Pilot study evaluating the monitoring of canine diabetes mellitus in primary care practice

ObjectivesThis study aimed to describe how canine diabetes mellitus (CDM) is monitored in primary care practice (PCP) and to report outcomes.DesignRetrospective case review.SettingPCP.Participants40 dogs of 22 different pedigrees and five crossbreeds. Median age at diagnosis was nine years and six m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary record open 2019-01, Vol.6 (1), p.e000250-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Cartwright, Jennifer Ann, Cobb, Malcolm, Dunning, Mark D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 1
container_start_page e000250
container_title Veterinary record open
container_volume 6
creator Cartwright, Jennifer Ann
Cobb, Malcolm
Dunning, Mark D
description ObjectivesThis study aimed to describe how canine diabetes mellitus (CDM) is monitored in primary care practice (PCP) and to report outcomes.DesignRetrospective case review.SettingPCP.Participants40 dogs of 22 different pedigrees and five crossbreeds. Median age at diagnosis was nine years and six months (eight years six months to 10 years five months). Dogs were diagnosed with CDM between January 1, 2008 and December 30, 2012 and remained with the practice to the study end or until death.Primary and secondary outcome measuresStability achievement and death or euthanasia. Consultations for each dog were identified and recorded through records collected from the PCP (January 1, 2008 to December 30, 2012).ResultsA median of three consultations per dog occurred in the first month, subsequently falling to a median of one consultation every 19 days thereafter. After the first month postdiagnosis, weight and single blood glucose concentrations were most frequently recorded at 66.8 and 42 per cent of consultations respectively and a blood glucose curve was performed infrequently (17.4 per cent). Serum biochemistry was measured at 8 per cent of consultations and urine culture at only 0.8 per cent. Median survival time (MST) for all dogs was eight months (2–21 months). Eighteen dogs stabilised within three months of diagnosis and their MST was 20.5 months, (10.25–25.75 months), significantly longer than the 22 dogs not achieving stability within three months (MST 2.5 months, 0–5.5 months) (P
doi_str_mv 10.1136/vetreco-2017-000250
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6541103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2242187693</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5532-e062f4386f583e15d7c8a0aab43394514ba3bd26dc3204ec760de652f6ca74c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1LHTEQhkNpqWL9BYUS6E1vVvOxye6BUlDxCwRF1AtvQjY7qznsJppkj5x_b5Y9Fdsrr5JhnvdlZl6EvlOyRymX-ytIAYwvGKFVQQhhgnxC24wIVsgMfH7330K7MS4zk3WU19VXtMVp7laMbaP7K9v7hGMa2zWGle5Hnax7wOkR8OCdTT5Mpe-w0c46wK3VDSSIeIC-t2mM2Dr8FOygwzozAXKhTbIGvqEvne4j7G7eHXR7cnxzdFZcXJ6eHx1cFI0QnBVAJOtKXstO1ByoaCtTa6J1U3K-KAUtG82blsnWcEZKMJUkLUjBOml0VRrOd9Cf2fdpbAZoDbgUdK82Mymvrfq34-yjevArJUVJKZkMfm0Mgn8eISY12GjyetqBH6NirGS0ruRiQn_-hy79GFxeL1NsUVeLfORM8ZkywccYoHsbhhI1xac28akpPjXHl1U_3u_xpvkbVgZ-z8CL7WH9EU91d33JDk9y9GSS783yZlh-aKBXyyy52w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2229879136</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pilot study evaluating the monitoring of canine diabetes mellitus in primary care practice</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cartwright, Jennifer Ann ; Cobb, Malcolm ; Dunning, Mark D</creator><creatorcontrib>Cartwright, Jennifer Ann ; Cobb, Malcolm ; Dunning, Mark D</creatorcontrib><description>ObjectivesThis study aimed to describe how canine diabetes mellitus (CDM) is monitored in primary care practice (PCP) and to report outcomes.DesignRetrospective case review.SettingPCP.Participants40 dogs of 22 different pedigrees and five crossbreeds. Median age at diagnosis was nine years and six months (eight years six months to 10 years five months). Dogs were diagnosed with CDM between January 1, 2008 and December 30, 2012 and remained with the practice to the study end or until death.Primary and secondary outcome measuresStability achievement and death or euthanasia. Consultations for each dog were identified and recorded through records collected from the PCP (January 1, 2008 to December 30, 2012).ResultsA median of three consultations per dog occurred in the first month, subsequently falling to a median of one consultation every 19 days thereafter. After the first month postdiagnosis, weight and single blood glucose concentrations were most frequently recorded at 66.8 and 42 per cent of consultations respectively and a blood glucose curve was performed infrequently (17.4 per cent). Serum biochemistry was measured at 8 per cent of consultations and urine culture at only 0.8 per cent. Median survival time (MST) for all dogs was eight months (2–21 months). Eighteen dogs stabilised within three months of diagnosis and their MST was 20.5 months, (10.25–25.75 months), significantly longer than the 22 dogs not achieving stability within three months (MST 2.5 months, 0–5.5 months) (P&lt;0.001). Those dogs not surviving beyond the first month had significantly fewer consultations than those still alive (P&lt;0.005).ConclusionsThis pilot study indicates dogs with CDM managed solely in PCP experience limited monitoring tests and have lower MST than reported in the literature. Recruitment of a larger cohort of CDM cases from a larger number of PCP will help determine whether these results accurately represent this demographic and verify if infrequent testing is associated with a poor outcome. Importantly, prospective evaluation of decision-making around monitoring CDM in PCP is required, to help determine the effectiveness and feasibility of more frequent monitoring strategies, such as those recommended by the American Animal Hospital Association, particularly to influence MST.