Effects on Clinical Outcomes of Grafts and Spacers Used in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: a Critical Review
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a relatively new and popular spinal fusion technique that has proven very useful since its introduction. To date, fusion rates for different combinations of modalities and materials have not been thoroughly compared and assessed. In this review of pub...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Orthopaedic surgery 2013-02, Vol.5 (1), p.13-17 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 17 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 13 |
container_title | Orthopaedic surgery |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Heida Jr, Kenneth Ebraheim, Molly Siddiqui, Saaid Liu, Jiayong |
description | Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a relatively new and popular spinal fusion technique that has proven very useful since its introduction. To date, fusion rates for different combinations of modalities and materials have not been thoroughly compared and assessed. In this review of published reports, 29 papers met criteria for assessing fusion rates for three different interbody spacers and four different combinations of bone grafts and extenders. The spacers included Capstone, polyether ether ketones and Telamon cages, and the grafting materials reviewed were locally harvested bone, iliac crest bone with local, local bone plus recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 and a mixture of local and allograft bone. Of these, it was found that only the Capstone cage and locally harvested bone achieved statistically significant higher fusion rates (96.46% ± 2.89% and 97.07% ± 1.94% respectively) than the other modalities and materials studied. Oswestry Disability Index scores and visual pain scales were also examined as indicators of overall improvement after using each spacer and graft; the Telamon cage and local bone mixed with rhBMP‐2 stood out as conferring statistically significant greater improvements according to these two scales. Our findings are that Capstone and locally harvested bone alone are relatively superior in terms of fusion rates. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/os.12026 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_24P</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6583142</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2894575531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5426-2dcf58bdebd9dab6897bf1f7265cb45f537bea6080fac646dcff048b9da688983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9vFCEYhydGY2s18RMYEi9epg7_GQ8mddNdm2zcxG71SIABpc7ACjNt99uXutuNHuQC4X14eN_8quo1bE5hWe9jPoWoQexJdQw55TUXDD49nCk-ql7kfN00rMWcP6-OECao4QQeV-O5c9aMGcQAZr0P3qgerKbRxMGWSwcWSblSVqEDlxtlbMrgKtsO-ADWSYXsYlKDD-XVchq0SuAijDbp2G3BfMo-hg9AgVny4x_zV3vj7e3L6plTfbav9vtJdTU_X88-18vV4mJ2tqwNJYjVqDOOCt1Z3bWd0ky0XDvoOGLUaEIdxVxbxRrROGUYYQV3DRG6wEyIVuCT6uPOu5n0YDtjw5hULzfJDyptZVRe_lsJ_qf8EW8kowJDgorg7V6Q4u_J5lFexymVYbOESAiCKYNtod7tKJNizsm6ww-wkQ_5yPjAl3wK-ubvjg7gYyAFqHfAre_t9r8iubp8FO55n0d7d-BV-iUZx5zK718WkkFC5t_wWn7C97zfqjI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1288435619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects on Clinical Outcomes of Grafts and Spacers Used in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: a Critical Review</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><creator>Heida Jr, Kenneth ; Ebraheim, Molly ; Siddiqui, Saaid ; Liu, Jiayong</creator><creatorcontrib>Heida Jr, Kenneth ; Ebraheim, Molly ; Siddiqui, Saaid ; Liu, Jiayong</creatorcontrib><description>Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a relatively new and popular spinal fusion technique that has proven very useful since its introduction. To date, fusion rates for different combinations of modalities and materials have not been thoroughly compared and assessed. In this review of published reports, 29 papers met criteria for assessing fusion rates for three different interbody spacers and four different combinations of bone grafts and extenders. The spacers included Capstone, polyether ether ketones and Telamon cages, and the grafting materials reviewed were locally harvested bone, iliac crest bone with local, local bone plus recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 and a mixture of local and allograft bone. Of these, it was found that only the Capstone cage and locally harvested bone achieved statistically significant higher fusion rates (96.46% ± 2.89% and 97.07% ± 1.94% respectively) than the other modalities and materials studied. Oswestry Disability Index scores and visual pain scales were also examined as indicators of overall improvement after using each spacer and graft; the Telamon cage and local bone mixed with rhBMP‐2 stood out as conferring statistically significant greater improvements according to these two scales. Our findings are that Capstone and locally harvested bone alone are relatively superior in terms of fusion rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1757-7853</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1757-7861</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/os.12026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23420741</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bone Transplantation - methods ; Clinical outcomes ; Grafts ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery ; Prostheses and Implants ; Review ; Spacers ; Spinal fusion ; Spinal Fusion - instrumentation ; Spinal Fusion - methods ; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Orthopaedic surgery, 2013-02, Vol.5 (1), p.13-17</ispartof><rights>2013 Chinese Orthopaedic Association and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</rights><rights>2013 Chinese Orthopaedic Association and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Chinese Orthopaedic Association and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5426-2dcf58bdebd9dab6897bf1f7265cb45f537bea6080fac646dcff048b9da688983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5426-2dcf58bdebd9dab6897bf1f7265cb45f537bea6080fac646dcff048b9da688983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6583142/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6583142/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fos.12026$$EView_record_in_Wiley-Blackwell$$FView_record_in_$$GWiley-Blackwell</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23420741$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heida Jr, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebraheim, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siddiqui, Saaid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jiayong</creatorcontrib><title>Effects on Clinical Outcomes of Grafts and Spacers Used in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: a Critical Review</title><title>Orthopaedic surgery</title><addtitle>Orthopaedic Surgery</addtitle><description>Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a relatively new and popular