Impact of carbon inputs on soil carbon fractionation, sequestration and biological responses under major nutrient management practices for rice-wheat cropping systems

Major nutrient management systems for rice-wheat cropping were compared for their potential to credit organic carbon (C) to the soil, its fractionation into active (very labile, VLc; labile, Lc) and passive (less labile, LLc; non-labile, NLc) pools, and crop yield responses. A ten-year long experime...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2019-06, Vol.9 (1), p.9114-10, Article 9114
Hauptverfasser: Bhardwaj, Ajay Kumar, Rajwar, Deepika, Mandal, Uttam Kumar, Ahamad, Sharif, Kaphaliya, Bhumija, Minhas, Paramjit Singh, Prabhakar, Mathyam, Banyal, Rakesh, Singh, Ranbir, Chaudhari, Suresh Kumar, Sharma, Parbodh Chander
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 10
container_issue 1
container_start_page 9114
container_title Scientific reports
container_volume 9
creator Bhardwaj, Ajay Kumar
Rajwar, Deepika
Mandal, Uttam Kumar
Ahamad, Sharif
Kaphaliya, Bhumija
Minhas, Paramjit Singh
Prabhakar, Mathyam
Banyal, Rakesh
Singh, Ranbir
Chaudhari, Suresh Kumar
Sharma, Parbodh Chander
description Major nutrient management systems for rice-wheat cropping were compared for their potential to credit organic carbon (C) to the soil, its fractionation into active (very labile, VLc; labile, Lc) and passive (less labile, LLc; non-labile, NLc) pools, and crop yield responses. A ten-year long experiment was used to study effects of: (i) no inputs (Control, O), (ii) 100% inorganic fertilizers (F) compared to reduced fertilizers inputs (55%) supplemented with biomass incorporation from (iii) opportunity legume crop ( Vigna radiata ) (LE), (iv) green manure ( Sesbania aculeata ) (GM), (v) farmyard manure (FYM), (vi) wheat stubble (WS), and (vii) rice stubble (RS). Maximum C input to soil (as the percentage of C assimilated in the system) was in GM (36%) followed by RS (34%), WS (33%), LE (24%), and FYM (21%) compared to O (15%) and F (15%). Total C input to soil had a direct effect on soil C stock, soil C fractions (maximum in VLc and LLc), yet the responses in terms of biological yield were controlled by the quality of the biomass (C:N ratio, decomposition, etc. ) incorporated. Legume-based biomass inputs accrued most benefits for soil C sequestration and biological productivity.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41598-019-45534-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6591388</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2246231064</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-472399e5d3559f37c5856f6f10545700f938002e56eed861648bd87090ddaed53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1u1TAQhSMEolXpC7BAltiwaMC_ib1BQlULlSqxKWvLN5mkvkrs4ElA7QPxnPXNbUthUS_ssefzsT0-RfGW0Y-MCv0JJVNGl5SZUiolZHn7ojjkVKqSC85fPokPimPELc1NcSOZeV0cCMaFqnl9WPy5GCfXzCR2pHFpEwPxYVpmJDnC6IeH1S5lysfgdt0JQfi5AM5pnRIXWrLxcYi9b9xAEuAUAwKSJbSQyOi2MZGwzMlDmPM0uB7GXTitqk0mu0ykHJW_r8HNpElxmnzoCd7gDCO-KV51bkA4vh-Pih_nZ1en38rL718vTr9clo1ibC5lzYUxoFqhlOlE3Sitqq7qGFVS1ZR2RmhKOagKoNUVq6TetLqmhratg1aJo-LzXndaNiO0Tb5kcoOdkh9durHReftvJvhr28dftlKGCa2zwId7gRTXEtnRYwPD4ALEBS3nsjK0UnSHvv8P3cYlhfy8leKC0Upmiu-pXBLEBN3jZRi1OyfYvRNsdoJdnWBv86Z3T5_xuOXh3zMg9gDmVOgh_T37Gdk7UK3DyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2246231064</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of carbon inputs on soil carbon fractionation, sequestration and biological responses under major nutrient management practices for rice-wheat cropping systems</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Nature Free</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Bhardwaj, Ajay Kumar ; Rajwar, Deepika ; Mandal, Uttam Kumar ; Ahamad, Sharif ; Kaphaliya, Bhumija ; Minhas, Paramjit Singh ; Prabhakar, Mathyam ; Banyal, Rakesh ; Singh, Ranbir ; Chaudhari, Suresh Kumar ; Sharma, Parbodh Chander</creator><creatorcontrib>Bhardwaj, Ajay Kumar ; Rajwar, Deepika ; Mandal, Uttam Kumar ; Ahamad, Sharif ; Kaphaliya, Bhumija ; Minhas, Paramjit Singh ; Prabhakar, Mathyam ; Banyal, Rakesh ; Singh, Ranbir ; Chaudhari, Suresh Kumar ; Sharma, Parbodh Chander</creatorcontrib><description>Major nutrient management systems for rice-wheat cropping were compared for their potential to credit organic carbon (C) to the soil, its fractionation into active (very labile, VLc; labile, Lc) and passive (less labile, LLc; non-labile, NLc) pools, and crop yield responses. A ten-year long experiment was used to study effects of: (i) no inputs (Control, O), (ii) 100% inorganic fertilizers (F) compared to reduced fertilizers inputs (55%) supplemented with biomass incorporation from (iii) opportunity legume crop ( Vigna radiata ) (LE), (iv) green manure ( Sesbania aculeata ) (GM), (v) farmyard manure (FYM), (vi) wheat stubble (WS), and (vii) rice stubble (RS). Maximum C input to soil (as the percentage of C assimilated in the system) was in GM (36%) followed by RS (34%), WS (33%), LE (24%), and FYM (21%) compared to O (15%) and F (15%). Total C input to soil had a direct effect on soil C stock, soil C fractions (maximum in VLc and LLc), yet the responses in terms of biological yield were controlled by the quality of the biomass (C:N ratio, decomposition, etc. ) incorporated. Legume-based biomass inputs accrued most benefits for soil C sequestration and biological productivity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-45534-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31235727</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/45/47/4113 ; 704/172/4081 ; 9/30 ; Agrochemicals ; Animal manures ; Biomass ; Carbon ; Carbon - metabolism ; Cereal crops ; Crop yield ; Cropping systems ; Fertilizers ; Fractionation ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Intercropping ; Legumes ; Manures ; Mineral fertilizers ; multidisciplinary ; Nutrients ; Nutrients - metabolism ; Organic carbon ; Oryza ; Oryza - growth &amp; development ; Oryza - metabolism ; Rice ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Sesbania aculeata ; Soil - chemistry ; Soils ; Stubble ; Triticum ; Triticum - growth &amp; development ; Triticum - metabolism ; Vigna radiata ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2019-06, Vol.9 (1), p.9114-10, Article 9114</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-472399e5d3559f37c5856f6f10545700f938002e56eed861648bd87090ddaed53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-472399e5d3559f37c5856f6f10545700f938002e56eed861648bd87090ddaed53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6591388/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6591388/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,41120,42189,51576,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31235727$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bhardwaj, Ajay Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajwar, Deepika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandal, Uttam Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahamad, Sharif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaphaliya, Bhumija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minhas, Paramjit Singh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prabhakar, Mathyam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banyal, Rakesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Ranbir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhari, Suresh Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Parbodh Chander</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of carbon inputs on soil carbon fractionation, sequestration and biological responses under major nutrient management practices for rice-wheat cropping systems</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Major nutrient management systems for rice-wheat cropping were compared for their potential to credit organic carbon (C) to the soil, its fractionation into active (very labile, VLc; labile, Lc) and passive (less labile, LLc; non-labile, NLc) pools, and crop yield responses. A ten-year long experiment was used to study effects of: (i) no inputs (Control, O), (ii) 100% inorganic fertilizers (F) compared to reduced fertilizers inputs (55%) supplemented with biomass incorporation from (iii) opportunity legume crop ( Vigna radiata ) (LE), (iv) green manure ( Sesbania aculeata ) (GM), (v) farmyard manure (FYM), (vi) wheat stubble (WS), and (vii) rice stubble (RS). Maximum C input to soil (as the percentage of C assimilated in the system) was in GM (36%) followed by RS (34%), WS (33%), LE (24%), and FYM (21%) compared to O (15%) and F (15%). Total C input to soil had a direct effect on soil C stock, soil C fractions (maximum in VLc and LLc), yet the responses in terms of biological yield were controlled by the quality of the biomass (C:N ratio, decomposition, etc. ) incorporated. Legume-based biomass inputs accrued most benefits for soil C sequestration and biological productivity.