Association of Stratification by Dual Enrollment Status With Financial Penalties in the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

IMPORTANCE: Beginning in fiscal year 2019, Medicare’s Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) stratifies hospitals into 5 peer groups based on the proportion of each hospital’s patient population that is dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid. The effect of this policy change is largely unk...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of internal medicine (1960) 2019-06, Vol.179 (6), p.769-776
Hauptverfasser: Joynt Maddox, Karen E, Reidhead, Mat, Qi, Andrew C, Nerenz, David R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 776
container_issue 6
container_start_page 769
container_title Archives of internal medicine (1960)
container_volume 179
creator Joynt Maddox, Karen E
Reidhead, Mat
Qi, Andrew C
Nerenz, David R
description IMPORTANCE: Beginning in fiscal year 2019, Medicare’s Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) stratifies hospitals into 5 peer groups based on the proportion of each hospital’s patient population that is dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid. The effect of this policy change is largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To identify hospital and state characteristics associated with changes in HRRP-related performance and penalties after stratification. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional analysis was performed of all 3049 hospitals participating in the HRRP in fiscal years 2018 and 2019, using publicly available data on hospital penalties, merged with information on hospital characteristics and state Medicaid eligibility cutoffs. EXPOSURES: The HRRP, under the 2018 traditional method and the 2019 stratification method. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Performance on readmissions, as measured by the excess readmissions ratio, and penalties under the HRRP both in relative percentage change and in absolute dollars. RESULTS: The study sample included 3049 hospitals. The mean proportion of dually enrolled beneficiaries ranged from 9.5% in the lowest quintile to 44.7% in the highest quintile. At the hospital level, changes in penalties ranged from an increase of $225 000 to a decrease of more than $436 000 after stratification. In total, hospitals in the lowest quintile of dual enrollment saw an increase of $12 330 157 in penalties, while those in the highest quintile of dual enrollment saw a decrease of $22 445 644. Teaching hospitals (odds ratio [OR], 2.13; 95% CI, 1.76-2.57; P 
doi_str_mv 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0117
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6547154</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>2730354</ama_id><sourcerecordid>2210012351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a464t-73f438f239b658c481c7c1e0f395e188809af2e1eea9887a7411c76992c3d82a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUlvFDEQhVsIRKKQP8ABLHHhMoO3drsvSFEWghSJiEUcrRqPO-OR2x5sN1JO_HWqmTAi-OKlvnryq9c0rxldMkrZuy2M4GN1OY5uveSU9UvKWPekOeZM6YViTD49nKk6ak5L2VJcmlIpxPPmSNBet1qJ4-bXWSnJeqg-RZIG8qVmPA_e7l9W9-RigkAuY04hjC5WJKBOhXz3dUOufISI3YHcugiheleIj6RuHLlOZecrVj47WI--FJQreFlP9o_ybU53GcYXzbMBQnGnD_tJ8-3q8uv59eLm04eP52c3C5BK1kUnBin0wEW_Uq22UjPbWeboIPrWMa017WHgjjkHvdYddJIhofqeW7HWHMRJ836vu5tWODWLTjIEs8t-hHxvEnjzuBL9xtyln0a1smOtRIG3DwI5_ZhcqQZNWRcCRJemYjifs-GiZYi--Q_dpinjfGZKStbSniqkuj1lcyolu-HwGUbNrGUe5WzmnM2cM3a--tfLoe9vqgi83AMocKjyTlCBRn4DP9qyZQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2244150906</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Association of Stratification by Dual Enrollment Status With Financial Penalties in the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program</title><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><creator>Joynt Maddox, Karen E ; Reidhead, Mat ; Qi, Andrew C ; Nerenz, David R</creator><creatorcontrib>Joynt Maddox, Karen E ; Reidhead, Mat ; Qi, Andrew C ; Nerenz, David R</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[IMPORTANCE: Beginning in fiscal year 2019, Medicare’s Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) stratifies hospitals into 5 peer groups based on the proportion of each hospital’s patient population that is dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid. The effect of this policy change is largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To identify hospital and state characteristics associated with changes in HRRP-related performance and penalties after stratification. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional analysis was performed of all 3049 hospitals participating in the HRRP in fiscal years 2018 and 2019, using publicly available data on hospital penalties, merged with information on hospital characteristics and state Medicaid eligibility cutoffs. EXPOSURES: The HRRP, under the 2018 traditional method and the 2019 stratification method. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Performance on readmissions, as measured by the excess readmissions ratio, and penalties under the HRRP both in relative percentage change and in absolute dollars. RESULTS: The study sample included 3049 hospitals. The mean proportion of dually enrolled beneficiaries ranged from 9.5% in the lowest quintile to 44.7% in the highest quintile. At the hospital level, changes in penalties ranged from an increase of $225 000 to a decrease of more than $436 000 after stratification. In total, hospitals in the lowest quintile of dual enrollment saw an increase of $12 330 157 in penalties, while those in the highest quintile of dual enrollment saw a decrease of $22 445 644. Teaching hospitals (odds ratio [OR], 2.13; 95% CI, 1.76-2.57; P < .001) and large hospitals (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.22-1.86; P < .001) had higher odds of receiving a reduced penalty. Not-for-profit hospitals (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.80; P < .001) were less likely to have a penalty reduction than for-profit hospitals, and hospitals in the Midwest (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.34-0.57; P < .001) and South (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.30-0.57; P < .001) were less likely to do so than hospitals in the Northeast. Hospitals with patients from the most disadvantaged neighborhoods (OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 2.03-3.38; P < .001) and those with the highest proportion of beneficiaries with disabilities (OR, 3.12; 95% CI, 2.50-3.90; P < .001) were markedly more likely to see a reduction in penalties, as were hospitals in states with the highest Medicaid eligibility cutoffs (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.50-2.14; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Stratification of the hospitals under the HRRP was associated with a significant shift in penalties for excess readmissions. Policymakers should monitor the association of this change with readmission rates as well as hospital financial performance as the policy is fully implemented.