Validation of the International Guide for Monitoring Child Development demonstrates good sensitivity and specificity in four diverse countries

Aim It is of critical importance to have internationally constructed tools to address early childhood development. The aim of this second phase of a two‐phase study was to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the Guide for Monitoring Child Development (GMCD) in identifying developmental delay...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta Paediatrica 2019-06, Vol.108 (6), p.1074-1086
Hauptverfasser: Ozturk Ertem, Ilgi, Krishnamurthy, Vibha, Mulaudzi, Mphelekedzeni C., Sguassero, Yanina, Bilik, Burcu, Srinivasan, Roopa, Balta, Hakan, Gulumser, Ozlem, Gan, Geliang, Calvocoressi, Lisa, Johnson, Benjamin, Shabanova, Veronika, Forsyth, Brian W.C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1086
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1074
container_title Acta Paediatrica
container_volume 108
creator Ozturk Ertem, Ilgi
Krishnamurthy, Vibha
Mulaudzi, Mphelekedzeni C.
Sguassero, Yanina
Bilik, Burcu
Srinivasan, Roopa
Balta, Hakan
Gulumser, Ozlem
Gan, Geliang
Calvocoressi, Lisa
Johnson, Benjamin
Shabanova, Veronika
Forsyth, Brian W.C.
description Aim It is of critical importance to have internationally constructed tools to address early childhood development. The aim of this second phase of a two‐phase study was to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the Guide for Monitoring Child Development (GMCD) in identifying developmental delay in four diverse countries. Methods The first phase of this 2011–2015 back‐to‐back study included 4949 children up to 42 months of age from primary healthcare centres in Argentina, India, South Africa and Turkey. Distribution curves were generated to show the ages when the children attained GMCD milestones and those that could be used across sexes and countries were placed in age ranges corresponding to the 85th and 97th percentile point estimates. Phase two examined a separately recruited sample of children in those countries to determine sensitivity and specificity of the GMCD. Results The validation phase of the 85 milestones in the GMCD identified delayed development in 30% of the 1731 children in the four countries. The sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0.71–0.94 and 0.69–0.82, respectively, for the total sample and the different age groups. Conclusion The GMCD standardised in four diverse countries has appropriate accuracy for identification of children with developmental delay.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/apa.14661
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6520130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2224275706</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-e27b3ba9fb48bbedf6e39ce8bd4fe1d16e75fab7e3f68dbf2311ce34795ac6793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy0EosvCgRdAlrjQQ1r_SZzkgrRaSqlUBAfgajn2eNdVYi-2s2hfgmfG7ZYKkPDFGvvTp5n5IfSSkjNazrnaqTNaC0EfoQUVDa0YY-1jtCAd4VXDGn6CnqV0QwjjfS2eohNO6pZ1lC_Qz29qdEZlFzwOFuct4CufIfq7JzXiy9kZwDZE_DF4l0N0foPXWzca_A72MIbdBD5jA1PwKUeVIeFNCAYn8Mllt3f5gJUv9Q60s07f1s4X4xyxcXuICbAOs8_RQXqOnlg1Jnhxfy_R1_cXX9YfqutPl1fr1XWl65rTClg78EH1dqi7YQBjBfBeQzeY2gI1VEDbWDW0wK3ozGAZp1QDr9u-UVq0PV-it0fvbh4mMLqMENUod9FNKh5kUE7-_ePdVm7CXoqGEcpJEby5F8TwfYaU5eSShnFUHsKcJKO8Iw2ty8qX6PU_6E2Zvey2UIzVrG1aIgp1eqR0DClFsA_NUCJvU5YlZXmXcmFf_dn9A_k71gKcH4EfboTD_01y9Xl1VP4CDru2YQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2224275706</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of the International Guide for Monitoring Child Development demonstrates good sensitivity and specificity in four diverse countries</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ozturk Ertem, Ilgi ; Krishnamurthy, Vibha ; Mulaudzi, Mphelekedzeni C. ; Sguassero, Yanina ; Bilik, Burcu ; Srinivasan, Roopa ; Balta, Hakan ; Gulumser, Ozlem ; Gan, Geliang ; Calvocoressi, Lisa ; Johnson, Benjamin ; Shabanova, Veronika ; Forsyth, Brian W.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ozturk Ertem, Ilgi ; Krishnamurthy, Vibha ; Mulaudzi, Mphelekedzeni C. ; Sguassero, Yanina ; Bilik, Burcu ; Srinivasan, Roopa ; Balta, Hakan ; Gulumser, Ozlem ; Gan, Geliang ; Calvocoressi, Lisa ; Johnson, Benjamin ; Shabanova, Veronika ; Forsyth, Brian W.C.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim It is of critical importance to have internationally constructed tools to address early childhood development. The aim of this second phase of a two‐phase study was to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the Guide for Monitoring Child Development (GMCD) in identifying developmental delay in four diverse countries. Methods The first phase of this 2011–2015 back‐to‐back study included 4949 children up to 42 months of age from primary healthcare centres in Argentina, India, South Africa and Turkey. Distribution curves were generated to show the ages when the children attained GMCD milestones and those that could be used across sexes and countries were placed in age ranges corresponding to the 85th and 97th percentile point estimates. Phase two examined a separately recruited sample of children in those countries to determine sensitivity and specificity of the GMCD. Results The validation phase of the 85 milestones in the GMCD identified delayed development in 30% of the 1731 children in the four countries. The sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0.71–0.94 and 0.69–0.82, respectively, for the total sample and the different age groups. Conclusion The GMCD standardised in four diverse countries has appropriate accuracy for identification of children with developmental delay.