Annual rhythms of milk and milk fat and protein production in dairy cattle in the United States
An annual pattern of milk composition has been well recognized in dairy cattle, with the highest milk fat and protein concentration observed during the winter and lowest occurring in the summer; however, rhythms of milk yield and composition have not been well quantified. Cosinor rhythmometry is com...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of dairy science 2019-01, Vol.102 (1), p.742-753 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 753 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 742 |
container_title | Journal of dairy science |
container_volume | 102 |
creator | Salfer, I.J. Dechow, C.D. Harvatine, K.J. |
description | An annual pattern of milk composition has been well recognized in dairy cattle, with the highest milk fat and protein concentration observed during the winter and lowest occurring in the summer; however, rhythms of milk yield and composition have not been well quantified. Cosinor rhythmometry is commonly used to model repeating daily and annual rhythms and allows determination of the amplitude (peak to mean), acrophase (time at peak), and period (time between peaks) of the rhythm. The objective of this study was to use cosinor rhythmometry to characterize the annual rhythms of milk yield and milk fat and protein concentration and yield using both national milk market and cow-level data. First, 10 yr of monthly average milk butterfat and protein concentration for each Federal Milk Marketing Order were obtained from the US Department of Agriculture Agricultural Marketing Service database. Fat and protein concentration fit a cosine function with a 12-mo period in all milk markets. We noted an interaction between milk marketing order and milk fat and protein concentration. The acrophase (time at peak) of the fat concentration rhythm ranged from December 4 to January 19 in all regions, whereas the rhythm of protein concentration peaked between December 27 and January 6. The amplitude (peak to mean) of the annual rhythm ranged from 0.07 to 0.14 percentage points for milk fat and from 0.08 to 0.12 percentage points for milk protein. The amplitude of the milk fat rhythm generally was lower in southern markets and higher in northern markets. Second, the annual rhythm of milk yield and milk fat and protein yield and concentration were analyzed in monthly test day data from 1,684 cows from 11 tiestall herds in Pennsylvania. Fat and protein concentration fit an annual rhythm in all herds, whereas milk and milk fat and protein yield only fit rhythms in 8 of the 11 herds. On average, milk yield peaked in April, fat and protein yield peaked in February, fat concentration peaked in January, and protein concentration peaked in December. Amplitudes of milk, fat, and protein yield averaged 0.82 kg, 55.3 g, and 30.4 g, respectively. Milk fat and protein concentration had average amplitudes of 0.12 and 0.07, respectively, similar to the results of the milk market data. Generally, milk yield and milk components fit annual rhythm regardless of parity or diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1) K232A polymorphism, with only cows of the low-frequency AA genotype (5.2% of total c |
doi_str_mv | 10.3168/jds.2018-15040 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6550460</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022030218310634</els_id><sourcerecordid>2135636321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-27448cf9ef82287e4474dac77a6c079733efd74f9b39ffb4a7f0688a4d28dcd23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1vGyEUxFGVqnHcXnus9pjLOnztwl4qRVGaRIrUQ5szwvCoSXfBBdaS__viOI2aQ9XTMGIYPd4PoY8Erxjp5cWjzSuKiWxJhzl-gxako13LyCBP0AJjSlvMMD1FZzk_Vkso7t6hU4Y5F4MkC6QuQ5j12KTNvmym3ETXTH782ehgjweny5PZpljAh4Pa2RQfQ1Od1T7tG6NLGeHgywaah-AL2OZb0QXye_TW6THDh2ddoocv19-vbtv7rzd3V5f3reGClpYKzqVxAzhJqRRQx-NWGyF0b7AYBGPgrOBuWLPBuTXXwuFeSs0tldZYypbo87F3O68nsAZCSXpU2-QnnfYqaq9e3wS_UT_iTvVdXVyPa8H5c0GKv2bIRU0-GxhHHSDOWVFKseSCSfr_KGFdz3pWdYlWx6hJMecE7mUigtUBoKoA1QGgegJYH3z6-x8v8T_EakAeA1C3ufOQVDYeggHrE5iibPT_6v4NiKyqrg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2135636321</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Annual rhythms of milk and milk fat and protein production in dairy cattle in the United States</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Salfer, I.J. ; Dechow, C.D. ; Harvatine, K.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Salfer, I.J. ; Dechow, C.D. ; Harvatine, K.J.