Implementing Systematic Screening and Structured Care for Distressed Callers Using Cancer Council's Telephone Services: Protocol for a Randomized Stepped-Wedge Trial

Structured distress management, comprised a 2-stage screening and referral model, can direct supportive care resources toward individuals who are most likely to benefit. This structured approach has yet to be trialed in Australian community-based services such as Cancer Council New South Wales (NSW)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JMIR research protocols 2019-05, Vol.8 (5), p.e12473-e12473
Hauptverfasser: Fradgley, Elizabeth A, Boltong, Anna, O'Brien, Lorna, Boyes, Allison W, Lane, Katherine, Beattie, Annette, Clinton-McHarg, Tara, Jacobsen, Paul B, Doran, Christopher, Barker, Daniel, Roach, Della, Taylor, Jo, Paul, Christine L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e12473
container_issue 5
container_start_page e12473
container_title JMIR research protocols
container_volume 8
creator Fradgley, Elizabeth A
Boltong, Anna
O'Brien, Lorna
Boyes, Allison W
Lane, Katherine
Beattie, Annette
Clinton-McHarg, Tara
Jacobsen, Paul B
Doran, Christopher
Barker, Daniel
Roach, Della
Taylor, Jo
Paul, Christine L
description Structured distress management, comprised a 2-stage screening and referral model, can direct supportive care resources toward individuals who are most likely to benefit. This structured approach has yet to be trialed in Australian community-based services such as Cancer Council New South Wales (NSW) and Victoria Cancer Information and Support (CIS) 13 11 20 lines who care for a large community of cancer patients and caregivers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of structured screening and referral in (1) increasing the proportion of distressed CIS callers who accept supportive care referrals and (2) reducing distress levels at 6-month follow-up. In this stepped-wedge trial, Cancer Council NSW and Victoria CIS consultants are randomized to deliver structured care during inbound 13 11 20 calls in accordance with 3 intervention periods. Eligible callers are patients or caregivers who score 4 or more on the Distress Thermometer; NSW or Victorian residents; aged 18 years or older; and English proficient. Study data are collected via computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATIs) at 3- and 6-month follow-up and CIS record audit. CATIs include demographic and service use items and the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) to assess distress. An economic analysis of the structured care model will be completed. The structured care model was developed by guideline review and identification of service characteristics to guide mapping decisions; place-card methodology; and clinical vignettes with think-aloud methodology to confirm referral appropriateness. The model includes an additional screening tool (Patient Health Questionnaire-4) and a referral model with 16-20 CIS services. Descriptive statistics will be used to assess referral uptake rates. Differences between GHQ-28 scores for structured and usual care callers will be tested using a generalized linear mixed model with fixed effects for intervention and each time period. The trial will recruit 1512 callers. The sample size will provide the study with approximately 80% power to detect a difference of 0.3 SD in the mean score of the GHQ-28 at an alpha level of .05 and assuming an intra-cluster correlation of .04. A random sample of recorded calls will be reviewed to assess intervention fidelity and contamination. To date, 1835 distressed callers have been invited to participate with 60.71% (1114/1835) enrolled in the study. A total of 692 participants have completed 6-month CATIs. Recruitme
doi_str_mv 10.2196/12473
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6542249</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2508658577</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-c7d2055d4ebcde704f5e6f71c89e25848f261596fabff967374fb51a1ae230503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkd9uFCEUxidGY5u6r2BIjNGbUWAGGLwwMeO_Jk007jZeEpY5bGkYmMJMk_o-vqfstjZVbiCHH9_5Dl9VrQh-Q4nkbwltRfOoOiaSyhqLtnv84HxUrXK-xGV1QkjKn1ZHDcFSNi05rn6fjpOHEcLswg6tb_IMo56dQWuTAMK-qMOA1nNazLwkGFCvEyAbE_ro8pwg50PNe0gZnef9g14HAwn1cQnG-VcZbcDDdBEDoDWka2cgv0PfU5yjif4gpdGP0iWO7hfse8E0wVD_hGEHaJOc9s-qJ1b7DKu7_aQ6__xp03-tz759Oe0_nNWm4XiujRgoZmxoYWsGELi1DLgVxHQSKOvazlJOmORWb62VXDSitVtGNNFAG8xwc1K9v9Wdlu0IgynfkrRXU3KjTjcqaqf-vQnuQu3iteKspbSVReD1nUCKVwvkWY0uG_BeB4hLVpQ2xSEvZgr64j_0Mi4plPEUZbjjrGNCFOrlLWVSzDmBvTdDsNpnrw7ZF-75Q-f31N-kmz9_Gatu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2508658577</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementing Systematic Screening and Structured Care for Distressed Callers Using Cancer Council's Telephone Services: Protocol for a Randomized Stepped-Wedge Trial</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Fradgley, Elizabeth