A Model of Binocular Motion Integration in MT Neurons
Primate cortical area MT plays a central role in visual motion perception, but models of this area have largely overlooked the binocular integration of motion signals. Recent electrophysiological studies tested binocular integration in MT and found surprisingly that MT neurons lose their hallmark &q...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of neuroscience 2016-06, Vol.36 (24), p.6563-6582 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 6582 |
---|---|
container_issue | 24 |
container_start_page | 6563 |
container_title | The Journal of neuroscience |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Baker, Pamela M Bair, Wyeth |
description | Primate cortical area MT plays a central role in visual motion perception, but models of this area have largely overlooked the binocular integration of motion signals. Recent electrophysiological studies tested binocular integration in MT and found surprisingly that MT neurons lose their hallmark "pattern motion" selectivity when stimuli are presented dichoptically and that many neurons are selective for motion-in-depth (MID). By unifying these novel observations with insights from monocular, frontoparallel motion studies concurrently in a binocular MT motion model, we generated clear, testable predictions about the circuitry and mechanisms underlying visual motion processing. We built binocular models in which signals from left- and right-eye streams could be integrated at various stages from V1 to MT, attempting to create the simplest plausible circuits that accounted for the physiological range of pattern motion selectivity, that explained changes across this range for dichoptic stimulus presentation, and that spanned the spectrum of MID selectivity observed in MT. Our successful models predict that motion-opponent suppression is the key mechanism to account for the striking loss of pattern motion sensitivity with dichoptic plaids, that opponent suppression precedes binocular integration, and that opponent suppression will be stronger in inputs to pattern cells than to component cells. We also found an unexpected connection between circuits for pattern motion selectivity and MID selectivity, suggesting that these two separately studied phenomena could be related. These results also hold in models that include binocular disparity computations, providing a platform for future exploration of binocular response properties in MT.
The neural pathways underlying our sense of visual motion are among the most studied and well-understood parts of the primate cerebral cortex. Nevertheless, our understanding is incomplete because electrophysiological research has focused mainly on motion in the 2D frontoparallel plane, even though real-world motion often occurs in three dimensions, involving a change in distance from the viewer. Recent studies have revealed a specialization for sensing 3D motion in area MT, the cortical area most tightly linked to the processing and perception of visual motion. Our study provides the first model to explain how 3D motion sensitivity can arise in MT neurons and predicts how essential features of 2D motion integration may relate to 3D |
doi_str_mv | 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3213-15.2016 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6601923</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1797878183</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-e57f64fd4fc886313594c4d0523133ff14c453342088edc52c2416b750fdd6fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctOwzAQRS0EoqXwC1WWbFLGj9jOBqlUBYr6kKBdW2lil6A0LnaCxN-T0FLBitW87lzN6CDUxzDAEaE3T_Px6nnxMpoMKME0xNGAAOYnqNtM45AwwKeoC0RAyJlgHXTh_RsACMDiHHWIoCAIo10UDYOZzXQRWBPc5aVN6yJxTavKbRlMykpvXPKd52UwWwZzXTtb-kt0ZpLC66tD7KHV_Xg5egyni4fJaDgNU8ZEFepIGM5MxkwqJaeYRjFLWQbNA5hSY3BTRZQyAlLqLI1IShjmaxGByTJuMtpDt3vfXb3eNgpdVi4p1M7l28R9Kpvk6u-kzF_Vxn4ozgHHhDYG1wcDZ99r7Su1zX2qiyIpta29whKkgJjE4n-piIUUEsvWle-lqbPeO22OF2FQLR51xKNaPE1PtXiaxf7vf45rPzzoFxRoiuk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1797878183</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Model of Binocular Motion Integration in MT Neurons</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Baker, Pamela M ; Bair, Wyeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Baker, Pamela M ; Bair, Wyeth</creatorcontrib><description>Primate cortical area MT plays a central role in visual motion perception, but models of this area have largely overlooked the binocular integration of motion signals. Recent electrophysiological studies tested binocular integration in MT and found surprisingly that MT neurons lose their hallmark "pattern motion" selectivity when stimuli are presented dichoptically and that many neurons are selective for motion-in-depth (MID). By unifying these novel observations with insights from monocular, frontoparallel motion studies concurrently in a binocular MT motion model, we generated clear, testable predictions about the circuitry and mechanisms underlying visual motion processing. We built binocular models in which signals from left- and right-eye streams could be integrated at various stages from V1 to MT, attempting to create the simplest plausible circuits that accounted for the physiological range of pattern motion selectivity, that explained changes across this range for dichoptic stimulus presentation, and that spanned the spectrum of MID selectivity observed in MT. Our successful models predict that motion-opponent suppression is the key mechanism to account for the striking loss of pattern motion sensitivity with dichoptic plaids, that opponent suppression precedes binocular integration, and that opponent suppression will be stronger in inputs to pattern cells than to component cells. We also found an unexpected connection between circuits for pattern motion selectivity and MID selectivity, suggesting that these two separately studied phenomena could be related. These results also hold in models that include binocular disparity computations, providing a platform for future exploration of binocular response properties in MT.