</description><subject>631/45/47/4113</subject><subject>704/172/4081</subject><subject>9/30</subject><subject>Agrochemicals</subject><subject>Animal manures</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon - metabolism</subject><subject>Cereal crops</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Cropping systems</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Fractionation</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Intercropping</subject><subject>Legumes</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>Mineral fertilizers</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Nutrients - metabolism</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Oryza</subject><subject>Oryza - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Oryza - metabolism</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Sesbania aculeata</subject><subject>Soil - chemistry</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Stubble</subject><subject>Triticum</subject><subject>Triticum - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Triticum - metabolism</subject><subject>Vigna radiata</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks1u1TAQhSMEolXpC7BAltiwaMC_ib1BQlULlSqxKWvLN5mkvkrs4ElA7QPxnPXNbUthUS_ssefzsT0-RfGW0Y-MCv0JJVNGl5SZUiolZHn7ojjkVKqSC85fPokPimPELc1NcSOZeV0cCMaFqnl9WPy5GCfXzCR2pHFpEwPxYVpmJDnC6IeH1S5lysfgdt0JQfi5AM5pnRIXWrLxcYi9b9xAEuAUAwKSJbSQyOi2MZGwzMlDmPM0uB7GXTitqk0mu0ykHJW_r8HNpElxmnzoCd7gDCO-KV51bkA4vh-Pih_nZ1en38rL718vTr9clo1ibC5lzYUxoFqhlOlE3Sitqq7qGFVS1ZR2RmhKOagKoNUVq6TetLqmhratg1aJo-LzXndaNiO0Tb5kcoOdkh9durHReftvJvhr28dftlKGCa2zwId7gRTXEtnRYwPD4ALEBS3nsjK0UnSHvv8P3cYlhfy8leKC0Upmiu-pXBLEBN3jZRi1OyfYvRNsdoJdnWBv86Z3T5_xuOXh3zMg9gDmVOgh_T37Gdk7UK3DyA</recordid><startdate>20190624</startdate><enddate>20190624</enddate><creator>Bhardwaj, Ajay Kumar</creator><creator>Rajwar, Deepika</creator><creator>Mandal, Uttam Kumar</creator><creator>Ahamad, Sharif</creator><creator>Kaphaliya, Bhumija</creator><creator>Minhas, Paramjit Singh</creator><creator>Prabhakar, Mathyam</creator><creator>Banyal, Rakesh</creator><creator>Singh, Ranbir</creator><creator>Chaudhari, Suresh Kumar</creator><creator>Sharma, Parbodh Chander</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190624</creationdate><title>Impact of carbon inputs on soil carbon fractionation, sequestration and biological responses under major nutrient management practices for rice-wheat cropping systems</title><author>Bhardwaj, Ajay Kumar ; Rajwar, Deepika ; Mandal, Uttam Kumar ; Ahamad, Sharif ; Kaphaliya, Bhumija ; Minhas, Paramjit Singh ; Prabhakar, Mathyam ; Banyal, Rakesh ; Singh, Ranbir ; Chaudhari, Suresh Kumar ; Sharma, Parbodh Chander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-472399e5d3559f37c5856f6f10545700f938002e56eed861648bd87090ddaed53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>631/45/47/4113</topic><topic>704/172/4081</topic><topic>9/30</topic><topic>Agrochemicals</topic><topic>Animal manures</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon - metabolism</topic><topic>Cereal crops</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Cropping systems</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Fractionation</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Intercropping</topic><topic>Legumes</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>Mineral fertilizers</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Nutrients - metabolism</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Oryza</topic><topic>Oryza - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Oryza - metabolism</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Sesbania aculeata</topic><topic>Soil - chemistry</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Stubble</topic><topic>Triticum</topic><topic>Triticum - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Triticum - metabolism</topic><topic>Vigna radiata</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bhardwaj, Ajay Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajwar, Deepika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandal, Uttam Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahamad, Sharif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaphaliya, Bhumija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minhas, Paramjit