Pharmaceutical expenditure and gross domestic product: Evidence of simultaneous effects using a two‐step instrumental variables strategy

This paper estimates the income elasticity of government pharmaceutical spending and assesses the simultaneous effect of such spending on gross domestic product (GDP). Using a panel dataset for 136 countries from 1995 to 2006, we employ a two‐step instrumental variable procedure where we first estim...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health economics 2019-01, Vol.28 (1), p.101-122
Hauptverfasser: Shaikh, Mujaheed, Gandjour, Afschin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 122
container_issue 1
container_start_page 101
container_title Health economics
container_volume 28
creator Shaikh, Mujaheed
Gandjour, Afschin
description This paper estimates the income elasticity of government pharmaceutical spending and assesses the simultaneous effect of such spending on gross domestic product (GDP). Using a panel dataset for 136 countries from 1995 to 2006, we employ a two‐step instrumental variable procedure where we first estimate the effect of GDP on public pharmaceutical expenditure using tourist receipts as an instrument for GDP. In the second step, we construct an adjusted pharmaceutical expenditure series where the response of public pharmaceutical expenditure to GDP is partialled out and use this endogeneity adjusted series as an instrument for pharmaceutical expenditure. Our estimations show that GDP has a strong positive impact on pharmaceutical spending with elasticity in excess of unity in countries with low spending on pharmaceuticals and countries with large economic freedom. In the second step, we find that when the quantitatively large reverse effect of GDP is accounted for, public pharmaceutical spending has a negative effect on GDP per capita particularly in countries with limited economic freedom.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hec.3832
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6585646</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2118308471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4712-c294bc055c544307f115e9cd96795556930723b0fa85696beda7307e41fd6fb33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhSNERUtB4gmQJTbdpNhx7ExYIKHRQJEqlQWsLce5mXGV2ME_U2bXNSuekSfhDlPKj8TK9r2fzj2-pyieMXrOKK1ebsCc8wWvHhQnjLZtyaigD_d30ZRtxelx8TjGa0qxR-Wj4phTTqWU7Unx9cNGh0kbyMkaPRL4MoPrbcoBiHY9WQcfI-n9BBEBMgffZ5NekdXW9uAMED-QaKc8Ju3A50hgGMCkSHK0bk00STf---23mGAm1sUU8gQu4aCtDlZ3I0SCRZ1gvXtSHA16jPD07jwtPr1dfVxelJdX794v31yWpm5YVZqqrTtDhTCirjltBsYEtKZvZdMKIWSLtYp3dNALfMgOet1gCWo29HLoOD8tXh9059xN0Bv0E_So5mAnHXbKa6v-7ji7UWu_VVKgYi1R4OxOIPjPGRejJhsNjONhBapibMHpAt0i-uIf9Nrn4PB7SIkGzXJa_xY0-20HGO7NMKr2ASsMWO0DRvT5n-bvwV-JIlAegBs7wu6_Qupitfwp-AP_UrNd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2157693304</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pharmaceutical expenditure and gross domestic product: Evidence of simultaneous effects using a two‐step instrumental variables strategy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Shaikh, Mujaheed ; Gandjour, Afschin</creator><creatorcontrib>Shaikh, Mujaheed ; Gandjour, Afschin</creatorcontrib><description>This paper estimates the income elasticity of government pharmaceutical spending and assesses the simultaneous effect of such spending on gross domestic product (GDP). Using a panel dataset for 136 countries from 1995 to 2006, we employ a two‐step instrumental variable procedure where we first estimate the effect of GDP on public pharmaceutical expenditure using tourist receipts as an instrument for GDP. In the second step, we construct an adjusted pharmaceutical expenditure series where the response of public pharmaceutical expenditure to GDP is partialled out and use this endogeneity adjusted series as an instrument for pharmaceutical expenditure. Our estimations show that GDP has a strong positive impact on pharmaceutical spending with elasticity in excess of unity in countries with low spending on pharmaceuticals and countries with large economic freedom. In the second step, we find that when the quantitatively large reverse effect of GDP is accounted for, public pharmaceutical spending has a negative effect on GDP per capita particularly in countries with limited economic freedom.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9230</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1099-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hec.3832</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30306669</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Economic models ; Elasticity ; Expenditures ; Freedoms ; GDP ; GDP per capita ; Global Health ; Gross Domestic Product ; Gross Domestic Product - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Gross Domestic Product - trends ; Health economics ; Health Expenditures - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Income elasticity ; instrumental variables ; Models, Econometric ; Pharmaceuticals ; Prescription drugs ; public pharmaceutical expenditure</subject><ispartof>Health economics, 2019-01, Vol.28 (1), p.101-122</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors Health Economics Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2018 The Authors Health Economics Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4712-c294bc055c544307f115e9cd96795556930723b0fa85696beda7307e41fd6fb33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4712-c294bc055c544307f115e9cd96795556930723b0fa85696beda7307e41fd6fb33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4262-8344 ; 0000-0002-4231-6631</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhec.3832$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhec.3832$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,30999,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30306669$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shaikh, Mujaheed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandjour, Afschin</creatorcontrib><title>Pharmaceutical expenditure and gross domestic product: Evidence of simultaneous effects using a two‐step instrumental variables strategy</title><title>Health economics</title><addtitle>Health Econ</addtitle><description>This paper estimates the income elasticity of government pharmaceutical spending and assesses the simultaneous effect of such spending on gross domestic product (GDP). Using a panel dataset for 136 countries from 1995 to 2006, we employ a two‐step instrumental variable procedure where we first estimate the effect of GDP on public pharmaceutical expenditure using tourist receipts as an instrument for GDP. In the second step, we construct an adjusted pharmaceutical expenditure series where the response of public pharmaceutical expenditure to GDP is partialled out and use this endogeneity adjusted series as an instrument for pharmaceutical expenditure. Our estimations show that GDP has a strong positive impact on pharmaceutical spending with elasticity in excess of unity in countries with low spending on pharmaceuticals and countries with large economic freedom. In the second step, we find that when the quantitatively large reverse effect of GDP is accounted for, public pharmaceutical spending has a negative effect on GDP per capita particularly in countries with limited economic freedom.