</creatorcontrib><description>An annual pattern of milk composition has been well recognized in dairy cattle, with the highest milk fat and protein concentration observed during the winter and lowest occurring in the summer; however, rhythms of milk yield and composition have not been well quantified. Cosinor rhythmometry is commonly used to model repeating daily and annual rhythms and allows determination of the amplitude (peak to mean), acrophase (time at peak), and period (time between peaks) of the rhythm. The objective of this study was to use cosinor rhythmometry to characterize the annual rhythms of milk yield and milk fat and protein concentration and yield using both national milk market and cow-level data. First, 10 yr of monthly average milk butterfat and protein concentration for each Federal Milk Marketing Order were obtained from the US Department of Agriculture Agricultural Marketing Service database. Fat and protein concentration fit a cosine function with a 12-mo period in all milk markets. We noted an interaction between milk marketing order and milk fat and protein concentration. The acrophase (time at peak) of the fat concentration rhythm ranged from December 4 to January 19 in all regions, whereas the rhythm of protein concentration peaked between December 27 and January 6. The amplitude (peak to mean) of the annual rhythm ranged from 0.07 to 0.14 percentage points for milk fat and from 0.08 to 0.12 percentage points for milk protein. The amplitude of the milk fat rhythm generally was lower in southern markets and higher in northern markets. Second, the annual rhythm of milk yield and milk fat and protein yield and concentration were analyzed in monthly test day data from 1,684 cows from 11 tiestall herds in Pennsylvania. Fat and protein concentration fit an annual rhythm in all herds, whereas milk and milk fat and protein yield only fit rhythms in 8 of the 11 herds. On average, milk yield peaked in April, fat and protein yield peaked in February, fat concentration peaked in January, and protein concentration peaked in December. Amplitudes of milk, fat, and protein yield averaged 0.82 kg, 55.3 g, and 30.4 g, respectively. Milk fat and protein concentration had average amplitudes of 0.12 and 0.07, respectively, similar to the results of the milk market data. Generally, milk yield and milk components fit annual rhythm regardless of parity or diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1) K232A polymorphism, with only cows of the low-frequency AA genotype (5.2% of total cows) failing to fit rhythm of milk yield. In conclusion, the yearly rhythms of milk yield and fat and protein concentration and yield consistently occur regardless of region, herd, parity, or DGAT1 genotype and supports generation by a conserved endogenous annual rhythm.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.2018-15040</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30447981</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; annual rhythm ; Cattle - genetics ; Cattle - physiology ; cows ; dairy cattle ; Dairying ; diacylglycerol acyltransferase ; Diacylglycerol O-Acyltransferase - genetics ; Fats - analysis ; Female ; Genotype ; herds ; Lactation - genetics ; Lactation - physiology ; markets ; milk ; Milk - chemistry ; milk fat ; milk proteins ; Milk Proteins - analysis ; Milk Proteins - biosynthesis ; milk synthesis ; milk yield ; Parity ; Pennsylvania ; Periodicity ; Polymorphism, Genetic ; Pregnancy ; protein synthesis ; seasonal rhythm ; Seasons ; summer ; United States ; USDA ; winter</subject><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 2019-01, Vol.102 (1), p.742-753</ispartof><rights>2019 American Dairy Science Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-27448cf9ef82287e4474dac77a6c079733efd74f9b39ffb4a7f0688a4d28dcd23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-27448cf9ef82287e4474dac77a6c079733efd74f9b39ffb4a7f0688a4d28dcd23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030218310634$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30447981$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salfer, I.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dechow, C.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harvatine, K.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Annual rhythms of milk and milk fat and protein production in dairy cattle in the United States</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><description>An annual pattern of milk composition has been well recognized in dairy cattle, with the highest milk fat and protein concentration observed during the winter and lowest occurring in the summer; however, rhythms of milk yield and composition have not been well quantified. Cosinor rhythmometry is commonly used to model repeating daily and annual rhythms and allows determination of the amplitude (peak to mean), acrophase (time at peak), and period (time between peaks) of the rhythm. The objective of this study was to use cosinor rhythmometry to characterize the annual rhythms of milk yield and milk fat and protein concentration and yield using both national milk market and cow-level data. First, 10 yr of monthly average milk butterfat and protein concentration for each Federal Milk Marketing Order were obtained from the US Department of Agriculture Agricultural Marketing Service database. Fat and protein concentration fit a cosine function with a 12-mo period in all milk markets. We noted an interaction between milk marketing order and milk fat