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0803-5253</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1651-2227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/apa.14661</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30472813</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Norway: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Child development ; Children ; Developmental assessment ; Early childhood development ; Early intervention ; Monitoring ; Screening ; Sensitivity ; Validation</subject><ispartof>Acta Paediatrica, 2019-06, Vol.108 (6), p.1074-1086</ispartof><rights>2018 Foundation Acta Pædiatrica. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2018 Foundation Acta Paediatrica. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2019 Foundation Acta Pædiatrica</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-e27b3ba9fb48bbedf6e39ce8bd4fe1d16e75fab7e3f68dbf2311ce34795ac6793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-e27b3ba9fb48bbedf6e39ce8bd4fe1d16e75fab7e3f68dbf2311ce34795ac6793</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9187-0869</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fapa.14661$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fapa.14661$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30472813$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ozturk Ertem, Ilgi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnamurthy, Vibha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulaudzi, Mphelekedzeni C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sguassero, Yanina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilik, Burcu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srinivasan, Roopa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balta, Hakan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulumser, Ozlem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gan, Geliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvocoressi, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shabanova, Veronika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forsyth, Brian W.C.</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of the International Guide for Monitoring Child Development demonstrates good sensitivity and specificity in four diverse countries</title><title>Acta Paediatrica</title><addtitle>Acta Paediatr</addtitle><description>Aim It is of critical importance to have internationally constructed tools to address early childhood development. The aim of this second phase of a two‐phase study was to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the Guide for Monitoring Child Development (GMCD) in identifying developmental delay in four diverse countries. Methods The first phase of this 2011–2015 back‐to‐back study included 4949 children up to 42 months of age from primary healthcare centres in Argentina, India, South Africa and Turkey. Distribution curves were generated to show the ages when the children attained GMCD milestones and those that could be used across sexes and countries were placed in age ranges corresponding to the 85th and 97th percentile point estimates. Phase two examined a separately recruited sample of children in those countries to determine sensitivity and specificity of the GMCD. Results The validation phase of the 85 milestones in the GMCD identified delayed development in 30% of the 1731 children in the four countries. The sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0.71–0.94 and 0.69–0.82, respectively, for the total sample and the different age groups. Conclusion The GMCD standardised in four diverse countries has appropriate accuracy for identification of children with developmental delay.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Developmental assessment</subject><subject>Early childhood development</subject><subject>Early intervention</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Validation</subject><issn>0803-5253</issn><issn>1651-2227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy0EosvCgRdAlrjQQ1r_SZzkgrRaSqlUBAfgajn2eNdVYi-2s2hfgmfG7ZYKkPDFGvvTp5n5IfSSkjNazrnaqTNaC0EfoQUVDa0YY-1jtCAd4VXDGn6CnqV0QwjjfS2eohNO6pZ1lC_Qz29qdEZlFzwOFuct4CufIfq7JzXiy9kZwDZE_DF4l0N0foPXWzca_A72MIbdBD5jA1PwKUeVIeFNCAYn8Mllt3f5gJUv9Q60s07f1s4X4xyxcXuICbAOs8_RQXqOnlg1Jnhxfy_R1_cXX9YfqutPl1fr1XWl65rTClg78EH1dqi7YQBjBfBeQzeY2gI1VEDbWDW0wK3ozGAZp1QDr9u-UVq0PV-it0fvbh4mMLqMENUod9FNKh5kUE7-_ePdVm7CXoqGEcpJEby5F8TwfYaU5eSShnFUHsKcJKO8Iw2ty8qX6PU_6E2Zvey2UIzVrG1aIgp1eqR0DClFsA_NUCJvU5YlZXmXcmFf_dn9A_k71gKcH4EfboTD_01y9Xl1VP4CDru2YQ</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Ozturk Ertem, Ilgi</creator><creator>Krishnamurthy, Vibha</creator><creator>Mulaudzi, Mphelekedzeni C.</creator><creator>Sguassero, Yanina</creator><creator>Bilik, Burcu</creator><creator>Srinivasan, Roopa</creator><creator>Balta, Hakan</creator><creator>Gulumser, Ozlem</creator><creator>Gan, Geliang</creator><creator>Calvocoressi, Lisa</creator><creator>Johnson, Benjamin</creator><creator>Shabanova, Veronika</creator><creator>Forsyth, Brian W.C.