Association of Adenoma and Proximal Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates With Endoscopist Characteristics
IMPORTANCE: Research demonstrates adenoma detection rate (ADR) and proximal sessile serrated polyp detection rate (pSSPDR) are associated with endoscopist characteristics including sex, specialty, and years in practice. However, many studies have not adjusted for other risk factors associated with c...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960) 2019-07, Vol.154 (7), p.627-635 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 635 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 627 |
| container_title | Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960) |
| container_volume | 154 |
| creator | Sarvepalli, Shashank Garber, Ari Rothberg, Michael B Mankaney, Gautam McMichael, John Morris-Stiff, Gareth Vargo, John J Rizk, Maged K Burke, Carol A |
| description | IMPORTANCE: Research demonstrates adenoma detection rate (ADR) and proximal sessile serrated polyp detection rate (pSSPDR) are associated with endoscopist characteristics including sex, specialty, and years in practice. However, many studies have not adjusted for other risk factors associated with colonic neoplasia. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between endoscopist characteristics and polyp detection after adjusting the factors included in previous studies as well as other factors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study was conducted in the Cleveland Clinic health system with data from individuals undergoing screening colonoscopies between January 2015 and June 2017. The study analyzed data using methods from previous studies that have demonstrated significant associations between endoscopist characteristics and ADR or pSSPDR. Multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression was performed to examine 7 endoscopist characteristics associated with ADRs and pSSPDRs after controlling for patient demographic, clinical, and colonoscopy-associated factors. EXPOSURES: Seven characteristics of endoscopists performing colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The ADR and pSSPDR, with a hypothesis created after data collection began. RESULTS: A total of 16 089 colonoscopies were performed in 16 089 patients by 56 clinicians. Of these, 8339 patients were male (51.8%), and the median (range) age of the cohort was 59 (52-66) years. Analyzing the data by the methods used in 4 previous studies yielded an association between endoscopist and polyp detection; surgeons (OR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.28-0.83]) and nongastroenterologists (OR, 0.50 [95% CI 0.29-0.85]) had reduced odds of pSSPDR, which was similar to results in previous studies. In a multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression analysis, ADR was not significantly associated with any endoscopist characteristic, and pSSPDR was only associated with years in practice (odds ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.83-0.89] per increment of 10 years; P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0564 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6583839</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>2730085</ama_id><sourcerecordid>2210944911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a449t-fd7f81db7920afdc45e0eb43cabfbb2e4923d1ee0aed7b3dde48f113d39657663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1vEzEQhi0EolXpH-gBWeLCJam_9sMXpCgtUKkSiA9xtGbt2cZhdx1sL6L_Hoe0EeDLeDzPO5rxS8gFZ0vOGL_cwghpjndLwbhesqpWT8ip4HW7qEUtnh7vlToh5yltWTktY0rq5-REMq2V5vyUfF-lFKyH7MNEQ09XDqcwAoXJ0Y8x_PIjDPQzpuQHLDFGyFgqYbjf0SvMaP8IP5XXRL_5vKHXkwvJhp1Pma43EMFmjCXxNr0gz3oYEp4_xDPy9e31l_X7xe2Hdzfr1e0ClNJ50bumb7nrGi0Y9M6qChl2Slro-q4TqLSQjiMyQNd00jlUbc-5dFLXVVPX8oy8OfTdzd2IzuKUIwxmF8sy8d4E8ObfyuQ35i78NHXVylbq0uD1Q4MYfsyYshl9sjgMMGGYkxGCM632H1jQV_-h2zDHqaxXqDKL5JWWhRIHysaQUsT-OAxnZm-nebTT7O00ezuL6OXfaxwlj-YV4OIAFO2xKhpZjK7kb-YzqNI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2266331593</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Association of Adenoma and Proximal Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates With Endoscopist Characteristics</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sarvepalli, Shashank ; Garber, Ari ; Rothberg, Michael B ; Mankaney, Gautam ; McMichael, John ; Morris-Stiff, Gareth ; Vargo, John J ; Rizk, Maged K ; Burke, Carol A</creator><creatorcontrib>Sarvepalli, Shashank ; Garber, Ari ; Rothberg, Michael B ; Mankaney, Gautam ; McMichael, John ; Morris-Stiff, Gareth ; Vargo, John J ; Rizk, Maged K ; Burke, Carol A</creatorcontrib><description>IMPORTANCE: Research demonstrates adenoma detection rate (ADR) and proximal sessile serrated polyp detection rate (pSSPDR) are associated with endoscopist characteristics including sex, specialty, and years in practice. However, many studies have not adjusted for other risk factors associated with colonic neoplasia. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between endoscopist characteristics and polyp detection after adjusting the factors included in previous studies as well as other factors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study was conducted in the Cleveland Clinic health system with data from individuals undergoing screening colonoscopies between January 2015 and June 2017. The study analyzed data using methods from previous studies that have demonstrated significant associations between endoscopist characteristics and ADR or pSSPDR. Multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression was performed to examine 7 endoscopist characteristics associated with ADRs and pSSPDRs after controlling for patient demographic, clinical, and colonoscopy-associated factors. EXPOSURES: Seven characteristics of endoscopists performing colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The ADR and pSSPDR, with a hypothesis created after data collection began. RESULTS: A total of 16 089 colonoscopies were performed in 16 089 patients by 56 clinicians. Of these, 8339 patients were male (51.8%), and the median (range) age of the cohort was 59 (52-66) years. Analyzing the data by the methods used in 4 previous studies yielded an association between endoscopist and polyp detection; surgeons (OR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.28-0.83]) and nongastroenterologists (OR, 0.50 [95% CI 0.29-0.85]) had reduced odds of pSSPDR, which was similar to results in previous studies. In a multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression analysis, ADR was not significantly associated with any endoscopist characteristic, and pSSPDR was only associated with years in practice (odds ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.83-0.89] per increment of 10 years; P < .001) and number of annual colonoscopies performed (odds ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.01-1.09] per 50 colonoscopies/year; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The differences in ADRs that were associated with 7 of 7 endoscopist characteristics and differences in pSSPDRs that were associated with 5 of 7 endoscopist characteristics in previous studies may have been associated with residual confounding, because they were not replicated in this analysis. Therefore, these characteristics should not influence the choice of endoscopist for colorectal cancer screening. However, clinicians further from their training and those with lower colonoscopy volumes have lower adjusted pSSPDRs and may need additional training to help increase pSSPDRs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-6254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-6262</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0564</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30994911</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Adenoma - diagnosis ; Adenoma - epidemiology ; Aged ; Clinical Competence ; Colonic Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Colonic Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Colonic Polyps - diagnosis ; Colonic Polyps - epidemiology ; Colonoscopy - methods ; Colorectal cancer ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastroenterologists - standards ; Humans ; Male ; Mass Screening - methods ; Medical screening ; Middle Aged ; Morbidity - trends ; Ohio - epidemiology ; Online First ; Original Investigation ; Regression analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk factors ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960), 2019-07, Vol.154 (7), p.627-635</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Medical Association Jul 2019</rights><rights>Copyright 2019 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a449t-fd7f81db7920afdc45e0eb43cabfbb2e4923d1ee0aed7b3dde48f113d39657663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a449t-fd7f81db7920afdc45e0eb43cabfbb2e4923d1ee0aed7b3dde48f113d39657663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/articlepdf/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0564$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0564$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,230,314,776,780,881,3327,27903,27904,76235,76238</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30994911$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sarvepalli, Shashank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garber, Ari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rothberg, Michael B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mankaney, Gautam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMichael, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris-Stiff, Gareth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargo, John J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizk, Maged K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, Carol A</creatorcontrib><title>Association of Adenoma and Proximal Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates With Endoscopist Characteristics</title><title>Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960)</title><addtitle>JAMA Surg</addtitle><description>IMPORTANCE: Research demonstrates adenoma detection rate (ADR) and proximal sessile serrated polyp detection rate (pSSPDR) are associated with endoscopist characteristics including sex, specialty, and years in practice. However, many studies have not adjusted for other risk factors associated with colonic neoplasia. