Comparison of Honey versus Polylactide Anti-Adhesion Barrier on Peritoneal Adhesion and Healing of Colon Anastomosis in Rabbits

Postoperative adhesion is still a consequence of intra-abdominal surgeries, which results in bowel obstruction and abdominopelvic pain. Bowel anastomosis as a common abdominal surgery has the incidence of leakage in up to 30% of patients that increase morbidity and mortality. Due to similar pathways...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences 2019-05, Vol.7 (10), p.1597-1601
Hauptverfasser: Negahi, Ali Reza, Hosseinpour, Parisa, Vaziri, Mohammad, Vaseghi, Hamed, Darvish, Pedram, Bouzari, Behnaz, Mousavie, Seyed Hamzeh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1601
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1597
container_title Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences
container_volume 7
creator Negahi, Ali Reza
Hosseinpour, Parisa
Vaziri, Mohammad
Vaseghi, Hamed
Darvish, Pedram
Bouzari, Behnaz
Mousavie, Seyed Hamzeh
description Postoperative adhesion is still a consequence of intra-abdominal surgeries, which results in bowel obstruction and abdominopelvic pain. Bowel anastomosis as a common abdominal surgery has the incidence of leakage in up to 30% of patients that increase morbidity and mortality. Due to similar pathways of adhesion formation and wound healing, it is important to find a way to reduce adhesions and anastomosis leakage. This study was designed to compare antiadhesive as well as anastomosis healing improvement effect of honey and polylactide anti-adhesive barrier film. Forty-five rabbits divided into three groups of honey, adhesion barrier film, and control group in an animal study. Under a similar condition, rabbits underwent resection and anastomosis of cecum under general anaesthesia. In the first group, honey was used at the anastomosis site, in the second one polylactide adhesion barrier film utilised, and the third one was the control group. Adhesion, as well as anastomosis leakage, was assessed after 21 days. Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Scientists (SPSS) for Windows version 25. Three groups of 15 rabbits were studied. The results showed that mean peritoneal adhesion score (PAS) was lower in the honey group (1.67) in comparison to the adhesion barrier film group (3.40) and the control group (6.33). Bio-absorbable polylactide barrier has an anti-adhesion effect but is not suitable for intestinal anastomosis in rabbits. Further studies needed to evaluate these effects on human beings.
doi_str_mv 10.3889/oamjms.2019.284
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6560280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2242814872</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3084-7cc78e41c8a046aa53f23222ad7f5e72a599a915401fcbefd065aed86587cb263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUFr3DAQhUVoSUKac25Fx168kWTLli-F7ZJ2A4GG0p7FWB4nCra01XgDe-pfr5ZNluQ0j5k3bwY-xq6kWJTGtNcRpqeJFkrIdqFMdcLOpdFN0dZaf3ijz9gl0ZMQQuq2lkqdsrNSKimMaM7Zv1WcNpA8xcDjwNcx4I4_Y6It8fs47kZws--RL8Psi2X_iOSz8xuk5DHxLO8x-TlvwciPYwg9X-eODw_70FUcc3MZgOY4RfLEfeC_oOv8TJ_YxwFGwsuXesH-fL_5vVoXdz9_3K6Wd4UrhamKxrnGYCWdAVHVALocVKmUgr4ZNDYKdNtCK3Ul5OA6HHpRa8De1No0rlN1ecG-HnI3227C3mGYE4x2k_wEaWcjePt-EvyjfYjPtta1UEbkgC8vASn-3SLNdvLkcBwhYNySVapSRlamUdl6fbC6FIkSDsczUtg9OXsgZ_fkbCaXNz6__e7of-VU_gf-o5hk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2242814872</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Honey versus Polylactide Anti-Adhesion Barrier on Peritoneal Adhesion and Healing of Colon Anastomosis in Rabbits</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Negahi, Ali Reza ; Hosseinpour, Parisa ; Vaziri, Mohammad ; Vaseghi, Hamed ; Darvish, Pedram ; Bouzari, Behnaz ; Mousavie, Seyed Hamzeh</creator><creatorcontrib>Negahi, Ali Reza ; Hosseinpour, Parisa ; Vaziri, Mohammad ; Vaseghi, Hamed ; Darvish, Pedram ; Bouzari, Behnaz ; Mousavie, Seyed Hamzeh</creatorcontrib><description>Postoperative adhesion is still a consequence of intra-abdominal surgeries, which results in bowel obstruction and abdominopelvic pain. Bowel anastomosis as a common abdominal surgery has the incidence of leakage in up to 30% of patients that increase morbidity and mortality. Due to similar pathways of adhesion formation and wound healing, it is important to find a way to reduce adhesions and anastomosis leakage. This study was designed to compare antiadhesive as well as anastomosis healing improvement effect of honey and polylactide anti-adhesive barrier film. Forty-five rabbits divided into three groups of honey, adhesion barrier film, and control group in an animal study. Under a similar condition, rabbits underwent resection and anastomosis of cecum under general anaesthesia. In the first group, honey was used at the anastomosis site, in the second one polylactide adhesion barrier film utilised, and the third one was the control group. Adhesion, as well as anastomosis leakage, was assessed after 21 days. Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Scientists (SPSS) for Windows version 25. Three groups of 15 rabbits were studied. The results showed that mean peritoneal adhesion score (PAS) was lower in the honey group (1.67) in comparison to the adhesion barrier film group (3.40) and the control group (6.33). Bio-absorbable polylactide barrier has an anti-adhesion effect but is not suitable for intestinal anastomosis in rabbits. Further studies needed to evaluate these effects on human beings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1857-9655</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1857-9655</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.284</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31210807</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Macedonia: Republic of Macedonia</publisher><subject>Basic Science</subject><ispartof>Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences, 2019-05, Vol.7 (10), p.1597-1601</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2019 Ali Reza Negahi, Parisa Hosseinpour, Mohammad Vaziri, Hamed Vaseghi, Pedram Darvish, Behnaz Bouzari, Seyed Hamzeh Mousavie. 2019</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3084-7cc78e41c8a046aa53f23222ad7f5e72a599a915401fcbefd065aed86587cb263</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560280/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560280/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31210807$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Negahi, Ali Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosseinpour, Parisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaziri, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaseghi, Hamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darvish, Pedram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouzari, Behnaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mousavie, Seyed Hamzeh</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Honey versus Polylactide Anti-Adhesion Barrier on Peritoneal Adhesion and Healing of Colon Anastomosis in Rabbits</title><title>Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences</title><addtitle>Open Access Maced J Med Sci</addtitle><description>Postoperative adhesion is still a consequence of intra-abdominal surgeries, which results in bowel obstruction and abdominopelvic pain. Bowel anastomosis as a common abdominal surgery has the incidence of leakage in up to 30% of patients that increase morbidity and mortality. Due to similar pathways of adhesion formation and wound healing, it is important to find a way to reduce adhesions and anastomosis leakage. This study was designed to compare antiadhesive as well as anastomosis healing improvement effect of honey and polylactide anti-adhesive barrier film. Forty-five rabbits divided into three groups of honey, adhesion barrier film, and control group in an animal study. Under a similar condition, rabbits underwent resection and anastomosis of cecum under general anaesthesia. In the first group, honey was used at the anastomosis site, in the second one polylactide adhesion barrier film utilised, and the third one was the control group. Adhesion, as well as anastomosis leakage, was assessed after 21 days. Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Scientists (SPSS) for Windows version 25. Three groups of 15 rabbits were studied. The results showed that mean peritoneal adhesion score (PAS) was lower in the honey group (1.67) in comparison to the adhesion barrier film group (3.40) and the control group (6.33). Bio-absorbable polylactide barrier has an anti-adhesion effect but is not suitable for intestinal anastomosis in rabbits. Further studies needed to evaluate these effects on human beings.</description><subject>Basic Science</subject><issn>1857-9655</issn><issn>1857-9655</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkUFr3DAQhUVoSUKac25Fx168kWTLli-F7ZJ2A4GG0p7FWB4nCra01XgDe-pfr5ZNluQ0j5k3bwY-xq6kWJTGtNcRpqeJFkrIdqFMdcLOpdFN0dZaf3ijz9gl0ZMQQuq2lkqdsrNSKimMaM7Zv1WcNpA8xcDjwNcx4I4_Y6It8fs47kZws--RL8Psi2X_iOSz8xuk5DHxLO8x-TlvwciPYwg9X-eODw_70FUcc3MZgOY4RfLEfeC_oOv8TJ_YxwFGwsuXesH-fL_5vVoXdz9_3K6Wd4UrhamKxrnGYCWdAVHVALocVKmUgr4ZNDYKdNtCK3Ul5OA6HHpRa8De1No0rlN1ecG-HnI3227C3mGYE4x2k_wEaWcjePt-EvyjfYjPtta1UEbkgC8vASn-3SLNdvLkcBwhYNySVapSRlamUdl6fbC6FIkSDsczUtg9OXsgZ_fkbCaXNz6__e7of-VU_gf-o5hk</recordid><startdate>20190531</startdate><enddate>20190531</enddate><creator>Negahi, Ali