Guide to simulating complex NMR probe circuits
S‐parameter‐based circuit simulators are well suited to obtaining accurate solutions of even the most complex rf probe circuits. The basic theory necessary for determining the relative S/N of the probe circuit, based on B1/P0.5, from the voltage, current, impedance, and S‐parameter data that come fr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Concepts in magnetic resonance. Part A, Bridging education and research Bridging education and research, 2018-03, Vol.47A (2), p.n/a |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Concepts in magnetic resonance. Part A, Bridging education and research |
container_volume | 47A |
creator | Doty, Francis David |
description | S‐parameter‐based circuit simulators are well suited to obtaining accurate solutions of even the most complex rf probe circuits. The basic theory necessary for determining the relative S/N of the probe circuit, based on B1/P0.5, from the voltage, current, impedance, and S‐parameter data that come from circuit simulators, is presented. Examples of simulator applications to circuits of increasing complexity are presented. A key requirement for effective utilization of circuit simulators in probe circuit optimizations is constructing an approximate analytical solution of the circuit, or an inverse simulation program, to accompany the direct circuit simulation, that calculates all the needed circuit component values based on minimal input data, such as B0, desired nuclides, sample coil description, and hardware options and details such as characteristics of various leads. A method of developing the needed inverse simulation program is presented for a simplified single‐coil HXY probe circuit. The inverse program is validated by the direct simulation itself. The methods are then applied to a detailed circuit that includes all significant leads, stray capacitances, couplings, and losses for a NB 28.2‐T 1‐mm HXYZ MAS probe. Similar HXY circuit models were validated by NMR experiments with rotor sizes from 0.75 mm to 3.2 mm at fields from 11.7 T to 21 T. Detailed HXYZ circuit model results at 11.7 T, including pulse widths, component values, voltages, and port isolations, agreed with experimental results within a few per cent. The 1200‐MHz HXYZ simulation predicted a 1H π/2 pulse of 1.3 μs at 25 W. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cmr.a.21463 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6555146</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2322735778</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4613-85a1a39190bf38779803e7ce89775ebcb78cb69283dca655abb82830ba58edb53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LwzAYgIMobk5P3qVHQVrz0Xz0IoyhU5gKQ88hSbMZ6cdMWnX_3s7OoRdPScjD8748AJwimCAI8aUpfaISjFJG9sAQUYpjCjHZ39xTFjMo2AAchfDawQym2SEYEIS4YCwbgmTautxGTR0FV7aFaly1jExdrgr7GT3cz6OVr7WNjPOmdU04BgcLVQR7sj1H4Pnm-mlyG88ep3eT8Sw2KUMkFlQhRTKUQb0ggvNMQGK5sSLjnFptNBdGswwLkhvFKFVai-4BtaLC5pqSEbjqvatWlzY3tmq8KuTKu1L5tayVk39_Kvcil_W77GR0U2IEzrcCX7-1NjSydMHYolCVrdsgMcGYE8q56NCLHjW-DsHbxW4MgnJTWHaFpZLfhTv67PdmO_YnaQfgHvhwhV3_55KT-_m4t34BZ9eGwg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2322735778</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Guide to simulating complex NMR probe circuits</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Doty, Francis David</creator><creatorcontrib>Doty, Francis David</creatorcontrib><description>S‐parameter‐based circuit simulators are well suited to obtaining accurate solutions of even the most complex rf probe circuits. The basic theory necessary for determining the relative S/N of the probe circuit, based on B1/P0.5, from the voltage, current, impedance, and S‐parameter data that come from circuit simulators, is presented. Examples of simulator applications to circuits of increasing complexity are presented. A key requirement for effective utilization of circuit simulators in probe circuit optimizations is constructing an approximate analytical solution of the circuit, or an inverse simulation program, to accompany the direct circuit simulation, that calculates all the needed circuit component values based on minimal input data, such as B0, desired nuclides, sample coil description, and hardware options and details such as characteristics of various leads. A method of developing the needed inverse simulation program is presented for a simplified single‐coil HXY probe circuit. The inverse program is validated by the direct simulation itself. The methods are then applied to a detailed circuit that includes all significant leads, stray capacitances, couplings, and losses for a NB 28.2‐T 1‐mm HXYZ MAS probe. Similar HXY circuit models were validated by NMR experiments with rotor sizes from 0.75 mm to 3.2 mm at fields from 11.7 T to 21 T. Detailed HXYZ circuit model results at 11.7 T, including pulse widths, component values, voltages, and port isolations, agreed with experimental results within a few per cent. The 1200‐MHz HXYZ simulation predicted a 1H π/2 pulse of 1.3 μs at 25 W.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1546-6086</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5023</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cmr.a.21463</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31178669</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Concepts in magnetic resonance. Part A, Bridging education and research, 2018-03, Vol.47A (2), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4613-85a1a39190bf38779803e7ce89775ebcb78cb69283dca655abb82830ba58edb53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4613-85a1a39190bf38779803e7ce89775ebcb78cb69283dca655abb82830ba58edb53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2608-8170</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31178669$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Doty, Francis David</creatorcontrib><title>Guide to simulating complex NMR probe circuits</title><title>Concepts in magnetic resonance. Part A, Bridging education and research</title><addtitle>Concepts Magn Reson Part A Bridg