A ; Boltong, Anna ; O'Brien, Lorna ; Boyes, Allison W ; Lane, Katherine ; Beattie, Annette ; Clinton-McHarg, Tara ; Jacobsen, Paul B ; Doran, Christopher ; Barker, Daniel ; Roach, Della ; Taylor, Jo ; Paul, Christine L</creator><creatorcontrib>Fradgley, Elizabeth A ; Boltong, Anna ; O'Brien, Lorna ; Boyes, Allison W ; Lane, Katherine ; Beattie, Annette ; Clinton-McHarg, Tara ; Jacobsen, Paul B ; Doran, Christopher ; Barker, Daniel ; Roach, Della ; Taylor, Jo ; Paul, Christine L</creatorcontrib><description>Structured distress management, comprised a 2-stage screening and referral model, can direct supportive care resources toward individuals who are most likely to benefit. This structured approach has yet to be trialed in Australian community-based services such as Cancer Council New South Wales (NSW) and Victoria Cancer Information and Support (CIS) 13 11 20 lines who care for a large community of cancer patients and caregivers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of structured screening and referral in (1) increasing the proportion of distressed CIS callers who accept supportive care referrals and (2) reducing distress levels at 6-month follow-up. In this stepped-wedge trial, Cancer Council NSW and Victoria CIS consultants are randomized to deliver structured care during inbound 13 11 20 calls in accordance with 3 intervention periods. Eligible callers are patients or caregivers who score 4 or more on the Distress Thermometer; NSW or Victorian residents; aged 18 years or older; and English proficient. Study data are collected via computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATIs) at 3- and 6-month follow-up and CIS record audit. CATIs include demographic and service use items and the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) to assess distress. An economic analysis of the structured care model will be completed. The structured care model was developed by guideline review and identification of service characteristics to guide mapping decisions; place-card methodology; and clinical vignettes with think-aloud methodology to confirm referral appropriateness. The model includes an additional screening tool (Patient Health Questionnaire-4) and a referral model with 16-20 CIS services. Descriptive statistics will be used to assess referral uptake rates. Differences between GHQ-28 scores for structured and usual care callers will be tested using a generalized linear mixed model with fixed effects for intervention and each time period. The trial will recruit 1512 callers. The sample size will provide the study with approximately 80% power to detect a difference of 0.3 SD in the mean score of the GHQ-28 at an alpha level of .05 and assuming an intra-cluster correlation of .04. A random sample of recorded calls will be reviewed to assess intervention fidelity and contamination. To date, 1835 distressed callers have been invited to participate with 60.71% (1114/1835) enrolled in the study. A total of 692 participants have completed 6-month CATIs. Recruitment is anticipated to end in late 2019. This trial is among the first to rigorously test the outcomes of a community-based structured approach to distress management. The model is evidence-informed, practice-ready, and trialed in a real-world setting. The study outcomes will advance the understanding of distress management internationally for both patients and caregivers. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12617000352303; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372105&amp;isReview=true (Archived by WebCite on http://www.webcitation.org/78AW0Ba09). DERR1-10.2196/12473.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1929-0748</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1929-0748</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2196/12473</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31099341</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: JMIR Publications</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Caregivers ; Clinical outcomes ; Consent ; Consultants ; Councils ; Oncology ; Patients ; Protocol ; Questionnaires ; Workshops</subject><ispartof>JMIR research protocols, 2019-05, Vol.8 (5), p.e12473-e12473</ispartof><rights>Elizabeth A Fradgley, Anna Boltong, Lorna O'Brien, Allison W Boyes, Katherine Lane, Annette Beattie, Tara Clinton-McHarg, Paul B Jacobsen, Christopher Doran, Daniel Barker, Della Roach, Jo Taylor, Christine L Paul. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 16.05.2019.</rights><rights>2019. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Elizabeth A Fradgley, Anna Boltong, Lorna O'Brien, Allison W Boyes, Katherine Lane, Annette Beattie, Tara Clinton-McHarg, Paul B Jacobsen, Christopher Doran, Daniel Barker, Della Roach, Jo Taylor, Christine L Paul. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 16.05.2019. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-c7d2055d4ebcde704f5e6f71c89e25848f261596fabff967374fb51a1ae230503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-c7d2055d4ebcde704f5e6f71c89e25848f261596fabff967374fb51a1ae230503</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4427-8800 ; 0000-0002-9021-5579 ; 0000-0001-7346-3805 ; 0000-0002-3987-3007 ; 0000-0001-9258-1372 ; 0000-0001-7702-7322 ; 0000-0003-1721-0533 ; 0000-0002-9009-4906 ; 0000-0001-5833-7376 ; 0000-0002-2555-8110 ; 0000-0002-0504-5246 ; 0000-0002-9707-4465 ; 0000-0003-3535-2885</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6542249/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6542249/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31099341$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fradgley, Elizabeth A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boltong, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Lorna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyes, Allison W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beattie, Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clinton-McHarg, Tara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Paul B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doran, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barker, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roach, Della</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, Christine L</creatorcontrib><title>Implementing Systematic Screening and Structured Care for Distressed Callers Using Cancer Council's Telephone Services: Protocol for a Randomized Stepped-Wedge Trial</title><title>JMIR research protocols</title><addtitle>JMIR Res Protoc</addtitle><description>Structured distress management, comprised a 2-stage screening and referral model, can direct supportive care resources toward individuals who are most likely to benefit. This structured approach has yet to be trialed in Australian community-based services such as Cancer Council New South Wales (NSW) and Victoria Cancer Information and Support (CIS) 13 11 20 lines who care for a large community of cancer patients and caregivers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of structured screening and referral in (1) increasing the proportion of distressed CIS callers who accept supportive care referrals and (2) reducing distress levels at 6-month follow-up. In this stepped-wedge trial, Cancer Council NSW and Victoria CIS consultants are randomized to deliver structured care during inbound 13 11 20 calls in accordance with 3 intervention periods. Eligible callers are patients or caregivers who score 4 or more on the Distress Thermometer; NSW or Victorian residents; aged 18 years or older; and English proficient. Study data are collected via computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATIs) at 3- and 6-month follow-up and CIS record audit. CATIs include demographic and service use items and the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) to assess distress. An economic analysis of the structured care model will be completed. The structured care model was developed by guideline review and identification of service characteristics to guide mapping decisions; place-card methodology; and clinical vignettes with think-aloud methodology to confirm referral appropriateness. The model includes an additional screening tool (Patient Health Questionnaire-4) and a referral model with 16-20 CIS services. Descriptive statistics will be used to assess referral uptake rates. Differences between GHQ-28 scores for structured and usual care callers will be tested using a generalized linear mixed model with fixed effects for intervention and each time period. The trial will recruit 1512 callers. The sample size will provide the study with approximately 80% power to detect a difference of 0.3 SD in the mean score of the GHQ-28 at an alpha level of .05 and assuming an intra-cluster correlation of .04. A random sample of recorded calls will be reviewed to assess intervention fidelity and contamination. To date, 1835 distressed callers have been invited to participate with 60.71% (1114/1835) enrolled in the study. A total of 692 participants have completed 6-month CATIs. Recruitment is anticipated to end in late 2019. This trial is among the first to rigorously test the outcomes of a community-based structured approach to distress management. The model is evidence-informed, practice-ready, and trialed in a real-world setting. The study outcomes will advance the understanding of distress management internationally for both patients and caregivers. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12617000352303; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372105&amp;isReview=true (Archived by WebCite on http://www.webcitation.org/78AW0Ba09). DERR1-10.2196/12473.