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-6106</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-6114</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0117</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30985863</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Health insurance ; Medicaid ; Medicare ; Online First ; Original Investigation ; Patient admissions</subject><ispartof>Archives of internal medicine (1960), 2019-06, Vol.179 (6), p.769-776</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Medical Association Jun 2019</rights><rights>Copyright 2019 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a464t-73f438f239b658c481c7c1e0f395e188809af2e1eea9887a7411c76992c3d82a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a464t-73f438f239b658c481c7c1e0f395e188809af2e1eea9887a7411c76992c3d82a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/articlepdf/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0117$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0117$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,230,314,778,782,883,3329,27907,27908,76240,76243</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30985863$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Joynt Maddox, Karen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reidhead, Mat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nerenz, David R</creatorcontrib><title>Association of Stratification by Dual Enrollment Status With Financial Penalties in the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program</title><title>Archives of internal medicine (1960)</title><addtitle>JAMA Intern Med</addtitle><description><![CDATA[IMPORTANCE: Beginning in fiscal year 2019, Medicare’s Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) stratifies hospitals into 5 peer groups based on the proportion of each hospital’s patient population that is dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid. The effect of this policy change is largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To identify hospital and state characteristics associated with changes in HRRP-related performance and penalties after stratification. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional analysis was performed of all 3049 hospitals participating in the HRRP in fiscal years 2018 and 2019, using publicly available data on hospital penalties, merged with information on hospital characteristics and state Medicaid eligibility cutoffs. EXPOSURES: The HRRP, under the 2018 traditional method and the 2019 stratification method. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Performance on readmissions, as measured by the excess readmissions ratio, and penalties under the HRRP both in relative percentage change and in absolute dollars. RESULTS: The study sample included 3049 hospitals. The mean proportion of dually enrolled beneficiaries ranged from 9.5% in the lowest quintile to 44.7% in the highest quintile. At the hospital level, changes in penalties ranged from an increase of $225 000 to a decrease of more than $436 000 after stratification. In total, hospitals in the lowest quintile of dual enrollment saw an increase of $12 330 157 in penalties, while those in the highest quintile of dual enrollment saw a decrease of $22 445 644. Teaching hospitals (odds ratio [OR], 2.13; 95% CI, 1.76-2.57; P < .001) and large hospitals (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.22-1.86; P < .001) had higher odds of receiving a reduced penalty. Not-for-profit hospitals (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.80; P < .001) were less likely to have a penalty reduction than for-profit hospitals, and hospitals in the Midwest (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.34-0.57; P < .001) and South (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.30-0.57; P < .001) were less likely to do so than hospitals in the Northeast. Hospitals with patients from the most disadvantaged neighborhoods (OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 2.03-3.38; P < .001) and those with the highest proportion of beneficiaries with disabilities (OR, 3.12; 95% CI, 2.50-3.90; P < .001) were markedly more likely to see a reduction in penalties, as were hospitals in states with the highest Medicaid eligibility cutoffs (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.50-2.14; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Stratification of the hospitals under the HRRP was associated with a significant shift in penalties for excess readmissions. Policymakers should monitor the association of this change with readmission rates as well as hospital financial performance as the policy is fully implemented.]]