Educ Res</addtitle><description>S‐parameter‐based circuit simulators are well suited to obtaining accurate solutions of even the most complex rf probe circuits. The basic theory necessary for determining the relative S/N of the probe circuit, based on B1/P0.5, from the voltage, current, impedance, and S‐parameter data that come from circuit simulators, is presented. Examples of simulator applications to circuits of increasing complexity are presented. A key requirement for effective utilization of circuit simulators in probe circuit optimizations is constructing an approximate analytical solution of the circuit, or an inverse simulation program, to accompany the direct circuit simulation, that calculates all the needed circuit component values based on minimal input data, such as B0, desired nuclides, sample coil description, and hardware options and details such as characteristics of various leads. A method of developing the needed inverse simulation program is presented for a simplified single‐coil HXY probe circuit. The inverse program is validated by the direct simulation itself. The methods are then applied to a detailed circuit that includes all significant leads, stray capacitances, couplings, and losses for a NB 28.2‐T 1‐mm HXYZ MAS probe. Similar HXY circuit models were validated by NMR experiments with rotor sizes from 0.75 mm to 3.2 mm at fields from 11.7 T to 21 T. Detailed HXYZ circuit model results at 11.7 T, including pulse widths, component values, voltages, and port isolations, agreed with experimental results within a few per cent. The 1200‐MHz HXYZ simulation predicted a 1H π/2 pulse of 1.3 μs at 25 W.</description><issn>1546-6086</issn><issn>1552-5023</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LwzAYgIMobk5P3qVHQVrz0Xz0IoyhU5gKQ88hSbMZ6cdMWnX_3s7OoRdPScjD8748AJwimCAI8aUpfaISjFJG9sAQUYpjCjHZ39xTFjMo2AAchfDawQym2SEYEIS4YCwbgmTautxGTR0FV7aFaly1jExdrgr7GT3cz6OVr7WNjPOmdU04BgcLVQR7sj1H4Pnm-mlyG88ep3eT8Sw2KUMkFlQhRTKUQb0ggvNMQGK5sSLjnFptNBdGswwLkhvFKFVai-4BtaLC5pqSEbjqvatWlzY3tmq8KuTKu1L5tayVk39_Kvcil_W77GR0U2IEzrcCX7-1NjSydMHYolCVrdsgMcGYE8q56NCLHjW-DsHbxW4MgnJTWHaFpZLfhTv67PdmO_YnaQfgHvhwhV3_55KT-_m4t34BZ9eGwg</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Doty, Francis David</creator><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2608-8170</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>Guide to simulating complex NMR probe circuits</title><author>Doty, Francis David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4613-85a1a39190bf38779803e7ce89775ebcb78cb69283dca655abb82830ba58edb53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Doty, Francis David</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Concepts in magnetic resonance. Part A, Bridging education and research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Doty, Francis David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Guide to simulating complex NMR probe circuits</atitle><jtitle>Concepts in magnetic resonance. Part A, Bridging education and research</jtitle><addtitle>Concepts Magn Reson Part A Bridg Educ Res</addtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>47A</volume><issue>2</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1546-6086</issn><eissn>1552-5023</eissn><abstract>S‐parameter‐based circuit simulators are well suited to obtaining accurate solutions of even the most complex rf probe circuits. The basic theory necessary for determining the relative S/N of the probe circuit, based on B1/P0.5, from the voltage, current, impedance, and S‐parameter data that come from circuit simulators, is presented. Examples of simulator applications to circuits of increasing complexity are presented. A key requirement for effective utilization of circuit simulators in probe circuit optimizations is constructing an approximate analytical solution of the circuit, or an inverse simulation program, to accompany the direct circuit simulation, that calculates all the needed circuit component values based on minimal input data, such as B0, desired nuclides, sample coil description, and hardware options and details such as characteristics of various leads. A method of developing the needed inverse simulation program is presented for a simplified single‐coil HXY probe circuit. The inverse program is validated by the direct simulation itself. The methods are then applied to a detailed circuit that includes all significant leads, stray capacitances, couplings, and losses for a NB 28.2‐T 1‐mm HXYZ MAS probe. Similar HXY circuit models were validated by NMR experiments with rotor sizes from 0.75 mm to 3.2 mm at fields from 11.7 T to 21 T. Detailed HXYZ circuit model results at 11.7 T, including pulse widths, component values, voltages, and port isolations, agreed with experimental results within a few per cent. The 1200‐MHz HXYZ simulation predicted a 1H π/2 pulse of 1.3 μs at 25 W.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>31178669</pmid><doi>10.1002/cmr.a.21463</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2608-8170</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1546-6086 |
ispartof | Concepts in magnetic resonance. Part A, Bridging education and research, 2018-03, Vol.47A (2), p.n/a |
issn | 1546-6086 1552-5023 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6555146 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Guide to simulating complex NMR probe circuits |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T20%3A30%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Guide%20to%20simulating%20complex%20NMR%20probe%20circuits&rft.jtitle=Concepts%20in%20magnetic%20resonance.%20Part%20A,%20Bridging%20education%20and%20research&rft.au=Doty,%20Francis%20David&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=47A&rft.issue=2&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1546-6086&rft.eissn=1552-5023&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cmr.a.21463&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2322735778%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2322735778&rft_id=info:pmid/31178669&rfr_iscdi=true |