Intermittent Administration of Haloperidol after Cortical Impact Injury Neither Impedes Spontaneous Recovery Nor Attenuates the Efficacy of Environmental Enrichment
The administration of haloperidol (HAL) once-daily for 19 days after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI) impedes recovery and attenuates the efficacy of environmental enrichment (EE). However, it is unknown how intermittent administration of HAL affects the recovery process when paired with EE...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neurotrauma 2019-05, Vol.36 (10), p.1606-1614 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1614 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1606 |
container_title | Journal of neurotrauma |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Bao, Gina C Bleimeister, Isabel H Zimmerman, Lydia A Wellcome, JoDy L Niesman, Peter J Radabaugh, Hannah L Bondi, Corina O Kline, Anthony E |
description | The administration of haloperidol (HAL) once-daily for 19 days after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI) impedes recovery and attenuates the efficacy of environmental enrichment (EE). However, it is unknown how intermittent administration of HAL affects the recovery process when paired with EE. Addressing the uncertainty is relevant because daily HAL is not always warranted to manage TBI-induced agitation in the clinic, and indeed intermittent therapy may be a more common approach. Hence, the aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that intermittent HAL would neither impair recovery in standard (STD)-housed controls nor attenuate the efficacy of EE. Anesthetized adult male rats received a cortical impact or sham injury and then were housed in STD or EE conditions. Beginning 24 h later, HAL (0.5 mg/kg; intraperitoneally [i.p.]) was administered either once-daily for 19 days or once every other day, whereas vehicle (VEH; 1 mL/kg; i.p.) was administered once daily. Motor performance and cognition were assessed on post-injury days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. Cortical lesion volume was quantified on day 21. SHAM controls performed better than all TBI groups on motor and spatial learning [
0.05]. The TBI + EE + daily VEH and TBI + EE + intermittent HAL groups did not differ from one another on beam-walk or spatial learning [
> 0.05], and both performed better than all other TBI groups [
|
doi_str_mv | 10.1089/neu.2018.6212 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6531904</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2136548655</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-40225298ed96fb4e097d4e70a7d68fd56cfa73b32e171878df57fa5db2b5ec7f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU-P0zAQxS0EYsvCkSuyxGUvKbYTx8kFqaoKW2kFEn_OlmOPqavEDo5Tqd-HD4qjLit2T5Y9P783Mw-ht5SsKWnaDx7mNSO0WdeMsmdoRTkXRUsq9hytcl0UgnJ6hV5N05EQWtZMvERXJal4Q2m9Qn_2PkEcXErgE96YwXk3paiSCx4Hi29VH0aIzoQeK5tRvA0xOa16vB9GpRPe--Mcz_gLuHTI5fwKBib8fQw-KQ9hnvA30OEECxQi3ixWs0qZyR_wztqsps-L2c6fXAx-yK1k_Z2PTh-Wy2v0wqp-gjf35zX6-Wn3Y3tb3H39vN9u7gpdUZ6KijDGWduAaWvbVUBaYSoQRAlTN9bwWlslyq5kQAVtRGMsF1Zx07GOgxa2vEYfL7rj3A1gdLaOqpdjdIOKZxmUk48r3h3kr3CSNS9p3nkWuLkXiOH3DFOSg5s09P1lEZLlAHjV1Jxn9P0T9Bjm6PN4krEcZVsJTjJVXCgdwzRFsA_NUCKX_GXOXy75yyX_zL_7f4IH-l_g5V8HSLED</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2221294750</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intermittent Administration of Haloperidol after Cortical Impact Injury Neither Impedes Spontaneous Recovery Nor Attenuates the Efficacy of Environmental Enrichment</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bao, Gina C ; Bleimeister, Isabel H ; Zimmerman, Lydia A ; Wellcome, JoDy L ; Niesman, Peter J ; Radabaugh, Hannah L ; Bondi, Corina O ; Kline, Anthony E</creator><creatorcontrib>Bao, Gina C ; Bleimeister, Isabel H ; Zimmerman, Lydia A ; Wellcome, JoDy L ; Niesman, Peter J ; Radabaugh, Hannah L ; Bondi, Corina O ; Kline, Anthony E</creatorcontrib><description>The administration of haloperidol (HAL) once-daily for 19 days after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI) impedes recovery and attenuates the efficacy of environmental enrichment (EE). However, it is unknown how intermittent administration of HAL affects the recovery process when paired with EE. Addressing the uncertainty is relevant because daily HAL is not always warranted to manage TBI-induced agitation in the clinic, and indeed intermittent therapy may be a more common approach. Hence, the aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that intermittent HAL would neither impair recovery in standard (STD)-housed controls nor attenuate the efficacy of EE. Anesthetized adult male rats received a cortical impact or sham injury and then were housed in STD or EE conditions. Beginning 24 h later, HAL (0.5 mg/kg; intraperitoneally [i.p.]) was administered either once-daily for 19 days or once every other day, whereas vehicle (VEH; 1 mL/kg; i.p.) was administered once daily. Motor performance and cognition were assessed on post-injury days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. Cortical lesion volume was quantified on day 21. SHAM controls performed better than all TBI groups on motor and spatial learning [
