Pharmaceutical expenditure and gross domestic product: Evidence of simultaneous effects using a two‐step instrumental variables strategy
This paper estimates the income elasticity of government pharmaceutical spending and assesses the simultaneous effect of such spending on gross domestic product (GDP). Using a panel dataset for 136 countries from 1995 to 2006, we employ a two‐step instrumental variable procedure where we first estim...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Health economics 2019-01, Vol.28 (1), p.101-122 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 122 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 101 |
container_title | Health economics |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Shaikh, Mujaheed Gandjour, Afschin |
description | This paper estimates the income elasticity of government pharmaceutical spending and assesses the simultaneous effect of such spending on gross domestic product (GDP). Using a panel dataset for 136 countries from 1995 to 2006, we employ a two‐step instrumental variable procedure where we first estimate the effect of GDP on public pharmaceutical expenditure using tourist receipts as an instrument for GDP. In the second step, we construct an adjusted pharmaceutical expenditure series where the response of public pharmaceutical expenditure to GDP is partialled out and use this endogeneity adjusted series as an instrument for pharmaceutical expenditure. Our estimations show that GDP has a strong positive impact on pharmaceutical spending with elasticity in excess of unity in countries with low spending on pharmaceuticals and countries with large economic freedom. In the second step, we find that when the quantitatively large reverse effect of GDP is accounted for, public pharmaceutical spending has a negative effect on GDP per capita particularly in countries with limited economic freedom. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/hec.3832 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6585646</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2118308471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4712-c294bc055c544307f115e9cd96795556930723b0fa85696beda7307e41fd6fb33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhSNERUtB4gmQJTbdpNhx7ExYIKHRQJEqlQWsLce5mXGV2ME_U2bXNSuekSfhDlPKj8TK9r2fzj2-pyieMXrOKK1ebsCc8wWvHhQnjLZtyaigD_d30ZRtxelx8TjGa0qxR-Wj4phTTqWU7Unx9cNGh0kbyMkaPRL4MoPrbcoBiHY9WQcfI-n9BBEBMgffZ5NekdXW9uAMED-QaKc8Ju3A50hgGMCkSHK0bk00STf---23mGAm1sUU8gQu4aCtDlZ3I0SCRZ1gvXtSHA16jPD07jwtPr1dfVxelJdX794v31yWpm5YVZqqrTtDhTCirjltBsYEtKZvZdMKIWSLtYp3dNALfMgOet1gCWo29HLoOD8tXh9059xN0Bv0E_So5mAnHXbKa6v-7ji7UWu_VVKgYi1R4OxOIPjPGRejJhsNjONhBapibMHpAt0i-uIf9Nrn4PB7SIkGzXJa_xY0-20HGO7NMKr2ASsMWO0DRvT5n-bvwV-JIlAegBs7wu6_Qupitfwp-AP_UrNd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2157693304</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pharmaceutical expenditure and gross domestic product: Evidence of simultaneous effects using a two‐step instrumental variables strategy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Shaikh, Mujaheed ; Gandjour, Afschin</creator><creatorcontrib>Shaikh, Mujaheed ; Gandjour, Afschin</creatorcontrib><description>This paper estimates the income elasticity of government pharmaceutical spending and assesses the simultaneous effect of such spending on gross domestic product (GDP). Using a panel dataset for 136 countries from 1995 to 2006, we employ a two‐step instrumental variable procedure where we first estimate the effect of GDP on public pharmaceutical expenditure using tourist receipts as an instrument for GDP. In the second step, we construct an adjusted pharmaceutical expenditure series where the response of public pharmaceutical expenditure to GDP is partialled out and use this endogeneity adjusted series as an instrument for pharmaceutical expenditure. Our estimations show that GDP has a strong positive impact on pharmaceutical spending with elasticity in excess of unity in countries with low spending on pharmaceuticals and countries with large economic freedom. In the second step, we find that when the quantitatively large reverse effect of GDP is accounted for, public pharmaceutical spending has a negative effect on GDP per capita particularly in countries with limited economic freedom.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9230</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1099-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hec.3832</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30306669</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Economic models ; Elasticity ; Expenditures ; Freedoms ; GDP ; GDP per capita ; Global Health ; Gross Domestic Product ; Gross Domestic Product - statistics & numerical data ; Gross Domestic Product - trends ; Health economics ; Health Expenditures - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Income elasticity ; instrumental variables ; Models, Econometric ; Pharmaceuticals ; Prescription drugs ; public pharmaceutical expenditure</subject><ispartof>Health economics, 2019-01, Vol.28 (1), p.101-122</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors Health Economics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2018 The Authors Health Economics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4712-c294bc055c544307f115e9cd96795556930723b0fa85696beda7307e41fd6fb33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4712-c294bc055c544307f115e9cd96795556930723b0fa85696beda7307e41fd6fb33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4262-8344 ; 0000-0002-4231-6631</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhec.3832$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhec.3832$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,30999,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30306669$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shaikh, Mujaheed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandjour, Afschin</creatorcontrib><title>Pharmaceutical expenditure and gross domestic product: Evidence of simultaneous effects using a two‐step instrumental variables strategy</title><title>Health economics</title><addtitle>Health Econ</addtitle><description>This paper estimates the income elasticity of government pharmaceutical spending and assesses the simultaneous effect of such spending on gross domestic product (GDP). Using a panel dataset for 136 countries from 1995 to 2006, we employ a two‐step instrumental variable procedure where we first estimate the effect of GDP on public pharmaceutical expenditure using tourist receipts as an instrument for GDP. In the second step, we construct an adjusted pharmaceutical expenditure series where the response of public pharmaceutical expenditure to GDP is partialled out and use this endogeneity adjusted series as an instrument for pharmaceutical expenditure. Our estimations show that GDP has a strong positive impact on pharmaceutical spending with elasticity in excess of unity in countries with low spending on pharmaceuticals and countries with large economic freedom. In the second step, we find that when the quantitatively large reverse effect of GDP is accounted for, public pharmaceutical spending has a negative effect on GDP per capita particularly in countries with limited economic freedom.