The neural pathways underlying our sense of visual motion are among the most studied and well-understood parts of the primate cerebral cortex. Nevertheless, our understanding is incomplete because electrophysiological research has focused mainly on motion in the 2D frontoparallel plane, even though real-world motion often occurs in three dimensions, involving a change in distance from the viewer. Recent studies have revealed a specialization for sensing 3D motion in area MT, the cortical area most tightly linked to the processing and perception of visual motion. Our study provides the first model to explain how 3D motion sensitivity can arise in MT neurons and predicts how essential features of 2D motion integration may relate to 3D motion processing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-6474</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-2401</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3213-15.2016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27307243</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Society for Neuroscience</publisher><subject>Animals ; Computer Simulation ; Humans ; Models, Biological ; Motion ; Motion Perception - physiology ; Neural Pathways ; Neurons - physiology ; Photic Stimulation ; Vision, Binocular - physiology ; Visual Cortex - cytology ; Visual Cortex - physiology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of neuroscience, 2016-06, Vol.36 (24), p.6563-6582</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/366563-20$15.00/0.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/366563-20$15.00/0 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-e57f64fd4fc886313594c4d0523133ff14c453342088edc52c2416b750fdd6fd3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6601923/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6601923/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27307243$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baker, Pamela M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bair, Wyeth</creatorcontrib><title>A Model of Binocular Motion Integration in MT Neurons</title><title>The Journal of neuroscience</title><addtitle>J Neurosci</addtitle><description>Primate cortical area MT plays a central role in visual motion perception, but models of this area have largely overlooked the binocular integration of motion signals. Recent electrophysiological studies tested binocular integration in MT and found surprisingly that MT neurons lose their hallmark "pattern motion" selectivity when stimuli are presented dichoptically and that many neurons are selective for motion-in-depth (MID). By unifying these novel observations with insights from monocular, frontoparallel motion studies concurrently in a binocular MT motion model, we generated clear, testable predictions about the circuitry and mechanisms underlying visual motion processing. We built binocular models in which signals from left- and right-eye streams could be integrated at various stages from V1 to MT, attempting to create the simplest plausible circuits that accounted for the physiological range of pattern motion selectivity, that explained changes across this range for dichoptic stimulus presentation, and that spanned the spectrum of MID selectivity observed in MT. Our successful models predict that motion-opponent suppression is the key mechanism to account for the striking loss of pattern motion sensitivity with dichoptic plaids, that opponent suppression precedes binocular integration, and that opponent suppression will be stronger in inputs to pattern cells than to component cells. We also found an unexpected connection between circuits for pattern motion selectivity and MID selectivity, suggesting that these two separately studied phenomena could be related. These results also hold in models that include binocular disparity computations, providing a platform for future exploration of binocular response properties in MT.
