The Efficacy of Upfront Intracranial Radiation with TKI Compared to TKI Alone in the NSCLC Patients Harboring EGFR Mutation and Brain Metastases

The high intracranial efficacy of EGFR-TKI challenges the role of upfront intracranial radiation therapy (RT) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutation and brain metastases (BM). Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis to demonstrate the role of upfront RT in these p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Cancer 2019-01, Vol.10 (9), p.1985-1990
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Chunyu, Lu, Xiaotong, Zhou, Zongmei, Wang, Jingbo, Hui, Zhouguang, Liang, Jun, Feng, QinFu, Chen, Dongfu, Xiao, Zefen, Lv, Jima, Wang, Xiaozhen, Wang, Xin, Zhang, Tao, Deng, Lei, Wang, Wenqing, Xiao, Jianping, Li, Junling, Bi, Nan, Wang, Luhua
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1990
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1985
container_title Journal of Cancer
container_volume 10
creator Wang, Chunyu
Lu, Xiaotong
Zhou, Zongmei
Wang, Jingbo
Hui, Zhouguang
Liang, Jun
Feng, QinFu
Chen, Dongfu
Xiao, Zefen
Lv, Jima
Wang, Xiaozhen
Wang, Xin
Zhang, Tao
Deng, Lei
Wang, Wenqing
Xiao, Jianping
Li, Junling
Bi, Nan
Wang, Luhua
description The high intracranial efficacy of EGFR-TKI challenges the role of upfront intracranial radiation therapy (RT) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutation and brain metastases (BM). Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis to demonstrate the role of upfront RT in these patients. Patients that had histologically confirmed NSCLC with EGFR mutation, brain metastases, and received TKI or upfront RT with TKI were included in this study. Intracranial progression was estimated using the Fine-Gray competing risks model. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Log-rank test were used to evaluate and compare intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), systemic PFS (sPFS), time to second-line systematic therapy (SST) and overall survival (OS). Among the 93 patients included, 53 patients received upfront RT and TKI, and 40 patients received TKI only. Upfront RT group showed lower intracranial progression risk with adjusted SHR 0.38 (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.75, = 0.006) and longer median time to sPFS (15.6 vs 8.9 months, = 0.009). There were 9 out of 36 (25%) and 16 out of 34 (47.1%) patients who had oligo-progression received salvage RT in the RT group and TKI group, respectively. After the salvage RT, upfront RT did not prolong the median time to SST (23.6 vs 18.9 months, =0.862) and OS (median time, 35.4 vs 35.8 months, =0.695) compared to TKI alone. Compared to upfront intracranial RT, the salvage RT to oligo-progressive disease allowed patients getting TKI to have similar time on initial TKI and OS despite worse iPFS. The best timing of intracranial RT remains to be further verified.
doi_str_mv 10.7150/jca.30131
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6548172</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2243500038</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-82129b1aab43e24022e17df2134b1ae704ea81aef15ff2d02b66e2e2ea740c1e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkctuUzEQhi0EolXpghdAXsIirW_nkg1SOUrbiBRQSdfWHJ9x4-rEDrYD6lvwyHWaUhXbkseefz5ffkLec3bS8Iqd3hk4kYxL_ooc8lY2k2ldq9cv4gNynNIdK01ORaPkW3IguWBVVbWH5O9yhXRmrTNg7mmw9GZjY_CZzn2OYCJ4ByO9hsFBdsHTPy6v6PLrnHZhvYGIA83hcX02Bo_UeZoL8NvPbtHRH6UEfU70EmIfovO3dHZxfk2vtnkPAz_QLxFK0RVmSGVgekfeWBgTHj_NR-TmfLbsLieL7xfz7mwxMbKp8qQVXEx7DtAriUIxIZA3gxVcqrKLDVMIbQksr6wVAxN9XaMoHRrFDEd5RD7vuZttv8bB4O69o95Et4Z4rwM4_X_Gu5W-Db91XamWN6IAPj4BYvi1xZT12iWD4wgewzZpIZSsdp_eFumnvdTEkFJE-3wMZ3pnoi4m6kcTi_bDy3s9K_9ZJh8AuPuYXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2243500038</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Efficacy of Upfront Intracranial Radiation with TKI Compared to TKI Alone in the NSCLC Patients Harboring EGFR Mutation and Brain Metastases</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Wang, Chunyu ; Lu, Xiaotong ; Zhou, Zongmei ; Wang, Jingbo ; Hui, Zhouguang ; Liang, Jun ; Feng, QinFu ; Chen, Dongfu ; Xiao, Zefen ; Lv, Jima ; Wang, Xiaozhen ; Wang, Xin ; Zhang, Tao ; Deng, Lei ; Wang, Wenqing ; Xiao, Jianping ; Li, Junling ; Bi, Nan ; Wang, Luhua</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chunyu ; Lu, Xiaotong ; Zhou, Zongmei ; Wang, Jingbo ; Hui, Zhouguang ; Liang, Jun ; Feng, QinFu ; Chen, Dongfu ; Xiao, Zefen ; Lv, Jima ; Wang, Xiaozhen ; Wang, Xin ; Zhang, Tao ; Deng, Lei ; Wang, Wenqing ; Xiao, Jianping ; Li, Junling ; Bi, Nan ; Wang, Luhua</creatorcontrib><description>The high intracranial efficacy of EGFR-TKI challenges the role of upfront intracranial radiation therapy (RT) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutation and brain metastases (BM). Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis to demonstrate the role of upfront RT in these patients. Patients that had histologically confirmed NSCLC with EGFR mutation, brain metastases, and received TKI or upfront RT with TKI were included in this study. Intracranial progression was estimated using the Fine-Gray competing risks model. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Log-rank test were used to evaluate and compare intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), systemic PFS (sPFS), time to second-line systematic therapy (SST) and overall survival (OS). Among the 93 patients included, 53 patients received upfront RT and TKI, and 40 patients received TKI only. Upfront RT group showed lower intracranial progression risk with adjusted SHR 0.38 (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.75, = 0.006) and longer median time to sPFS (15.6 vs 8.9 months, = 0.009). There were 9 out of 36 (25%) and 16 out of 34 (47.1%) patients who had oligo-progression received salvage RT in the RT group and TKI group, respectively. After the salvage RT, upfront RT did not prolong the median time to SST (23.6 vs 18.9 months, =0.862) and OS (median time, 35.4 vs 35.8 months, =0.695) compared to TKI alone. Compared to upfront intracranial RT, the salvage RT to oligo-progressive disease allowed patients getting TKI to have similar time on initial TKI and OS despite worse iPFS. The best timing of intracranial RT remains to be further verified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1837-9664</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1837-9664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7150/jca.30131</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31205558</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Ivyspring International Publisher</publisher><subject>Research Paper</subject><ispartof>Journal of Cancer, 2019-01, Vol.10 (9), p.1985-1990</ispartof><rights>Ivyspring International Publisher 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-82129b1aab43e24022e17df2134b1ae704ea81aef15ff2d02b66e2e2ea740c1e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6548172/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6548172/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31205558$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chunyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xiaotong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Zongmei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jingbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hui, Zhouguang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, QinFu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Dongfu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Zefen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Jima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaozhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wenqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Jianping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Junling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bi, Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Luhua</creatorcontrib><title>The Efficacy of Upfront Intracranial Radiation with TKI Compared to TKI Alone in the NSCLC Patients Harboring EGFR Mutation and Brain Metastases</title><title>Journal of Cancer</title><addtitle>J Cancer</addtitle><description>The high intracranial efficacy of EGFR-TKI challenges the role of upfront intracranial radiation therapy (RT) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutation and brain metastases (BM). Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis to demonstrate the role of upfront RT in these patients. Patients that had histologically confirmed NSCLC with EGFR mutation, brain metastases, and received TKI or upfront RT with TKI were included in this study. Intracranial progression was estimated using the Fine-Gray competing risks model. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Log-rank test were used to evaluate and compare intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), systemic PFS (sPFS), time to second-line systematic therapy (SST) and overall survival (OS). Among the 93 patients included, 53 patients received upfront RT and TKI, and 40 patients received TKI only. Upfront RT group showed lower intracranial progression risk with adjusted SHR 0.38 (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.75, = 0.006) and longer median time to sPFS (15.6 vs 8.9 months, = 0.009). There were 9 out of 36 (25%) and 16 out of 34 (47.1%) patients who had oligo-progression received salvage RT in the RT group and TKI group, respectively. After the salvage RT, upfront RT did not prolong the median time to SST (23.6 vs 18.9 months, =0.862) and OS (median time, 35.4 vs 35.8 months, =0.695) compared to TKI alone. Compared to upfront intracranial RT, the salvage RT to oligo-progressive disease allowed patients getting TKI to have similar time on initial TKI and OS despite worse iPFS. The best timing of intracranial RT remains to be further verified.</description><subject>Research Paper</subject><issn>1837-9664</issn><issn>1837-9664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkctuUzEQhi0EolXpghdAXsIirW_nkg1SOUrbiBRQSdfWHJ9x4-rEDrYD6lvwyHWaUhXbkseefz5ffkLec3bS8Iqd3hk4kYxL_ooc8lY2k2ldq9cv4gNynNIdK01ORaPkW3IguWBVVbWH5O9yhXRmrTNg7mmw9GZjY_CZzn2OYCJ4ByO9hsFBdsHTPy6v6PLrnHZhvYGIA83hcX02Bo_UeZoL8NvPbtHRH6UEfU70EmIfovO3dHZxfk2vtnkPAz_QLxFK0RVmSGVgekfeWBgTHj_NR-TmfLbsLieL7xfz7mwxMbKp8qQVXEx7DtAriUIxIZA3gxVcqrKLDVMIbQksr6wVAxN9XaMoHRrFDEd5RD7vuZttv8bB4O69o95Et4Z4rwM4_X_Gu5W-Db91XamWN6IAPj4BYvi1xZT12iWD4wgewzZpIZSsdp_eFumnvdTEkFJE-3wMZ3pnoi4m6kcTi_bDy3s9K_9ZJh8AuPuYXw</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Wang, Chunyu</creator><creator>Lu, Xiaotong</creator><creator>Zhou, Zongmei</creator><creator>Wang, Jingbo</creator><creator>Hui, Zhouguang</creator><creator>Liang, Jun</creator><creator>Feng, QinFu</creator><creator>Chen, Dongfu</creator><creator>Xiao, Zefen</creator><creator>Lv, Jima</creator><creator>Wang, Xiaozhen</creator><creator>Wang, Xin</creator><creator>Zhang, Tao</creator><creator>Deng, Lei</creator><creator>Wang, Wenqing</creator><creator>Xiao, Jianping</creator><creator>Li, Junling</creator><creator>Bi, Nan</creator><creator>Wang, Luhua</creator><general>Ivyspring