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between endoscopist characteristics and polyp detection after adjusting the factors included in previous studies as well as other factors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study was conducted in the Cleveland Clinic health system with data from individuals undergoing screening colonoscopies between January 2015 and June 2017. The study analyzed data using methods from previous studies that have demonstrated significant associations between endoscopist characteristics and ADR or pSSPDR. Multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression was performed to examine 7 endoscopist characteristics associated with ADRs and pSSPDRs after controlling for patient demographic, clinical, and colonoscopy-associated factors. EXPOSURES: Seven characteristics of endoscopists performing colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The ADR and pSSPDR, with a hypothesis created after data collection began. RESULTS: A total of 16 089 colonoscopies were performed in 16 089 patients by 56 clinicians. Of these, 8339 patients were male (51.8%), and the median (range) age of the cohort was 59 (52-66) years. Analyzing the data by the methods used in 4 previous studies yielded an association between endoscopist and polyp detection; surgeons (OR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.28-0.83]) and nongastroenterologists (OR, 0.50 [95% CI 0.29-0.85]) had reduced odds of pSSPDR, which was similar to results in previous studies. In a multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression analysis, ADR was not significantly associated with any endoscopist characteristic, and pSSPDR was only associated with years in practice (odds ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.83-0.89] per increment of 10 years; P < .001) and number of annual colonoscopies performed (odds ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.01-1.09] per 50 colonoscopies/year; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The differences in ADRs that were associated with 7 of 7 endoscopist characteristics and differences in pSSPDRs that were associated with 5 of 7 endoscopist characteristics in previous studies may have been associated with residual confounding, because they were not replicated in this analysis. Therefore, these characteristics should not influence the choice of endoscopist for colorectal cancer screening. However, clinicians further from their training and those with lower colonoscopy volumes have lower adjusted pSSPDRs and may need additional training to help increase pSSPDRs.</description><subject>Adenoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Adenoma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Colonic Polyps - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colonic Polyps - epidemiology</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gastroenterologists - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morbidity - trends</subject><subject>Ohio - epidemiology</subject><subject>Online First</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>2168-6254</issn><issn>2168-6262</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1vEzEQhi0EolXpH-gBWeLCJam_9sMXpCgtUKkSiA9xtGbt2cZhdx1sL6L_Hoe0EeDLeDzPO5rxS8gFZ0vOGL_cwghpjndLwbhesqpWT8ip4HW7qEUtnh7vlToh5yltWTktY0rq5-REMq2V5vyUfF-lFKyH7MNEQ09XDqcwAoXJ0Y8x_PIjDPQzpuQHLDFGyFgqYbjf0SvMaP8IP5XXRL_5vKHXkwvJhp1Pma43EMFmjCXxNr0gz3oYEp4_xDPy9e31l_X7xe2Hdzfr1e0ClNJ50bumb7nrGi0Y9M6qChl2Slro-q4TqLSQjiMyQNd00jlUbc-5dFLXVVPX8oy8OfTdzd2IzuKUIwxmF8sy8d4E8ObfyuQ35i78NHXVylbq0uD1Q4MYfsyYshl9sjgMMGGYkxGCM632H1jQV_-h2zDHqaxXqDKL5JWWhRIHysaQUsT-OAxnZm-nebTT7O00ezuL6OXfaxwlj-YV4OIAFO2xKhpZjK7kb-YzqNI</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Sarvepalli, Shashank</creator><creator>Garber, Ari</creator><creator>Rothberg, Michael B</creator><creator>Mankaney, Gautam</creator><creator>McMichael, John</creator><creator>Morris-Stiff, Gareth</creator><creator>Vargo, John J</creator><creator>Rizk, Maged K</creator><creator>Burke, Carol A</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Association of Adenoma and Proximal Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates With Endoscopist Characteristics</title><author>Sarvepalli, Shashank ; Garber, Ari ; Rothberg, Michael B ; Mankaney, Gautam ; McMichael, John ; Morris-Stiff, Gareth ; Vargo, John J ; Rizk, Maged K ; Burke, Carol A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a449t-fd7f81db7920afdc45e0eb43cabfbb2e4923d1ee0aed7b3dde48f113d39657663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adenoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Adenoma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Colonic Polyps - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colonic Polyps - epidemiology</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gastroenterologists - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morbidity - trends</topic><topic>Ohio - epidemiology</topic><topic>Online First</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sarvepalli, Shashank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garber, Ari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rothberg, Michael B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mankaney, Gautam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMichael, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris-Stiff, Gareth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargo, John J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizk, Maged K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, Carol A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sarvepalli, Shashank</au><au>Garber, Ari</au><au>Rothberg, Michael B</au><au>Mankaney, Gautam</au><au>McMichael, John</au><au>Morris-Stiff, Gareth</au><au>Vargo, John