pirjo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalliokoski, Kari K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannukainen, Jarna C</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied physiology (1985)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Motiani, Kumail K</au><au>Savolainen, Anna M</au><au>Toivanen, Jussi</au><au>Eskelinen, Jari-Joonas</au><au>Yli-Karjanmaa, Minna</au><au>Virtanen, Kirsi A</au><au>Saunavaara, Virva</au><au>Heiskanen, Marja A</au><au>Parkkola, Riitta</au><au>Haaparanta-Solin, Merja</au><au>Solin, Olof</au><au>Savisto, Nina</au><au>Löyttyniemi, Eliisa</au><au>Knuuti, Juhani</au><au>Nuutila, Pirjo</au><au>Kalliokoski, Kari K</au><au>Hannukainen, Jarna C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of short-term sprint interval and moderate-intensity continuous training on liver fat content, lipoprotein profile, and substrate uptake: a randomized trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied physiology (1985)</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Physiol (1985)</addtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1756</spage><epage>1768</epage><pages>1756-1768</pages><issn>8750-7587</issn><eissn>1522-1601</eissn><abstract>Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and increased liver fat content (LFC) alter lipoprotein profile and composition and impair liver substrate uptake. Exercise training mitigates T2D and reduces LFC, but the benefits of different training intensities in terms of lipoprotein classes and liver substrate uptake are unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) or sprint interval training (SIT) on LFC, liver substrate uptake, and lipoprotein profile in subjects with normoglycemia or prediabetes/T2D. We randomized 54 subjects (normoglycemic group,
= 28; group with prediabetes/T2D,
= 26; age = 40-55 yr) to perform either MICT or SIT for 2 wk and measured LFC with magnetic resonance spectroscopy, lipoprotein composition with NMR, and liver glucose uptake (GU) and fatty acid uptake (FAU) using PET. At baseline, the group with prediabetes/T2D had higher LFC, impaired lipoprotein profile, and lower whole body insulin sensitivity and aerobic capacity compared with the normoglycemic group. Both training modes improved aerobic capacity (
< 0.001) and lipoprotein profile (reduced LDL and increased large HDL subclasses; all
< 0.05) with no training regimen (SIT vs. MICT) or group effect (normoglycemia vs. prediabetes/T2D). LFC tended to be reduced in the group with prediabetes/T2D compared with the normoglycemic group posttraining (
= 0.051). When subjects were divided according to LFC (high LFC, >5.6%; low LFC, <5.6%), training reduced LFC in subjects with high LFC (
= 0.009), and only MICT increased insulin-stimulated liver GU (
= 0.03). Short-term SIT and MICT are effective in reducing LFC in subjects with fatty liver and in improving lipoprotein profile regardless of baseline glucose tolerance. Short-term MICT is more efficient in improving liver insulin sensitivity compared with SIT.
In the short term, both sprint interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) reduce liver fat content and improve lipoprotein profile; however, MICT seems to be preferable in improving liver insulin sensitivity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Physiological Society</pub><pmid>30998125</pmid><doi>10.1152/japplphysiol.00900.2018</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7366-0120</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8893-7126</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 8750-7587 |
ispartof | Journal of applied physiology (1985), 2019-06, Vol.126 (6), p.1756-1768 |
issn | 8750-7587 1522-1601 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6620664 |
source | American Physiological Society; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aerobic capacity Composition Diabetes mellitus Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent) Fatty acids Fatty liver Glucose Glucose tolerance High density lipoprotein Insulin Lipoproteins Liver Low density lipoprotein Magnetic resonance spectroscopy NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Risk factors Sensitivity Short term Substrates Training |
title | Effects of short-term sprint interval and moderate-intensity continuous training on liver fat content, lipoprotein profile, and substrate uptake: a randomized trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T21%3A49%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20short-term%20sprint%20interval%20and%20moderate-intensity%20continuous%20training%20on%20liver%20fat%20content,%20lipoprotein%20profile,%20and%20substrate%20uptake:%20a%20randomized%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20physiology%20(1985)&rft.au=Motiani,%20Kumail%20K&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1756&rft.epage=1768&rft.pages=1756-1768&rft.issn=8750-7587&rft.eissn=1522-1601&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152/japplphysiol.00900.2018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2211323036%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2245653583&rft_id=info:pmid/30998125&rfr_iscdi=true |