Reza</creator><creator>Hosseinpour, Parisa</creator><creator>Vaziri, Mohammad</creator><creator>Vaseghi, Hamed</creator><creator>Darvish, Pedram</creator><creator>Bouzari, Behnaz</creator><creator>Mousavie, Seyed Hamzeh</creator><general>Republic of Macedonia</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190531</creationdate><title>Comparison of Honey versus Polylactide Anti-Adhesion Barrier on Peritoneal Adhesion and Healing of Colon Anastomosis in Rabbits</title><author>Negahi, Ali Reza ; Hosseinpour, Parisa ; Vaziri, Mohammad ; Vaseghi, Hamed ; Darvish, Pedram ; Bouzari, Behnaz ; Mousavie, Seyed Hamzeh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3084-7cc78e41c8a046aa53f23222ad7f5e72a599a915401fcbefd065aed86587cb263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Basic Science</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Negahi, Ali Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosseinpour, Parisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaziri, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaseghi, Hamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darvish, Pedram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouzari, Behnaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mousavie, Seyed Hamzeh</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Negahi, Ali Reza</au><au>Hosseinpour, Parisa</au><au>Vaziri, Mohammad</au><au>Vaseghi, Hamed</au><au>Darvish, Pedram</au><au>Bouzari, Behnaz</au><au>Mousavie, Seyed Hamzeh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Honey versus Polylactide Anti-Adhesion Barrier on Peritoneal Adhesion and Healing of Colon Anastomosis in Rabbits</atitle><jtitle>Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Open Access Maced J Med Sci</addtitle><date>2019-05-31</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1597</spage><epage>1601</epage><pages>1597-1601</pages><issn>1857-9655</issn><eissn>1857-9655</eissn><abstract>Postoperative adhesion is still a consequence of intra-abdominal surgeries, which results in bowel obstruction and abdominopelvic pain. Bowel anastomosis as a common abdominal surgery has the incidence of leakage in up to 30% of patients that increase morbidity and mortality. Due to similar pathways of adhesion formation and wound healing, it is important to find a way to reduce adhesions and anastomosis leakage. This study was designed to compare antiadhesive as well as anastomosis healing improvement effect of honey and polylactide anti-adhesive barrier film. Forty-five rabbits divided into three groups of honey, adhesion barrier film, and control group in an animal study. Under a similar condition, rabbits underwent resection and anastomosis of cecum under general anaesthesia. In the first group, honey was used at the anastomosis site, in the second one polylactide adhesion barrier film utilised, and the third one was the control group. Adhesion, as well as anastomosis leakage, was assessed after 21 days. Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Scientists (SPSS) for Windows version 25. Three groups of 15 rabbits were studied. The results showed that mean peritoneal adhesion score (PAS) was lower in the honey group (1.67) in comparison to the adhesion barrier film group (3.40) and the control group (6.33). Bio-absorbable polylactide barrier has an anti-adhesion effect but is not suitable for intestinal anastomosis in rabbits. Further studies needed to evaluate these effects on human beings.</abstract><cop>Macedonia</cop><pub>Republic of Macedonia</pub><pmid>31210807</pmid><doi>10.3889/oamjms.2019.284</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1857-9655
ispartof Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences, 2019-05, Vol.7 (10), p.1597-1601
issn 1857-9655
1857-9655
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6560280
source PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Basic Science
title Comparison of Honey versus Polylactide Anti-Adhesion Barrier on Peritoneal Adhesion and Healing of Colon Anastomosis in Rabbits
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T21%3A50%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Honey%20versus%20Polylactide%20Anti-Adhesion%20Barrier%20on%20Peritoneal%20Adhesion%20and%20Healing%20of%20Colon%20Anastomosis%20in%20Rabbits&rft.jtitle=Open%20access%20Macedonian%20journal%20of%20medical%20sciences&rft.au=Negahi,%20Ali%20Reza&rft.date=2019-05-31&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1597&rft.epage=1601&rft.pages=1597-1601&rft.issn=1857-9655&rft.eissn=1857-9655&rft_id=info:doi/10.3889/oamjms.2019.284&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2242814872%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2242814872&rft_id=info:pmid/31210807&rfr_iscdi=true