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Consultants</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Protocol</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Workshops</subject><issn>1929-0748</issn><issn>1929-0748</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkd9uFCEUxidGY5u6r2BIjNGbUWAGGLwwMeO_Jk007jZeEpY5bGkYmMJMk_o-vqfstjZVbiCHH9_5Dl9VrQh-Q4nkbwltRfOoOiaSyhqLtnv84HxUrXK-xGV1QkjKn1ZHDcFSNi05rn6fjpOHEcLswg6tb_IMo56dQWuTAMK-qMOA1nNazLwkGFCvEyAbE_ro8pwg50PNe0gZnef9g14HAwn1cQnG-VcZbcDDdBEDoDWka2cgv0PfU5yjif4gpdGP0iWO7hfse8E0wVD_hGEHaJOc9s-qJ1b7DKu7_aQ6__xp03-tz759Oe0_nNWm4XiujRgoZmxoYWsGELi1DLgVxHQSKOvazlJOmORWb62VXDSitVtGNNFAG8xwc1K9v9Wdlu0IgynfkrRXU3KjTjcqaqf-vQnuQu3iteKspbSVReD1nUCKVwvkWY0uG_BeB4hLVpQ2xSEvZgr64j_0Mi4plPEUZbjjrGNCFOrlLWVSzDmBvTdDsNpnrw7ZF-75Q-f31N-kmz9_Gatu</recordid><startdate>20190516</startdate><enddate>20190516</enddate><creator>Fradgley, Elizabeth A</creator><creator>Boltong, Anna</creator><creator>O'Brien, Lorna</creator><creator>Boyes, Allison W</creator><creator>Lane, Katherine</creator><creator>Beattie, Annette</creator><creator>Clinton-McHarg, Tara</creator><creator>Jacobsen, Paul B</creator><creator>Doran, Christopher</creator><creator>Barker, Daniel</creator><creator>Roach, Della</creator><creator>Taylor, Jo</creator><creator>Paul, Christine L</creator><general>JMIR Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4427-8800</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9021-5579</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7346-3805</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3987-3007</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9258-1372</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7702-7322</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1721-0533</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9009-4906</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5833-7376</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2555-8110</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0504-5246</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9707-4465</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3535-2885</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190516</creationdate><title>Implementing Systematic Screening and Structured Care for Distressed Callers Using Cancer Council's Telephone Services: Protocol for a Randomized Stepped-Wedge Trial</title><author>Fradgley, Elizabeth A ; Boltong, Anna ; O'Brien, Lorna ; Boyes, Allison W ; Lane, Katherine ; Beattie, Annette ; Clinton-McHarg, Tara ; Jacobsen, Paul B ; Doran, Christopher ; Barker, Daniel ; Roach, Della ; Taylor, Jo ; Paul, Christine L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-c7d2055d4ebcde704f5e6f71c89e25848f261596fabff967374fb51a1ae230503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Consultants</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Protocol</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Workshops</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fradgley, Elizabeth A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boltong, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Lorna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyes, Allison W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beattie, Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clinton-McHarg, Tara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Paul B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doran, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barker, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roach, Della</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, Christine L</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JMIR research protocols</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fradgley, Elizabeth A</au><au>Boltong, Anna</au><au>O'Brien, Lorna</au><au>Boyes, Allison W</au><au>Lane, Katherine</au><au>Beattie, Annette</au><au>Clinton-McHarg, Tara</au><au>Jacobsen, Paul B</au><au>Doran, Christopher</au><au>Barker, Daniel</au><au>Roach, Della</au><au>Taylor, Jo</au><au>Paul, Christine L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementing Systematic Screening and Structured Care for Distressed Callers Using Cancer Council's Telephone Services: Protocol for a Randomized Stepped-Wedge Trial</atitle><jtitle>JMIR research protocols</jtitle><addtitle>JMIR Res Protoc</addtitle><date>2019-05-16</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e12473</spage><epage>e12473</epage><pages>e12473-e12473</pages><issn>1929-0748</issn><eissn>1929-0748</eissn><abstract>Structured distress management, comprised a 2-stage screening and referral model, can direct supportive care resources toward individuals who are most likely to benefit. This structured approach has yet to be trialed in Australian community-based services such as Cancer Council New South Wales (NSW) and Victoria Cancer Information and Support (CIS) 13 11 20 lines who care for a large community of cancer patients and