Validation of the International Guide for Monitoring Child Development demonstrates good sensitivity and specificity in four diverse countries
Aim It is of critical importance to have internationally constructed tools to address early childhood development. The aim of this second phase of a two‐phase study was to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the Guide for Monitoring Child Development (GMCD) in identifying developmental delay...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta Paediatrica 2019-06, Vol.108 (6), p.1074-1086 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1086 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1074 |
container_title | Acta Paediatrica |
container_volume | 108 |
creator | Ozturk Ertem, Ilgi Krishnamurthy, Vibha Mulaudzi, Mphelekedzeni C. Sguassero, Yanina Bilik, Burcu Srinivasan, Roopa Balta, Hakan Gulumser, Ozlem Gan, Geliang Calvocoressi, Lisa Johnson, Benjamin Shabanova, Veronika Forsyth, Brian W.C. |
description | Aim
It is of critical importance to have internationally constructed tools to address early childhood development. The aim of this second phase of a two‐phase study was to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the Guide for Monitoring Child Development (GMCD) in identifying developmental delay in four diverse countries.
Methods
The first phase of this 2011–2015 back‐to‐back study included 4949 children up to 42 months of age from primary healthcare centres in Argentina, India, South Africa and Turkey. Distribution curves were generated to show the ages when the children attained GMCD milestones and those that could be used across sexes and countries were placed in age ranges corresponding to the 85th and 97th percentile point estimates. Phase two examined a separately recruited sample of children in those countries to determine sensitivity and specificity of the GMCD.
Results
The validation phase of the 85 milestones in the GMCD identified delayed development in 30% of the 1731 children in the four countries. The sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0.71–0.94 and 0.69–0.82, respectively, for the total sample and the different age groups.
Conclusion
The GMCD standardised in four diverse countries has appropriate accuracy for identification of children with developmental delay. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/apa.14661 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6520130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2224275706</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-e27b3ba9fb48bbedf6e39ce8bd4fe1d16e75fab7e3f68dbf2311ce34795ac6793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy0EosvCgRdAlrjQQ1r_SZzkgrRaSqlUBAfgajn2eNdVYi-2s2hfgmfG7ZYKkPDFGvvTp5n5IfSSkjNazrnaqTNaC0EfoQUVDa0YY-1jtCAd4VXDGn6CnqV0QwjjfS2eohNO6pZ1lC_Qz29qdEZlFzwOFuct4CufIfq7JzXiy9kZwDZE_DF4l0N0foPXWzca_A72MIbdBD5jA1PwKUeVIeFNCAYn8Mllt3f5gJUv9Q60s07f1s4X4xyxcXuICbAOs8_RQXqOnlg1Jnhxfy_R1_cXX9YfqutPl1fr1XWl65rTClg78EH1dqi7YQBjBfBeQzeY2gI1VEDbWDW0wK3ozGAZp1QDr9u-UVq0PV-it0fvbh4mMLqMENUod9FNKh5kUE7-_ePdVm7CXoqGEcpJEby5F8TwfYaU5eSShnFUHsKcJKO8Iw2ty8qX6PU_6E2Zvey2UIzVrG1aIgp1eqR0DClFsA_NUCJvU5YlZXmXcmFf_dn9A_k71gKcH4EfboTD_01y9Xl1VP4CDru2YQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2224275706</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of the International Guide for Monitoring Child Development demonstrates good sensitivity and specificity in four diverse countries</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ozturk Ertem, Ilgi ; Krishnamurthy, Vibha ; Mulaudzi, Mphelekedzeni C. ; Sguassero, Yanina ; Bilik, Burcu ; Srinivasan, Roopa ; Balta, Hakan ; Gulumser, Ozlem ; Gan, Geliang ; Calvocoressi, Lisa ; Johnson, Benjamin ; Shabanova, Veronika ; Forsyth, Brian W.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ozturk Ertem, Ilgi ; Krishnamurthy, Vibha ; Mulaudzi, Mphelekedzeni C. ; Sguassero, Yanina ; Bilik, Burcu ; Srinivasan, Roopa ; Balta, Hakan ; Gulumser, Ozlem ; Gan, Geliang ; Calvocoressi, Lisa ; Johnson, Benjamin ; Shabanova, Veronika ; Forsyth, Brian W.C.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
It is of critical importance to have internationally constructed tools to address early childhood development. The aim of this second phase of a two‐phase study was to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the Guide for Monitoring Child Development (GMCD) in identifying developmental delay in four diverse countries.
