Effects on Clinical Outcomes of Grafts and Spacers Used in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: a Critical Review

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a relatively new and popular spinal fusion technique that has proven very useful since its introduction. To date, fusion rates for different combinations of modalities and materials have not been thoroughly compared and assessed. In this review of pub...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Orthopaedic surgery 2013-02, Vol.5 (1), p.13-17
Hauptverfasser: Heida Jr, Kenneth, Ebraheim, Molly, Siddiqui, Saaid, Liu, Jiayong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 17
container_issue 1
container_start_page 13
container_title Orthopaedic surgery
container_volume 5
creator Heida Jr, Kenneth
Ebraheim, Molly
Siddiqui, Saaid
Liu, Jiayong
description Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a relatively new and popular spinal fusion technique that has proven very useful since its introduction. To date, fusion rates for different combinations of modalities and materials have not been thoroughly compared and assessed. In this review of published reports, 29 papers met criteria for assessing fusion rates for three different interbody spacers and four different combinations of bone grafts and extenders. The spacers included Capstone, polyether ether ketones and Telamon cages, and the grafting materials reviewed were locally harvested bone, iliac crest bone with local, local bone plus recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 and a mixture of local and allograft bone. Of these, it was found that only the Capstone cage and locally harvested bone achieved statistically significant higher fusion rates (96.46% ± 2.89% and 97.07% ± 1.94% respectively) than the other modalities and materials studied. Oswestry Disability Index scores and visual pain scales were also examined as indicators of overall improvement after using each spacer and graft; the Telamon cage and local bone mixed with rhBMP‐2 stood out as conferring statistically significant greater improvements according to these two scales. Our findings are that Capstone and locally harvested bone alone are relatively superior in terms of fusion rates.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/os.12026
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_24P</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6583142</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2894575531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5426-2dcf58bdebd9dab6897bf1f7265cb45f537bea6080fac646dcff048b9da688983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9vFCEYhydGY2s18RMYEi9epg7_GQ8mddNdm2zcxG71SIABpc7ACjNt99uXutuNHuQC4X14eN_8quo1bE5hWe9jPoWoQexJdQw55TUXDD49nCk-ql7kfN00rMWcP6-OECao4QQeV-O5c9aMGcQAZr0P3qgerKbRxMGWSwcWSblSVqEDlxtlbMrgKtsO-ADWSYXsYlKDD-XVchq0SuAijDbp2G3BfMo-hg9AgVny4x_zV3vj7e3L6plTfbav9vtJdTU_X88-18vV4mJ2tqwNJYjVqDOOCt1Z3bWd0ky0XDvoOGLUaEIdxVxbxRrROGUYYQV3DRG6wEyIVuCT6uPOu5n0YDtjw5hULzfJDyptZVRe_lsJ_qf8EW8kowJDgorg7V6Q4u_J5lFexymVYbOESAiCKYNtod7tKJNizsm6ww-wkQ_5yPjAl3wK-ubvjg7gYyAFqHfAre_t9r8iubp8FO55n0d7d-BV-iUZx5zK718WkkFC5t_wWn7C97zfqjI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1288435619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects on Clinical Outcomes of Grafts and Spacers Used in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: a Critical Review</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><creator>Heida Jr, Kenneth ; Ebraheim, Molly ; Siddiqui, Saaid ; Liu, Jiayong</creator><creatorcontrib>Heida Jr, Kenneth ; Ebraheim, Molly ; Siddiqui, Saaid ; Liu, Jiayong</creatorcontrib><description>Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a relatively new and popular spinal fusion technique that has proven very useful since its introduction. To date, fusion rates for different combinations of modalities and materials have not been thoroughly compared and assessed. In this review of published reports, 29 papers met criteria for assessing fusion rates for three different interbody spacers and four different combinations of bone grafts and extenders. The spacers included Capstone, polyether ether ketones and Telamon cages, and the grafting materials reviewed were locally harvested bone, iliac crest bone with local, local bone plus recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 and a mixture of local and allograft bone. Of these, it was found that only the Capstone cage and locally harvested bone achieved statistically significant higher fusion rates (96.46% ± 2.89% and 97.07% ± 1.94% respectively) than the other modalities and materials studied. Oswestry Disability Index scores and visual pain scales were also examined as indicators of overall improvement after using each spacer and graft; the Telamon cage and local bone mixed with rhBMP‐2 stood out as conferring statistically significant greater improvements according to these two scales. Our findings are that Capstone and locally harvested bone alone are relatively superior in terms of fusion rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1757-7853</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1757-7861</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/os.12026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23420741</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bone Transplantation - methods ; Clinical outcomes ; Grafts ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery ; Prostheses and Implants ; Review ; Spacers ; Spinal fusion ; Spinal Fusion - instrumentation ; Spinal Fusion - methods ; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Orthopaedic surgery, 2013-02, Vol.5 (1), p.13-17</ispartof><rights>2013 Chinese Orthopaedic Association and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</rights><rights>2013 Chinese Orthopaedic Association and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Chinese Orthopaedic Association and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5426-2dcf58bdebd9dab6897bf1f7265cb45f537bea6080fac646dcff048b9da688983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5426-2dcf58bdebd9dab6897bf1f7265cb45f537bea6080fac646dcff048b9da688983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6583142/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6583142/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fos.12026$$EView_record_in_Wiley-Blackwell$$FView_record_in_$$GWiley-Blackwell</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23420741$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heida Jr, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebraheim, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siddiqui, Saaid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jiayong</creatorcontrib><title>Effects on Clinical Outcomes of Grafts and Spacers Used in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: a Critical Review</title><title>Orthopaedic surgery</title><addtitle>Orthopaedic Surgery</addtitle><description>Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a relatively