Socio-economic predictors of environmental performance among African nations

Socio-economic changes in Africa have increased pressure on the continent’s ecosystems. Most research investigating environmental change has focused on the changing status of specific species or communities and protected areas, but has largely neglected the broad-scale socio-economic conditions unde...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2019-06, Vol.9 (1), p.9306-13, Article 9306
Hauptverfasser: Bradshaw, Corey J. A., Di Minin, Enrico
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 13
container_issue 1
container_start_page 9306
container_title Scientific reports
container_volume 9
creator Bradshaw, Corey J. A.
Di Minin, Enrico
description Socio-economic changes in Africa have increased pressure on the continent’s ecosystems. Most research investigating environmental change has focused on the changing status of specific species or communities and protected areas, but has largely neglected the broad-scale socio-economic conditions underlying environmental degradation. We tested national-scale hypotheses regarding the socio-economic predictors of ecosystem change and degradation across Africa, hypothesizing that human density and economic development increase the likelihood of cumulative environmental damage. Our combined environmental performance rank includes national ecological footprint, proportional species threat, recent deforestation, freshwater removal, livestock density, cropland coverage, and per capita emissions. Countries like Central African Republic, Botswana, Namibia, and Congo have the best relative environmental performance overall. Structural equation models indicate that increasing population density and overall economic activity (per capita gross domestic product corrected for purchasing-power parity) are the most strongly correlated with greater environmental degradation, while greater wealth inequality (Gini index) correlates with better environmental performance. This represents the first Africa-scale assessment of the socio-economic correlates of environmental degradation, and suggests that dedicated family planning to reduce population growth, and economic development that limits agricultural expansion (cf. intensification) are needed to support environmental sustainability.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41598-019-45762-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6594960</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2248379973</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-5e9eec78e41eb7ca404cd210aa184ce1c6f8b6d0bb3afb3b2a549aba55f0a1683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LxDAQhoMoKuof8CAFL16q-WybiyDiFyx4UM9hmp2ukTZZk67gvzfr-n0wlwTmyTMzvITsM3rMqGhOkmRKNyVlupSqrngp1sg2p1KVXHC-_uO9RfZSeqL5KK4l05tkSzAuhaDNNpncBetCiTb4MDhbzCNOnR1DTEXoCvQvLgY_oB-hL-YYuxAH8BYLGIKfFWdddBZ84WF0waddstFBn3Dv494hD5cX9-fX5eT26ub8bFJaxeqxVKgRbd2gZNjWFiSVdsoZBWCNtMhs1TVtNaVtK6BrRctBSQ0tKNVRYFUjdsjpyjtftANObR4vQm_m0Q0QX00AZ35XvHs0s_BiKqWlrmgWHH0IYnheYBrN4JLFvgePYZEM57IRtda1yOjhH_QpLKLP6y2pulJc1SxTfEXZGFKK2H0Nw6hZ5mVWeZmcl3nPyyzVBz_X-PrymU4GxApIueRnGL97_6N9A3a_ork</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2247652571</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Socio-economic predictors of environmental performance among African nations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Nature Free</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Bradshaw, Corey J. A. ; Di Minin, Enrico</creator><creatorcontrib>Bradshaw, Corey J. A. ; Di Minin, Enrico</creatorcontrib><description>Socio-economic changes in Africa have increased pressure on the continent’s ecosystems. Most research investigating environmental change has focused on the changing status of specific species or communities and protected areas, but has largely neglected the broad-scale socio-economic conditions underlying environmental degradation. We tested national-scale hypotheses regarding the socio-economic predictors of ecosystem change and degradation across Africa, hypothesizing that human density and economic development increase the likelihood of cumulative environmental damage. Our combined environmental performance rank includes national ecological footprint, proportional species threat, recent deforestation, freshwater removal, livestock density, cropland coverage, and per capita emissions. Countries like Central African Republic, Botswana, Namibia, and Congo have the best relative environmental performance overall. Structural equation models indicate that increasing population density and overall economic activity (per capita gross domestic product corrected for purchasing-power parity) are the most strongly correlated with greater environmental degradation, while greater wealth inequality (Gini index) correlates with better environmental performance. This represents the first Africa-scale assessment of the socio-economic correlates of environmental degradation, and suggests that dedicated family planning to reduce population growth, and economic development that limits agricultural expansion (cf. intensification) are needed to support environmental sustainability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-45762-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31243308</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/158/670 ; 704/172 ; Africa ; Agricultural expansion ; Agricultural land ; Agriculture ; Animals ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Deforestation ; Ecological footprint ; Economic conditions ; Economic development ; Economic Development - trends ; Economics ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystems ; Environment ; Environmental changes ; Environmental degradation ; Environmental performance ; Family planning ; Fresh Water ; GDP ; Gross Domestic Product ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Livestock ; multidisciplinary ; Population Density ; Population Growth ; Protected areas ; Protected species ; Regression Analysis ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Social Class ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Socioeconomics</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2019-06, Vol.9 (1), p.9306-13, Article 9306</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-5e9eec78e41eb7ca404cd210aa184ce1c6f8b6d0bb3afb3b2a549aba55f0a1683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-5e9eec78e41eb7ca404cd210aa184ce1c6f8b6d0bb3afb3b2a549aba55f0a1683</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5562-318X ; 0000-0002-5328-7741</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6594960/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6594960/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,41120,42189,51576,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31243308$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bradshaw, Corey J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Minin, Enrico</creatorcontrib><title>Socio-economic predictors of environmental performance among African nations</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Socio-economic changes in Africa have increased pressure on the continent’s ecosystems. Most research investigating environmental change has focused on the changing status of specific species or communities and protected areas, but has largely neglected the broad-scale socio-economic conditions underlying environmental degradation. We tested national-scale hypotheses regarding the socio-economic predictors of ecosystem change and degradation across Africa, hypothesizing that human density and economic development increase the likelihood of cumulative environmental damage. Our combined environmental performance rank includes national ecological footprint, proportional species threat, recent deforestation, freshwater removal, livestock density, cropland coverage, and per capita emissions. Countries like Central African Republic, Botswana, Namibia, and Congo have the best relative environmental performance overall. Structural equation models indicate that increasing population density and overall economic activity (per capita gross domestic product corrected for purchasing-power parity) are the most strongly correlated with greater environmental degradation, while greater wealth inequality (Gini index) correlates with better environmental performance. This represents the first Africa-scale assessment of the socio-economic correlates of environmental degradation, and suggests that dedicated family planning to reduce population growth, and economic development that limits agricultural expansion (cf. intensification) are needed to support environmental sustainability.