Condylar fractures: Surgical versus conservative management

Background and Objectives: Condylar fractures can be treated with one of the two methods, including the conservative (closed reduction and immobilization) and/or surgical (open reduction and internal fixation) methods. Both these modalities of treatment have their indications and contraindications a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of maxillofacial surgery 2019-01, Vol.9 (1), p.15-22
Hauptverfasser: Karan, Abhishek, Kedarnath, N, Reddy, G, Harish Kumar, T, Neelima, C, Bhavani, M, Nayyar, Abhishek
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 22
container_issue 1
container_start_page 15
container_title Annals of maxillofacial surgery
container_volume 9
creator Karan, Abhishek
Kedarnath, N
Reddy, G
Harish Kumar, T
Neelima, C
Bhavani, M
Nayyar, Abhishek
description Background and Objectives: Condylar fractures can be treated with one of the two methods, including the conservative (closed reduction and immobilization) and/or surgical (open reduction and internal fixation) methods. Both these modalities of treatment have their indications and contraindications and merits and demerits. The present study was designed with the purpose of comparing the outcomes of surgical versus conservative management of moderately displaced subcondylar and condylar neck fractures. Materials and Methods: The present study included a total of 20 patients with moderately displaced condylar fractures in patients > 18 years of age who were randomly divided into nonsurgical and surgical group and were managed accordingly. In the present study, the outcomes of conservative versus surgical management of subcondylar and condylar neck fractures were discussed in terms of seven parameters, including the maximal interincisal mouth opening, protrusive and lateral excursive movements of the mandible, status of occlusion, deviation of mandible during mouth opening, pain (in terms of visual analog scale) and the height of ascending ramus (radiographically) which were measured and evaluated pre- and post-operatively at different intervals of time. The follow-up was done for a period of up to 6 weeks postoperatively. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive and analytical statistics were calculated using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 19. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to assess the significance of the difference between the groups, whereas the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess the significance of the difference between the paired observations in each group. Results: Patients treated surgically showed better improvement in maximal interincisal mouth opening, lateral excursions with minimal deviation, early relief from pain, and restoration of height of the ramus with symmetry in comparison with the patients managed conservatively where prolonged periods of pain apart from obvious deviation and minimal restoration of height of the ramus was observed over a follow-up period of 6 weeks postoperatively. The results were also found to be statistically significant with the value of P < 0.05. Interpretation and Conclusion: Surgery is inarguably preferred over conservative management of moderately displaced condylar fractures as per the results of the present study. The present study provided valuable information and mandated furt
doi_str_mv 10.4103/ams.ams_157_17
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6585226</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A589747731</galeid><sourcerecordid>A589747731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392r-46d8b696bb7f7c7c8f55399d0efbab67c978f4485fab648e77f84af652a7a3193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9LHDEUx0OpVFGvPZY5SS-zTn4nLVhkUSsIHmzP4U022Z2amWgys4v_fbOsP9qDgfAS3ud9X_K-CH3GzYzhhp5Cn2dlG8ylwfIDOiCE6ZoqLD5uzxTXjWRiHx3n_KcpqyQUJZ_QPsVEU034Afo-j8PiKUCqfAI7Tsnlb9XdlJadhVCtXcpTrmwcsktrGLu1q3oYYOl6N4xHaM9DyO74OR6i35cXv-Y_65vbq-v5-U1tS49UM7FQrdCibaWXVlrlOadaLxrnW2iFtFoqz5jivtyYclJ6xcALTkACxZoeorOd7sPU9m5hS-sEwTykrof0ZCJ05v_M0K3MMq6N4IoTIorA12eBFB8nl0fTd9m6EGBwccqGEC4wpoKogp7s0CUEZ1YOwrjKMUxjV2ZgzrnSkklJcQFnO9CmmHNy_vU9uDFbd8zWmTd3SsGXf3_xir94UYAfO2ATw1gGfx-mjUumsPdD3LwjW4J5sZD-BSZTo_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2256113628</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Condylar fractures: Surgical versus conservative management</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Karan, Abhishek ; Kedarnath, N ; Reddy, G ; Harish Kumar, T ; Neelima, C ; Bhavani, M ; Nayyar, Abhishek</creator><creatorcontrib>Karan, Abhishek ; Kedarnath, N ; Reddy, G ; Harish Kumar, T ; Neelima, C ; Bhavani, M ; Nayyar, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Objectives: Condylar fractures can be treated with one of the two methods, including the conservative (closed reduction and immobilization) and/or surgical (open reduction and internal fixation) methods. Both these modalities of treatment have their indications and contraindications and merits and demerits. The present study was designed with the purpose of comparing the outcomes of surgical versus conservative management of moderately displaced subcondylar and condylar neck fractures. Materials and Methods: The present study included a total of 20 patients with moderately displaced condylar fractures in patients &gt; 18 years of age who were randomly divided into nonsurgical and surgical group and were managed accordingly. In the present study, the outcomes of conservative versus surgical management of subcondylar and condylar neck fractures were discussed in terms of seven parameters, including the maximal interincisal mouth opening, protrusive and lateral excursive movements of the mandible, status of occlusion, deviation of mandible during mouth opening, pain (in terms of visual analog scale) and the height of ascending ramus (radiographically) which were measured and evaluated pre- and post-operatively at different intervals of time. The follow-up was done for a period of up to 6 weeks postoperatively. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive and analytical statistics were calculated using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 19. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to assess the significance of the difference between the groups, whereas the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess the significance of the difference between the paired observations in each group. Results: Patients treated surgically showed better improvement in maximal interincisal mouth opening, lateral excursions with minimal deviation, early relief from pain, and restoration of height of the ramus with symmetry in comparison with the patients managed conservatively where prolonged periods of pain apart from obvious deviation and minimal restoration of height of the ramus was observed over a follow-up period of 6 weeks postoperatively. The results were also found to be statistically significant with the value of P &lt; 0.05. Interpretation and Conclusion: Surgery is inarguably preferred over conservative management of moderately displaced condylar fractures as per the results of the present study. The present study provided valuable information and mandated further studies with larger sample sizes to come to definitive conclusions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2231-0746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2249-3816</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_157_17</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31293925</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>CAT scans ; Conservatism ; Fractures (Injuries) ; Injuries ; Internal fixation ; Medical research ; Original - Comparative Study ; Skeleton ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Annals of maxillofacial surgery, 2019-01, Vol.9 (1), p.15-22</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2019 Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392r-46d8b696bb7f7c7c8f55399d0efbab67c978f4485fab648e77f84af652a7a3193</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585226/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6585226/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4024,27458,27923,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31293925$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karan, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kedarnath, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harish Kumar, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neelima, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhavani, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nayyar, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><title>Condylar fractures: Surgical versus conservative management</title><title>Annals of maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Background and Objectives: Condylar fractures can be treated with one of the two methods, including the conservative (closed reduction and immobilization) and/or surgical (open reduction and internal fixation) methods. Both these modalities of treatment have their indications and contraindications and merits and demerits. The present study was designed with the purpose of comparing the outcomes of surgical versus conservative management of moderately displaced subcondylar and condylar neck fractures. Materials and Methods: The present study included a total of 20 patients with moderately displaced condylar fractures in patients &gt; 18 years of age who were randomly divided into nonsurgical and surgical group and were managed accordingly. In the present study, the outcomes of conservative versus surgical management of subcondylar and condylar neck fractures were discussed in terms of seven parameters, including the maximal interincisal mouth opening, protrusive and lateral excursive movements of the mandible, status of occlusion, deviation of mandible during mouth opening, pain (in terms of visual analog scale) and the height of ascending ramus (radiographically) which were measured and evaluated pre- and post-operatively at different intervals of time. The follow-up was done for a period of up to 6 weeks postoperatively. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive and analytical statistics were calculated using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 19. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to assess the significance of the difference between the groups, whereas the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess the significance of the difference between the paired observations in each group. Results: Patients treated surgically showed better improvement in maximal interincisal mouth opening, lateral excursions with minimal deviation, early relief from pain, and restoration of height of the ramus with symmetry in comparison with the patients managed conservatively where prolonged periods of pain apart from obvious deviation and minimal restoration of height of the ramus was observed over a follow-up period of 6 weeks postoperatively. The results were also found to be statistically significant with the value of P &lt; 0.05. Interpretation and Conclusion: Surgery is inarguably preferred over conservative management of moderately displaced condylar fractures as per the results of the present study. The present study provided valuable information and mandated further studies with larger sample sizes to come to definitive conclusions.