J</au><au>Rizk, Maged K</au><au>Burke, Carol A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Association of Adenoma and Proximal Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates With Endoscopist Characteristics</atitle><jtitle>Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960)</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Surg</addtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>154</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>627</spage><epage>635</epage><pages>627-635</pages><issn>2168-6254</issn><eissn>2168-6262</eissn><abstract>IMPORTANCE: Research demonstrates adenoma detection rate (ADR) and proximal sessile serrated polyp detection rate (pSSPDR) are associated with endoscopist characteristics including sex, specialty, and years in practice. However, many studies have not adjusted for other risk factors associated with colonic neoplasia. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between endoscopist characteristics and polyp detection after adjusting the factors included in previous studies as well as other factors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study was conducted in the Cleveland Clinic health system with data from individuals undergoing screening colonoscopies between January 2015 and June 2017. The study analyzed data using methods from previous studies that have demonstrated significant associations between endoscopist characteristics and ADR or pSSPDR. Multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression was performed to examine 7 endoscopist characteristics associated with ADRs and pSSPDRs after controlling for patient demographic, clinical, and colonoscopy-associated factors. EXPOSURES: Seven characteristics of endoscopists performing colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The ADR and pSSPDR, with a hypothesis created after data collection began. RESULTS: A total of 16 089 colonoscopies were performed in 16 089 patients by 56 clinicians. Of these, 8339 patients were male (51.8%), and the median (range) age of the cohort was 59 (52-66) years. Analyzing the data by the methods used in 4 previous studies yielded an association between endoscopist and polyp detection; surgeons (OR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.28-0.83]) and nongastroenterologists (OR, 0.50 [95% CI 0.29-0.85]) had reduced odds of pSSPDR, which was similar to results in previous studies. In a multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression analysis, ADR was not significantly associated with any endoscopist characteristic, and pSSPDR was only associated with years in practice (odds ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.83-0.89] per increment of 10 years; P < .001) and number of annual colonoscopies performed (odds ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.01-1.09] per 50 colonoscopies/year; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The differences in ADRs that were associated with 7 of 7 endoscopist characteristics and differences in pSSPDRs that were associated with 5 of 7 endoscopist characteristics in previous studies may have been associated with residual confounding, because they were not replicated in this analysis. Therefore, these characteristics should not influence the choice of endoscopist for colorectal cancer screening. However, clinicians further from their training and those with lower colonoscopy volumes have lower adjusted pSSPDRs and may need additional training to help increase pSSPDRs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>30994911</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0564</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2168-6254 |
| ispartof | Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960), 2019-07, Vol.154 (7), p.627-635 |
| issn | 2168-6254 2168-6262 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6583839 |
| source | MEDLINE; American Medical Association Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Adenoma - diagnosis Adenoma - epidemiology Aged Clinical Competence Colonic Neoplasms - diagnosis Colonic Neoplasms - epidemiology Colonic Polyps - diagnosis Colonic Polyps - epidemiology Colonoscopy - methods Colorectal cancer Early Detection of Cancer - methods Female Follow-Up Studies Gastroenterologists - standards Humans Male Mass Screening - methods Medical screening Middle Aged Morbidity - trends Ohio - epidemiology Online First Original Investigation Regression analysis Retrospective Studies Risk factors Studies |
| title | Association of Adenoma and Proximal Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates With Endoscopist Characteristics |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T01%3A01%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Association%20of%20Adenoma%20and%20Proximal%20Sessile%20Serrated%20Polyp%20Detection%20Rates%20With%20Endoscopist%20Characteristics&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20surgery%20(Chicago.%201960)&rft.au=Sarvepalli,%20Shashank&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=154&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=627&rft.epage=635&rft.pages=627-635&rft.issn=2168-6254&rft.eissn=2168-6262&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0564&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2210944911%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2266331593&rft_id=info:pmid/30994911&rft_ama_id=2730085&rfr_iscdi=true |