Processing transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) data to detect low-level drinking

Several studies have objectively quantified drinking through the use of Alcohol Monitoring System's (AMS) transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) device known as SCRAM CAM. Criteria that AMS uses to detect drinking are known to be conservative and only reliably detect heavy drinking equivalent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2019-12, Vol.81, p.101-110
Hauptverfasser: Roache, John D., Karns-Wright, Tara E., Goros, Martin, Hill-Kapturczak, Nathalie, Mathias, Charles W., Dougherty, Donald M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 110
container_issue
container_start_page 101
container_title Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.)
container_volume 81
creator Roache, John D.
Karns-Wright, Tara E.
Goros, Martin
Hill-Kapturczak, Nathalie
Mathias, Charles W.
Dougherty, Donald M.
description Several studies have objectively quantified drinking through the use of Alcohol Monitoring System's (AMS) transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) device known as SCRAM CAM. Criteria that AMS uses to detect drinking are known to be conservative and only reliably detect heavy drinking equivalent to 5 or more standard drinks. Our group has developed Research Rules used to process TAC data in a manner that will detect low-level and moderate drinking even though it is below the AMS criteria for detection. Sixteen male and 14 female paid research volunteers wore TAC monitors for 28 days in their natural environments and responded daily to text message prompts to self-report the previous day's drinking. Current analyses describe the Research Rules that we developed and how use of those rules impacts the detection of self-reported drinking treated as the standard in sensitivity/specificity analysis. We observed 606 occurrences of positive TAC events over a total of 867 days and processed the TAC data to retain 345 as possible drinking events, even though AMS criteria confirmed drinking for only 163 of these events. The kinds of TAC events removed or retained by our rules are illustrated as cases of low and moderate drinking days that were detected by our rules but not by the conservative AMS criteria. AMS-confirmed TAC events have a high specificity (99.8%) to detect primarily heavy drinking, but have a poor sensitivity to detect lower-level drinking and a poor specificity as an indicator of alcohol abstinence. In contrast, our Research Rules detected 100% of TAC events detected by AMS but also detected 31% of the lower-level drinking events not detected by AMS, with 91% specificity. Reliance upon the AMS criteria for alcohol detection affords a high specificity for detection of heavy drinking but is a poor indicator of abstinence rates. In contrast, use of our Research Rules provides more sensitive means to quantify either any drinking or low–moderate levels of drinking while still maintaining good specificity. •Transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) data can be used to objectively detect low–moderate levels of drinking.•SCRAM (Alcohol Monitoring Systems, AMS) detects only “heavy” drinking and lacks sensitivity to detect lower drinking levels.•9 Research Rules are described to detect drinking that is not detected by AMS SCRAM CAM.•Our rules remove false-positive TAC readings and achieve 90% specificity and 69% sensitivity for detection of “any” drinking.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.alcohol.2018.08.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6559864</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0741832918301101</els_id><sourcerecordid>2099893573</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-b5c06cdb1171feb982f129c14fb0681789d7d7e20da5c8c5ec2008474fddae923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9vEzEQxS0EomnhI4AscSmHDWPvH9sXUBVRQKoEh3C2vPZs6-DYxd4E8e1xlFABF6SRfJjfPL-ZR8gLBksGbHizWZpg010KSw5MLqEW6x6RBZOibQbJ28dkAaJjjWy5OiPnpWwAQAihnpKzFphQAuSCrL_kZLEUH2_pnE0sDvPWBHoSpzZFi7F2Zp8ivVxfrV5TZ2ZD50QdzmhnGtKPJuAeA3XZx29V6Rl5MplQ8PnpvSBfr9-vVx-bm88fPq2ubhrbqX5uxt7CYN3ImGATjkryiXFlWTeNMEgmpHLCCeTgTG-l7dFyANmJbnLOoOLtBXl71L3fjVt0R6NB32e_NfmnTsbrvzvR3-nbtNdD3ys5dFXg8iSQ0_cdlllvfbEYgomYdkVzUEqqthdtRV_9g27SLse6nuYt54zxoYNK9UfK5lRKxunBDAN9yE1v9Om0-pCbhlrsYOTln5s8TP0OqgLvjgDWe-49Zl2sx5qN87mGoF3y__niF7oirTk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2322112640</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Processing transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) data to detect low-level drinking</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Roache, John D. ; Karns-Wright, Tara E. ; Goros, Martin ; Hill-Kapturczak, Nathalie ; Mathias, Charles W. ; Dougherty, Donald M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Roache, John D. ; Karns-Wright, Tara E. ; Goros, Martin ; Hill-Kapturczak, Nathalie ; Mathias, Charles W. ; Dougherty, Donald M.