and protein concentration. The acrophase (time at peak) of the fat concentration rhythm ranged from December 4 to January 19 in all regions, whereas the rhythm of protein concentration peaked between December 27 and January 6. The amplitude (peak to mean) of the annual rhythm ranged from 0.07 to 0.14 percentage points for milk fat and from 0.08 to 0.12 percentage points for milk protein. The amplitude of the milk fat rhythm generally was lower in southern markets and higher in northern markets. Second, the annual rhythm of milk yield and milk fat and protein yield and concentration were analyzed in monthly test day data from 1,684 cows from 11 tiestall herds in Pennsylvania. Fat and protein concentration fit an annual rhythm in all herds, whereas milk and milk fat and protein yield only fit rhythms in 8 of the 11 herds. On average, milk yield peaked in April, fat and protein yield peaked in February, fat concentration peaked in January, and protein concentration peaked in December. Amplitudes of milk, fat, and protein yield averaged 0.82 kg, 55.3 g, and 30.4 g, respectively. Milk fat and protein concentration had average amplitudes of 0.12 and 0.07, respectively, similar to the results of the milk market data. Generally, milk yield and milk components fit annual rhythm regardless of parity or diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1) K232A polymorphism, with only cows of the low-frequency AA genotype (5.2% of total cows) failing to fit rhythm of milk yield. In conclusion, the yearly rhythms of milk yield and fat and protein concentration and yield consistently occur regardless of region, herd, parity, or DGAT1 genotype and supports generation by a conserved endogenous annual rhythm.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>annual rhythm</subject><subject>Cattle - genetics</subject><subject>Cattle - physiology</subject><subject>cows</subject><subject>dairy cattle</subject><subject>Dairying</subject><subject>diacylglycerol acyltransferase</subject><subject>Diacylglycerol O-Acyltransferase - genetics</subject><subject>Fats - analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>herds</subject><subject>Lactation - genetics</subject><subject>Lactation - physiology</subject><subject>markets</subject><subject>milk</subject><subject>Milk - chemistry</subject><subject>milk fat</subject><subject>milk proteins</subject><subject>Milk Proteins - analysis</subject><subject>Milk Proteins - biosynthesis</subject><subject>milk synthesis</subject><subject>milk yield</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Pennsylvania</subject><subject>Periodicity</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Genetic</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>protein synthesis</subject><subject>seasonal rhythm</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>summer</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>USDA</subject><subject>winter</subject><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1vGyEUxFGVqnHcXnus9pjLOnztwl4qRVGaRIrUQ5szwvCoSXfBBdaS__viOI2aQ9XTMGIYPd4PoY8Erxjp5cWjzSuKiWxJhzl-gxako13LyCBP0AJjSlvMMD1FZzk_Vkso7t6hU4Y5F4MkC6QuQ5j12KTNvmym3ETXTH782ehgjweny5PZpljAh4Pa2RQfQ1Od1T7tG6NLGeHgywaah-AL2OZb0QXye_TW6THDh2ddoocv19-vbtv7rzd3V5f3reGClpYKzqVxAzhJqRRQx-NWGyF0b7AYBGPgrOBuWLPBuTXXwuFeSs0tldZYypbo87F3O68nsAZCSXpU2-QnnfYqaq9e3wS_UT_iTvVdXVyPa8H5c0GKv2bIRU0-GxhHHSDOWVFKseSCSfr_KGFdz3pWdYlWx6hJMecE7mUigtUBoKoA1QGgegJYH3z6-x8v8T_EakAeA1C3ufOQVDYeggHrE5iibPT_6v4NiKyqrg</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Salfer, I.J.</creator><creator>Dechow, C.D.</creator><creator>Harvatine, K.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Annual rhythms of milk and milk fat and protein production in dairy cattle in the United States</title><author>Salfer, I.J. ; Dechow, C.D. ; Harvatine, K.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-27448cf9ef82287e4474dac77a6c079733efd74f9b39ffb4a7f0688a4d28dcd23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>annual rhythm</topic><topic>Cattle - genetics</topic><topic>Cattle - physiology</topic><topic>cows</topic><topic>dairy cattle</topic><topic>Dairying</topic><topic>diacylglycerol acyltransferase</topic><topic>Diacylglycerol O-Acyltransferase - genetics</topic><topic>Fats - analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>herds</topic><topic>Lactation - genetics</topic><topic>Lactation - physiology</topic><topic>markets</topic><topic>milk</topic><topic>Milk - chemistry</topic><topic>milk fat</topic><topic>milk proteins</topic><topic>Milk Proteins - analysis</topic><topic>Milk Proteins - biosynthesis</topic><topic>milk synthesis</topic><topic>milk yield</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Pennsylvania</topic><topic>Periodicity</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Genetic</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>protein synthesis</topic><topic>seasonal rhythm</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>summer</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>USDA</topic><topic>winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salfer, I.