< 0.05], but did not differ from the TBI + EE + daily VEH group on memory retention [
> 0.05]. The TBI + EE + daily VEH and TBI + EE + intermittent HAL groups did not differ from one another on beam-walk or spatial learning [
> 0.05], and both performed better than all other TBI groups [
< 0.05]. In contrast, the TBI + STD + daily HAL group performed worse than all TBI groups on spatial learning [
< 0.05]. No difference in any endpoint was revealed between the TBI + STD + intermittent HAL and TBI + STD + daily VEH groups [
> 0.05]. The results support the hypothesis that HAL is not detrimental when provided intermittently. If translatable to the clinic, intermittent HAL may be used to control TBI-induced agitation without negatively affecting spontaneous recovery or rehabilitative efficacy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0897-7151</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-9042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/neu.2018.6212</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30458116</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</publisher><subject>Agitation ; Antipsychotics ; Behavior ; Brain research ; Cognition ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cortex ; Drug dosages ; Enrichment ; Haloperidol ; Medicine ; Motor skill learning ; Motor task performance ; Neurogenesis ; Neurosciences ; Original ; Psychotropic drugs ; Recovery (Medical) ; Rehabilitation ; Rodents ; Spatial discrimination learning ; Spatial memory ; Spontaneous recovery ; Traumatic brain injury</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurotrauma, 2019-05, Vol.36 (10), p.1606-1614</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2019, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</rights><rights>Copyright 2019, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-40225298ed96fb4e097d4e70a7d68fd56cfa73b32e171878df57fa5db2b5ec7f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-40225298ed96fb4e097d4e70a7d68fd56cfa73b32e171878df57fa5db2b5ec7f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30458116$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bao, Gina C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bleimeister, Isabel H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, Lydia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wellcome, JoDy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niesman, Peter J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radabaugh, Hannah L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bondi, Corina O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kline, Anthony E</creatorcontrib><title>Intermittent Administration of Haloperidol after Cortical Impact Injury Neither Impedes Spontaneous Recovery Nor Attenuates the Efficacy of Environmental Enrichment</title><title>Journal of neurotrauma</title><addtitle>J Neurotrauma</addtitle><description>The administration of haloperidol (HAL) once-daily for 19 days after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI) impedes recovery and attenuates the efficacy of environmental enrichment (EE). However, it is unknown how intermittent administration of HAL affects the recovery process when paired with EE. Addressing the uncertainty is relevant because daily HAL is not always warranted to manage TBI-induced agitation in the clinic, and indeed intermittent therapy may be a more common approach. Hence, the aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that intermittent HAL would neither impair recovery in standard (STD)-housed controls nor attenuate the efficacy of EE. Anesthetized adult male rats received a cortical impact or sham injury and then were housed in STD or EE conditions. Beginning 24 h later, HAL (0.5 mg/kg; intraperitoneally [i.p.]) was administered either once-daily for 19 days or once every other day, whereas vehicle (VEH; 1 mL/kg; i.p.) was administered once daily. Motor performance and cognition were assessed on post-injury days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. Cortical lesion volume was quantified on day 21. SHAM controls performed better than all TBI groups on motor and spatial learning [