caregivers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of structured screening and referral in (1) increasing the proportion of distressed CIS callers who accept supportive care referrals and (2) reducing distress levels at 6-month follow-up. In this stepped-wedge trial, Cancer Council NSW and Victoria CIS consultants are randomized to deliver structured care during inbound 13 11 20 calls in accordance with 3 intervention periods. Eligible callers are patients or caregivers who score 4 or more on the Distress Thermometer; NSW or Victorian residents; aged 18 years or older; and English proficient. Study data are collected via computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATIs) at 3- and 6-month follow-up and CIS record audit. CATIs include demographic and service use items and the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) to assess distress. An economic analysis of the structured care model will be completed. The structured care model was developed by guideline review and identification of service characteristics to guide mapping decisions; place-card methodology; and clinical vignettes with think-aloud methodology to confirm referral appropriateness. The model includes an additional screening tool (Patient Health Questionnaire-4) and a referral model with 16-20 CIS services. Descriptive statistics will be used to assess referral uptake rates. Differences between GHQ-28 scores for structured and usual care callers will be tested using a generalized linear mixed model with fixed effects for intervention and each time period. The trial will recruit 1512 callers. The sample size will provide the study with approximately 80% power to detect a difference of 0.3 SD in the mean score of the GHQ-28 at an alpha level of .05 and assuming an intra-cluster correlation of .04. A random sample of recorded calls will be reviewed to assess intervention fidelity and contamination. To date, 1835 distressed callers have been invited to participate with 60.71% (1114/1835) enrolled in the study. A total of 692 participants have completed 6-month CATIs. Recruitment is anticipated to end in late 2019. This trial is among the first to rigorously test the outcomes of a community-based structured approach to distress management. The model is evidence-informed, practice-ready, and trialed in a real-world setting. The study outcomes will advance the understanding of distress management internationally for both patients and caregivers. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12617000352303; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372105&amp;isReview=true (Archived by WebCite on http://www.webcitation.org/78AW0Ba09). DERR1-10.2196/12473.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>JMIR Publications</pub><pmid>31099341</pmid><doi>10.2196/12473</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4427-8800</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9021-5579</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7346-3805</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3987-3007</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9258-1372</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7702-7322</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1721-0533</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9009-4906</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5833-7376</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2555-8110</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0504-5246</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9707-4465</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3535-2885</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1929-0748
ispartof JMIR research protocols, 2019-05, Vol.8 (5), p.e12473-e12473
issn 1929-0748
1929-0748
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6542249
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Cancer
Caregivers
Clinical outcomes
Consent
Consultants
Councils
Oncology
Patients
Protocol
Questionnaires
Workshops
title Implementing Systematic Screening and Structured Care for Distressed Callers Using Cancer Council's Telephone Services: Protocol for a Randomized Stepped-Wedge Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T14%3A14%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementing%20Systematic%20Screening%20and%20Structured%20Care%20for%20Distressed%20Callers%20Using%20Cancer%20Council's%20Telephone%20Services:%20Protocol%20for%20a%20Randomized%20Stepped-Wedge%20Trial&rft.jtitle=JMIR%20research%20protocols&rft.au=Fradgley,%20Elizabeth%20A&rft.date=2019-05-16&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e12473&rft.epage=e12473&rft.pages=e12473-e12473&rft.issn=1929-0748&rft.eissn=1929-0748&rft_id=info:doi/10.2196/12473&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2508658577%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2508658577&rft_id=info:pmid/31099341&rfr_iscdi=true