</description><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Elasticity</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Freedoms</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>GDP per capita</subject><subject>Global Health</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product - trends</subject><subject>Health economics</subject><subject>Health Expenditures - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Income elasticity</subject><subject>instrumental variables</subject><subject>Models, Econometric</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Prescription drugs</subject><subject>public pharmaceutical expenditure</subject><issn>1057-9230</issn><issn>1099-1050</issn><issn>1099-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhSNERUtB4gmQJTbdpNhx7ExYIKHRQJEqlQWsLce5mXGV2ME_U2bXNSuekSfhDlPKj8TK9r2fzj2-pyieMXrOKK1ebsCc8wWvHhQnjLZtyaigD_d30ZRtxelx8TjGa0qxR-Wj4phTTqWU7Unx9cNGh0kbyMkaPRL4MoPrbcoBiHY9WQcfI-n9BBEBMgffZ5NekdXW9uAMED-QaKc8Ju3A50hgGMCkSHK0bk00STf---23mGAm1sUU8gQu4aCtDlZ3I0SCRZ1gvXtSHA16jPD07jwtPr1dfVxelJdX794v31yWpm5YVZqqrTtDhTCirjltBsYEtKZvZdMKIWSLtYp3dNALfMgOet1gCWo29HLoOD8tXh9059xN0Bv0E_So5mAnHXbKa6v-7ji7UWu_VVKgYi1R4OxOIPjPGRejJhsNjONhBapibMHpAt0i-uIf9Nrn4PB7SIkGzXJa_xY0-20HGO7NMKr2ASsMWO0DRvT5n-bvwV-JIlAegBs7wu6_Qupitfwp-AP_UrNd</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Shaikh, Mujaheed</creator><creator>Gandjour, Afschin</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4262-8344</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4231-6631</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Pharmaceutical expenditure and gross domestic product: Evidence of simultaneous effects using a two‐step instrumental variables strategy</title><author>Shaikh, Mujaheed ; Gandjour, Afschin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4712-c294bc055c544307f115e9cd96795556930723b0fa85696beda7307e41fd6fb33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Elasticity</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Freedoms</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>GDP per capita</topic><topic>Global Health</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product - trends</topic><topic>Health economics</topic><topic>Health Expenditures - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Income elasticity</topic><topic>instrumental variables</topic><topic>Models, Econometric</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Prescription drugs</topic><topic>public pharmaceutical expenditure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shaikh, Mujaheed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandjour, Afschin</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Health economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shaikh, Mujaheed</au><au>Gandjour, Afschin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pharmaceutical expenditure and gross domestic product: Evidence of simultaneous effects using a two‐step instrumental variables strategy</atitle><jtitle>Health economics</jtitle><addtitle>Health Econ</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>122</epage><pages>101-122</pages><issn>1057-9230</issn><issn>1099-1050</issn><eissn>1099-1050</eissn><abstract>This paper estimates the income elasticity of government pharmaceutical spending and assesses the simultaneous effect of such spending on gross domestic product (GDP). Using a panel dataset for 136 countries from 1995 to 2006, we employ a two‐step instrumental variable procedure where we first estimate the effect of GDP on public pharmaceutical expenditure using tourist receipts as an instrument for GDP. In the second step, we construct an adjusted pharmaceutical expenditure series where the response of public pharmaceutical expenditure to GDP is partialled out and use this endogeneity adjusted series as an instrument for pharmaceutical expenditure. Our estimations show that GDP has a strong positive impact on pharmaceutical spending with elasticity in excess of unity in countries with low spending on pharmaceuticals and countries with large economic freedom. In the second step, we find that when the quantitatively large reverse effect of GDP is accounted for, public pharmaceutical spending has a negative effect on GDP per capita particularly in countries with limited economic freedom.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><pmid>30306669</pmid><doi>10.1002/hec.3832</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4262-8344</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4231-6631</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1057-9230 |
ispartof | Health economics, 2019-01, Vol.28 (1), p.101-122 |
issn | 1057-9230 1099-1050 1099-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6585646 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Economic models Elasticity Expenditures Freedoms GDP GDP per capita Global Health Gross Domestic Product Gross Domestic Product - statistics & numerical data Gross Domestic Product - trends Health economics Health Expenditures - statistics & numerical data Humans Income elasticity instrumental variables Models, Econometric Pharmaceuticals Prescription drugs public pharmaceutical expenditure |
title | Pharmaceutical expenditure and gross domestic product: Evidence of simultaneous effects using a two‐step instrumental variables strategy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A36%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pharmaceutical%20expenditure%20and%20gross%20domestic%20product:%20Evidence%20of%20simultaneous%20effects%20using%20a%20two%E2%80%90step%20instrumental%20variables%20strategy&rft.jtitle=Health%20economics&rft.au=Shaikh,%20Mujaheed&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=122&rft.pages=101-122&rft.issn=1057-9230&rft.eissn=1099-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hec.3832&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2118308471%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2157693304&rft_id=info:pmid/30306669&rfr_iscdi=true |