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dechow, C.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harvatine, K.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salfer, I.J.</au><au>Dechow, C.D.</au><au>Harvatine, K.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Annual rhythms of milk and milk fat and protein production in dairy cattle in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>742</spage><epage>753</epage><pages>742-753</pages><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><abstract>An annual pattern of milk composition has been well recognized in dairy cattle, with the highest milk fat and protein concentration observed during the winter and lowest occurring in the summer; however, rhythms of milk yield and composition have not been well quantified. Cosinor rhythmometry is commonly used to model repeating daily and annual rhythms and allows determination of the amplitude (peak to mean), acrophase (time at peak), and period (time between peaks) of the rhythm. The objective of this study was to use cosinor rhythmometry to characterize the annual rhythms of milk yield and milk fat and protein concentration and yield using both national milk market and cow-level data. First, 10 yr of monthly average milk butterfat and protein concentration for each Federal Milk Marketing Order were obtained from the US Department of Agriculture Agricultural Marketing Service database. Fat and protein concentration fit a cosine function with a 12-mo period in all milk markets. We noted an interaction between milk marketing order and milk fat and protein concentration. The acrophase (time at peak) of the fat concentration rhythm ranged from December 4 to January 19 in all regions, whereas the rhythm of protein concentration peaked between December 27 and January 6. The amplitude (peak to mean) of the annual rhythm ranged from 0.07 to 0.14 percentage points for milk fat and from 0.08 to 0.12 percentage points for milk protein. The amplitude of the milk fat rhythm generally was lower in southern markets and higher in northern markets. Second, the annual rhythm of milk yield and milk fat and protein yield and concentration were analyzed in monthly test day data from 1,684 cows from 11 tiestall herds in Pennsylvania. Fat and protein concentration fit an annual rhythm in all herds, whereas milk and milk fat and protein yield only fit rhythms in 8 of the 11 herds. On average, milk yield peaked in April, fat and protein yield peaked in February, fat concentration peaked in January, and protein concentration peaked in December. Amplitudes of milk, fat, and protein yield averaged 0.82 kg, 55.3 g, and 30.4 g, respectively. Milk fat and protein concentration had average amplitudes of 0.12 and 0.07, respectively, similar to the results of the milk market data. Generally, milk yield and milk components fit annual rhythm regardless of parity or diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1) K232A polymorphism, with only cows of the low-frequency AA genotype (5.2% of total cows) failing to fit rhythm of milk yield. In conclusion, the yearly rhythms of milk yield and fat and protein concentration and yield consistently occur regardless of region, herd, parity, or DGAT1 genotype and supports generation by a conserved endogenous annual rhythm.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30447981</pmid><doi>10.3168/jds.2018-15040</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0302 |
ispartof | Journal of dairy science, 2019-01, Vol.102 (1), p.742-753 |
issn | 0022-0302 1525-3198 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6550460 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Animals annual rhythm Cattle - genetics Cattle - physiology cows dairy cattle Dairying diacylglycerol acyltransferase Diacylglycerol O-Acyltransferase - genetics Fats - analysis Female Genotype herds Lactation - genetics Lactation - physiology markets milk Milk - chemistry milk fat milk proteins Milk Proteins - analysis Milk Proteins - biosynthesis milk synthesis milk yield Parity Pennsylvania Periodicity Polymorphism, Genetic Pregnancy protein synthesis seasonal rhythm Seasons summer United States USDA winter |
title | Annual rhythms of milk and milk fat and protein production in dairy cattle in the United States |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T05%3A38%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Annual%20rhythms%20of%20milk%20and%20milk%20fat%20and%20protein%20production%20in%20dairy%20cattle%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Salfer,%20I.J.&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=742&rft.epage=753&rft.pages=742-753&rft.issn=0022-0302&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.2018-15040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2135636321%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2135636321&rft_id=info:pmid/30447981&rft_els_id=S0022030218310634&rfr_iscdi=true |