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-0869</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Validation of the International Guide for Monitoring Child Development demonstrates good sensitivity and specificity in four diverse countries</title><author>Ozturk Ertem, Ilgi ; Krishnamurthy, Vibha ; Mulaudzi, Mphelekedzeni C. ; Sguassero, Yanina ; Bilik, Burcu ; Srinivasan, Roopa ; Balta, Hakan ; Gulumser, Ozlem ; Gan, Geliang ; Calvocoressi, Lisa ; Johnson, Benjamin ; Shabanova, Veronika ; Forsyth, Brian W.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-e27b3ba9fb48bbedf6e39ce8bd4fe1d16e75fab7e3f68dbf2311ce34795ac6793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Developmental assessment</topic><topic>Early childhood development</topic><topic>Early intervention</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Validation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ozturk Ertem, Ilgi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnamurthy, Vibha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulaudzi, Mphelekedzeni C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sguassero, Yanina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilik, Burcu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srinivasan, Roopa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balta, Hakan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulumser, Ozlem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gan, Geliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvocoressi, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shabanova, Veronika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forsyth, Brian W.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Acta Paediatrica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ozturk Ertem, Ilgi</au><au>Krishnamurthy, Vibha</au><au>Mulaudzi, Mphelekedzeni C.</au><au>Sguassero, Yanina</au><au>Bilik, Burcu</au><au>Srinivasan, Roopa</au><au>Balta, Hakan</au><au>Gulumser, Ozlem</au><au>Gan, Geliang</au><au>Calvocoressi, Lisa</au><au>Johnson, Benjamin</au><au>Shabanova, Veronika</au><au>Forsyth, Brian W.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of the International Guide for Monitoring Child Development demonstrates good sensitivity and specificity in four diverse countries</atitle><jtitle>Acta Paediatrica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Paediatr</addtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1074</spage><epage>1086</epage><pages>1074-1086</pages><issn>0803-5253</issn><eissn>1651-2227</eissn><abstract>Aim It is of critical importance to have internationally constructed tools to address early childhood development. The aim of this second phase of a two‐phase study was to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the Guide for Monitoring Child Development (GMCD) in identifying developmental delay in four diverse countries. Methods The first phase of this 2011–2015 back‐to‐back study included 4949 children up to 42 months of age from primary healthcare centres in Argentina, India, South Africa and Turkey. Distribution curves were generated to show the ages when the children attained GMCD milestones and those that could be used across sexes and countries were placed in age ranges corresponding to the 85th and 97th percentile point estimates. Phase two examined a separately recruited sample of children in those countries to determine sensitivity and specificity of the GMCD. Results The validation phase of the 85 milestones in the GMCD identified delayed development in 30% of the 1731 children in the four countries. The sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0.71–0.94 and 0.69–0.82, respectively, for the total sample and the different age groups. Conclusion The GMCD standardised in four diverse countries has appropriate accuracy for identification of children with developmental delay.</abstract><cop>Norway</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30472813</pmid><doi>10.1111/apa.14661</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-0869</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0803-5253
ispartof Acta Paediatrica, 2019-06, Vol.108 (6), p.1074-1086
issn 0803-5253
1651-2227
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6520130
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Age
Child development
Children
Developmental assessment
Early childhood development
Early intervention
Monitoring
Screening
Sensitivity
Validation
title Validation of the International Guide for Monitoring Child Development demonstrates good sensitivity and specificity in four diverse countries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T21%3A54%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20the%20International%20Guide%20for%20Monitoring%20Child%20Development%20demonstrates%20good%20sensitivity%20and%20specificity%20in%20four%20diverse%20countries&rft.jtitle=Acta%20Paediatrica&rft.au=Ozturk%20Ertem,%20Ilgi&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1074&rft.epage=1086&rft.pages=1074-1086&rft.issn=0803-5253&rft.eissn=1651-2227&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/apa.14661&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2224275706%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2224275706&rft_id=info:pmid/30472813&rfr_iscdi=true