< 0.05], but did not differ from the TBI + EE + daily VEH group on memory retention [
> 0.05]. The TBI + EE + daily VEH and TBI + EE + intermittent HAL groups did not differ from one another on beam-walk or spatial learning [
> 0.05], and both performed better than all other TBI groups [
< 0.05]. In contrast, the TBI + STD + daily HAL group performed worse than all TBI groups on spatial learning [
< 0.05]. No difference in any endpoint was revealed between the TBI + STD + intermittent HAL and TBI + STD + daily VEH groups [
> 0.05]. The results support the hypothesis that HAL is not detrimental when provided intermittently. If translatable to the clinic, intermittent HAL may be used to control TBI-induced agitation without negatively affecting spontaneous recovery or rehabilitative efficacy.</description><subject>Agitation</subject><subject>Antipsychotics</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cortex</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Enrichment</subject><subject>Haloperidol</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Motor skill learning</subject><subject>Motor task performance</subject><subject>Neurogenesis</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Psychotropic drugs</subject><subject>Recovery (Medical)</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Spatial discrimination learning</subject><subject>Spatial memory</subject><subject>Spontaneous recovery</subject><subject>Traumatic brain injury</subject><issn>0897-7151</issn><issn>1557-9042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU-P0zAQxS0EYsvCkSuyxGUvKbYTx8kFqaoKW2kFEn_OlmOPqavEDo5Tqd-HD4qjLit2T5Y9P783Mw-ht5SsKWnaDx7mNSO0WdeMsmdoRTkXRUsq9hytcl0UgnJ6hV5N05EQWtZMvERXJal4Q2m9Qn_2PkEcXErgE96YwXk3paiSCx4Hi29VH0aIzoQeK5tRvA0xOa16vB9GpRPe--Mcz_gLuHTI5fwKBib8fQw-KQ9hnvA30OEECxQi3ixWs0qZyR_wztqsps-L2c6fXAx-yK1k_Z2PTh-Wy2v0wqp-gjf35zX6-Wn3Y3tb3H39vN9u7gpdUZ6KijDGWduAaWvbVUBaYSoQRAlTN9bwWlslyq5kQAVtRGMsF1Zx07GOgxa2vEYfL7rj3A1gdLaOqpdjdIOKZxmUk48r3h3kr3CSNS9p3nkWuLkXiOH3DFOSg5s09P1lEZLlAHjV1Jxn9P0T9Bjm6PN4krEcZVsJTjJVXCgdwzRFsA_NUCKX_GXOXy75yyX_zL_7f4IH-l_g5V8HSLED</recordid><startdate>20190515</startdate><enddate>20190515</enddate><creator>Bao, Gina C</creator><creator>Bleimeister, Isabel H</creator><creator>Zimmerman, Lydia A</creator><creator>Wellcome, JoDy L</creator><creator>Niesman, Peter J</creator><creator>Radabaugh, Hannah L</creator><creator>Bondi, Corina O</creator><creator>Kline, Anthony E</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190515</creationdate><title>Intermittent Administration of Haloperidol after Cortical Impact Injury Neither Impedes Spontaneous Recovery Nor Attenuates the Efficacy of Environmental Enrichment</title><author>Bao, Gina C ; Bleimeister, Isabel H ; Zimmerman, Lydia A ; Wellcome, JoDy L ; Niesman, Peter J ; Radabaugh, Hannah L ; Bondi, Corina O ; Kline, Anthony E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-40225298ed96fb4e097d4e70a7d68fd56cfa73b32e171878df57fa5db2b5ec7f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agitation</topic><topic>Antipsychotics</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cortex</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Enrichment</topic><topic>Haloperidol</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Motor skill learning</topic><topic>Motor task performance</topic><topic>Neurogenesis</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Psychotropic drugs</topic><topic>Recovery (Medical)</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Spatial discrimination learning</topic><topic>Spatial memory</topic><topic>Spontaneous recovery</topic><topic>Traumatic brain injury</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bao, Gina C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bleimeister, Isabel H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, Lydia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wellcome, JoDy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niesman, Peter J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radabaugh, Hannah L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bondi, Corina O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kline, Anthony