Singh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prabhakar, Mathyam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banyal, Rakesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Ranbir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhari, Suresh Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Parbodh Chander</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bhardwaj, Ajay Kumar</au><au>Rajwar, Deepika</au><au>Mandal, Uttam Kumar</au><au>Ahamad, Sharif</au><au>Kaphaliya, Bhumija</au><au>Minhas, Paramjit Singh</au><au>Prabhakar, Mathyam</au><au>Banyal, Rakesh</au><au>Singh, Ranbir</au><au>Chaudhari, Suresh Kumar</au><au>Sharma, Parbodh Chander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of carbon inputs on soil carbon fractionation, sequestration and biological responses under major nutrient management practices for rice-wheat cropping systems</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2019-06-24</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>9114</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>9114-10</pages><artnum>9114</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Major nutrient management systems for rice-wheat cropping were compared for their potential to credit organic carbon (C) to the soil, its fractionation into active (very labile, VLc; labile, Lc) and passive (less labile, LLc; non-labile, NLc) pools, and crop yield responses. A ten-year long experiment was used to study effects of: (i) no inputs (Control, O), (ii) 100% inorganic fertilizers (F) compared to reduced fertilizers inputs (55%) supplemented with biomass incorporation from (iii) opportunity legume crop ( Vigna radiata ) (LE), (iv) green manure ( Sesbania aculeata ) (GM), (v) farmyard manure (FYM), (vi) wheat stubble (WS), and (vii) rice stubble (RS). Maximum C input to soil (as the percentage of C assimilated in the system) was in GM (36%) followed by RS (34%), WS (33%), LE (24%), and FYM (21%) compared to O (15%) and F (15%). Total C input to soil had a direct effect on soil C stock, soil C fractions (maximum in VLc and LLc), yet the responses in terms of biological yield were controlled by the quality of the biomass (C:N ratio, decomposition, etc. ) incorporated. Legume-based biomass inputs accrued most benefits for soil C sequestration and biological productivity.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>31235727</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-019-45534-z</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-2322
ispartof Scientific reports, 2019-06, Vol.9 (1), p.9114-10, Article 9114
issn 2045-2322
2045-2322
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6591388
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Nature Free; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects 631/45/47/4113
704/172/4081
9/30
Agrochemicals
Animal manures
Biomass
Carbon
Carbon - metabolism
Cereal crops
Crop yield
Cropping systems
Fertilizers
Fractionation
Humanities and Social Sciences
Intercropping
Legumes
Manures
Mineral fertilizers
multidisciplinary
Nutrients
Nutrients - metabolism
Organic carbon
Oryza
Oryza - growth & development
Oryza - metabolism
Rice
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
Sesbania aculeata
Soil - chemistry
Soils
Stubble
Triticum
Triticum - growth & development
Triticum - metabolism
Vigna radiata
Wheat
title Impact of carbon inputs on soil carbon fractionation, sequestration and biological responses under major nutrient management practices for rice-wheat cropping systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A09%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20carbon%20inputs%20on%20soil%20carbon%20fractionation,%20sequestration%20and%20biological%20responses%20under%20major%20nutrient%20management%20practices%20for%20rice-wheat%20cropping%20systems&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Bhardwaj,%20Ajay%20Kumar&rft.date=2019-06-24&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9114&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=9114-10&rft.artnum=9114&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-019-45534-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2246231064%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2246231064&rft_id=info:pmid/31235727&rfr_iscdi=true