</description><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Elasticity</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Freedoms</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>GDP per capita</subject><subject>Global Health</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product - trends</subject><subject>Health economics</subject><subject>Health Expenditures - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Income elasticity</subject><subject>instrumental variables</subject><subject>Models, Econometric</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Prescription drugs</subject><subject>public pharmaceutical expenditure</subject><issn>1057-9230</issn><issn>1099-1050</issn><issn>1099-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhSNERUtB4gmQJTbdpNhx7ExYIKHRQJEqlQWsLce5mXGV2ME_U2bXNSuekSfhDlPKj8TK9r2fzj2-pyieMXrOKK1ebsCc8wWvHhQnjLZtyaigD_d30ZRtxelx8TjGa0qxR-Wj4phTTqWU7Unx9cNGh0kbyMkaPRL4MoPrbcoBiHY9WQcfI-n9BBEBMgffZ5NekdXW9uAMED-QaKc8Ju3A50hgGMCkSHK0bk00STf---23mGAm1sUU8gQu4aCtDlZ3I0SCRZ1gvXtSHA16jPD07jwtPr1dfVxelJdX794v31yWpm5YVZqqrTtDhTCirjltBsYEtKZvZdMKIWSLtYp3dNALfMgOet1gCWo29HLoOD8tXh9059xN0Bv0E_So5mAnHXbKa6v-7ji7UWu_VVKgYi1R4OxOIPjPGRejJhsNjONhBapibMHpAt0i-uIf9Nrn4PB7SIkGzXJa_xY0-20HGO7NMKr2ASsMWO0DRvT5n-bvwV-JIlAegBs7wu6_Qupitfwp-AP_UrNd</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Shaikh, Mujaheed</creator><creator>Gandjour, Afschin</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4262-8344</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4231-6631</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Pharmaceutical expenditure and gross domestic product: Evidence of simultaneous effects using a two‐step instrumental variables strategy</title><author>Shaikh, Mujaheed ; Gandjour, Afschin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4712-c294bc055c544307f115e9cd96795556930723b0fa85696beda7307e41fd6fb33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Elasticity</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Freedoms</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>GDP per capita</topic><topic>Global Health</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product - trends</topic><topic>Health economics</topic><topic>Health Expenditures - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Income elasticity</topic><topic>instrumental variables</topic><topic>Models, Econometric</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Prescription drugs</topic><topic>public pharmaceutical expenditure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shaikh, Mujaheed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandjour, Afschin</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Health economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shaikh, Mujaheed</au><au>Gandjour, Afschin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pharmaceutical expenditure and gross domestic product: Evidence of simultaneous effects using a two‐step instrumental variables strategy</atitle><jtitle>Health economics</jtitle><addtitle>Health Econ</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>122</epage><pages>101-122</pages><issn>1057-9230</issn><issn>1099-1050</issn><eissn>1099-1050</eissn><abstract>This paper estimates the income elasticity of government pharmaceutical spending and assesses the simultaneous effect of such spending on gross domestic product (GDP). Using a panel dataset for 136 countries from 1995 to 2006, we employ a two‐step instrumental variable procedure where we first estimate the effect of GDP on public pharmaceutical expenditure using tourist receipts as an instrument for GDP. In the second step, we construct an adjusted pharmaceutical expenditure series where the response of public pharmaceutical expenditure to GDP is partialled out and use this endogeneity adjusted series as an instrument for pharmaceutical expenditure. Our estimations show that GDP has a strong positive impact on pharmaceutical spending with elasticity in excess of unity in countries with low spending on pharmaceuticals and countries with large economic freedom. In the second step, we find that when the quantitatively large reverse effect of GDP is accounted for, public pharmaceutical spending has a negative effect on GDP per capita particularly in countries with limited economic freedom.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><pmid>30306669</pmid><doi>10.1002/hec.3832</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4262-8344</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4231-6631</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1057-9230
ispartof Health economics, 2019-01, Vol.28 (1), p.101-122
issn 1057-9230
1099-1050
1099-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6585646
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Economic models
Elasticity
Expenditures
Freedoms
GDP
GDP per capita
Global Health
Gross Domestic Product
Gross Domestic Product - statistics & numerical data
Gross Domestic Product - trends
Health economics
Health Expenditures - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Income elasticity
instrumental variables
Models, Econometric
Pharmaceuticals
Prescription drugs
public pharmaceutical expenditure
title Pharmaceutical expenditure and gross domestic product: Evidence of simultaneous effects using a two‐step instrumental variables strategy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A36%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pharmaceutical%20expenditure%20and%20gross%20domestic%20product:%20Evidence%20of%20simultaneous%20effects%20using%20a%20two%E2%80%90step%20instrumental%20variables%20strategy&rft.jtitle=Health%20economics&rft.au=Shaikh,%20Mujaheed&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=122&rft.pages=101-122&rft.issn=1057-9230&rft.eissn=1099-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hec.3832&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2118308471%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2157693304&rft_id=info:pmid/30306669&rfr_iscdi=true