</description><subject>CAT scans</subject><subject>Conservatism</subject><subject>Fractures (Injuries)</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Internal fixation</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Original - Comparative Study</subject><subject>Skeleton</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>2231-0746</issn><issn>2249-3816</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc9LHDEUx0OpVFGvPZY5SS-zTn4nLVhkUSsIHmzP4U022Z2amWgys4v_fbOsP9qDgfAS3ud9X_K-CH3GzYzhhp5Cn2dlG8ylwfIDOiCE6ZoqLD5uzxTXjWRiHx3n_KcpqyQUJZ_QPsVEU034Afo-j8PiKUCqfAI7Tsnlb9XdlJadhVCtXcpTrmwcsktrGLu1q3oYYOl6N4xHaM9DyO74OR6i35cXv-Y_65vbq-v5-U1tS49UM7FQrdCibaWXVlrlOadaLxrnW2iFtFoqz5jivtyYclJ6xcALTkACxZoeorOd7sPU9m5hS-sEwTykrof0ZCJ05v_M0K3MMq6N4IoTIorA12eBFB8nl0fTd9m6EGBwccqGEC4wpoKogp7s0CUEZ1YOwrjKMUxjV2ZgzrnSkklJcQFnO9CmmHNy_vU9uDFbd8zWmTd3SsGXf3_xir94UYAfO2ATw1gGfx-mjUumsPdD3LwjW4J5sZD-BSZTo_g</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Karan, Abhishek</creator><creator>Kedarnath, N</creator><creator>Reddy, G</creator><creator>Harish Kumar, T</creator><creator>Neelima, C</creator><creator>Bhavani, M</creator><creator>Nayyar, Abhishek</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Condylar fractures: Surgical versus conservative management</title><author>Karan, Abhishek ; Kedarnath, N ; Reddy, G ; Harish Kumar, T ; Neelima, C ; Bhavani, M ; Nayyar, Abhishek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392r-46d8b696bb7f7c7c8f55399d0efbab67c978f4485fab648e77f84af652a7a3193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>CAT scans</topic><topic>Conservatism</topic><topic>Fractures (Injuries)</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Internal fixation</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Original - Comparative Study</topic><topic>Skeleton</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karan, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kedarnath, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harish Kumar, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neelima, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhavani, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nayyar, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karan, Abhishek</au><au>Kedarnath, N</au><au>Reddy, G</au><au>Harish Kumar, T</au><au>Neelima, C</au><au>Bhavani, M</au><au>Nayyar, Abhishek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Condylar fractures: Surgical versus conservative management</atitle><jtitle>Annals of maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>15-22</pages><issn>2231-0746</issn><eissn>2249-3816</eissn><abstract>Background and Objectives: Condylar fractures can be treated with one of the two methods, including the conservative (closed reduction and immobilization) and/or surgical (open reduction and internal fixation) methods. Both these modalities of treatment have their indications and contraindications and merits and demerits. The present study was designed with the purpose of comparing the outcomes of surgical versus conservative management of moderately displaced subcondylar and condylar neck fractures. Materials and Methods: The present study included a total of 20 patients with moderately displaced condylar fractures in patients &gt; 18 years of age who were randomly divided into nonsurgical and surgical group and were managed accordingly. In the present study, the outcomes of conservative versus surgical management of subcondylar and condylar neck fractures were discussed in terms of seven parameters, including the maximal interincisal mouth opening, protrusive and lateral excursive movements of the mandible, status of occlusion, deviation of mandible during mouth opening, pain (in terms of visual analog scale) and the height of ascending ramus (radiographically) which were measured and evaluated pre- and post-operatively at different intervals of time. The follow-up was done for a period of up to 6 weeks postoperatively. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive and analytical statistics were calculated using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 19. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to assess the significance of the difference between the groups, whereas the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess the significance of the difference between the paired observations in each group. Results: Patients treated surgically showed better improvement in maximal interincisal mouth opening, lateral excursions with minimal deviation, early relief from pain, and restoration of height of the ramus with symmetry in comparison with the patients managed conservatively where prolonged periods of pain apart from obvious deviation and minimal restoration of height of the ramus was observed over a follow-up period of 6 weeks postoperatively. The results were also found to be statistically significant with the value of P &lt; 0.05. Interpretation and Conclusion: Surgery is inarguably preferred over conservative management of moderately displaced condylar fractures as per the results of the present study. The present study provided valuable information and mandated further studies with larger sample sizes to come to definitive conclusions.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>31293925</pmid><doi>10.4103/ams.ams_157_17</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2231-0746
ispartof Annals of maxillofacial surgery, 2019-01, Vol.9 (1), p.15-22
issn 2231-0746
2249-3816
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6585226
source Medknow Open Access Medical Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects CAT scans
Conservatism
Fractures (Injuries)
Injuries
Internal fixation
Medical research
Original - Comparative Study
Skeleton
Surgery
title Condylar fractures: Surgical versus conservative management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T14%3A44%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Condylar%20fractures:%20Surgical%20versus%20conservative%20management&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Karan,%20Abhishek&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=15-22&rft.issn=2231-0746&rft.eissn=2249-3816&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/ams.ams_157_17&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA589747731%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2256113628&rft_id=info:pmid/31293925&rft_galeid=A589747731&rfr_iscdi=true