new and popular spinal fusion technique that has proven very useful since its introduction. To date, fusion rates for different combinations of modalities and materials have not been thoroughly compared and assessed. In this review of published reports, 29 papers met criteria for assessing fusion rates for three different interbody spacers and four different combinations of bone grafts and extenders. The spacers included Capstone, polyether ether ketones and Telamon cages, and the grafting materials reviewed were locally harvested bone, iliac crest bone with local, local bone plus recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 and a mixture of local and allograft bone. Of these, it was found that only the Capstone cage and locally harvested bone achieved statistically significant higher fusion rates (96.46% ± 2.89% and 97.07% ± 1.94% respectively) than the other modalities and materials studied. Oswestry Disability Index scores and visual pain scales were also examined as indicators of overall improvement after using each spacer and graft; the Telamon cage and local bone mixed with rhBMP‐2 stood out as conferring statistically significant greater improvements according to these two scales. Our findings are that Capstone and locally harvested bone alone are relatively superior in terms of fusion rates.</description><subject>Bone Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Grafts</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Spacers</subject><subject>Spinal fusion</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - instrumentation</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - methods</subject><subject>Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1757-7853</issn><issn>1757-7861</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9vFCEYhydGY2s18RMYEi9epg7_GQ8mddNdm2zcxG71SIABpc7ACjNt99uXutuNHuQC4X14eN_8quo1bE5hWe9jPoWoQexJdQw55TUXDD49nCk-ql7kfN00rMWcP6-OECao4QQeV-O5c9aMGcQAZr0P3qgerKbRxMGWSwcWSblSVqEDlxtlbMrgKtsO-ADWSYXsYlKDD-XVchq0SuAijDbp2G3BfMo-hg9AgVny4x_zV3vj7e3L6plTfbav9vtJdTU_X88-18vV4mJ2tqwNJYjVqDOOCt1Z3bWd0ky0XDvoOGLUaEIdxVxbxRrROGUYYQV3DRG6wEyIVuCT6uPOu5n0YDtjw5hULzfJDyptZVRe_lsJ_qf8EW8kowJDgorg7V6Q4u_J5lFexymVYbOESAiCKYNtod7tKJNizsm6ww-wkQ_5yPjAl3wK-ubvjg7gYyAFqHfAre_t9r8iubp8FO55n0d7d-BV-iUZx5zK718WkkFC5t_wWn7C97zfqjI</recordid><startdate>201302</startdate><enddate>201302</enddate><creator>Heida Jr, Kenneth</creator><creator>Ebraheim, Molly</creator><creator>Siddiqui, Saaid</creator><creator>Liu, Jiayong</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201302</creationdate><title>Effects on Clinical Outcomes of Grafts and Spacers Used in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: a Critical Review</title><author>Heida Jr, Kenneth ; Ebraheim, Molly ; Siddiqui, Saaid ; Liu, Jiayong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5426-2dcf58bdebd9dab6897bf1f7265cb45f537bea6080fac646dcff048b9da688983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Bone Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Grafts</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Spacers</topic><topic>Spinal fusion</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - instrumentation</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - methods</topic><topic>Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heida Jr, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebraheim, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siddiqui, Saaid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jiayong</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Orthopaedic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heida Jr, Kenneth</au><au>Ebraheim, Molly</au><au>Siddiqui, Saaid</au><au>Liu, Jiayong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects on Clinical Outcomes of Grafts and Spacers Used in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: a Critical Review</atitle><jtitle>Orthopaedic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Orthopaedic Surgery</addtitle><date>2013-02</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>13-17</pages><issn>1757-7853</issn><eissn>1757-7861</eissn><abstract>Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a relatively new and popular spinal fusion technique that has proven very useful since its introduction. To date, fusion rates for different combinations of modalities and materials have not been thoroughly compared and assessed. In this review of published reports, 29 papers met criteria for assessing fusion rates for three different interbody spacers and four different combinations of bone grafts and extenders. The spacers included Capstone, polyether ether ketones and Telamon cages, and the grafting materials reviewed were locally harvested bone, iliac crest bone with local, local bone plus recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 and a mixture of local and allograft bone. Of these, it was found that only the Capstone cage and locally harvested bone achieved statistically significant higher fusion rates (96.46% ± 2.89% and 97.07% ± 1.94% respectively) than the other modalities and materials studied. Oswestry Disability Index scores and visual pain scales were also examined as indicators of overall improvement after using each spacer and graft; the Telamon cage and local bone mixed with rhBMP‐2 stood out as conferring statistically significant greater improvements according to these two scales. Our findings are that Capstone and locally harvested bone alone are relatively superior in terms of fusion rates.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23420741</pmid><doi>10.1111/os.12026</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1757-7853
ispartof Orthopaedic surgery, 2013-02, Vol.5 (1), p.13-17
issn 1757-7853
1757-7861
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6583142
source Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles
subjects Bone Transplantation - methods
Clinical outcomes
Grafts
Humans
Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery
Prostheses and Implants
Review
Spacers
Spinal fusion
Spinal Fusion - instrumentation
Spinal Fusion - methods
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
Treatment Outcome
title Effects on Clinical Outcomes of Grafts and Spacers Used in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: a Critical Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A18%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_24P&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20on%20Clinical%20Outcomes%20of%20Grafts%20and%20Spacers%20Used%20in%20Transforaminal%20Lumbar%20Interbody%20Fusion:%20a%20Critical%20Review&rft.jtitle=Orthopaedic%20surgery&rft.au=Heida%20Jr,%20Kenneth&rft.date=2013-02&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=13-17&rft.issn=1757-7853&rft.eissn=1757-7861&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/os.12026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_24P%3E2894575531%3C/proquest_24P%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1288435619&rft_id=info:pmid/23420741&rfr_iscdi=true