E</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurotrauma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bao, Gina C</au><au>Bleimeister, Isabel H</au><au>Zimmerman, Lydia A</au><au>Wellcome, JoDy L</au><au>Niesman, Peter J</au><au>Radabaugh, Hannah L</au><au>Bondi, Corina O</au><au>Kline, Anthony E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intermittent Administration of Haloperidol after Cortical Impact Injury Neither Impedes Spontaneous Recovery Nor Attenuates the Efficacy of Environmental Enrichment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurotrauma</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurotrauma</addtitle><date>2019-05-15</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1606</spage><epage>1614</epage><pages>1606-1614</pages><issn>0897-7151</issn><eissn>1557-9042</eissn><abstract>The administration of haloperidol (HAL) once-daily for 19 days after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI) impedes recovery and attenuates the efficacy of environmental enrichment (EE). However, it is unknown how intermittent administration of HAL affects the recovery process when paired with EE. Addressing the uncertainty is relevant because daily HAL is not always warranted to manage TBI-induced agitation in the clinic, and indeed intermittent therapy may be a more common approach. Hence, the aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that intermittent HAL would neither impair recovery in standard (STD)-housed controls nor attenuate the efficacy of EE. Anesthetized adult male rats received a cortical impact or sham injury and then were housed in STD or EE conditions. Beginning 24 h later, HAL (0.5 mg/kg; intraperitoneally [i.p.]) was administered either once-daily for 19 days or once every other day, whereas vehicle (VEH; 1 mL/kg; i.p.) was administered once daily. Motor performance and cognition were assessed on post-injury days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. Cortical lesion volume was quantified on day 21. SHAM controls performed better than all TBI groups on motor and spatial learning [
< 0.05], but did not differ from the TBI + EE + daily VEH group on memory retention [
> 0.05]. The TBI + EE + daily VEH and TBI + EE + intermittent HAL groups did not differ from one another on beam-walk or spatial learning [
> 0.05], and both performed better than all other TBI groups [
< 0.05]. In contrast, the TBI + STD + daily HAL group performed worse than all TBI groups on spatial learning [
< 0.05]. No difference in any endpoint was revealed between the TBI + STD + intermittent HAL and TBI + STD + daily VEH groups [
> 0.05]. The results support the hypothesis that HAL is not detrimental when provided intermittently. If translatable to the clinic, intermittent HAL may be used to control TBI-induced agitation without negatively affecting spontaneous recovery or rehabilitative efficacy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</pub><pmid>30458116</pmid><doi>10.1089/neu.2018.6212</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0897-7151 |
ispartof | Journal of neurotrauma, 2019-05, Vol.36 (10), p.1606-1614 |
issn | 0897-7151 1557-9042 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6531904 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Agitation Antipsychotics Behavior Brain research Cognition Cognition & reasoning Cortex Drug dosages Enrichment Haloperidol Medicine Motor skill learning Motor task performance Neurogenesis Neurosciences Original Psychotropic drugs Recovery (Medical) Rehabilitation Rodents Spatial discrimination learning Spatial memory Spontaneous recovery Traumatic brain injury |
title | Intermittent Administration of Haloperidol after Cortical Impact Injury Neither Impedes Spontaneous Recovery Nor Attenuates the Efficacy of Environmental Enrichment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T15%3A54%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intermittent%20Administration%20of%20Haloperidol%20after%20Cortical%20Impact%20Injury%20Neither%20Impedes%20Spontaneous%20Recovery%20Nor%20Attenuates%20the%20Efficacy%20of%20Environmental%20Enrichment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurotrauma&rft.au=Bao,%20Gina%20C&rft.date=2019-05-15&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1606&rft.epage=1614&rft.pages=1606-1614&rft.issn=0897-7151&rft.eissn=1557-9042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/neu.2018.6212&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2136548655%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2221294750&rft_id=info:pmid/30458116&rfr_iscdi=true |