Seattle’s minimum wage ordinance did not affect supermarket food prices by food processing category
To examine the impacts of Seattle's minimum wage ordinance on food prices by food processing category. Supermarket food prices were collected for 106 items using a University of Washington Center for Public Health Nutrition market basket at affected and unaffected supermarket chain stores at th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Public health nutrition 2018-06, Vol.21 (9), p.1762-1770 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1770 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1762 |
container_title | Public health nutrition |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Spoden, Amanda L Buszkiewicz, James H Drewnowski, Adam Long, Mark C Otten, Jennifer J |
description | To examine the impacts of Seattle's minimum wage ordinance on food prices by food processing category.
Supermarket food prices were collected for 106 items using a University of Washington Center for Public Health Nutrition market basket at affected and unaffected supermarket chain stores at three times: March 2015 (1-month pre-policy enactment), May 2015 (1-month post-policy enactment) and May 2016 (1-year post-policy enactment). Food items were categorized into four food processing groups, from minimally to ultra-processed. Data were analysed across time using a multilevel, linear difference-in-differences model at the store and price level stratified by level of food processing.
Six large supermarket chain stores located in Seattle ('intervention') affected by the policy and six same-chain but unaffected stores in King County ('control'), Washington, USA.
One hundred and six food and beverage items.
The largest change in average price by food item was +$US 0·53 for 'processed foods' in King County between 1-month post-policy and 1-year post-policy enactment (P < 0·01). The smallest change was $US 0·00 for 'unprocessed or minimally processed foods' in Seattle between 1-month post-policy and 1-year post-policy enactment (P = 0·94). No significant changes in averaged chain prices were observed across food processing level strata in Seattle v. King County stores at 1-month or 1-year post-policy enactment.
Supermarket food prices do not appear to be differentially impacted by Seattle's minimum wage ordinance by level of the food's processing. These results suggest that the early implementation of a city-level minimum wage policy does not alter supermarket food prices by level of food processing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1368980017004037 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6579531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1368980017004037</cupid><sourcerecordid>1999197314</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-1b2df145ec26a67bb80641ea19b3c9fdd3b040427c714252f84bb764ad817b2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Uctu1TAUtBAVLYUPYIMssWETajt2HG-QUMVLqtRFYW35cRJcEvtiJ6C762_09_gSfNXbUkCsfI5mznhGg9AzSl5RQuXJBW27XvWkzoRw0soH6IhyKRommXxY5wo3O_wQPS7lkhAipJSP0CFTnCghxBGCCzDLMsHPq-uC5xDDvM74hxkBp-xDNNEB9sHjmBZshgHcgsu6gTyb_BUWPKTk8SYHBwXb7e2a6lpCHLEzC4wpb5-gg8FMBZ7u32P0-d3bT6cfmrPz9x9P35w1jku6NNQyP1AuwLHOdNLannScgqHKtk4N3re2xuRMOkk5E2zoubWy48b3VFpm2mP0-kZ3s9oZvIO4ZDPparD63epkgv4TieGLHtN33QmpREurwMu9QE7fViiLnkNxME0mQlqLpkopqmRLeaW--It6mdYcazzNqkfSdpzvBOkNy-VUSobhzgwlelei_qfEevP8foq7i9vWKqHdi5rZ5uBH-P33_2V_AVQzqQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2042036441</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seattle’s minimum wage ordinance did not affect supermarket food prices by food processing category</title><source>PubMed Central (Open access)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Spoden, Amanda L ; Buszkiewicz, James H ; Drewnowski, Adam ; Long, Mark C ; Otten, Jennifer J</creator><creatorcontrib>Spoden, Amanda L ; Buszkiewicz, James H ; Drewnowski, Adam ; Long, Mark C ; Otten, Jennifer J</creatorcontrib><description>To examine the impacts of Seattle's minimum wage ordinance on food prices by food processing category.
Supermarket food prices were collected for 106 items using a University of Washington Center for Public Health Nutrition market basket at affected and unaffected supermarket chain stores at three times: March 2015 (1-month pre-policy enactment), May 2015 (1-month post-policy enactment) and May 2016 (1-year post-policy enactment). Food items were categorized into four food processing groups, from minimally to ultra-processed. Data were analysed across time using a multilevel, linear difference-in-differences model at the store and price level stratified by level of food processing.