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2052-6113</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2399-2050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2052-6113</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/vetreco-2017-000250</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31205722</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: British Veterinary Association</publisher><subject>Companion or Pet Animals ; Diabetes ; Dogs ; fructosamine ; Glucose ; Insulin ; Laboratory animals ; Primary care ; Studies ; Survival analysis</subject><ispartof>Veterinary record open, 2019-01, Vol.6 (1), p.e000250-n/a</ispartof><rights>British Veterinary Association 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>British Veterinary Association 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC 4.0</rights><rights>2019 British Veterinary Association 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>British Veterinary Association 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5532-e062f4386f583e15d7c8a0aab43394514ba3bd26dc3204ec760de652f6ca74c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5532-e062f4386f583e15d7c8a0aab43394514ba3bd26dc3204ec760de652f6ca74c33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1143-9011</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6541103/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6541103/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,11562,27924,27925,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31205722$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cartwright, Jennifer Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cobb, Malcolm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunning, Mark D</creatorcontrib><title>Pilot study evaluating the monitoring of canine diabetes mellitus in primary care practice</title><title>Veterinary record open</title><addtitle>Vet Rec Open</addtitle><description>ObjectivesThis study aimed to describe how canine diabetes mellitus (CDM) is monitored in primary care practice (PCP) and to report outcomes.DesignRetrospective case review.SettingPCP.Participants40 dogs of 22 different pedigrees and five crossbreeds. Median age at diagnosis was nine years and six months (eight years six months to 10 years five months). Dogs were diagnosed with CDM between January 1, 2008 and December 30, 2012 and remained with the practice to the study end or until death.Primary and secondary outcome measuresStability achievement and death or euthanasia. Consultations for each dog were identified and recorded through records collected from the PCP (January 1, 2008 to December 30, 2012).ResultsA median of three consultations per dog occurred in the first month, subsequently falling to a median of one consultation every 19 days thereafter. After the first month postdiagnosis, weight and single blood glucose concentrations were most frequently recorded at 66.8 and 42 per cent of consultations respectively and a blood glucose curve was performed infrequently (17.4 per cent). Serum biochemistry was measured at 8 per cent of consultations and urine culture at only 0.8 per cent. Median survival time (MST) for all dogs was eight months (2–21 months). Eighteen dogs stabilised within three months of diagnosis and their MST was 20.5 months, (10.25–25.75 months), significantly longer than the 22 dogs not achieving stability within three months (MST 2.5 months, 0–5.5 months) (P&lt;0.001). Those dogs not surviving beyond the first month had significantly fewer consultations than those still alive (P&lt;0.005).ConclusionsThis pilot study indicates dogs with CDM managed solely in PCP experience limited monitoring tests and have lower MST than reported in the literature. Recruitment of a larger cohort of CDM cases from a larger number of PCP will help determine whether these results accurately represent this demographic and verify if infrequent testing is associated with a poor outcome. Importantly, prospective evaluation of decision-making around monitoring CDM in PCP is required, to help determine the effectiveness and feasibility of more frequent monitoring strategies, such as those recommended by the American Animal Hospital Association, particularly to influence MST.</description><subject>Companion or Pet Animals</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>fructosamine</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Insulin</subject><subject>Laboratory animals</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><issn>2052-6113</issn><issn>2399-2050</issn><issn>2052-6113</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1LHTEQhkNpqWL9BYUS6E1vVvOxye6BUlDxCwRF1AtvQjY7qznsJppkj5x_b5Y9Fdsrr5JhnvdlZl6EvlOyRymX-ytIAYwvGKFVQQhhgnxC24wIVsgMfH7330K7MS4zk3WU19VXtMVp7laMbaP7K9v7hGMa2zWGle5Hnax7wOkR8OCdTT5Mpe-w0c46wK3VDSSIeIC-t2mM2Dr8FOygwzozAXKhTbIGvqEvne4j7G7eHXR7cnxzdFZcXJ6eHx1cFI0QnBVAJOtKXstO1ByoaCtTa6J1U3K-KAUtG82blsnWcEZKMJUkLUjBOml0VRrOd9Cf2fdpbAZoDbgUdK82Mymvrfq34-yjevArJUVJKZkMfm0Mgn8eISY12GjyetqBH6NirGS0ruRiQn_-hy79GFxeL1NsUVeLfORM8ZkywccYoHsbhhI1xac28akpPjXHl1U_3u_xpvkbVgZ-z8CL7WH9EU91d33JDk9y9GSS783yZlh-aKBXyyy52w</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Cartwright, Jennifer