Methods
The first phase of this 2011–2015 back‐to‐back study included 4949 children up to 42 months of age from primary healthcare centres in Argentina, India, South Africa and Turkey. Distribution curves were generated to show the ages when the children attained GMCD milestones and those that could be used across sexes and countries were placed in age ranges corresponding to the 85th and 97th percentile point estimates. Phase two examined a separately recruited sample of children in those countries to determine sensitivity and specificity of the GMCD.
Results
The validation phase of the 85 milestones in the GMCD identified delayed development in 30% of the 1731 children in the four countries. The sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0.71–0.94 and 0.69–0.82, respectively, for the total sample and the different age groups.
Conclusion
The GMCD standardised in four diverse countries has appropriate accuracy for identification of children with developmental delay.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0803-5253</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1651-2227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/apa.14661</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30472813</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Norway: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Child development ; Children ; Developmental assessment ; Early childhood development ; Early intervention ; Monitoring ; Screening ; Sensitivity ; Validation</subject><ispartof>Acta Paediatrica, 2019-06, Vol.108 (6), p.1074-1086</ispartof><rights>2018 Foundation Acta Pædiatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2018 Foundation Acta Paediatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2019 Foundation Acta Pædiatrica</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-e27b3ba9fb48bbedf6e39ce8bd4fe1d16e75fab7e3f68dbf2311ce34795ac6793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-e27b3ba9fb48bbedf6e39ce8bd4fe1d16e75fab7e3f68dbf2311ce34795ac6793</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9187-0869</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fapa.14661$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fapa.14661$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30472813$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ozturk Ertem, Ilgi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnamurthy, Vibha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulaudzi, Mphelekedzeni C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sguassero, Yanina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilik, Burcu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srinivasan, Roopa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balta, Hakan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulumser, Ozlem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gan, Geliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvocoressi, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shabanova, Veronika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forsyth, Brian W.C.</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of the International Guide for Monitoring Child Development demonstrates good sensitivity and specificity in four diverse countries</title><title>Acta Paediatrica</title><addtitle>Acta Paediatr</addtitle><description>Aim
It is of critical importance to have internationally constructed tools to address early childhood development. The aim of this second phase of a two‐phase study was to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the Guide for Monitoring Child Development (GMCD) in identifying developmental delay in four diverse countries.
Methods
The first phase of this 2011–2015 back‐to‐back study included 4949 children up to 42 months of age from primary healthcare centres in Argentina, India, South Africa and Turkey. Distribution curves were generated to show the ages when the children attained GMCD milestones and those that could be used across sexes and countries were placed in age ranges corresponding to the 85th and 97th percentile point estimates. Phase two examined a separately recruited sample of children in those countries to determine sensitivity and specificity of the GMCD.
Results
The validation phase of the 85 milestones in the GMCD identified delayed development in 30% of the 1731 children in the four countries. The sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0.71–0.94 and 0.69–0.82, respectively, for the total sample and the different age groups.
Conclusion
The GMCD standardised in four diverse countries has appropriate accuracy for identification of children with developmental delay.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Developmental assessment</subject><subject>Early childhood development</subject><subject>Early intervention</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Validation</subject><issn>0803-5253</issn><issn>1651-2227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy0EosvCgRdAlrjQQ1r_SZzkgrRaSqlUBAfgajn2eNdVYi-2s2hfgmfG7ZYKkPDFGvvTp5n5IfSSkjNazrnaqTNaC0EfoQUVDa0YY-1jtCAd4VXDGn6CnqV0QwjjfS2eohNO6pZ1lC_Qz29qdEZlFzwOFuct4CufIfq7JzXiy9kZwDZE_DF4l0N0foPXWzca_A72MIbdBD5jA1PwKUeVIeFNCAYn8Mllt3f5gJUv9Q60s07f1s4X4xyxcXuICbAOs8_RQXqOnlg1Jnhxfy_R1_cXX9YfqutPl1fr1XWl65rTClg78EH1dqi7YQBjBfBeQzeY2gI1VEDbWDW0wK3ozGAZp1QDr9u-UVq0PV-it0fvbh4mMLqMENUod9FNKh5kUE7-_ePdVm7CXoqGEcpJEby5F8TwfYaU5eSShnFUHsKcJKO8Iw2ty8qX6PU_6E2Zvey2UIzVrG1aIgp1eqR0DClFsA_NUCJvU5YlZXmXcmFf_dn9A_k71gKcH4EfboTD_01y9Xl1VP4CDru2YQ</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Ozturk Ertem, Ilgi</creator><creator>Krishnamurthy, Vibha</creator><creator>Mulaudzi, Mphelekedzeni C.