spinal fusion technique that has proven very useful since its introduction. To date, fusion rates for different combinations of modalities and materials have not been thoroughly compared and assessed. In this review of published reports, 29 papers met criteria for assessing fusion rates for three different interbody spacers and four different combinations of bone grafts and extenders. The spacers included Capstone, polyether ether ketones and Telamon cages, and the grafting materials reviewed were locally harvested bone, iliac crest bone with local, local bone plus recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 and a mixture of local and allograft bone. Of these, it was found that only the Capstone cage and locally harvested bone achieved statistically significant higher fusion rates (96.46% ± 2.89% and 97.07% ± 1.94% respectively) than the other modalities and materials studied. Oswestry Disability Index scores and visual pain scales were also examined as indicators of overall improvement after using each spacer and graft; the Telamon cage and local bone mixed with rhBMP‐2 stood out as conferring statistically significant greater improvements according to these two scales. Our findings are that Capstone and locally harvested bone alone are relatively superior in terms of fusion rates.</description><subject>Bone Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Grafts</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Spacers</subject><subject>Spinal fusion</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - instrumentation</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - methods</subject><subject>Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1757-7853</issn><issn>1757-7861</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9vFCEYhydGY2s18RMYEi9epg7_GQ8mddNdm2zcxG71SIABpc7ACjNt99uXutuNHuQC4X14eN_8quo1bE5hWe9jPoWoQexJdQw55TUXDD49nCk-ql7kfN00rMWcP6-OECao4QQeV-O5c9aMGcQAZr0P3qgerKbRxMGWSwcWSblSVqEDlxtlbMrgKtsO-ADWSYXsYlKDD-XVchq0SuAijDbp2G3BfMo-hg9AgVny4x_zV3vj7e3L6plTfbav9vtJdTU_X88-18vV4mJ2tqwNJYjVqDOOCt1Z3bWd0ky0XDvoOGLUaEIdxVxbxRrROGUYYQV3DRG6wEyIVuCT6uPOu5n0YDtjw5hULzfJDyptZVRe_lsJ_qf8EW8kowJDgorg7V6Q4u_J5lFexymVYbOESAiCKYNtod7tKJNizsm6ww-wkQ_5yPjAl3wK-ubvjg7gYyAFqHfAre_t9r8iubp8FO55n0d7d-BV-iUZx5zK718WkkFC5t_wWn7C97zfqjI</recordid><startdate>201302</startdate><enddate>201302</enddate><creator>Heida Jr, Kenneth</creator><creator>Ebraheim, Molly</creator><creator>Siddiqui, Saaid</creator><creator>Liu, Jiayong</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201302</creationdate><title>Effects on Clinical Outcomes of Grafts and Spacers Used in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: a Critical Review</title><author>Heida Jr, Kenneth ; Ebraheim, Molly ; Siddiqui, Saaid ; Liu, Jiayong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5426-2dcf58bdebd9dab6897bf1f7265cb45f537bea6080fac646dcff048b9da688983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Bone Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Grafts</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Spacers</topic><topic>Spinal fusion</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - instrumentation</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - methods</topic><topic>Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heida Jr, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebraheim, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siddiqui, Saaid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jiayong</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Orthopaedic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heida Jr, Kenneth</au><au>Ebraheim, Molly</au><au>Siddiqui, Saaid</au><au>Liu, Jiayong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects on Clinical Outcomes of Grafts and Spacers Used in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: a Critical Review</atitle><jtitle>Orthopaedic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Orthopaedic Surgery</addtitle><date>2013-02</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>13-17</pages><issn>1757-7853</issn><eissn>1757-7861</eissn><abstract>Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a relatively new and popular spinal fusion technique that has proven very useful since its introduction. To date, fusion rates for different combinations of modalities and materials have not been thoroughly compared and assessed. In this review of published reports, 29 papers met criteria for assessing fusion rates for three different interbody spacers and four different combinations of bone grafts and extenders. The spacers included Capstone, polyether ether ketones and Telamon cages, and the grafting materials reviewed were locally harvested bone, iliac crest bone with local, local bone plus recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 and a mixture of local and allograft bone. Of these, it was found that only the Capstone cage and locally harvested bone achieved statistically significant higher fusion rates (96.46% ± 2.89% and 97.07% ± 1.94% respectively) than the other modalities and materials studied. Oswestry Disability Index scores and visual pain scales were also examined as indicators of overall improvement after using each spacer and graft; the Telamon cage and local bone mixed with rhBMP‐2 stood out as conferring statistically significant greater improvements according to these two scales. Our findings are that Capstone and locally harvested bone alone are relatively superior in terms of fusion rates.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23420741</pmid><doi>10.1111/os.12026</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1757-7853 |
ispartof | Orthopaedic surgery, 2013-02, Vol.5 (1), p.13-17 |
issn | 1757-7853 1757-7861 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6583142 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles |
subjects | Bone Transplantation - methods Clinical outcomes Grafts Humans Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery Prostheses and Implants Review Spacers Spinal fusion Spinal Fusion - instrumentation Spinal Fusion - methods Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Treatment Outcome |
title | Effects on Clinical Outcomes of Grafts and Spacers Used in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: a Critical Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A18%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_24P&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20on%20Clinical%20Outcomes%20of%20Grafts%20and%20Spacers%20Used%20in%20Transforaminal%20Lumbar%20Interbody%20Fusion:%20a%20Critical%20Review&rft.jtitle=Orthopaedic%20surgery&rft.au=Heida%20Jr,%20Kenneth&rft.date=2013-02&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=13-17&rft.issn=1757-7853&rft.eissn=1757-7861&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/os.12026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_24P%3E2894575531%3C/proquest_24P%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1288435619&rft_id=info:pmid/23420741&rfr_iscdi=true |