International Publisher</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>The Efficacy of Upfront Intracranial Radiation with TKI Compared to TKI Alone in the NSCLC Patients Harboring EGFR Mutation and Brain Metastases</title><author>Wang, Chunyu ; Lu, Xiaotong ; Zhou, Zongmei ; Wang, Jingbo ; Hui, Zhouguang ; Liang, Jun ; Feng, QinFu ; Chen, Dongfu ; Xiao, Zefen ; Lv, Jima ; Wang, Xiaozhen ; Wang, Xin ; Zhang, Tao ; Deng, Lei ; Wang, Wenqing ; Xiao, Jianping ; Li, Junling ; Bi, Nan ; Wang, Luhua</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-82129b1aab43e24022e17df2134b1ae704ea81aef15ff2d02b66e2e2ea740c1e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Research Paper</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chunyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xiaotong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Zongmei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jingbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hui, Zhouguang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, QinFu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Dongfu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Zefen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Jima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaozhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wenqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Jianping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Junling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bi, Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Luhua</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Chunyu</au><au>Lu, Xiaotong</au><au>Zhou, Zongmei</au><au>Wang, Jingbo</au><au>Hui, Zhouguang</au><au>Liang, Jun</au><au>Feng, QinFu</au><au>Chen, Dongfu</au><au>Xiao, Zefen</au><au>Lv, Jima</au><au>Wang, Xiaozhen</au><au>Wang, Xin</au><au>Zhang, Tao</au><au>Deng, Lei</au><au>Wang, Wenqing</au><au>Xiao, Jianping</au><au>Li, Junling</au><au>Bi, Nan</au><au>Wang, Luhua</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Efficacy of Upfront Intracranial Radiation with TKI Compared to TKI Alone in the NSCLC Patients Harboring EGFR Mutation and Brain Metastases</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>J Cancer</addtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1985</spage><epage>1990</epage><pages>1985-1990</pages><issn>1837-9664</issn><eissn>1837-9664</eissn><abstract>The high intracranial efficacy of EGFR-TKI challenges the role of upfront intracranial radiation therapy (RT) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutation and brain metastases (BM). Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis to demonstrate the role of upfront RT in these patients. Patients that had histologically confirmed NSCLC with EGFR mutation, brain metastases, and received TKI or upfront RT with TKI were included in this study. Intracranial progression was estimated using the Fine-Gray competing risks model. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Log-rank test were used to evaluate and compare intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), systemic PFS (sPFS), time to second-line systematic therapy (SST) and overall survival (OS). Among the 93 patients included, 53 patients received upfront RT and TKI, and 40 patients received TKI only. Upfront RT group showed lower intracranial progression risk with adjusted SHR 0.38 (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.75, = 0.006) and longer median time to sPFS (15.6 vs 8.9 months, = 0.009). There were 9 out of 36 (25%) and 16 out of 34 (47.1%) patients who had oligo-progression received salvage RT in the RT group and TKI group, respectively. After the salvage RT, upfront RT did not prolong the median time to SST (23.6 vs 18.9 months, =0.862) and OS (median time, 35.4 vs 35.8 months, =0.695) compared to TKI alone. Compared to upfront intracranial RT, the salvage RT to oligo-progressive disease allowed patients getting TKI to have similar time on initial TKI and OS despite worse iPFS. The best timing of intracranial RT remains to be further verified.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Ivyspring International Publisher</pub><pmid>31205558</pmid><doi>10.7150/jca.30131</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1837-9664
ispartof Journal of Cancer, 2019-01, Vol.10 (9), p.1985-1990
issn 1837-9664
1837-9664
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6548172
source PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Research Paper
title The Efficacy of Upfront Intracranial Radiation with TKI Compared to TKI Alone in the NSCLC Patients Harboring EGFR Mutation and Brain Metastases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T10%3A26%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Efficacy%20of%20Upfront%20Intracranial%20Radiation%20with%20TKI%20Compared%20to%20TKI%20Alone%20in%20the%20NSCLC%20Patients%20Harboring%20EGFR%20Mutation%20and%20Brain%20Metastases&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Cancer&rft.au=Wang,%20Chunyu&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1985&rft.epage=1990&rft.pages=1985-1990&rft.issn=1837-9664&rft.eissn=1837-9664&rft_id=info:doi/10.7150/jca.30131&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2243500038%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2243500038&rft_id=info:pmid/31205558&rfr_iscdi=true