</creatorcontrib><description>Several studies have objectively quantified drinking through the use of Alcohol Monitoring System's (AMS) transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) device known as SCRAM CAM. Criteria that AMS uses to detect drinking are known to be conservative and only reliably detect heavy drinking equivalent to 5 or more standard drinks. Our group has developed Research Rules used to process TAC data in a manner that will detect low-level and moderate drinking even though it is below the AMS criteria for detection. Sixteen male and 14 female paid research volunteers wore TAC monitors for 28 days in their natural environments and responded daily to text message prompts to self-report the previous day's drinking. Current analyses describe the Research Rules that we developed and how use of those rules impacts the detection of self-reported drinking treated as the standard in sensitivity/specificity analysis. We observed 606 occurrences of positive TAC events over a total of 867 days and processed the TAC data to retain 345 as possible drinking events, even though AMS criteria confirmed drinking for only 163 of these events. The kinds of TAC events removed or retained by our rules are illustrated as cases of low and moderate drinking days that were detected by our rules but not by the conservative AMS criteria. AMS-confirmed TAC events have a high specificity (99.8%) to detect primarily heavy drinking, but have a poor sensitivity to detect lower-level drinking and a poor specificity as an indicator of alcohol abstinence. In contrast, our Research Rules detected 100% of TAC events detected by AMS but also detected 31% of the lower-level drinking events not detected by AMS, with 91% specificity. Reliance upon the AMS criteria for alcohol detection affords a high specificity for detection of heavy drinking but is a poor indicator of abstinence rates. In contrast, use of our Research Rules provides more sensitive means to quantify either any drinking or low–moderate levels of drinking while still maintaining good specificity. •Transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) data can be used to objectively detect low–moderate levels of drinking.•SCRAM (Alcohol Monitoring Systems, AMS) detects only “heavy” drinking and lacks sensitivity to detect lower drinking levels.•9 Research Rules are described to detect drinking that is not detected by AMS SCRAM CAM.•Our rules remove false-positive TAC readings and achieve 90% specificity and 69% sensitivity for detection of “any” drinking.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-8329</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2018.08.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30179708</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Alcohol ; Alcohol consumption ; Alcohol use ; Alcoholic beverages ; Alcohols ; Alliances ; Criteria ; Drinking ; Drinking behavior ; Heavy drinking ; Laboratories ; Low-level drinking ; Reading ; Sensitivity ; Specificity ; Transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) ; Transdermal alcohol monitoring</subject><ispartof>Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.), 2019-12, Vol.81, p.101-110</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2018. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-b5c06cdb1171feb982f129c14fb0681789d7d7e20da5c8c5ec2008474fddae923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-b5c06cdb1171feb982f129c14fb0681789d7d7e20da5c8c5ec2008474fddae923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2322112640?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3548,27923,27924,45994,64384,64386,64388,72240</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30179708$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roache, John D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karns-Wright, Tara E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goros, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill-Kapturczak, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathias, Charles W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dougherty, Donald M.