></description><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Online First</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><subject>Patient admissions</subject><issn>2168-6106</issn><issn>2168-6114</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkUlvFDEQhVsIRKKQP8ABLHHhMoO3drsvSFEWghSJiEUcrRqPO-OR2x5sN1JO_HWqmTAi-OKlvnryq9c0rxldMkrZuy2M4GN1OY5uveSU9UvKWPekOeZM6YViTD49nKk6ak5L2VJcmlIpxPPmSNBet1qJ4-bXWSnJeqg-RZIG8qVmPA_e7l9W9-RigkAuY04hjC5WJKBOhXz3dUOufISI3YHcugiheleIj6RuHLlOZecrVj47WI--FJQreFlP9o_ybU53GcYXzbMBQnGnD_tJ8-3q8uv59eLm04eP52c3C5BK1kUnBin0wEW_Uq22UjPbWeboIPrWMa017WHgjjkHvdYddJIhofqeW7HWHMRJ836vu5tWODWLTjIEs8t-hHxvEnjzuBL9xtyln0a1smOtRIG3DwI5_ZhcqQZNWRcCRJemYjifs-GiZYi--Q_dpinjfGZKStbSniqkuj1lcyolu-HwGUbNrGUe5WzmnM2cM3a--tfLoe9vqgi83AMocKjyTlCBRn4DP9qyZQ</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Joynt Maddox, Karen E</creator><creator>Reidhead, Mat</creator><creator>Qi, Andrew C</creator><creator>Nerenz, David R</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Association of Stratification by Dual Enrollment Status With Financial Penalties in the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program</title><author>Joynt Maddox, Karen E ; Reidhead, Mat ; Qi, Andrew C ; Nerenz, David R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a464t-73f438f239b658c481c7c1e0f395e188809af2e1eea9887a7411c76992c3d82a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Online First</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><topic>Patient admissions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Joynt Maddox, Karen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reidhead, Mat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nerenz, David R</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Archives of internal medicine (1960)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Joynt Maddox, Karen E</au><au>Reidhead, Mat</au><au>Qi, Andrew C</au><au>Nerenz, David R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Association of Stratification by Dual Enrollment Status With Financial Penalties in the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program</atitle><jtitle>Archives of internal medicine (1960)</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Intern Med</addtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>179</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>769</spage><epage>776</epage><pages>769-776</pages><issn>2168-6106</issn><eissn>2168-6114</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[IMPORTANCE: Beginning in fiscal year 2019, Medicare’s Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) stratifies hospitals into 5 peer groups based on the proportion of each hospital’s patient population that is dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid. The effect of this policy change is largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To identify hospital and state characteristics associated with changes in HRRP-related performance and penalties after stratification. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional analysis was performed of all 3049 hospitals participating in the HRRP in fiscal years 2018 and 2019, using publicly available data on hospital penalties, merged with information on hospital characteristics and state Medicaid eligibility cutoffs. EXPOSURES: The HRRP, under the 2018 traditional method and the 2019 stratification method. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Performance on readmissions, as measured by the excess readmissions ratio, and penalties under the HRRP both in relative percentage change and in absolute dollars. RESULTS: The study sample included 3049 hospitals. The mean proportion of dually enrolled beneficiaries ranged from 9.5% in the lowest quintile to 44.7% in the highest quintile. At the hospital level, changes in penalties ranged from an increase of $225 000 to a decrease of more than $436 000 after stratification. In total, hospitals in the lowest quintile of dual enrollment saw an increase of $12 330 157 in penalties, while those in the highest quintile of dual enrollment saw a decrease of $22 445 644. Teaching hospitals (odds ratio [OR], 2.13; 95% CI, 1.76-2.57; P < .001) and large hospitals (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.22-1.86; P < .001) had higher odds of receiving a reduced penalty. Not-for-profit hospitals (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.80; P < .001) were less likely to have a penalty reduction than for-profit hospitals, and hospitals in the Midwest (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.34-0.57; P < .001) and South (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.30-0.57; P < .001) were less likely to do so than hospitals in the Northeast. Hospitals with patients from the most disadvantaged neighborhoods (OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 2.03-3.38; P < .001) and those with the highest proportion of beneficiaries with disabilities (OR, 3.12; 95% CI, 2.50-3.90; P < .001) were markedly more likely to see a reduction in penalties, as were hospitals in states with the highest Medicaid eligibility cutoffs (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.50-2.14; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Stratification of the hospitals under the HRRP was associated with a significant shift in penalties for excess readmissions. Policymakers should monitor the association of this change with readmission rates as well as hospital financial performance as the policy is fully implemented.]]></abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>30985863</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0117</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-6106
ispartof Archives of internal medicine (1960), 2019-06, Vol.179 (6), p.769-776
issn 2168-6106
2168-6114
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6547154
source American Medical Association Journals
subjects Health insurance
Medicaid
Medicare
Online First
Original Investigation
Patient admissions
title Association of Stratification by Dual Enrollment Status With Financial Penalties in the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T21%3A05%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Association%20of%20Stratification%20by%20Dual%20Enrollment%20Status%20With%20Financial%20Penalties%20in%20the%20Hospital%20Readmissions%20Reduction%20Program&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20internal%20medicine%20(1960)&rft.au=Joynt%20Maddox,%20Karen%20E&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=179&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=769&rft.epage=776&rft.pages=769-776&rft.issn=2168-6106&rft.eissn=2168-6114&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0117&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2210012351%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2244150906&rft_id=info:pmid/30985863&rft_ama_id=2730354&rfr_iscdi=true