Ann</creator><creator>Cobb, Malcolm</creator><creator>Dunning, Mark D</creator><general>British Veterinary Association</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1143-9011</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Pilot study evaluating the monitoring of canine diabetes mellitus in primary care practice</title><author>Cartwright, Jennifer Ann ; Cobb, Malcolm ; Dunning, Mark D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b5532-e062f4386f583e15d7c8a0aab43394514ba3bd26dc3204ec760de652f6ca74c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Companion or Pet Animals</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>fructosamine</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Insulin</topic><topic>Laboratory animals</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cartwright, Jennifer Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cobb, Malcolm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunning, Mark D</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Veterinary record open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cartwright, Jennifer Ann</au><au>Cobb, Malcolm</au><au>Dunning, Mark D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pilot study evaluating the monitoring of canine diabetes mellitus in primary care practice</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary record open</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Rec Open</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e000250</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e000250-n/a</pages><issn>2052-6113</issn><issn>2399-2050</issn><eissn>2052-6113</eissn><abstract>ObjectivesThis study aimed to describe how canine diabetes mellitus (CDM) is monitored in primary care practice (PCP) and to report outcomes.DesignRetrospective case review.SettingPCP.Participants40 dogs of 22 different pedigrees and five crossbreeds. Median age at diagnosis was nine years and six months (eight years six months to 10 years five months). Dogs were diagnosed with CDM between January 1, 2008 and December 30, 2012 and remained with the practice to the study end or until death.Primary and secondary outcome measuresStability achievement and death or euthanasia. Consultations for each dog were identified and recorded through records collected from the PCP (January 1, 2008 to December 30, 2012).ResultsA median of three consultations per dog occurred in the first month, subsequently falling to a median of one consultation every 19 days thereafter. After the first month postdiagnosis, weight and single blood glucose concentrations were most frequently recorded at 66.8 and 42 per cent of consultations respectively and a blood glucose curve was performed infrequently (17.4 per cent). Serum biochemistry was measured at 8 per cent of consultations and urine culture at only 0.8 per cent. Median survival time (MST) for all dogs was eight months (2–21 months). Eighteen dogs stabilised within three months of diagnosis and their MST was 20.5 months, (10.25–25.75 months), significantly longer than the 22 dogs not achieving stability within three months (MST 2.5 months, 0–5.5 months) (P&lt;0.001). Those dogs not surviving beyond the first month had significantly fewer consultations than those still alive (P&lt;0.005).ConclusionsThis pilot study indicates dogs with CDM managed solely in PCP experience limited monitoring tests and have lower MST than reported in the literature. Recruitment of a larger cohort of CDM cases from a larger number of PCP will help determine whether these results accurately represent this demographic and verify if infrequent testing is associated with a poor outcome. Importantly, prospective evaluation of decision-making around monitoring CDM in PCP is required, to help determine the effectiveness and feasibility of more frequent monitoring strategies, such as those recommended by the American Animal Hospital Association, particularly to influence MST.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>British Veterinary Association</pub><pmid>31205722</pmid><doi>10.1136/vetreco-2017-000250</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1143-9011</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2052-6113
ispartof Veterinary record open, 2019-01, Vol.6 (1), p.e000250-n/a
issn 2052-6113
2399-2050
2052-6113
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6541103
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Companion or Pet Animals
Diabetes
Dogs
fructosamine
Glucose
Insulin
Laboratory animals
Primary care
Studies
Survival analysis
title Pilot study evaluating the monitoring of canine diabetes mellitus in primary care practice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T04%3A41%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pilot%20study%20evaluating%20the%20monitoring%20of%20canine%20diabetes%20mellitus%20in%20primary%20care%20practice&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20record%20open&rft.au=Cartwright,%20Jennifer%20Ann&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e000250&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e000250-n/a&rft.issn=2052-6113&rft.eissn=2052-6113&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/vetreco-2017-000250&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2242187693%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2229879136&rft_id=info:pmid/31205722&rfr_iscdi=true