The neural pathways underlying our sense of visual motion are among the most studied and well-understood parts of the primate cerebral cortex. Nevertheless, our understanding is incomplete because electrophysiological research has focused mainly on motion in the 2D frontoparallel plane, even though real-world motion often occurs in three dimensions, involving a change in distance from the viewer. Recent studies have revealed a specialization for sensing 3D motion in area MT, the cortical area most tightly linked to the processing and perception of visual motion. Our study provides the first model to explain how 3D motion sensitivity can arise in MT neurons and predicts how essential features of 2D motion integration may relate to 3D motion processing.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Motion Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Neural Pathways</subject><subject>Neurons - physiology</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Vision, Binocular - physiology</subject><subject>Visual Cortex - cytology</subject><subject>Visual Cortex - physiology</subject><issn>0270-6474</issn><issn>1529-2401</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctOwzAQRS0EoqXwC1WWbFLGj9jOBqlUBYr6kKBdW2lil6A0LnaCxN-T0FLBitW87lzN6CDUxzDAEaE3T_Px6nnxMpoMKME0xNGAAOYnqNtM45AwwKeoC0RAyJlgHXTh_RsACMDiHHWIoCAIo10UDYOZzXQRWBPc5aVN6yJxTavKbRlMykpvXPKd52UwWwZzXTtb-kt0ZpLC66tD7KHV_Xg5egyni4fJaDgNU8ZEFepIGM5MxkwqJaeYRjFLWQbNA5hSY3BTRZQyAlLqLI1IShjmaxGByTJuMtpDt3vfXb3eNgpdVi4p1M7l28R9Kpvk6u-kzF_Vxn4ozgHHhDYG1wcDZ99r7Su1zX2qiyIpta29whKkgJjE4n-piIUUEsvWle-lqbPeO22OF2FQLR51xKNaPE1PtXiaxf7vf45rPzzoFxRoiuk</recordid><startdate>20160615</startdate><enddate>20160615</enddate><creator>Baker, Pamela M</creator><creator>Bair, Wyeth</creator><general>Society for Neuroscience</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160615</creationdate><title>A Model of Binocular Motion Integration in MT Neurons</title><author>Baker, Pamela M ; Bair, Wyeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-e57f64fd4fc886313594c4d0523133ff14c453342088edc52c2416b750fdd6fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Motion Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Neural Pathways</topic><topic>Neurons - physiology</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Vision, Binocular - physiology</topic><topic>Visual Cortex - cytology</topic><topic>Visual Cortex - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baker, Pamela M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bair, Wyeth</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baker, Pamela M</au><au>Bair, Wyeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Model of Binocular Motion Integration in MT Neurons</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurosci</addtitle><date>2016-06-15</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>6563</spage><epage>6582</epage><pages>6563-6582</pages><issn>0270-6474</issn><eissn>1529-2401</eissn><abstract>Primate cortical area MT plays a central role in visual motion perception, but models of this area have largely overlooked the binocular integration of motion signals. Recent electrophysiological studies tested binocular integration in MT and found surprisingly that MT neurons lose their hallmark "pattern motion" selectivity when stimuli are presented dichoptically and that many neurons are selective for motion-in-depth (MID). By unifying these novel observations with insights from monocular, frontoparallel motion studies concurrently in a binocular MT motion model, we generated clear, testable predictions about the circuitry and mechanisms underlying visual motion processing. We built binocular models in which signals from left- and right-eye streams could be integrated at various stages from V1 to MT, attempting to create the simplest plausible circuits that accounted for the physiological range of pattern motion selectivity, that explained changes across this range for dichoptic stimulus presentation, and that spanned the spectrum of MID selectivity observed in MT. Our successful models predict that motion-opponent suppression is the key mechanism to account for the striking loss of pattern motion sensitivity with dichoptic plaids, that opponent suppression precedes binocular integration, and that opponent suppression will be stronger in inputs to pattern cells than to component cells. We also found an unexpected connection between circuits for pattern motion selectivity and MID selectivity, suggesting that these two separately studied phenomena could be related. These results also hold in models that include binocular disparity computations, providing a platform for future exploration of binocular response properties in MT.
The neural pathways underlying our sense of visual motion are among the most studied and well-understood parts of the primate cerebral cortex. Nevertheless, our understanding is incomplete because electrophysiological research has focused mainly on motion in the 2D frontoparallel plane, even though real-world motion often occurs in three dimensions, involving a change in distance from the viewer. Recent studies have revealed a specialization for sensing 3D motion in area MT, the cortical area most tightly linked to the processing and perception of visual motion. Our study provides the first model to explain how 3D motion sensitivity can arise in MT neurons and predicts how essential features of 2D motion integration may relate to 3D motion processing.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Society for Neuroscience</pub><pmid>27307243</pmid><doi>10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3213-15.2016</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0270-6474 |
ispartof | The Journal of neuroscience, 2016-06, Vol.36 (24), p.6563-6582 |
issn | 0270-6474 1529-2401 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6601923 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Animals Computer Simulation Humans Models, Biological Motion Motion Perception - physiology Neural Pathways Neurons - physiology Photic Stimulation Vision, Binocular - physiology Visual Cortex - cytology Visual Cortex - physiology |
title | A Model of Binocular Motion Integration in MT Neurons |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T11%3A16%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Model%20of%20Binocular%20Motion%20Integration%20in%20MT%20Neurons&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20neuroscience&rft.au=Baker,%20Pamela%20M&rft.date=2016-06-15&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=6563&rft.epage=6582&rft.pages=6563-6582&rft.issn=0270-6474&rft.eissn=1529-2401&rft_id=info:doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3213-15.2016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1797878183%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1797878183&rft_id=info:pmid/27307243&rfr_iscdi=true |