</creatorcontrib><title>Processing transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) data to detect low-level drinking</title><title>Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Alcohol</addtitle><description>Several studies have objectively quantified drinking through the use of Alcohol Monitoring System's (AMS) transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) device known as SCRAM CAM. Criteria that AMS uses to detect drinking are known to be conservative and only reliably detect heavy drinking equivalent to 5 or more standard drinks. Our group has developed Research Rules used to process TAC data in a manner that will detect low-level and moderate drinking even though it is below the AMS criteria for detection. Sixteen male and 14 female paid research volunteers wore TAC monitors for 28 days in their natural environments and responded daily to text message prompts to self-report the previous day's drinking. Current analyses describe the Research Rules that we developed and how use of those rules impacts the detection of self-reported drinking treated as the standard in sensitivity/specificity analysis. We observed 606 occurrences of positive TAC events over a total of 867 days and processed the TAC data to retain 345 as possible drinking events, even though AMS criteria confirmed drinking for only 163 of these events. The kinds of TAC events removed or retained by our rules are illustrated as cases of low and moderate drinking days that were detected by our rules but not by the conservative AMS criteria. AMS-confirmed TAC events have a high specificity (99.8%) to detect primarily heavy drinking, but have a poor sensitivity to detect lower-level drinking and a poor specificity as an indicator of alcohol abstinence. In contrast, our Research Rules detected 100% of TAC events detected by AMS but also detected 31% of the lower-level drinking events not detected by AMS, with 91% specificity. Reliance upon the AMS criteria for alcohol detection affords a high specificity for detection of heavy drinking but is a poor indicator of abstinence rates. In contrast, use of our Research Rules provides more sensitive means to quantify either any drinking or low–moderate levels of drinking while still maintaining good specificity. •Transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) data can be used to objectively detect low–moderate levels of drinking.•SCRAM (Alcohol Monitoring Systems, AMS) detects only “heavy” drinking and lacks sensitivity to detect lower drinking levels.•9 Research Rules are described to detect drinking that is not detected by AMS SCRAM CAM.•Our rules remove false-positive TAC readings and achieve 90% specificity and 69% sensitivity for detection of “any” drinking.</description><subject>Alcohol</subject><subject>Alcohol consumption</subject><subject>Alcohol use</subject><subject>Alcoholic beverages</subject><subject>Alcohols</subject><subject>Alliances</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Drinking</subject><subject>Drinking behavior</subject><subject>Heavy drinking</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Low-level drinking</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Specificity</subject><subject>Transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC)</subject><subject>Transdermal alcohol monitoring</subject><issn>0741-8329</issn><issn>1873-6823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9vEzEQxS0EomnhI4AscSmHDWPvH9sXUBVRQKoEh3C2vPZs6-DYxd4E8e1xlFABF6SRfJjfPL-ZR8gLBksGbHizWZpg010KSw5MLqEW6x6RBZOibQbJ28dkAaJjjWy5OiPnpWwAQAihnpKzFphQAuSCrL_kZLEUH2_pnE0sDvPWBHoSpzZFi7F2Zp8ivVxfrV5TZ2ZD50QdzmhnGtKPJuAeA3XZx29V6Rl5MplQ8PnpvSBfr9-vVx-bm88fPq2ubhrbqX5uxt7CYN3ImGATjkryiXFlWTeNMEgmpHLCCeTgTG-l7dFyANmJbnLOoOLtBXl71L3fjVt0R6NB32e_NfmnTsbrvzvR3-nbtNdD3ys5dFXg8iSQ0_cdlllvfbEYgomYdkVzUEqqthdtRV_9g27SLse6nuYt54zxoYNK9UfK5lRKxunBDAN9yE1v9Om0-pCbhlrsYOTln5s8TP0OqgLvjgDWe-49Zl2sx5qN87mGoF3y__niF7oirTk</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Roache, John D.</creator><creator>Karns-Wright, Tara E.</creator><creator>Goros, Martin</creator><creator>Hill-Kapturczak, Nathalie</creator><creator>Mathias, Charles W.</creator><creator>Dougherty, Donald M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Processing transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) data to detect low-level drinking</title><author>Roache, John D. ; Karns-Wright, Tara E. ; Goros, Martin ; Hill-Kapturczak, Nathalie ; Mathias, Charles W. ; Dougherty, Donald M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-b5c06cdb1171feb982f129c14fb0681789d7d7e20da5c8c5ec2008474fddae923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Alcohol</topic><topic>Alcohol consumption</topic><topic>Alcohol use</topic><topic>Alcoholic beverages</topic><topic>Alcohols</topic><topic>Alliances</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Drinking</topic><topic>Drinking behavior</topic><topic>Heavy drinking</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Low-level drinking</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Specificity</topic><topic>Transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC)</topic><topic>Transdermal alcohol monitoring</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roache, John D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karns-Wright, Tara E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goros, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill-Kapturczak, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathias, Charles W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dougherty, Donald M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roache, John D.