Six large supermarket chain stores located in Seattle ('intervention') affected by the policy and six same-chain but unaffected stores in King County ('control'), Washington, USA.
One hundred and six food and beverage items.
The largest change in average price by food item was +$US 0·53 for 'processed foods' in King County between 1-month post-policy and 1-year post-policy enactment (P < 0·01). The smallest change was $US 0·00 for 'unprocessed or minimally processed foods' in Seattle between 1-month post-policy and 1-year post-policy enactment (P = 0·94). No significant changes in averaged chain prices were observed across food processing level strata in Seattle v. King County stores at 1-month or 1-year post-policy enactment.
Supermarket food prices do not appear to be differentially impacted by Seattle's minimum wage ordinance by level of the food's processing. These results suggest that the early implementation of a city-level minimum wage policy does not alter supermarket food prices by level of food processing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-9800</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1368980017004037</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29409555</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Cities ; Commerce - statistics & numerical data ; Food Handling - economics ; Food prices ; Food processing ; Food Supply - economics ; Humans ; Minimum wage ; Nutrition ; Processed foods ; Public health ; Public policies ; Research Papers ; Salaries and Fringe Benefits - legislation & jurisprudence ; Studies ; Supermarkets ; Washington</subject><ispartof>Public health nutrition, 2018-06, Vol.21 (9), p.1762-1770</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Authors 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-1b2df145ec26a67bb80641ea19b3c9fdd3b040427c714252f84bb764ad817b2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-1b2df145ec26a67bb80641ea19b3c9fdd3b040427c714252f84bb764ad817b2a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6579531/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6579531/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29409555$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spoden, Amanda L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buszkiewicz, James H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drewnowski, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Mark C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otten, Jennifer J</creatorcontrib><title>Seattle’s minimum wage ordinance did not affect supermarket food prices by food processing category</title><title>Public health nutrition</title><addtitle>Public Health Nutr</addtitle><description>To examine the impacts of Seattle's minimum wage ordinance on food prices by food processing category.
Supermarket food prices were collected for 106 items using a University of Washington Center for Public Health Nutrition market basket at affected and unaffected supermarket chain stores at three times: March 2015 (1-month pre-policy enactment), May 2015 (1-month post-policy enactment) and May 2016 (1-year post-policy enactment). Food items were categorized into four food processing groups, from minimally to ultra-processed. Data were analysed across time using a multilevel, linear difference-in-differences model at the store and price level stratified by level of food processing.
Six large supermarket chain stores located in Seattle ('intervention') affected by the policy and six same-chain but unaffected stores in King County ('control'), Washington, USA.
One hundred and six food and beverage items.
The largest change in average price by food item was +$US 0·53 for 'processed foods' in King County between 1-month post-policy and 1-year post-policy enactment (P < 0·01). The smallest change was $US 0·00 for 'unprocessed or minimally processed foods' in Seattle between 1-month post-policy and 1-year post-policy enactment (P = 0·94). No significant changes in averaged chain prices were observed across food processing level strata in Seattle v. King County stores at 1-month or 1-year post-policy enactment.
Supermarket food prices do not appear to be differentially impacted by Seattle's minimum wage ordinance by level of the food's processing. These results suggest that the early implementation of a city-level minimum wage policy does not alter supermarket food prices by level of food processing.</description><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Commerce - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Food Handling - economics</subject><subject>Food prices</subject><subject>Food processing</subject><subject>Food Supply - economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Minimum wage</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Processed foods</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public policies</subject><subject>Research Papers</subject><subject>Salaries and Fringe Benefits - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supermarkets</subject><subject>Washington</subject><issn>1368-9800</issn><issn>1475-2727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Uctu1TAUtBAVLYUPYIMssWETajt2HG-QUMVLqtRFYW35cRJcEvtiJ6C762_09_gSfNXbUkCsfI5mznhGg9AzSl5RQuXJBW27XvWkzoRw0soH6IhyKRommXxY5wo3O_wQPS7lkhAipJSP0CFTnCghxBGCCzDLMsHPq-uC5xDDvM74hxkBp-xDNNEB9sHjmBZshgHcgsu6gTyb_BUWPKTk8SYHBwXb7e2a6lpCHLEzC4wpb5-gg8FMBZ7u32P0-d3bT6cfmrPz9x9P35w1jku6NNQyP1AuwLHOdNLannScgqHKtk4N3re2xuRMOkk5E2zoubWy48b3VFpm2mP0-kZ3s9oZvIO4ZDPparD63epkgv4TieGLHtN33QmpREurwMu9QE7fViiLnkNxME0mQlqLpkopqmRLeaW--It6mdYcazzNqkfSdpzvBOkNy-VUSobhzgwlelei_qfEevP8foq7i9vWKqHdi5rZ5uBH-P33_2V_AVQzqQg</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Spoden, Amanda