</creator><creator>Sguassero, Yanina</creator><creator>Bilik, Burcu</creator><creator>Srinivasan, Roopa</creator><creator>Balta, Hakan</creator><creator>Gulumser, Ozlem</creator><creator>Gan, Geliang</creator><creator>Calvocoressi, Lisa</creator><creator>Johnson, Benjamin</creator><creator>Shabanova, Veronika</creator><creator>Forsyth, Brian W.C.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-0869</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Validation of the International Guide for Monitoring Child Development demonstrates good sensitivity and specificity in four diverse countries</title><author>Ozturk Ertem, Ilgi ; Krishnamurthy, Vibha ; Mulaudzi, Mphelekedzeni C. ; Sguassero, Yanina ; Bilik, Burcu ; Srinivasan, Roopa ; Balta, Hakan ; Gulumser, Ozlem ; Gan, Geliang ; Calvocoressi, Lisa ; Johnson, Benjamin ; Shabanova, Veronika ; Forsyth, Brian W.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-e27b3ba9fb48bbedf6e39ce8bd4fe1d16e75fab7e3f68dbf2311ce34795ac6793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Developmental assessment</topic><topic>Early childhood development</topic><topic>Early intervention</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Validation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ozturk Ertem, Ilgi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnamurthy, Vibha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulaudzi, Mphelekedzeni C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sguassero, Yanina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilik, Burcu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srinivasan, Roopa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balta, Hakan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulumser, Ozlem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gan, Geliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvocoressi, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shabanova, Veronika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forsyth, Brian W.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Acta Paediatrica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ozturk Ertem, Ilgi</au><au>Krishnamurthy, Vibha</au><au>Mulaudzi, Mphelekedzeni C.</au><au>Sguassero, Yanina</au><au>Bilik, Burcu</au><au>Srinivasan, Roopa</au><au>Balta, Hakan</au><au>Gulumser, Ozlem</au><au>Gan, Geliang</au><au>Calvocoressi, Lisa</au><au>Johnson, Benjamin</au><au>Shabanova, Veronika</au><au>Forsyth, Brian W.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of the International Guide for Monitoring Child Development demonstrates good sensitivity and specificity in four diverse countries</atitle><jtitle>Acta Paediatrica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Paediatr</addtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1074</spage><epage>1086</epage><pages>1074-1086</pages><issn>0803-5253</issn><eissn>1651-2227</eissn><abstract>Aim
It is of critical importance to have internationally constructed tools to address early childhood development. The aim of this second phase of a two‐phase study was to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the Guide for Monitoring Child Development (GMCD) in identifying developmental delay in four diverse countries.
Methods
The first phase of this 2011–2015 back‐to‐back study included 4949 children up to 42 months of age from primary healthcare centres in Argentina, India, South Africa and Turkey. Distribution curves were generated to show the ages when the children attained GMCD milestones and those that could be used across sexes and countries were placed in age ranges corresponding to the 85th and 97th percentile point estimates. Phase two examined a separately recruited sample of children in those countries to determine sensitivity and specificity of the GMCD.
Results
The validation phase of the 85 milestones in the GMCD identified delayed development in 30% of the 1731 children in the four countries. The sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0.71–0.94 and 0.69–0.82, respectively, for the total sample and the different age groups.
Conclusion
The GMCD standardised in four diverse countries has appropriate accuracy for identification of children with developmental delay.</abstract><cop>Norway</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30472813</pmid><doi>10.1111/apa.14661</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-0869</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0803-5253 |
ispartof | Acta Paediatrica, 2019-06, Vol.108 (6), p.1074-1086 |
issn | 0803-5253 1651-2227 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6520130 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Age Child development Children Developmental assessment Early childhood development Early intervention Monitoring Screening Sensitivity Validation |
title | Validation of the International Guide for Monitoring Child Development demonstrates good sensitivity and specificity in four diverse countries |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T21%3A54%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20the%20International%20Guide%20for%20Monitoring%20Child%20Development%20demonstrates%20good%20sensitivity%20and%20specificity%20in%20four%20diverse%20countries&rft.jtitle=Acta%20Paediatrica&rft.au=Ozturk%20Ertem,%20Ilgi&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1074&rft.epage=1086&rft.pages=1074-1086&rft.issn=0803-5253&rft.eissn=1651-2227&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/apa.14661&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2224275706%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2224275706&rft_id=info:pmid/30472813&rfr_iscdi=true |