</au><au>Karns-Wright, Tara E.</au><au>Goros, Martin</au><au>Hill-Kapturczak, Nathalie</au><au>Mathias, Charles W.</au><au>Dougherty, Donald M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Processing transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) data to detect low-level drinking</atitle><jtitle>Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Alcohol</addtitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>81</volume><spage>101</spage><epage>110</epage><pages>101-110</pages><issn>0741-8329</issn><eissn>1873-6823</eissn><abstract>Several studies have objectively quantified drinking through the use of Alcohol Monitoring System's (AMS) transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) device known as SCRAM CAM. Criteria that AMS uses to detect drinking are known to be conservative and only reliably detect heavy drinking equivalent to 5 or more standard drinks. Our group has developed Research Rules used to process TAC data in a manner that will detect low-level and moderate drinking even though it is below the AMS criteria for detection. Sixteen male and 14 female paid research volunteers wore TAC monitors for 28 days in their natural environments and responded daily to text message prompts to self-report the previous day's drinking. Current analyses describe the Research Rules that we developed and how use of those rules impacts the detection of self-reported drinking treated as the standard in sensitivity/specificity analysis. We observed 606 occurrences of positive TAC events over a total of 867 days and processed the TAC data to retain 345 as possible drinking events, even though AMS criteria confirmed drinking for only 163 of these events. The kinds of TAC events removed or retained by our rules are illustrated as cases of low and moderate drinking days that were detected by our rules but not by the conservative AMS criteria. AMS-confirmed TAC events have a high specificity (99.8%) to detect primarily heavy drinking, but have a poor sensitivity to detect lower-level drinking and a poor specificity as an indicator of alcohol abstinence. In contrast, our Research Rules detected 100% of TAC events detected by AMS but also detected 31% of the lower-level drinking events not detected by AMS, with 91% specificity. Reliance upon the AMS criteria for alcohol detection affords a high specificity for detection of heavy drinking but is a poor indicator of abstinence rates. In contrast, use of our Research Rules provides more sensitive means to quantify either any drinking or low–moderate levels of drinking while still maintaining good specificity. •Transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) data can be used to objectively detect low–moderate levels of drinking.•SCRAM (Alcohol Monitoring Systems, AMS) detects only “heavy” drinking and lacks sensitivity to detect lower drinking levels.•9 Research Rules are described to detect drinking that is not detected by AMS SCRAM CAM.•Our rules remove false-positive TAC readings and achieve 90% specificity and 69% sensitivity for detection of “any” drinking.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30179708</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.alcohol.2018.08.014</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0741-8329
ispartof Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.), 2019-12, Vol.81, p.101-110
issn 0741-8329
1873-6823
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6559864
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Alcohol
Alcohol consumption
Alcohol use
Alcoholic beverages
Alcohols
Alliances
Criteria
Drinking
Drinking behavior
Heavy drinking
Laboratories
Low-level drinking
Reading
Sensitivity
Specificity
Transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC)
Transdermal alcohol monitoring
title Processing transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) data to detect low-level drinking
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T01%3A04%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Processing%20transdermal%20alcohol%20concentration%20(TAC)%20data%20to%20detect%20low-level%20drinking&rft.jtitle=Alcohol%20(Fayetteville,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Roache,%20John%20D.&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=81&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=110&rft.pages=101-110&rft.issn=0741-8329&rft.eissn=1873-6823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.alcohol.2018.08.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2099893573%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2322112640&rft_id=info:pmid/30179708&rft_els_id=S0741832918301101&rfr_iscdi=true