</description><subject>631/158/670</subject><subject>704/172</subject><subject>Africa</subject><subject>Agricultural expansion</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Deforestation</subject><subject>Ecological footprint</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic Development - trends</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Environmental degradation</subject><subject>Environmental performance</subject><subject>Family planning</subject><subject>Fresh Water</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>Population Growth</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Protected species</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1LxDAQhoMoKuof8CAFL16q-WybiyDiFyx4UM9hmp2ukTZZk67gvzfr-n0wlwTmyTMzvITsM3rMqGhOkmRKNyVlupSqrngp1sg2p1KVXHC-_uO9RfZSeqL5KK4l05tkSzAuhaDNNpncBetCiTb4MDhbzCNOnR1DTEXoCvQvLgY_oB-hL-YYuxAH8BYLGIKfFWdddBZ84WF0waddstFBn3Dv494hD5cX9-fX5eT26ub8bFJaxeqxVKgRbd2gZNjWFiSVdsoZBWCNtMhs1TVtNaVtK6BrRctBSQ0tKNVRYFUjdsjpyjtftANObR4vQm_m0Q0QX00AZ35XvHs0s_BiKqWlrmgWHH0IYnheYBrN4JLFvgePYZEM57IRtda1yOjhH_QpLKLP6y2pulJc1SxTfEXZGFKK2H0Nw6hZ5mVWeZmcl3nPyyzVBz_X-PrymU4GxApIueRnGL97_6N9A3a_ork</recordid><startdate>20190626</startdate><enddate>20190626</enddate><creator>Bradshaw, Corey J. A.</creator><creator>Di Minin, Enrico</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5562-318X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5328-7741</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190626</creationdate><title>Socio-economic predictors of environmental performance among African nations</title><author>Bradshaw, Corey J. A. ; Di Minin, Enrico</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-5e9eec78e41eb7ca404cd210aa184ce1c6f8b6d0bb3afb3b2a549aba55f0a1683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>631/158/670</topic><topic>704/172</topic><topic>Africa</topic><topic>Agricultural expansion</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Deforestation</topic><topic>Ecological footprint</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic Development - trends</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Environmental degradation</topic><topic>Environmental performance</topic><topic>Family planning</topic><topic>Fresh Water</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>Population Growth</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Protected species</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bradshaw, Corey J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Minin, Enrico</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bradshaw, Corey J. A.</au><au>Di Minin, Enrico</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Socio-economic predictors of environmental performance among African nations</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2019-06-26</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>9306</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>9306-13</pages><artnum>9306</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Socio-economic changes in Africa have increased pressure on the continent’s ecosystems. Most research investigating environmental change has focused on the changing status of specific species or communities and protected areas, but has largely neglected the broad-scale socio-economic conditions underlying environmental degradation. We tested national-scale hypotheses regarding the socio-economic predictors of ecosystem change and degradation across Africa, hypothesizing that human density and economic development increase the likelihood of cumulative environmental damage. Our combined environmental performance rank includes national ecological footprint, proportional species threat, recent deforestation, freshwater removal, livestock density, cropland coverage, and per capita emissions. Countries like Central African Republic, Botswana, Namibia, and Congo have the best relative environmental performance overall. Structural equation models indicate that increasing population density and overall economic activity (per capita gross domestic product corrected for purchasing-power parity) are the most strongly correlated with greater environmental degradation, while greater wealth inequality (Gini index) correlates with better environmental performance. This represents the first Africa-scale assessment of the socio-economic correlates of environmental degradation, and suggests that dedicated family planning to reduce population growth, and economic development that limits agricultural expansion (cf. intensification) are needed to support environmental sustainability.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>31243308</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-019-45762-3</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5562-318X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5328-7741</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-2322
ispartof Scientific reports, 2019-06, Vol.9 (1), p.9306-13, Article 9306
issn 2045-2322
2045-2322
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6594960
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Nature Free; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects 631/158/670
704/172
Africa
Agricultural expansion
Agricultural land
Agriculture
Animals
Conservation of Natural Resources
Deforestation
Ecological footprint
Economic conditions
Economic development
Economic Development - trends
Economics
Ecosystem
Ecosystems
Environment
Environmental changes
Environmental degradation
Environmental performance
Family planning
Fresh Water
GDP
Gross Domestic Product
Humanities and Social Sciences
Humans
Livestock
multidisciplinary
Population Density
Population Growth
Protected areas
Protected species
Regression Analysis
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
Social Class
Socioeconomic Factors
Socioeconomics
title Socio-economic predictors of environmental performance among African nations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T03%3A39%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Socio-economic%20predictors%20of%20environmental%20performance%20among%20African%20nations&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Bradshaw,%20Corey%20J.%20A.&rft.date=2019-06-26&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9306&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=9306-13&rft.artnum=9306&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-019-45762-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2248379973%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2247652571&rft_id=info:pmid/31243308&rfr_iscdi=true