L</creator><creator>Buszkiewicz, James H</creator><creator>Drewnowski, Adam</creator><creator>Long, Mark C</creator><creator>Otten, Jennifer J</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Seattle’s minimum wage ordinance did not affect supermarket food prices by food processing category</title><author>Spoden, Amanda L ; Buszkiewicz, James H ; Drewnowski, Adam ; Long, Mark C ; Otten, Jennifer J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-1b2df145ec26a67bb80641ea19b3c9fdd3b040427c714252f84bb764ad817b2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Commerce - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Food Handling - economics</topic><topic>Food prices</topic><topic>Food processing</topic><topic>Food Supply - economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Minimum wage</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Processed foods</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public policies</topic><topic>Research Papers</topic><topic>Salaries and Fringe Benefits - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supermarkets</topic><topic>Washington</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spoden, Amanda L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buszkiewicz, James H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drewnowski, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Mark C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otten, Jennifer J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Public health nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spoden, Amanda L</au><au>Buszkiewicz, James H</au><au>Drewnowski, Adam</au><au>Long, Mark C</au><au>Otten, Jennifer J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seattle’s minimum wage ordinance did not affect supermarket food prices by food processing category</atitle><jtitle>Public health nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>Public Health Nutr</addtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1762</spage><epage>1770</epage><pages>1762-1770</pages><issn>1368-9800</issn><eissn>1475-2727</eissn><abstract>To examine the impacts of Seattle's minimum wage ordinance on food prices by food processing category.
Supermarket food prices were collected for 106 items using a University of Washington Center for Public Health Nutrition market basket at affected and unaffected supermarket chain stores at three times: March 2015 (1-month pre-policy enactment), May 2015 (1-month post-policy enactment) and May 2016 (1-year post-policy enactment). Food items were categorized into four food processing groups, from minimally to ultra-processed. Data were analysed across time using a multilevel, linear difference-in-differences model at the store and price level stratified by level of food processing.
Six large supermarket chain stores located in Seattle ('intervention') affected by the policy and six same-chain but unaffected stores in King County ('control'), Washington, USA.
One hundred and six food and beverage items.
The largest change in average price by food item was +$US 0·53 for 'processed foods' in King County between 1-month post-policy and 1-year post-policy enactment (P < 0·01). The smallest change was $US 0·00 for 'unprocessed or minimally processed foods' in Seattle between 1-month post-policy and 1-year post-policy enactment (P = 0·94). No significant changes in averaged chain prices were observed across food processing level strata in Seattle v. King County stores at 1-month or 1-year post-policy enactment.
Supermarket food prices do not appear to be differentially impacted by Seattle's minimum wage ordinance by level of the food's processing. These results suggest that the early implementation of a city-level minimum wage policy does not alter supermarket food prices by level of food processing.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>29409555</pmid><doi>10.1017/S1368980017004037</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1368-9800 |
ispartof | Public health nutrition, 2018-06, Vol.21 (9), p.1762-1770 |
issn | 1368-9800 1475-2727 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6579531 |
source | PubMed Central (Open access); MEDLINE; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Cities Commerce - statistics & numerical data Food Handling - economics Food prices Food processing Food Supply - economics Humans Minimum wage Nutrition Processed foods Public health Public policies Research Papers Salaries and Fringe Benefits - legislation & jurisprudence Studies Supermarkets Washington |
title | Seattle’s minimum wage ordinance did not affect supermarket food prices by food processing category |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A25%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seattle%E2%80%99s%20minimum%20wage%20ordinance%20did%20not%20affect%20supermarket%20food%20prices%20by%20food%20processing%20category&rft.jtitle=Public%20health%20nutrition&rft.au=Spoden,%20Amanda%20L&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1762&rft.epage=1770&rft.pages=1762-1770&rft.issn=1368-9800&rft.eissn=1475-2727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1368980017004037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1999197314%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2042036441&rft_id=info:pmid/29409555&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1368980017004037&rfr_iscdi=true |